4 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

"it would have been worse...." and that is because the TV told them that the shots don't keep you from catching or spreading COVID, but they will definitely reduce symptoms and keep you from dying.

But I do have several friends who apparently caught COVID early on in 2019 and they were very sick -- they said it was worse than anything they'd ever had.

Since Omicron, I have not heard of a single person saying they have anything worse than "mild." Must be the vaxxes doing their work, right?

Expand full comment

I don't think anyone seriously denies that the "vaccines" provide some protection*. I believe the current official line is the (mRNA) jabs provide some protection against serious illness. In defense of Pharma (something I rarely do), they never promised the jabs would provide high protection against infection or transmission (and I believe that claim is factually correct, although I've not verified it for myself.) Beyond all doubt, there have been plenty of false statements by our President and many others who should have known better, of course, that the jab would protect one from getting sick, etc. Therefore the general charge by Our Side that the public has been substantially lied to from the outset is substantially true.

*I'm the first to admit that this "protection" is of dubious value. In the first place, most people are at near-zero risk of the virus. Secondly, the protection at best lasts several months. Thirdly is the let's-pretend-nothing-is-wrong taboo topic of nasty side effects.

Expand full comment

They have to provide some level of protection for a certain period of time --- because otherwise the virus would not be challenged ... and we'd not see the endless mutations (which Bossche claims will culminate in a very lethal highly contagious variant).

If anyone is suggesting that this short period of protection is something to celebrate... they've got it very much wrong.

Expand full comment