185 Comments

The real issue is whether Congress or the doj have any desire to show how bad things really are.

If not, perhaps they benefit too much from the same waste and corruption.

Expand full comment
author

this might actually be quite a workable little compromise.

they round up all the bad guys and nail them for "destruction of federal documents" and "conspiracy to destroy evidence" or failure to follow federal rules or perjury.

they hand out fines and jail time.

and they never have to actually delve into the "what happened" part and can sweep that under the rug while still making a pretense to "justice having been done."

crazier things have happened.

Expand full comment

Typical scapegoat situation likely for sure.no doubt Tony will get to retire on his stolen riches.

Expand full comment
founding
May 23·edited May 23

The real issue we have is thousands of fucktards like Morens who could on any given day unleash the second man-made global catastrophe in history.

Expand full comment

A Confederacy of Dunces

Expand full comment

They are working on that now…

Expand full comment
founding
May 23·edited May 23

Right?! And another plandemic is just one possibility out of a limitless total available market for fuck ups.

It's like we have an endless caravan of Inspector Clouseaus in white Ford Broncos going the wrong way on I-5 and thinking the gridlock is a surprise heros parade just for them.

Expand full comment

"It's like we have an endless caravan of Inspector Clouseaus in white Ford Broncos going the wrong way on I-5 and thinking the gridlock is a suprise heros parade just for them."

Where do you come up with this stuff? - Poetry!

Expand full comment
founding
May 23·edited May 23

Lots of voices in my head. Sometimes they sync...lol

Expand full comment

Ah huh, maybe you better have that checked out.

Expand full comment

Can't help pondering the question: Who is the more incompetent bumbling buffoon, the fictional Clouseau or the all too real Brandon?

Expand full comment
founding

Hands down that full diaper in an empty suit currently in the white house

Expand full comment

If there were any real investigative journalists left in the MSM to hold their feet to the fire, maybe they'd have to. But alas.

Expand full comment

Ya think? :)

Expand full comment

All of us here are like, le duh. But the folks who are so propagandized, they can’t process true information - what/when is the course correction? ‘Cause I have a shit ton of evidence accumulating for these folks.

Expand full comment

“Perhaps”??? We all know they do!

Expand full comment

Just being diplomatic, but I agree it’s a giant tax funded feeding frenzy

Expand full comment

Haha, that’s because you’re nicer than I am! I’m one of those “the hell with diplomacy” kindda gals!

Expand full comment

I’d give anything to see the punishment for all sorts of people, low AND high & not just in the US, but I wonder if there is enough courage & decency left in the world to do so

Expand full comment

There is.., I just know it! And courage grows when others are exposed to it! Have faith!

Expand full comment

Giddy up partner!

Expand full comment

“morens had the email hygiene of a 70’s bathhouse.”

Best Quote. Funny yet disturbing.

Expand full comment

^

Expand full comment

And still nothing in the mainstream media....infuriating.

Expand full comment

I wish I could say that I was surprised.

Expand full comment

Thanks Mr. Gato. Nothing like starting my day with a laugh. So, "can “i did not know that lying to congress was illegal!” be far behind?" I think the regime has found their replacement if dementia Joe needs to go.

Expand full comment

Lying to Congress is illegal, unless you're a politician or working for them. I think it's the height of irony that you can go to jail for lying to a bunch of sleazebags whose entire career is based on peddling lies.

Expand full comment

Yeah, but only if you’re not a liberal. They get an automatic “get out of jail” card!

Expand full comment

When I was working in preclinical pharmaceutical research we were repeatedly told to be careful when composing and sending e-mails because even if deleted they can still be retrieved and used against you. Apparently David and co. didn't get that memo.

Expand full comment

Looks like a whole flock of memos just sailed right past him.

Expand full comment

^

Expand full comment

I just don’t know why anyone has to tell anyone else to “be careful writing emails.” Really? Why? You don’t have to be careful writing anything when you are dealing with truth and transparency. If something you write ends up hurting a department or cause, then maybe it should! These people giving the warnings anger me just as much as those like Morens.

Expand full comment

Bingo!

Expand full comment

That’s only if you’re flying in coach. This gang is in first class...nothing will happen to them except maybe they will fail up.

Expand full comment

I think he just got to cocky so thought why bother being careful. I am muy importante persona.

Expand full comment

"we were repeatedly told to be careful when composing and sending e-mails because even if deleted they can still be retrieved"

But they can't retrieved if they're sent via Gmail, or when he just swings by Tony's house on the way past from the office.

This town deserves a better class of criminal.

Expand full comment

In my public school teaching days (ended only 3 yrs ago) the same warning was given us faculty.

Expand full comment

I think it might be likely that, like banks, they thought themselves ' too big to fail'... ot at least too important for the grimy hands of peons to touch.

Expand full comment

Knocking it out of the park again.. seriously, my days become a lot lighter when they’re exposed to your word waterfalls! The tide has definitely turned and I for one can’t wait to see these evil morons sink! Absolutely splendid my dear fellow! Macht weiter! 👍

Expand full comment

Word waterfalls… gonna save that for every fast-speaking obfuscationist I come across!

Expand full comment
May 23·edited May 23

It probably sounds better in the original German. 🤔

Word Waterfalls - nice!

Expand full comment
May 23·edited May 23

I just added a little German at the end as I like that saying….the original was English, and a nod to el gato’s love of alliteration! I live in Switzerland but I’m from Canada, the newly minted despotic land. …. Perhaps it’s been for a while now….so long away, but I no longer recognize it. By the way, the phrase is pretty similar in English…word is Wort, and waterfall is Wasserfall….it’s very clear that English is primarily a Germanic language….cheers!

Expand full comment

"I live in Switzerland but I’m from Canada, the newly minted despotic land."

*snicker*

L'Chayim!

(that's 'gesoffen!' from right to left)

Expand full comment

Hebrew! Love the language! My children both learned it at school in Munich; their father was Israeli! My knowledge is lacking but I understand a little. 😊 cheers back to you! I hope you’re not Canadian. I mean no disrespect but I’m so disappointed in my country of origin. Disappointed with most nations at the moment.. as well as a majority of humans.

Expand full comment

I am not Canadian. I'm a United Stater but am a little ashamed of my mother's homeland, Jolly Old England.

I've found that one of People's greatest challenges is that they're Only Human.

Expand full comment

word waterfalls!

Expand full comment

Unfortunately, Congress can't really punish anyone, just refer them to the Prog Black Hole of Justice, aka the DoJ.

Nothing will happen. Zero. Nada. He knows it, the DoJ knows it, Fauci knows it, everybody knows it. Plus, the committee vote will be along party lines, and most likely die in the full house. Why? Because Pfizer and the ChiComs owns those folks, at least a majority.

I pray for a red wave, a Trump sweep, and then maybe some will deservedly hang by their necks until dead.

Expand full comment

Trump would need to completely clean out the DOJ, which is problematic. But, if he succeeds, it would be interesting to see who in Congress tries to run interference for Fauci and Big Pharma.

Expand full comment

All of them except a handful! They’re bought and paid for.

Expand full comment

I hope it’s either Trump OR RFKJr. Truthfully I don’t see Trump cleaning out the corruption quite as well as RFK will. RFK is interesting to listen to and so refreshing, completely outside of the circus and issues focused, the issues we all care about right now. So many of our problems are downstream of the corruption and collusion with media, which is why I think that is the single most important issue to tackle first, and everything else can then start to be addressed. But if the primary focus is on all these other issues first, it will never stop the bleeding that the corruption is causing so it will be one step forward and three steps back. RFKJr truly wants to tackle the corruption and return the power to the people. I’m glad I ignored all the false accusations about him and sought out to hear him for myself first. He is not at all what either side wants us to believe. I’m not going to wholly agree with any candidate, so I’m not going to let lesser issues that I disagree with keep me from voting for someone who abhors all this corruption. I figure I can’t lose voting for RFK. Either I help him win and our nation wins, or … Trump ends up winning anyway and we are a step closer in the right direction. Either is preferable today.

Expand full comment

Strip away a couple of hot issues, and RFK is a proggy prog who advocates a strong central gubmint, universal health insurance, higher taxers, climate change, reparations, etc.

I liked the guy until digging into who he really is.

Expand full comment

I’ll keep digging then. I hadn’t seen any of that yet. Hearsay yes, but not directly from him.

Expand full comment

I admire his brave stance against vaxxxxxes.

I admire anyone who promotes transparency and anti-corruption.

I understand why he does not trust the deep state based on his father and uncle.

But beyond those two issues, there is nothing about RFK I could advocate, much less vote for.

He has a long history of uber-prog positions.

Head of the CDC/FDA? Sure. He'd be great. POTUS? No way.

Expand full comment

BUT, point me to his own words or his own record that shows something more urgent than the censoring and corruption, please, and I’ll listen. But it can’t be passing on what you’ve heard about him. It has to be supported by his own words and actions. And it has to Trump the present infringement on our freedoms.

Expand full comment

You need to dig deeper into RFK.

Expand full comment

None of those other issues will ever be handled properly until corruption is under control. That’s why I’m compromising for now.

Expand full comment

Now is NOT the time to compromise. He’s so far left it’s ridiculous.

Expand full comment

They will NEVER let him win! The Deep State is just as afraid of Bobby as they are of Trump. Neither of them are interested in this, but I’d love to see a Trump/Kennedy ticket!

Expand full comment

He’s 100% anti-2A despite what he has said in the last 18 months. Do you ever fully trust a former heroin addict?

He is correct on vaxxines and government corruption.

Expand full comment

If the way to end all the corruption and clean up Washington is to let in a candidate that we will have to fight to hold back his anti-2A legislation, then I would. I’d rather fight to protect our second amendment and win that than have to fight one more day for ALL our freedoms and still lose the way we have over the past four years. We were no longer a democracy at all and Washington was nothing short of a dictatorship. Do you really think we have any chance in hell of protecting and preserving our right to bear arms with the present state of our government. Right now they can control the narrative and media to convince most of America to forfeit their arms. It ALL has to change from the inside. Power needs to be returned back to the people and I do believe RFK desires to do that. I’m not sure Trump can since so much of the swamp will remain on the republican side and they need to go too. RFK may hold some positions I deeply disagree with, but I don’t believe he won’t force his will on us in the same way the current administration does, ignoring what the majority of America wants. He does believe in the process of democracy. The current administration does not, they despise it because it is a threat to their own personal agendas. RFK has no personal agenda but to clean up the corruption and the Covid nightmare.

Again, what good is doing anything with any of the other issues while the corruption is as bad as it is? First things first. We can’t let these issues keep us from being able to clean up Washington first. Everybody wants to charge the civil war angle and fight each other or charge the capital and hang everybody - rather than first trying a candidate that does want to stop all the corruption and give us back our power. RFK used to be a Democrat, sure, but even he has had enough and no longer aligns with how they believe, think, or do things. They no longer represent him. That’s why he went independent. The Democratic Party of his uncle and prior is no more, and shows no sign of returning. He said that himself and believes it strongly. And the fact that he used to be addicted to heroin, actually beat it, and never tries to hide it, says more about his character than those that try to use his past addiction of his youth as a weapon against him today. God help me if anyone used the sins of my youth to judge the person I am today. I grew up, wised up, and faithed up. I am a new creation and nobody has a right to discredit me using who I used to be, or the mistakes I made in my 20s, or even early 30s! C’mon, we are better than that. Those are leftist tactics and I won’t partake.

We are so used to candidates saying whatever they think you want to hear just to get elected, but here’s a guy saying what he believes regardless the backlash it causes him. He believes it’s right to stand up to Washington. I wanna see him do it.

Expand full comment

Correction typo above: I don’t believe he WILL force his will on us.

Expand full comment

He's just an old leftie.

Expand full comment

However, some of those issues are easier to reverse or get control of later whereas ending the corruption is not. Corruption really has to be the first thing a new president addresses.

Expand full comment

RFK Jr. wants to pay billions in reparations to black people.

Expand full comment

Yeah that’s an example of a lesser issue that I won’t let get in the way of combating all this corruption. When I say lesser issue I don’t mean it’s unimportant. I just mean it’s something we have time to work with him on later after we get this corruption under control. If the guy who doesn’t want reparations wins but can’t end this corruption, what benefits that?? People who only want one candidate to win will use any issue they disagree with to sway others from voting for the other guy. I’m saying I have a preference, BUT I’m not looking to only have one candidate win. Either will make me happier.

Expand full comment

And I am for some things Trump wants to tackle that RFK is silent about, especially the nonsense of grooming in our schools. That’s why I can be happy with either candidate. But I think we ALL have to listen closely to EVERYthing both candidate is discussing. Trump is hurting himself by spending over 75% of his breath in a speech bashing Biden and the leftist radicals. Stop already. We agree. Spend more of your time addressing how you will rectify this Gestapo experience with Covid and ensure it can’t happen again. I want to hear more about how he intends to end all this corruption and the collusion between corporate/government/media. I don’t want to hear him bashing the other side. That’s their playbook. Show me you can play out of a better one like RFK. As soon as Trump starts to do that, I’ll start to support him more.

Expand full comment

You believe that RFK Jr. will be a champion of smaller government and the liberty of the individual and his choices?

Expand full comment

After listening to four of his speeches and interviews, yes I do. But there is more to research so I’m open to hearing otherwise. I’m not open to regurgitation of gossip being spread around. I want facts, evidence, I want to hear it from his own mouth before I believe it. The same way I am dealing with Covid in the media and rumors about Trump. I’m sick of hearsay.

Expand full comment

It's not a matter of hearsay but of a person's lifelong history, in and out of the public eye. We'd all be better off not being much persuaded by speeches.

Expand full comment
May 23·edited May 23

To be honest... I haven't seen such obviously self-incriminating emails since the Trump campaign. One of the most interesting features of these debacles is the selection bias and partisanship. Trump co.'s emails are almost as bad as these, and no one on the right cares. These emails are brazenly criminal, yet no one on the left cares.

Small brain: the other team is fascist/corrupt/evil!

Big brain: They're both bad, but my side is better.

Galaxy brain: Every last one of them is ball juice.

Expand full comment

Uniparty delenda est!

Or, as my friend Lillia says, The Elephant and Ass Show.

https://lilliagajewski.substack.com/p/the-elephant-and-ass-show?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

Expand full comment

What’s the over/under on the newspaper headline of Morens “dies suddenly”

Expand full comment

Can we use the new term “Boeinged?”

Expand full comment

You're thinking something like suicide by two bullets to the back of the head?

Expand full comment

Subtlety is not their strong point so yeah, sounds about right.

Expand full comment

^

Expand full comment

This is funny. They must’ve felt invincible at the time and now they’re caught. Liars will lie and eventually all lies come out.

Expand full comment

"They must’ve felt invincible at the time and now they’re caught. "

It's called "Drunk on Power".

Expand full comment

Poor fellow. He will likely perish soon in an outbreak of that mysterious contagious disease, "Whitewater" which is highly toxic to anyone who threatens to expose "problematic" things.

Expand full comment

“Found deceased with 13 shots to his head. Ruled self inflicted. Case closed”. Hope he puts out a statement stating he is not suicidal!

Expand full comment

It was Covid.

Expand full comment

With covid.

Expand full comment

I can’t imagine he is sleeping well at night at this time. Can you imagine the levels of anxiety?? He knows he’s plankton. I don’t know how any of them are sleeping well right now. Living with excessive amounts of wealth can’t cover a guilty conscience. So if any of them ARE sleeping soundly, that’s proof they are completely inhuman and without conscience and should be treated as such.

Expand full comment

You’re assuming he HAS a conscience…I see zero evidence of that. If he’s not sleeping at night, it’s because he’s worried about being Epsteined, not because he cares about the death and destruction he’s been party to…

Expand full comment

you took the words right out of my fingertips! psychopaths have zero conscience.

Expand full comment

It's funny though that Fauci ensured all his underlings were morons so they were no threat to him. Funnier--turns out that morons are dangerous too.

Expand full comment

“the big question that remains is ‘will he turn squealer and/or pave a path to others who will?’”

-----------------

The biggest question is—is there anyone clean enough in DC who can take all of these guys down without getting himself destroyed as he tries?

[deleted duplicate comment]

Expand full comment

If there is, the CIA would already be inserting the child pornography onto their laptops.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately DC is filled with more than enough morons to make the CIA's mischief unnecessary. It's not like the Moms for Liberty pair were a unique anomaly. OK--those two weren't in DC. They were in Florida.

Expand full comment

Of course, that's why it's hard to find someone with the integrity needed to clean up DC. However, if such a person arose, the deep state would simply create crimes with which to smear them. For example, I would not say that Trump is a man of particularly high integrity, but it was high enough that the deep state had to create Russia Gate, and they continue to do it now. If RFK Jr. was to become a much bigger threat Biden, and thus to Big Pharma, you can bet that all kinds of dirt, real or fake, would be coming out.

Expand full comment

No, this is nonsense. Trump has no integrity. It's just that he wasn't the one they wanted to win.

RFK Jr. has so much of his own home-grown dirt they don't need to manufacture any more of it.

All of these people are a cross-section of us. We the American people keep electing them because they lavish our districts with filthy money that no one wants to forswear. We need to fix ourselves if we want to fix DC.

Expand full comment

Nonsense? No, it's a spectrum. There is no People = Good, Politicians = Bad. Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean that they have no integrity. It is a myth of the Left that businessmen have no integrity. The reality is that a businessman with no integrity soon has no business. Some people who have worked for or with Trump love him, others hate him. No one has come forward with a credible case that Trump committed fraud against them. He would best be described as "cut-throat", but then most successful businessmen are. In the end, everyone has home-grown dirt and most people will accept a certain amount. The real differentiater is ideology. Someone who you don't dislike, or might even admire, becomes a zero-integrity criminal when you find that their ideology is significantly different from yours.

Expand full comment

Your remarks here are entirely irrelevant to what I wrote.

Expand full comment

So much this.

Expand full comment

^

Expand full comment

Don’t be surprised if Morens ends up having an “accident” and ends up dead before he can do any “testifying” 😉. Something tells me these guys know of some viruses that might take care of business quietly 🤣. Live by the virus, die by the virus 😃

Expand full comment

The thing he repeatedly said was that he moved to using Gmail out of fear for Peters safety...that release of the contents of official emails via FOIA might jeopardize Dazak.

That should have prompted a whole series of questions ...

1) why would FOIAD emails jeopardize Dazaks safety? Is it because Dazaks GOF work might have led to the death of millions?

2) do any of the emails mention his concern about Dazaks safety? If not ,why?

Etc

Maybe he truly was worried about Dazaks safety...

Expand full comment