She is NOT saying they own the science of Climate Change. They work with google to control the science of the narrative. Communication per the UN has two legs--Education and Media.
Both are controlled in a way that makes the actual facts of the climate or even weather irrelevant.
but, it sure does dominate the perception of anyone caught in its broadcast--whether in a classroom or just listening or reading in general.
You're assuming what she was referring to as "the science"... Perhaps she was referring to their "owning the science" of narrative building & defending, as you believe. Or, perhaps she was referring to "owning the science" of presumed "man caused" climate change.
But, one thing is absolutely certain. Fleming, a UN employee, was saying that the UN performs work on the WEF's behalf... Therefore, there is NO SEPARATION BETWEEN THE UN & THE WEF - THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY ONE AND THE SAME.
Now, I know a lot of you will say, "well, of course we 'knew' that" - but, did we "know" that for sure before now? Has that relationship been made clear elsewhere, and I missed it?
I'll say again--the ascendancy of the "neurodivergent" to overlordsy is what happens when you're so inclusive that you can't recognize sociopathy and its lesser sub-categories that you've lost the tools to stop them.
These people can't be shamed because they have no ability to perceive it. What they *do* have is the ability to conceal it for a time, because they do understand the value of camouflage. But they always lose their grip on themselves sooner or later.
Every societal problem we have right now leads back to this. They are the useful foot soldiers of the non-neurodivergent garden-variety evil sort; they are the cover and the advance march. They have the gift of genuine sincerity of what they say and that disarms normal people who hear voice tones and don't listen hard enough to the words.
100% agree. Once you realize that many of the people in charge are psychopaths incapable of empathy, remorse, or in many cases even fear, everything makes a lot more sense.
And people don’t want to believe it but the Neurodivergent are created in infancy by parenting style.
John Bowlby was given money from a Foundation created in 1947 in Europe to recreate what was on the chemical & Pharma companies before the Second World War. I’m certain these dudes worked w/UNESCO & all that crap.
Anyway, these SCUM were studying everything about the human race and are all Eugenicists and Cyberneticists.
Bowlby’s team included Animal Researchers and Human Researchers all looking at human development in the first year of life. They studied the development of the social smile extensively.
The human brain develops via Epigenetics that is responsive to Neurofeedback. Human brainwaves change in seconds just by looking at a screen and kids to the age of 7 are in theta (hypnotic) brainwave state.
Anyway - the researchers showed that really only securely attached kids were appropriately social, has normal identity/self (all the trans kids) development at a year of age.
The rejecting and neglecting mothers had infants who became toddlers who all had varying degrees of empathy deficits, affect dysregulation & were to one degree or another antisocial.
Researchers at McGill showed how serious Sensory Deprivation could be to an adult human. It’s worse for the infant.
When a mother rejects her infant or neglects the baby, the synapses develop in patterned ways based on the sensory stimulation that brain receives. A healthy mother is an important component of the feedback loop to develop a healthy baby.
In 1969, Ford and Carnigie created Sesame Street.
When a baby is put in a substandard daycare at 6 weeks where he’s bonded to a handheld screen, you get the type of unmirrored infant with patterned sensory deprivation that creates autism.
I watched as the numbers of these babies increased over the last 20 years. And I watched as AAP said, Oh we just pick them up better now - It’s BULL.
They were created because the thinking is rigid and Reflective Functioning is mostly poor. That’s what I’ve seen.
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, though- there are decades of quite solid research on the lifelong implications of in utero and genetic events that have permanent effects on child development and things you've stated like intelligence and psychopathy.
There are strong genetic markers for many developmental disabilities and chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia.
There are nearly always both genetic and environmental precursors to the issues you're discussing.
I’m sorry, there aren’t strong Genetic Components.
The human brain develops around experience and that experience starts when the sperm meets the egg in utero. However, the most significant impact is at birth and in response to the quality of the social relationship.
I know it’s hard for people to accept this but it absolutely has to be understood because the way society as a whole raises or neglects infants absolutely determines the society we find ourselves living in.
And from foundations formed out of the Remains of Corps like IG Farben and they he Macy Conference at Cornell and the Yale Longitudinal Study on Personality Development. And yes it was closely affiliated with Some researchers who were interested in Mind Control. The research SHOWs it’s just not published widely that the infant develops in context w/relationships especially w/the mother. We are dealing with liars and frauds. Gen they want something they get it by lying and not telling humans the truth and tue autism thing is convenient. Bad parents, and I’ve seen 1000’s of them, don’t want to acknowledge how terrible they can be to their infant so they split. Anyway - This isn’t belief…: it’s fact.
And Harry Skeels showed during the Great Depression that IQ is created by the degree of Social Interaction and Aensory stim in Infants. He took orphan infants and could swing IQ by 40 points. The eugenists at Stanford couldn’t tolerate that because they wanted these “substandard” human stock euthanized…. But they couldn’t cover up Skeels work so they studied it and learned it was basically Sensory Stimulation (like how we learn to play a piano) that develops the infant brain but the infant needs another human, a mother to develop properly. But you could get a kid that’s avoidant & lacking in empathy if you started early and bonded the infant to a screen & now AI.
I agree 100%. Some people are born with psychopathic brains but behave in a prosocial manner, thanks to good parenting. Others are born with normal brains and conditioned into sociopathic behavior, as you've described.
There was a short-lived TV show called "Profit" in the mid-90s. Adrian Pasdar played a corporate ladder-climber whose sociopathy was the result of his negligent (and later incestuous) mother leaving him as an infant in a cardboard box to watch TV 24 hours per day. Perhaps it was too close to the truth, because the show only lasted a few episodes.
The only thing more dangerous than a psychopathic liar is a psychopathic zealot. Her body language, tone, and demeanor all suggest that she truly BELIEVES what she's saying. As El Gato says, the grifters have given way to rubes. Chilling.
Just wait till they tell us that “they are democracy”, and “they are capitalism”, and “they are the environmental experts”, and they are………….. The list goes on and on.
Bill Hates said he is putting every last cent of his ( and probably ours too ) into it.
Somebody just haul him off. Track him on his private planes from small private airport to small private airport and let's do a citizens arrest. He is wanted in many countries. Maybe the Indians will help us escort him in. Wouldn't he do well in the jails? Right ?
His time for murder and menace is up. We don't even need Seals and Rangers for this one. Soccer moms of the injected would be more foreboding. Let's get a job waiting on him in one way shape or form.
I agree they have too much to lose to give up yet, but I think you'll be surprised how meekly they go in the end. There will be lots of yelling and screaming and gnashing of teeth, but once they figure out that the ship has sailed and their rats have all deserted, they will go to their fates with big, scared eyes.
Google has long gaslit the public about the search engine's identity as a disinterested index of information despite no shortage of examples to the contrary, including caving to pressure from businesses, outside interest groups, and governments around the world—incidents that have increased sharply since the 2016 election.
Interesting anecdote: I remember when Google first came out and we all jumped on it because there were no ads and it was fast (Most of us were still on dial-up modem (some on dsl), even the business I worked at, so any images took ages to download.). Only a couple of us wondered: "I wonder what their business model is since they aren't running ads?" Now we know; we are the mice gobbling up "free" cheese in the mousetrap. Diabolical and brilliant! Even I fell for it. doh!
Watch Joe Rogan #1768 if you want an idea of how bad it is. If you do not already know! Never use google search, unless you don't really care about the results and do not mind google adding it to your history.
the only thing these narcissistic sociopaths are going to own will be the millions of deaths brought about by famine and winter. these sniveling bureaucrats and their arrogantly conceived new world order will harm so many people. and people just lap up the propaganda.
Yes. And he is under their protection. This is why this short man can go like a rooster down the road. Like a little rooster with his collar up at age 100.
Outstanding piece. I only wish I had confidence that people get it. I know far too many people who just want peace and are willing to trust anyone who promises to take care of everything for them. . . . But you do give me hope.
All ya gotta do is look where she went to college and you'll have your answer.
Another thing i've noticed. If you look these people up, none of them have ever had a real job. They start in .gov and never seem to leave.
"Fleming started her career as a journalist. Between 1989 and 1994, Fleming worked as a Public Affairs Specialist for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in Munich."
So what newspaper did she work for? Oh they don't say, but she worked for radio free europe! So she's been in controlling information and propaganda her entire career..........
She blinded me with science
And hit me with technology
i can smell the chemicals...
She is NOT saying they own the science of Climate Change. They work with google to control the science of the narrative. Communication per the UN has two legs--Education and Media.
Both are controlled in a way that makes the actual facts of the climate or even weather irrelevant.
but, it sure does dominate the perception of anyone caught in its broadcast--whether in a classroom or just listening or reading in general.
You're assuming what she was referring to as "the science"... Perhaps she was referring to their "owning the science" of narrative building & defending, as you believe. Or, perhaps she was referring to "owning the science" of presumed "man caused" climate change.
But, one thing is absolutely certain. Fleming, a UN employee, was saying that the UN performs work on the WEF's behalf... Therefore, there is NO SEPARATION BETWEEN THE UN & THE WEF - THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY ONE AND THE SAME.
Now, I know a lot of you will say, "well, of course we 'knew' that" - but, did we "know" that for sure before now? Has that relationship been made clear elsewhere, and I missed it?
Yes.
I'll say again--the ascendancy of the "neurodivergent" to overlordsy is what happens when you're so inclusive that you can't recognize sociopathy and its lesser sub-categories that you've lost the tools to stop them.
These people can't be shamed because they have no ability to perceive it. What they *do* have is the ability to conceal it for a time, because they do understand the value of camouflage. But they always lose their grip on themselves sooner or later.
Every societal problem we have right now leads back to this. They are the useful foot soldiers of the non-neurodivergent garden-variety evil sort; they are the cover and the advance march. They have the gift of genuine sincerity of what they say and that disarms normal people who hear voice tones and don't listen hard enough to the words.
100% agree. Once you realize that many of the people in charge are psychopaths incapable of empathy, remorse, or in many cases even fear, everything makes a lot more sense.
Colloquially referred to as "lizard people". They're not so much like us mortals.
And people don’t want to believe it but the Neurodivergent are created in infancy by parenting style.
John Bowlby was given money from a Foundation created in 1947 in Europe to recreate what was on the chemical & Pharma companies before the Second World War. I’m certain these dudes worked w/UNESCO & all that crap.
Anyway, these SCUM were studying everything about the human race and are all Eugenicists and Cyberneticists.
Bowlby’s team included Animal Researchers and Human Researchers all looking at human development in the first year of life. They studied the development of the social smile extensively.
The human brain develops via Epigenetics that is responsive to Neurofeedback. Human brainwaves change in seconds just by looking at a screen and kids to the age of 7 are in theta (hypnotic) brainwave state.
Anyway - the researchers showed that really only securely attached kids were appropriately social, has normal identity/self (all the trans kids) development at a year of age.
The rejecting and neglecting mothers had infants who became toddlers who all had varying degrees of empathy deficits, affect dysregulation & were to one degree or another antisocial.
Researchers at McGill showed how serious Sensory Deprivation could be to an adult human. It’s worse for the infant.
When a mother rejects her infant or neglects the baby, the synapses develop in patterned ways based on the sensory stimulation that brain receives. A healthy mother is an important component of the feedback loop to develop a healthy baby.
In 1969, Ford and Carnigie created Sesame Street.
When a baby is put in a substandard daycare at 6 weeks where he’s bonded to a handheld screen, you get the type of unmirrored infant with patterned sensory deprivation that creates autism.
I watched as the numbers of these babies increased over the last 20 years. And I watched as AAP said, Oh we just pick them up better now - It’s BULL.
They were created because the thinking is rigid and Reflective Functioning is mostly poor. That’s what I’ve seen.
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, though- there are decades of quite solid research on the lifelong implications of in utero and genetic events that have permanent effects on child development and things you've stated like intelligence and psychopathy.
There are strong genetic markers for many developmental disabilities and chronic mental illnesses such as schizophrenia.
There are nearly always both genetic and environmental precursors to the issues you're discussing.
I’m sorry, there aren’t strong Genetic Components.
The human brain develops around experience and that experience starts when the sperm meets the egg in utero. However, the most significant impact is at birth and in response to the quality of the social relationship.
I know it’s hard for people to accept this but it absolutely has to be understood because the way society as a whole raises or neglects infants absolutely determines the society we find ourselves living in.
Agree to disagree, then. I'm pretty secure in the scientific paradigm I've engaged.
Let's see what research, not belief, demonstrates going forward.
I don’t say what I’m saying based in Belief. I’m saying it based in research by Attachment Researchers who worked out of Tavistock.
And from foundations formed out of the Remains of Corps like IG Farben and they he Macy Conference at Cornell and the Yale Longitudinal Study on Personality Development. And yes it was closely affiliated with Some researchers who were interested in Mind Control. The research SHOWs it’s just not published widely that the infant develops in context w/relationships especially w/the mother. We are dealing with liars and frauds. Gen they want something they get it by lying and not telling humans the truth and tue autism thing is convenient. Bad parents, and I’ve seen 1000’s of them, don’t want to acknowledge how terrible they can be to their infant so they split. Anyway - This isn’t belief…: it’s fact.
And Harry Skeels showed during the Great Depression that IQ is created by the degree of Social Interaction and Aensory stim in Infants. He took orphan infants and could swing IQ by 40 points. The eugenists at Stanford couldn’t tolerate that because they wanted these “substandard” human stock euthanized…. But they couldn’t cover up Skeels work so they studied it and learned it was basically Sensory Stimulation (like how we learn to play a piano) that develops the infant brain but the infant needs another human, a mother to develop properly. But you could get a kid that’s avoidant & lacking in empathy if you started early and bonded the infant to a screen & now AI.
I agree 100%. Some people are born with psychopathic brains but behave in a prosocial manner, thanks to good parenting. Others are born with normal brains and conditioned into sociopathic behavior, as you've described.
There was a short-lived TV show called "Profit" in the mid-90s. Adrian Pasdar played a corporate ladder-climber whose sociopathy was the result of his negligent (and later incestuous) mother leaving him as an infant in a cardboard box to watch TV 24 hours per day. Perhaps it was too close to the truth, because the show only lasted a few episodes.
🎯🎯🎯
Spoken like a boring neurotypical. I bet you sit around writing short stories instead of developing emissionless energy sources.
I gotta hide my foul purposes better.
Your poor father and I spent way too much money on 8 years of rocket science school for you to sit around talking about Bangladeshi fish all day.
But I've found the inexpensive way to make them fly...
You need to write a story about a rocket scientist. Or an astronaut.
https://redfoliot.substack.com/p/star-maven
I 💖 this take!
The only thing more dangerous than a psychopathic liar is a psychopathic zealot. Her body language, tone, and demeanor all suggest that she truly BELIEVES what she's saying. As El Gato says, the grifters have given way to rubes. Chilling.
Just wait till they tell us that “they are democracy”, and “they are capitalism”, and “they are the environmental experts”, and they are………….. The list goes on and on.
“ the grifters have given way to rubes”. Perfect T-shirt Logo for the El Gato online gift shop.
Yes, gato's description of these people 'in charge' is perfect. She believes what she is saying. She doesn't know much, but she believes.
They have way too much invested in this to lose now. This will be a huge fight. Are y’all ready?
Bill Hates said he is putting every last cent of his ( and probably ours too ) into it.
Somebody just haul him off. Track him on his private planes from small private airport to small private airport and let's do a citizens arrest. He is wanted in many countries. Maybe the Indians will help us escort him in. Wouldn't he do well in the jails? Right ?
His time for murder and menace is up. We don't even need Seals and Rangers for this one. Soccer moms of the injected would be more foreboding. Let's get a job waiting on him in one way shape or form.
Indian jail and feed him daily cricket pie.
Let his jailers be some of the thousands of Indian fathers whose sons and daughters were killed or paralyzed by Gate's toxic polio vaccine.
Mmmmm Cricket Pie.
Very much so, with sharpened teeth and smiles.
Yep. More than ready.
Ready.
I agree they have too much to lose to give up yet, but I think you'll be surprised how meekly they go in the end. There will be lots of yelling and screaming and gnashing of teeth, but once they figure out that the ship has sailed and their rats have all deserted, they will go to their fates with big, scared eyes.
"ALL YOUR SCIENCES ARE BELONG TO US!!!"
lol. i almost used that as the UN motto but was not sure enough people would get it.
People here would. Normies, another matter.
Well, just because I would have, that doesn't mean that "enough" would. :-)
Google has long gaslit the public about the search engine's identity as a disinterested index of information despite no shortage of examples to the contrary, including caving to pressure from businesses, outside interest groups, and governments around the world—incidents that have increased sharply since the 2016 election.
https://euphoricrecall.substack.com/p/googlegov-part-2
Interesting anecdote: I remember when Google first came out and we all jumped on it because there were no ads and it was fast (Most of us were still on dial-up modem (some on dsl), even the business I worked at, so any images took ages to download.). Only a couple of us wondered: "I wonder what their business model is since they aren't running ads?" Now we know; we are the mice gobbling up "free" cheese in the mousetrap. Diabolical and brilliant! Even I fell for it. doh!
Sigh. Yep. Never know you’re in the good old days … until they’re gone.
THESE are the good old Substack days. 💜
Watch Joe Rogan #1768 if you want an idea of how bad it is. If you do not already know! Never use google search, unless you don't really care about the results and do not mind google adding it to your history.
agree. One day, one of Obiden's "tax men" will come knocking at your door
Brave Private Search engine or Tor, both with a VPN.
the only thing these narcissistic sociopaths are going to own will be the millions of deaths brought about by famine and winter. these sniveling bureaucrats and their arrogantly conceived new world order will harm so many people. and people just lap up the propaganda.
de-population seems to be necessary to get the planet less damaged by carbon....
but not sufficient bc climate hysteria is religion and no data supposes that cutting carbon will adjust!
they will own it and they will, along with that, possess a sense of extreme pride in those pitiful events.
Since Fauci is "the science," does that mean they own him? Well, officially own him.
Yes. And he is under their protection. This is why this short man can go like a rooster down the road. Like a little rooster with his collar up at age 100.
He just handed out another grant to Peter Daszak and EcoHealth... for bat coronaviruses! It's amazing.
There are no consequences. Nobody has ever been held accountable.
You say it's a grant. I'd call it hush money.
haha, yes. They said the quiet part out loud again! Some intrepid journalist should break that story.
This is insane. "We own the science." Was spoken with such nonchalance. Obvious that she believes that her science cannot be questioned.
arrogant and condescending
These people have no shits to give if you have a different opinion.
how dare you
Arrogant, condescending and dimwitted. A stellar combo.
"We own the propaganda..."
She is a Mostly Peaceful Scientist. Please disperse, nothing to see here.
Resistance is futile -- you will be assimilated
Outstanding piece. I only wish I had confidence that people get it. I know far too many people who just want peace and are willing to trust anyone who promises to take care of everything for them. . . . But you do give me hope.
People who say things like this only reveal how little they understand about science.
Oh Bob, we're SO past that little problem of understanding anything... we're now up to the chapter on 'Tyranny' in kittengarten...
"I! AM! SCIENCE!"
-Fauci
And i am Owned and hence protected by the all powerfull WEF! BOW YOUR HEADS YOU PEASANT FOLK. YOU ARE OURS FOREVER NOW TOO!!!!!!!!
"SCIENCE! UNLIMITED SCIENCE!"
Because for some reason all this schtick they're up to makes me think of Emperor Palpatine.
All ya gotta do is look where she went to college and you'll have your answer.
Another thing i've noticed. If you look these people up, none of them have ever had a real job. They start in .gov and never seem to leave.
"Fleming started her career as a journalist. Between 1989 and 1994, Fleming worked as a Public Affairs Specialist for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in Munich."
So what newspaper did she work for? Oh they don't say, but she worked for radio free europe! So she's been in controlling information and propaganda her entire career..........
yes! indeed
Damn, that was fun. Another great one from one helluva a writer