Clearly, you must get command of the data, with the huge proviso that all the “data” appears to be bogus. (See phony PCR test story about number of cycles being run, add in the labeling games around cause of death reporting, add in designed to fail VAERS reporting system, add in the deliberate destruction of the control group for vaccine…
Clearly, you must get command of the data, with the huge proviso that all the “data” appears to be bogus. (See phony PCR test story about number of cycles being run, add in the labeling games around cause of death reporting, add in designed to fail VAERS reporting system, add in the deliberate destruction of the control group for vaccine tests, add in suppression of Ivermectin (see Dr.Pierre Kory) add in Phizer’s criminal record—for starters. Really, I would say you have to be a sociopathic loon to persist in overlooking the obvious “tells” that this thing is a crime against humanity. Dr. Judy Mikowits has impressed me with her talks, I would drill down by reading her books to learn her technical arguments, as well as studying Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Michael Yeadon, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Charles Hoffe, America’s Frontline Doctors are some of the clearest and most heroic in their service that I have run across to date.
Oh, and I forgot to add in one more thing about the “data.” It just plain old hasn’t had time yet to even reveal itself, so how can these learned numbskulls be insisting that they “know” it is safe? They are flying blind. This is not anything that takes an expert to see. Long established safety protocols in the field have been skipped! Come on man!
Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets.They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years.
Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche. Moderna’s most advanced competitors, CureVac and BioNTech, have acknowledged the same challenge with mRNA. Each is principally focused on vaccines for infectious disease and cancer, which the companies believe can be attacked with just a few doses of mRNA. And each has already tested its technology on hundreds of patients.
“I would say that mRNA is better suited for diseases where treatment for short duration is sufficiently curative, so the toxicities caused by delivery materials are less likely to occur,” said Katalin Karikó, a pioneer in the field who serves as a vice president at BioNTech.
Clearly, you must get command of the data, with the huge proviso that all the “data” appears to be bogus. (See phony PCR test story about number of cycles being run, add in the labeling games around cause of death reporting, add in designed to fail VAERS reporting system, add in the deliberate destruction of the control group for vaccine tests, add in suppression of Ivermectin (see Dr.Pierre Kory) add in Phizer’s criminal record—for starters. Really, I would say you have to be a sociopathic loon to persist in overlooking the obvious “tells” that this thing is a crime against humanity. Dr. Judy Mikowits has impressed me with her talks, I would drill down by reading her books to learn her technical arguments, as well as studying Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Michael Yeadon, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Charles Hoffe, America’s Frontline Doctors are some of the clearest and most heroic in their service that I have run across to date.
Oh, and I forgot to add in one more thing about the “data.” It just plain old hasn’t had time yet to even reveal itself, so how can these learned numbskulls be insisting that they “know” it is safe? They are flying blind. This is not anything that takes an expert to see. Long established safety protocols in the field have been skipped! Come on man!
Here's a link to a pre-covid article that talks about the safety issues with repeated doses.
https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/13/moderna-therapeutics-biotech-mrna/
Some quotes:
Delivery — actually getting RNA into cells — has long bedeviled the whole field. On their own, RNA molecules have a hard time reaching their targets.They work better if they’re wrapped up in a delivery mechanism, such as nanoparticles made of lipids. But those nanoparticles can lead to dangerous side effects, especially if a patient has to take repeated doses over months or years.
Novartis abandoned the related realm of RNA interference over concerns about toxicity, as did Merck and Roche. Moderna’s most advanced competitors, CureVac and BioNTech, have acknowledged the same challenge with mRNA. Each is principally focused on vaccines for infectious disease and cancer, which the companies believe can be attacked with just a few doses of mRNA. And each has already tested its technology on hundreds of patients.
“I would say that mRNA is better suited for diseases where treatment for short duration is sufficiently curative, so the toxicities caused by delivery materials are less likely to occur,” said Katalin Karikó, a pioneer in the field who serves as a vice president at BioNTech.
...so much that’s Pfishy...