Ding is a fraud with some talent for self-promotion and alarmism, if not for science or data analysis. But there were many legitimate scientists calling for further massive and prolonged lockdowns due to these supposedly terrifying variants. They ought to be ashamed. There is one in particular I’m disappointed in. He ought to have known …
Ding is a fraud with some talent for self-promotion and alarmism, if not for science or data analysis. But there were many legitimate scientists calling for further massive and prolonged lockdowns due to these supposedly terrifying variants. They ought to be ashamed. There is one in particular I’m disappointed in. He ought to have known better.
These scientists who’ve pushed for lockdowns seem to me to have been violating basic bioethical principles:
“ If lockdowns were a prescription drug for Covid-19 treatment, the FDA would never have approved it.”
Ding is a fraud with some talent for self-promotion and alarmism, if not for science or data analysis. But there were many legitimate scientists calling for further massive and prolonged lockdowns due to these supposedly terrifying variants. They ought to be ashamed. There is one in particular I’m disappointed in. He ought to have known better.
These scientists who’ve pushed for lockdowns seem to me to have been violating basic bioethical principles:
“ If lockdowns were a prescription drug for Covid-19 treatment, the FDA would never have approved it.”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.spectator.co.uk/article/a-medic-s-case-against-another-lockdown/amp
But perhaps politics comes first for them, rather than ethics?