Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeremy's avatar

Look at that table again, specifically, the females column. Notice anything interesting??

Ages 40-49: --- Dose1: 6.9 --- Dose2: 3.8

Ages 50-59: --- Dose1: 10.2 -- Dose2: 11.5

Ages 60-69: --- Dose1: 2.8 --- Dose2: 5.2

So, women undergoing menopause, when their testosterone levels are at the highest relative to their estrogen levels for their entire lives (and in flux)... have higher levels of this adverse reaction than outside of that time-frame.... If there's ANY signal that demonstrates a vaccine cause, this one is ironclad. Men clearly have a bigger problem with these heart problems with the vaccines, and women have it worse when their testosterone levels are high... Sex-selected or biochemical selected adverse events mean the medicine is to blame, not randomness, or injection method, or anything else.

Expand full comment
Igor Chudov's avatar

I find the discussion shocking. Any time I would mention VAERS, I would get a reply "VAERS is so unreliable". But the authorities are not looking into VAERS at all!!!

I actually took time to look into VAERS myself, for just my state. I wanted to see if I could spot fake, antivaxxer-generated entries.

I could not find any such entries. Most were clearly medical personnel generated, some were reports like "my brother died two days after his second dose, his doctor would not report him to VAERS"

Expand full comment
108 more comments...

No posts