The crime hear is that they will approve new boosters based on bio markers alone. No looking at actual health outcomes, no looking at adverse events - you know, things like paralysis and death. And the fact that they stopped publishing hospitalization and death rates for vaxxed vs. boosted prices THEY KNOW that it is better to avoid the vaccine. And they are hiding it. Because profits > death.
The crime hear is that they will approve new boosters based on bio markers alone. No looking at actual health outcomes, no looking at adverse events - you know, things like paralysis and death. And the fact that they stopped publishing hospitalization and death rates for vaxxed vs. boosted prices THEY KNOW that it is better to avoid the vaccine. And they are hiding it. Because profits > death.
I think that's true too, but people will eventually catch on and become furiously, probably homicidally angry when it does. The numbers aren't in the oligarchy's favor for a protracted conflict, so the herd will need to be thinned before it gets to that point.
I'm not sure about what's going on exactly. I am sure that it is not for the benefit of humanity, however.
The narrative is shifting to, "It's the unjabbed's fault." The jabbed vigger sheep are stupid and could become violent. Good thing most will be armed with limp wrists and dildos and adverse to natural sunlight.
Why should Pharma care? They have zero, absolutely no fear of liability, either under EUA or if they get on the childhood vaccine schedule. You're damned right -- it's all about money. Even better if you get essentially guaranteed contracts from governments as well as coerced market for your poison. To a large degree, vaccines (and many other medical products) are for all practical purposes socialized medicine, and this was true long before the pandemic. On the surface, a naive person might think it's "good" that the product is "free" to the end consumer. But there are downsides to the total lack of normal market forces. And if one's forced to consume the product, that is a violation of ethics.
The crime hear is that they will approve new boosters based on bio markers alone. No looking at actual health outcomes, no looking at adverse events - you know, things like paralysis and death. And the fact that they stopped publishing hospitalization and death rates for vaxxed vs. boosted prices THEY KNOW that it is better to avoid the vaccine. And they are hiding it. Because profits > death.
I think it's very reasonable to conclude that death is the goal of this vaccination program.
Also auto immune diseasesтАж Right now all of these biologic agents like Humira etc. are so expensive and so many people are receiving them.
And infertility.
Or just to prevent life in the first place. That seems like a lower energy pathway
I think that's true too, but people will eventually catch on and become furiously, probably homicidally angry when it does. The numbers aren't in the oligarchy's favor for a protracted conflict, so the herd will need to be thinned before it gets to that point.
I'm not sure about what's going on exactly. I am sure that it is not for the benefit of humanity, however.
The narrative is shifting to, "It's the unjabbed's fault." The jabbed vigger sheep are stupid and could become violent. Good thing most will be armed with limp wrists and dildos and adverse to natural sunlight.
They have said the 21st century will be all about collecting and harvesting data. No privacy whatsoever.
Why should Pharma care? They have zero, absolutely no fear of liability, either under EUA or if they get on the childhood vaccine schedule. You're damned right -- it's all about money. Even better if you get essentially guaranteed contracts from governments as well as coerced market for your poison. To a large degree, vaccines (and many other medical products) are for all practical purposes socialized medicine, and this was true long before the pandemic. On the surface, a naive person might think it's "good" that the product is "free" to the end consumer. But there are downsides to the total lack of normal market forces. And if one's forced to consume the product, that is a violation of ethics.
Once upon a time, I was sure that the government would never want to kill tax paying citizens.
I've reversed that position. Seems that Our Betters really want white Christians taken out of the equation.
Whites, at least. Bonus points if Christian.
Double bonus points if you're conservative.
Immunity from civil product liability. IIRC criminal liability for malfeasance still applies -- in theory.
BINGO!