15 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
la chevalerie vit's avatar

“ The main cause of bullying at school is the harshly authoritarian nature of school.”

Uh, no.

Bullying’s main caus is bullies: enabled assholes who take their angst out on weaker kids.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Shitty parenting, which gets shittier every year.

Expand full comment
la chevalerie vit's avatar

Won’t argue that. I hold that bullying is at its core an issue of personal responsibility. Bullies need to be larned the lesson. We could do this the easy way, or the hard way.

Expand full comment
Brian Dixon's avatar

I must correct your factual error. Persistent bullying is indeed preventable at the institutional level: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/freedom-to-learn/201006/freedom-from-bullying-how-a-school-can-be-a-moral-community

Expand full comment
la chevalerie vit's avatar

Schools do not cause bullying, bullies cause bullying. That is a fact of personal responsibility that cannot be transferred to an institution. This article is a perfect example of enabling crying to be an emergency, the subject of EGM post, in the form of glorified mob rule and tyranny.

Expand full comment
JC's avatar

It's the environment. Disease of any sort loves a toxic environment. Schools - and social media - combined - are toxic environments in which the Bully Disease thrives.

A healthy biome ejects the bully.

Expand full comment
la chevalerie vit's avatar

True enough, yet we cannot release bullies from personal responsibilty.

Expand full comment
Brian Dixon's avatar

Is there mob rule and tyranny at the Sudbury Valley School or its many imitators? No, there isn't. Instead, there is liberal democracy and the rule of law. Mr. gato has a bit of a point on the virtue of toughness, but there is also virtue in compassion, the baby you're throwing out with the bathwater.

Expand full comment
la chevalerie vit's avatar

Yes there is. It is very far beyond a reasonable process. Simple, clear, written rules and policies suffice for discipline. The Sudbury “process” unnecessarily enables arbitrary, subjective control based on tyranny of a majority a.k.a. ganging up. Banning from class for a week because person A didn’t like something person B did and got a few people to agree. Extra-judicial and arbitrary. The so-called supreme court style discussions are the giveaway that novices have strayed out of bounds. Recall, democracy is not a good thing as our Founding Fathers understood. I’m so happy my kids didn’t attend a horror show like that.

Expand full comment
Brian Dixon's avatar

Meanwhile, in a typically authoritarian school, kids are sent to the principal's office to be punished without due process. And according to you, that's not the horror show. Wow.

Expand full comment
la chevalerie vit's avatar

Break the clear rules, get sent to the Principal’s office. Simple and straightforward. Your crying is not an emergency.

Expand full comment
JC's avatar

I was one who got punished for being in the wrong place, wrong time. I was not with the offending students (age 10?) but was punished with them. However - I lived. My crying was not an emergency.

Expand full comment
Brian Dixon's avatar

You lived, JC, but apparently with a kind of Stockholm syndrome that keeps you from acknowledging the political implications of what happened to you. Bite the bullet, man. Admit how outrageous it was.

Expand full comment
Brian Dixon's avatar

So, according to you [la chevalerie vit], all that stuff about being presumed innocent until proven guilty is for crybabies?

Expand full comment
la chevalerie vit's avatar

Take your strawman elsewhere. Goodbye.

Expand full comment