They aren't even testing for efficacy anymore? Apparently, the FDA can't even be bothered to pretend to be doing their jobs now. And how convenient for the "epidemiologists" claiming that the unvaxxed are driving this that countries have decided to stop releasing data that showed otherwise.
They aren't even testing for efficacy anymore? Apparently, the FDA can't even be bothered to pretend to be doing their jobs now. And how convenient for the "epidemiologists" claiming that the unvaxxed are driving this that countries have decided to stop releasing data that showed otherwise.
I've gotten to the point where I review for myself a drug that's prescribed before I'll take it. Within the past month I was prescribed Paxlovid, even though (in my opinion) I was low risk and thus should not take it. Needless to say, once I found it was EUA and Pfizer, I called the pharmacy and said no thanks. At the risk of being a broken record, you must take your health into your own hands. From the top (regulatory) down to the doctor who pokes, prods and prescribes, they clearly do not make patient health or safety a priority.
You’re not kidding. Yesterday, CVS notified my husband he had a prescription ready, when he got home he didn’t recognize the prescription or the doctor. After a few minutes of brain rattling, we realized it was prescribed by a doctor that briefly checked in on him while in the hospital 4 months ago.
And you know that the newest booster this fall, which is going to be an Alpha/Omicron mix will not go through clinical trials? The FDA bypassed them since each has already gone through them.
I'd expand that to avoid mRNA products entirely. Their testing is a joke and they have absolutely zero liability. I will probably never voluntarily take an immunization of any type ever again. That's easy for me to say, I'm 60 and retired. If you have children, or other requirements, I don't know what your options are.
Pfizer is doing clinical trials for mRNA flu, pneumonia and shingles right now. However, this is on the traditional 7-10 year FDA schedule.
I'm not terribly far away from retirement, so I'm not getting the poison death jab under any circumstances. Or any other vaxx. I am worried about my grandson who is 4; his parents aren't jabbed, and don't intend on getting him jabbed. I may very well end up home schooling him if it becomes a requirement here.
So many unknowns. Me thinks this is to confuse the peeps...many of which have fancy expert credentials.
"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know"
- Rumsfeld...er...war criminal
They could cut and past that quote for every manufactured crisis.
Not knowing is preferred by the sheeps. The experts knowingly take advantage of this.
Ryan...are you sure that's Rumsfeld? I'm pretty sure you're channeling Kamala, yes Kamala, and we know this by what we can see, unburdoned by what has been.
You're right about "not knowing". This is why people won't go to the doctor to check up on obvious problems....they fear finding out something is wrong and there's this mentality that if you aren't told it's not real. A friend's brother got a hernia and he was afraid to deal with it. The hernia got so large and protruded out so far it looked like he had a second penis. After more than a year of this, he had some sort of medical emergency related to the untreated hernia, he ended up with major surgery twice, and nearly died. All because he didn't want to "know".
They aren't even testing for efficacy anymore? Apparently, the FDA can't even be bothered to pretend to be doing their jobs now. And how convenient for the "epidemiologists" claiming that the unvaxxed are driving this that countries have decided to stop releasing data that showed otherwise.
Until you look at the African countries or Haiti. Or the other intelligent countries in the world. I wouldn’t include much of the west in that!
I've gotten to the point where I review for myself a drug that's prescribed before I'll take it. Within the past month I was prescribed Paxlovid, even though (in my opinion) I was low risk and thus should not take it. Needless to say, once I found it was EUA and Pfizer, I called the pharmacy and said no thanks. At the risk of being a broken record, you must take your health into your own hands. From the top (regulatory) down to the doctor who pokes, prods and prescribes, they clearly do not make patient health or safety a priority.
You’re not kidding. Yesterday, CVS notified my husband he had a prescription ready, when he got home he didn’t recognize the prescription or the doctor. After a few minutes of brain rattling, we realized it was prescribed by a doctor that briefly checked in on him while in the hospital 4 months ago.
And you know that the newest booster this fall, which is going to be an Alpha/Omicron mix will not go through clinical trials? The FDA bypassed them since each has already gone through them.
So... yeah, avoid that booster entirely.
I'd expand that to avoid mRNA products entirely. Their testing is a joke and they have absolutely zero liability. I will probably never voluntarily take an immunization of any type ever again. That's easy for me to say, I'm 60 and retired. If you have children, or other requirements, I don't know what your options are.
Just so everyone knows:
Pfizer is doing clinical trials for mRNA flu, pneumonia and shingles right now. However, this is on the traditional 7-10 year FDA schedule.
I'm not terribly far away from retirement, so I'm not getting the poison death jab under any circumstances. Or any other vaxx. I am worried about my grandson who is 4; his parents aren't jabbed, and don't intend on getting him jabbed. I may very well end up home schooling him if it becomes a requirement here.
So many unknowns. Me thinks this is to confuse the peeps...many of which have fancy expert credentials.
"Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know"
- Rumsfeld...er...war criminal
They could cut and past that quote for every manufactured crisis.
Not knowing is preferred by the sheeps. The experts knowingly take advantage of this.
Hence so many Unknown causes for death lately.
Ryan...are you sure that's Rumsfeld? I'm pretty sure you're channeling Kamala, yes Kamala, and we know this by what we can see, unburdoned by what has been.
You're right about "not knowing". This is why people won't go to the doctor to check up on obvious problems....they fear finding out something is wrong and there's this mentality that if you aren't told it's not real. A friend's brother got a hernia and he was afraid to deal with it. The hernia got so large and protruded out so far it looked like he had a second penis. After more than a year of this, he had some sort of medical emergency related to the untreated hernia, he ended up with major surgery twice, and nearly died. All because he didn't want to "know".
Denial - now more than a really long river!