more on inability to generate N antibodies and new info on systemic effects
Covid cases that occur from 1-14 days after the last jab are always, by order of some higher but unidentifiable authority that cannot be held publicly accountable, counted as "unvaccinated" even when people have had 1 or more doses. Untold numbers of actual cases occurring in the 1-14-day period in people who have had 1-4 jabs are not counted as vaccinated cases. This leads me to conclude that They KNEW there would immediate immune suppression following each jab that would increase infection rates, and They made up the 14-day exclusion zone so that those cases could conveniently be blamed publicly on refusers to influence political action against them.
I am always angered by the fact that even studies like this one, always begin the introduction with a statement like: "Vaccination against SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) combined with contact restrictions is the only way to reduce individual deaths and thus control the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic"... even if the study in question demonstrates exactly the opposite.
This also seems to be a cruel reversal of the tiresome 2020 debates about how to attribute cause of death. Everyone insisting that COVID was surely a contributing factor in almost all documented COVID deaths, must now admit that vaccination likewise is surely a contributing factor in worsened COVID outcomes by way of OAS. "They might not have died if they hadn't gotten COVID" has tragically become "they might not have died if they hadn't been injected with a leaky vaccine."
But there's one important distinction: after SARS-CoV-2 escaped Wuhan, there was never any avoiding contracting the disease. But vaccination was something chosen and enforced by policy. By human beings. OAS due to leaky vaccination is the "we could have avoided all this if not for stupid policy" fiasco that the Experts accused COVID itself of being two years ago.
I had a general conversation about "vaccine injury" with a person who managed some of the c0vid clinical trials. If you say ANYTHING negative about the MiracleVax (TM) she will launch into a tirade about how they are SAVING LIVES! Plus, there are NO OTHER options to stop c0vid. If you don't get vaxxinated, you will die. End of story. And by pointing out vaxxine issues, you are encouraging people not to take it, and they will DIE. Plus... any doctor writing about this is only out for their own glory, and is damaging the industry as a whole.
FYI... right now, she's managing trials for mRNA vaxxes for pneumonia, flu and shingles.
More miserable reading for those of us with dearly cherished family and friends who were compelled to take the vax or, for the medically fragile, advised this was the best way to protect themselves.
And more and more I'm extremely puzzled by some of the most prominent voices in the anti-vax universe. I myself understood from the get-go that a novel technology rushed out before we even knew all the essentials about the disease itself was something to flee from, and I'm just, you, know, a nobody.
Why *did* Steve Kirsch get vaxed in the first place? (He never answered me when I replied to one of his comments on another Substack with that question.) I'm starting to feel he's a peculiar sort of charlatan.
Why did Robert Malone think it would be the dandy treatment for the "long covid" he thought he had? (He admires some mighty sketchy authors and that gave me extreme pause last week.)
Why did Martin Kulldorf, who I almost entirely admire and respect, think vaxing was a great idea for the at-risk elderly?
This is all some real string and Post-Its crazy-wall stuff, ain't it?
Which is why, at least in the UK, they're suppressing autopsies on the jabbed.
VAIDS VAIDS VAIDS! Everyone has VAIDS! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yC7HwPh6Es
As the terrible side effects of the gene therapy become more and more widely known, it seems like the powers that be are trying to talk about it less and less. They want to let it fade into the background. We can't let that happen. It wasn't stupidity on their part. It was active malice.
Every day I read your research & note its sources, every day I'm that much gladder I've never had any mRNA shots (age 62 & in good health despite two infection/recovery cycles - Alpha & Delta)...
It’s a compelling and worrying argument. One confounding factor, however. People with cancer and other high risk vulnerabilities may be (likely, even) more highly represented in the vaccinated group compared to those who choose not to be vaccinated.
YET, we will just stop recommending or even talking about boosters and just move on as if nothing has happened and blame all the fall-out on Covid, rather than our response.
☹️ at least omni is less virulent so when everyone catches it for the 30th time it will be bearable?
Hey Cat, i gotta say you are the best thing i read just about every day. Im not even sure if you charge $ or if this is a free subscription, but its worth a good amount and you never let me down.
My mom has beaten breast cancer twice and has been vaxxed and boosted once. So scared for her. I dont talk to her about the uptick in cancers in the vaxxed because i dont want her to worry.
I don't think I'll be getting the vaccine.
p.s. Thank you for all your hard work on this bad cat!
So if we in a year or so compare the number of americans (to keep it simple and in one nation) killed by the vaccine aggravating or directly causing a lethal condition with the number killed in shootings, and the vaccine number is greater (going by Steve Kirsch's various estimates the number of people killed by adverse side effects already outstrips the number killed by being shot, yearly) - does it not then follow that mRNA-vaccines must be outlawed?
Or we could take Canada - "One canadian killed by a vaccine is one too many", yes?