Happy Easter. Looking forward to your analysis.
There might be one study that won't be done but could shed light on the long-covid gaslighting. Look at unvaxed, i.e., never vaxed, who had a bad case of covid-19 to see if they have residual issues. It's possible that such persons were overwhelmed with spike and could have many of the s…
There might be one study that won't be done but could shed light on the long-covid gaslighting. Look at unvaxed, i.e., never vaxed, who had a bad case of covid-19 to see if they have residual issues. It's possible that such persons were overwhelmed with spike and could have many of the same issues as vax injured. If this is the case, while it might seem to support the gaslighters, it would rather prove that the vax causes the worst of the worst covid symptoms. The correct conclusion would be to never vax, but to administer early treatment to prevent problems in the first place.
I mean, this really IS the question. If care was focused on treating early and stopping viral replication, could the symptoms we colloquially identify as "long covid" be minimized or prevented?
The unvaxed in my family who got Covid did have some severe issues afterwards, some with blood clots going to the lungs. They took Ivermectin at the onset of Covid along with an antibiotic and anti inflammatory (Dr. McCullough’s protocol). I had the J&J jab (stupid me) and when I got Covid also did Dr. McCullough’s protocol) and had pretty severe gastro problems for months.
It’s obvious that the spike protein in the bioweapon that Covid is and the spike protein (which I’m also calling a bioweapon) in the jabs can create some severe issues both at the time of illness and lasting well past the illness. I’m not sure how we are going to be able to tell the difference in the jabbed and nonjabbed for those who get Covid. It should be easy to tell in the jabbed who have issues who have not had Covid.
Happy Easter. Looking forward to your analysis.
There might be one study that won't be done but could shed light on the long-covid gaslighting. Look at unvaxed, i.e., never vaxed, who had a bad case of covid-19 to see if they have residual issues. It's possible that such persons were overwhelmed with spike and could have many of the same issues as vax injured. If this is the case, while it might seem to support the gaslighters, it would rather prove that the vax causes the worst of the worst covid symptoms. The correct conclusion would be to never vax, but to administer early treatment to prevent problems in the first place.
I mean, this really IS the question. If care was focused on treating early and stopping viral replication, could the symptoms we colloquially identify as "long covid" be minimized or prevented?
I’m thinking Yes.
The unvaxed in my family who got Covid did have some severe issues afterwards, some with blood clots going to the lungs. They took Ivermectin at the onset of Covid along with an antibiotic and anti inflammatory (Dr. McCullough’s protocol). I had the J&J jab (stupid me) and when I got Covid also did Dr. McCullough’s protocol) and had pretty severe gastro problems for months.
It’s obvious that the spike protein in the bioweapon that Covid is and the spike protein (which I’m also calling a bioweapon) in the jabs can create some severe issues both at the time of illness and lasting well past the illness. I’m not sure how we are going to be able to tell the difference in the jabbed and nonjabbed for those who get Covid. It should be easy to tell in the jabbed who have issues who have not had Covid.