I will forego my typical shtick and be direct. This might be the most important piece you have authored. The puffery about the "Delta Variant" is so banal as to insult a moron's intelligence. One might conclude, on that basis, that Shaman Fauci is exactly the right person to convey it on TV. (Wait, I said I would be serious...) Anyway, great stuff, Bad Cat. Thanks.
If you have a family member and/or friend who is dead set on getting the vaccine and are worried about them, it's a good discussion to point them to. Steve Kirsch is rather hugh strung, but both scientists are very precise and careful in their speech. (The video clocks in at over 3 hours, but it is worth the watch.)
And considering the treatments that are available, pushing vaccination is not even sensible. Evil people are at the helm, that's for sure.
So given the mountain of evidence presented herewith and the lengths that MSM and big tech go to to censor anyone who presents these data and facts, I must ask again, WHY? What is the end game? Is everyone in power in bed with big Pharma? Is it about control and one global party and currency? I really struggle with why this is happening for a virus that has a 99.5% survival rate
Does the name "Delta Variant" make anyone else think of John Belushi/Animal House? In all seriousness though, this push to give children these vaccines scares me. My eldest just turned 11 and is thankfully not eligible, but we're kidding ourselves if we think they don't have their eyes set on young children and even babies. Sr. Gato, you focus quite a bit on the myocarditis issue, but have you looked into the reports of women and girls having menstrual issues (as well as quite a few anecdotes of miscarriages among pregnant women) after vaccination? I was listening to Trish Wood's podcast with Dr. Byram Bridle from Canada, and he talked about info that was received from data about the Pfizer jab obtained by the Japanese government. This analysis found evidence of the spike protein being found in all organs of the body, but particularly in ovaries and bone marrow. The former concerns me quite a lot, as we are giving this vaccine (and in the case of many universities, mandating it) in large numbers to women of childbearing age and younger with no idea of how this might affect their future fertility.
- The chart says that 0.7 required medical care and that 0.2 required hospitalization. (You say it was 0.7).
- That number seems high, too. The powerpoint (#12) says that 144/6M and 790/21.6M doses produced severe reactions. Those are incredibly small numbers, way less than 0.7.
- Then you compare 0.7 to the population hospitalization rate for covid. Doesn't seem like a valid comparison.
This is all quite easy to explain if you want to go into full-on conspiracy mode. Tinfoil hat: on! Of course they are trying to make thinking folk lose all confidence in public health! That way, when they release the real killer pathogen, we will all ignore anything they say/do. Easy way to get rid of us all and leave just the most compliant of sheep standing. Tinfoil hat: off.
imagine if they were honest. ha ha ha. everyone now thinks this is far deadlier and worse. they'll keep testing. they won't stop. ever. this is 100% fundamental destruction of society and we can o nothing.
Your point is made, but isn't 0.01% = 1 in 10,000, not 1 in a million? Am I misreading this? Vax is still a factor of 10 higher, so no problem with your overall argument.
On the bar chart where it says "0.2% medical care in ED/hospital" rate for 12-15 year olds after Dose 2 -- what's the difference between that and the bar just below it where it says 0.7% required medical care?
Is it possible to get the variants of concern data and hospitalization rates from the CDC as well? It would be nice to counter the hysteria using all of their own data. I know, I know, do it myself. I've poked around a little, but I lack the skill and expertise of others around here.
I will forego my typical shtick and be direct. This might be the most important piece you have authored. The puffery about the "Delta Variant" is so banal as to insult a moron's intelligence. One might conclude, on that basis, that Shaman Fauci is exactly the right person to convey it on TV. (Wait, I said I would be serious...) Anyway, great stuff, Bad Cat. Thanks.
Very sobering. Biologist Bret Weinstein had Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of mRNA vaccine technology) on his podcast along with Steve Kirsch, who is spearheading an investigation into vaccine harms. Youtube yanked it but you can find it here: https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/how-to-save-the-world,-in-three-easy:0?fbclid=IwAR2ID_kkQDwMLejCnTTFtr-GWkYF0kYLS-733t6BWxc19vhOesS8aXpZtF8
If you have a family member and/or friend who is dead set on getting the vaccine and are worried about them, it's a good discussion to point them to. Steve Kirsch is rather hugh strung, but both scientists are very precise and careful in their speech. (The video clocks in at over 3 hours, but it is worth the watch.)
And considering the treatments that are available, pushing vaccination is not even sensible. Evil people are at the helm, that's for sure.
“ you lied and lied and then lied about lying” - that is a summary of CDC/NIH public policy in one sentence..
So given the mountain of evidence presented herewith and the lengths that MSM and big tech go to to censor anyone who presents these data and facts, I must ask again, WHY? What is the end game? Is everyone in power in bed with big Pharma? Is it about control and one global party and currency? I really struggle with why this is happening for a virus that has a 99.5% survival rate
Does the name "Delta Variant" make anyone else think of John Belushi/Animal House? In all seriousness though, this push to give children these vaccines scares me. My eldest just turned 11 and is thankfully not eligible, but we're kidding ourselves if we think they don't have their eyes set on young children and even babies. Sr. Gato, you focus quite a bit on the myocarditis issue, but have you looked into the reports of women and girls having menstrual issues (as well as quite a few anecdotes of miscarriages among pregnant women) after vaccination? I was listening to Trish Wood's podcast with Dr. Byram Bridle from Canada, and he talked about info that was received from data about the Pfizer jab obtained by the Japanese government. This analysis found evidence of the spike protein being found in all organs of the body, but particularly in ovaries and bone marrow. The former concerns me quite a lot, as we are giving this vaccine (and in the case of many universities, mandating it) in large numbers to women of childbearing age and younger with no idea of how this might affect their future fertility.
Appreciate the effort you're putting in.
However, really seems like the numbers are wrong.
- The chart says that 0.7 required medical care and that 0.2 required hospitalization. (You say it was 0.7).
- That number seems high, too. The powerpoint (#12) says that 144/6M and 790/21.6M doses produced severe reactions. Those are incredibly small numbers, way less than 0.7.
- Then you compare 0.7 to the population hospitalization rate for covid. Doesn't seem like a valid comparison.
This is all quite easy to explain if you want to go into full-on conspiracy mode. Tinfoil hat: on! Of course they are trying to make thinking folk lose all confidence in public health! That way, when they release the real killer pathogen, we will all ignore anything they say/do. Easy way to get rid of us all and leave just the most compliant of sheep standing. Tinfoil hat: off.
imagine if they were honest. ha ha ha. everyone now thinks this is far deadlier and worse. they'll keep testing. they won't stop. ever. this is 100% fundamental destruction of society and we can o nothing.
Your point is made, but isn't 0.01% = 1 in 10,000, not 1 in a million? Am I misreading this? Vax is still a factor of 10 higher, so no problem with your overall argument.
This is really good. Thank you.
Thanks gato, another great article!
On the bar chart where it says "0.2% medical care in ED/hospital" rate for 12-15 year olds after Dose 2 -- what's the difference between that and the bar just below it where it says 0.7% required medical care?
Per CDC, 1968 adolescents and children age 5-17 were hospitalized for C19 from January 1, 2020 through June 12, 2021.
https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/COVIDNet/COVID19_5.html?fbclid=IwAR2X0HAWOz-51Y-Wzb9yBJKMEpyndS8yT3m5Mfxl-nQDASeUpIkrIIJkL70
Is it possible to get the variants of concern data and hospitalization rates from the CDC as well? It would be nice to counter the hysteria using all of their own data. I know, I know, do it myself. I've poked around a little, but I lack the skill and expertise of others around here.
the fraud in chief would nuke the usa official child abuse on mengele level is par.
idnk biden would be like xi and putin the only other people in the world that have conditions on which they would nuke the usa.