I think your points are valid, although she isn’t the type to give in to peer pressure. She actually felt she did her due diligence by consulting a biochemist friend and a physician friend, both of whom supposedly researched the vaccines thoroughly and didn’t have any concerns. She admitted that she didn’t have the bandwidth to invest th…
I think your points are valid, although she isn’t the type to give in to peer pressure. She actually felt she did her due diligence by consulting a biochemist friend and a physician friend, both of whom supposedly researched the vaccines thoroughly and didn’t have any concerns. She admitted that she didn’t have the bandwidth to invest the amount of time researching that I did, and I conceded I’m not surprised she and her friends came to the conclusions they did given that the Ministry of Truth is censoring any facts/evidence that counter their carefully crafted narrative. I absolved her of blame for believing what the authorities told her but encouraged her to start asking questions. I asked her questions like, “Why do you trust BigPharma? Why do you trust mainstream media? Why do you trust Big Tech? Why do you trust the government? Why would you trust BigPharma over the victims they are viciously silencing? Why would Pfizer act like Maddie de Garay doesn’t exist when she volunteered to be part of a clinical trial for teens that was supposedly intended to identify safety concerns they could address? Why haven’t the vaccines been pulled off the market when they have resulted in millions of reports of adverse reactions and tens of thousands of deaths whereas every other vaccine in history was immediately pulled after a tiny handful of AE’s? Why are they forging ahead with a global mass vaccination policy of a brand-new technology that has not undergone long-term clinical trials and that scientists predicted would put selective pressure on the virus to mutate into potentially more virulent forms, which has proven true? Why are they mandating a vaccine that has been proven both unsafe *and* ineffective? Why is anybody risking their life and health to take an untested product in response to an infinitesimal threat? Why did BigPharma smear ivermectin and other cheap, effective treatments that would have prohibited them from securing the EUAs? Why is there a media blackout on vaxx injuries/deaths while they blare out COVID cases based on fraudulent PCR tests and deaths ‘with’ not ‘of’ COVID? Why did they thwart the development of natural herd immunity in evidence by December 2020 when that is what has gotten us out of every other situation like this in history? Why, if this is about health, was there absolutely no mention of preventative health measures that could be taken, emphasis on dietary and lifestyle changes, or advocacy of early treatment protocols?” And dozens upon dozens of other questions she couldn’t answer.
When she brought up the flu vaccine, I replied, “Exactly—why have they never mandated that, and why is the response to this virus so different to all past responses?”
When she asked me why they would lie, I said, “Totalitarianism, and trillions of dollars in recurring profits.”
She was most moved by the stories of the victims and the cruelty with which BigPharma had treated them. I can only hope she will be true to her word and watch the Ron Johnson panel I shared with her.
Here’s the kicker—she had a friend who died of cardiac issues after getting vaxxed! But she also knew several people who died “of” COVID, so I think she weighed the risks and felt it was worth it.
"She was most moved by the stories of the victims..."
This is part of the problem. People are making emotional decisions based on what amounts to a very small number of unfortunate outcomes.
There is no doubt that the number of adverse outcomes deserves withdrawal of this ineffective treatment, but pointing out a few heartbreaking cases that changes people's minds, should show us all just how little actual evidence can be recruited to steer people in the direction TPTB want us to go.
I see your point, but I would not call more than 4 million reports of adverse reactions worldwide, including tens of thousands of deaths, “a very small number”! And considering self-reporting systems are notoriously significantly underreported—combined with the unprecedented amount of pressure on medical facilities and professionals NOT to report—that number is likely exponentially higher in reality.
I think your points are valid, although she isn’t the type to give in to peer pressure. She actually felt she did her due diligence by consulting a biochemist friend and a physician friend, both of whom supposedly researched the vaccines thoroughly and didn’t have any concerns. She admitted that she didn’t have the bandwidth to invest the amount of time researching that I did, and I conceded I’m not surprised she and her friends came to the conclusions they did given that the Ministry of Truth is censoring any facts/evidence that counter their carefully crafted narrative. I absolved her of blame for believing what the authorities told her but encouraged her to start asking questions. I asked her questions like, “Why do you trust BigPharma? Why do you trust mainstream media? Why do you trust Big Tech? Why do you trust the government? Why would you trust BigPharma over the victims they are viciously silencing? Why would Pfizer act like Maddie de Garay doesn’t exist when she volunteered to be part of a clinical trial for teens that was supposedly intended to identify safety concerns they could address? Why haven’t the vaccines been pulled off the market when they have resulted in millions of reports of adverse reactions and tens of thousands of deaths whereas every other vaccine in history was immediately pulled after a tiny handful of AE’s? Why are they forging ahead with a global mass vaccination policy of a brand-new technology that has not undergone long-term clinical trials and that scientists predicted would put selective pressure on the virus to mutate into potentially more virulent forms, which has proven true? Why are they mandating a vaccine that has been proven both unsafe *and* ineffective? Why is anybody risking their life and health to take an untested product in response to an infinitesimal threat? Why did BigPharma smear ivermectin and other cheap, effective treatments that would have prohibited them from securing the EUAs? Why is there a media blackout on vaxx injuries/deaths while they blare out COVID cases based on fraudulent PCR tests and deaths ‘with’ not ‘of’ COVID? Why did they thwart the development of natural herd immunity in evidence by December 2020 when that is what has gotten us out of every other situation like this in history? Why, if this is about health, was there absolutely no mention of preventative health measures that could be taken, emphasis on dietary and lifestyle changes, or advocacy of early treatment protocols?” And dozens upon dozens of other questions she couldn’t answer.
When she brought up the flu vaccine, I replied, “Exactly—why have they never mandated that, and why is the response to this virus so different to all past responses?”
When she asked me why they would lie, I said, “Totalitarianism, and trillions of dollars in recurring profits.”
She was most moved by the stories of the victims and the cruelty with which BigPharma had treated them. I can only hope she will be true to her word and watch the Ron Johnson panel I shared with her.
Here’s the kicker—she had a friend who died of cardiac issues after getting vaxxed! But she also knew several people who died “of” COVID, so I think she weighed the risks and felt it was worth it.
"She was most moved by the stories of the victims..."
This is part of the problem. People are making emotional decisions based on what amounts to a very small number of unfortunate outcomes.
There is no doubt that the number of adverse outcomes deserves withdrawal of this ineffective treatment, but pointing out a few heartbreaking cases that changes people's minds, should show us all just how little actual evidence can be recruited to steer people in the direction TPTB want us to go.
I see your point, but I would not call more than 4 million reports of adverse reactions worldwide, including tens of thousands of deaths, “a very small number”! And considering self-reporting systems are notoriously significantly underreported—combined with the unprecedented amount of pressure on medical facilities and professionals NOT to report—that number is likely exponentially higher in reality.