There are other systems for reporting vaccine adverse events; but, of course, they aren't public.
According the Robert Malone, the FDA chose not to require more stringent data collection and reporting of the Pharma companies. According to Peter McCullough, the FDA chose not to set up an independent safety monitoring board, which he bel…
There are other systems for reporting vaccine adverse events; but, of course, they aren't public.
According the Robert Malone, the FDA chose not to require more stringent data collection and reporting of the Pharma companies. According to Peter McCullough, the FDA chose not to set up an independent safety monitoring board, which he believes is unprecedented.
Clearly, they anticipated problems and took steps to hide them before the jabs were even approved. This isn't incompetence. This is malfeasance. This was the plan. And, of course, they have many useful idiots in media and tech and the general public parroting their talking points and trashing anyone who mentions the VAERS data.
FYI, attorney Thomas Renz has filed a motion for preliminary injunction against the vaxx EUAs. He has a whistleblower who claims that there were about 45,000 deaths within 72 hours of injection in the CMS data bases as of mid-July.
The fraud of the FDA approval is written into the document:
"We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion. [...]
We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and ***identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.***
Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks."
I agree, but most people won't see this or won't read this or will dismiss it outright. I know...I'm related to some of them. The cognitive dissonance is hard to crack. I joke that we're stuck in a sci-fi movie and about to learn that our elected "leaders" have been replaced by space alien lizards to release some of the frustration.
I hope that most of the captured...when confronted with the reality of tens of thousands of dead people...especially elderly and poor dead people...will be shaken from their stupor and wake TH up.
There are other systems for reporting vaccine adverse events; but, of course, they aren't public.
According the Robert Malone, the FDA chose not to require more stringent data collection and reporting of the Pharma companies. According to Peter McCullough, the FDA chose not to set up an independent safety monitoring board, which he believes is unprecedented.
Clearly, they anticipated problems and took steps to hide them before the jabs were even approved. This isn't incompetence. This is malfeasance. This was the plan. And, of course, they have many useful idiots in media and tech and the general public parroting their talking points and trashing anyone who mentions the VAERS data.
FYI, attorney Thomas Renz has filed a motion for preliminary injunction against the vaxx EUAs. He has a whistleblower who claims that there were about 45,000 deaths within 72 hours of injection in the CMS data bases as of mid-July.
You can read the plaintiff's motion here:
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/files/alabama-preliminary-injunction/
And Canadian Professor Jessica Rose estimates there are ~150k vaccine related deaths.
https://covexit.com/vaers-what-do-the-data-tell-us/
The fraud of the FDA approval is written into the document:
"We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including the clinical study design and trial results, did not raise concerns or controversial issues that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion. [...]
We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and ***identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.***
Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks."
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
There isn't even any need for a whistleblower.
I agree, but most people won't see this or won't read this or will dismiss it outright. I know...I'm related to some of them. The cognitive dissonance is hard to crack. I joke that we're stuck in a sci-fi movie and about to learn that our elected "leaders" have been replaced by space alien lizards to release some of the frustration.
I hope that most of the captured...when confronted with the reality of tens of thousands of dead people...especially elderly and poor dead people...will be shaken from their stupor and wake TH up.