4 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Perry Simms's avatar

This is full-on bullshit. Look at the sources they cite for example. The experimental graphene antenna operate in the teraherz band. Bluetooth opertes in the gigaherz band 2.402-2.48. A teraherz antenna can't send at bluetooth wavelengths which are a thousand times longer.

These people are shooting shit with a shotgun and seeing whom they can grift some donations from.

[It's also trivial to test with a friend. Install bluetooth scanner app. Go somewhere away from bluetooth devices. Have jab victim approach. You won't see a bluetooth beacon.]

Expand full comment
Flo's avatar

Graphene Oxide, nanobots, all of that vaccine related BS cracks me up. They are toxic because of the mRNA, the LNPs and maybe the Spike protein is also toxic (not convinced about that, though).

Expand full comment
Mira's avatar

Could you post the DOI or other source identifier for the paper(s) that you refer to? The list of sources is quite long at the end of the documentary.

Expand full comment
Perry Simms's avatar

From their bibliography nothing indicates gigaherz-band research.

https://www.comusav.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/bibliografiaA-MikAndersen.pdf

bbasi, Q.H.; El-Sallabi, H.; Chopra, N.; Yang, K.; Qaraqe, K.A.; Alomainy, A. (2016).

Terahertz channel characterization inside the human skin for nano-scale body-centric

networks. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 6(3), pp. 427-434.

https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2542213

Abbasi, Q.H.; Nasir, A.A.; Yang, K.; Qaraqe, K.A.; Alomainy, A. (2017). Cooperative in-

vivo nano-network communication at terahertz frequencies. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 8642-

8647. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2677498

Aliouat, L.; Rahmani, M.; Mabed, H.; Bourgeois, J. (2021). Enhancement and

performance analysis of channel access mechanisms in terahertz band. Nano

Communication Networks, 29, 100364.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2021.100364

etc

Expand full comment