"they'd understand that 100% prevention of transmission is impossible."
I don't think reasonable people expected 100% prophylaxis.
But at least some efficacy should have been the minimal requirment for mandates, for driving job losses (either by refusing the vax or their company not surviving the economic downturn), divisive language again…
"they'd understand that 100% prevention of transmission is impossible."
I don't think reasonable people expected 100% prophylaxis.
But at least some efficacy should have been the minimal requirment for mandates, for driving job losses (either by refusing the vax or their company not surviving the economic downturn), divisive language against the skeptical, and especially censorship.
It's hard to justify censorship under almost any circumstances but, if you are going to smother every dissenting voice, you should sure be closer to Correct than our BigPublicHealth betters are.
"they'd understand that 100% prevention of transmission is impossible."
I don't think reasonable people expected 100% prophylaxis.
But at least some efficacy should have been the minimal requirment for mandates, for driving job losses (either by refusing the vax or their company not surviving the economic downturn), divisive language against the skeptical, and especially censorship.
It's hard to justify censorship under almost any circumstances but, if you are going to smother every dissenting voice, you should sure be closer to Correct than our BigPublicHealth betters are.
Given that we are injecting a drug into healthy people, I argue that safety has to be even more important than for other drugs, vioxx notwithstanding.
Anybody that fell for the promise of "two jabs to get back to normal" was a retard.
Just do the OPPOSITE of whatever Jews say if you want to live longer and/or make more money. EASY.
"Just do the OPPOSITE of whatever Jews say"
I'll just leave this here without comment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
10 lbs of hate in a 5 lb bag.
Ignore him
Oy gevalt iz mir!