Bingo. I'm wrestling with the implications re:how to be a voice for noncompliance at my work. There's a reason this has come as far as it has: it's risky, and isolation tactics make it worse.
The best strategy I have heard is to ensure that your employer knows in no uncertain terms that they will be held liable for adverse reactions. Remind them not even the pharma companies face that liability. Zero chance they take that risk.
If 10% say "shove it" most employers can't afford to lose that many peopl5, what with the fat unemployment checks keeping so many home. You have leverage.
this comes down to normalizing doing so.
if one company refuses, they'll be pounded into submission.
if a million companies refuse, the regulators will be relegated to irrelevance.
Bingo. I'm wrestling with the implications re:how to be a voice for noncompliance at my work. There's a reason this has come as far as it has: it's risky, and isolation tactics make it worse.
build coalitions then rise as one.
make the few realize they are not the many and that the crowd is not with them by gathering the isolated into community and standing together.
that seems like the way. the divided get conquered. the united cannot be.
The best strategy I have heard is to ensure that your employer knows in no uncertain terms that they will be held liable for adverse reactions. Remind them not even the pharma companies face that liability. Zero chance they take that risk.
If 10% say "shove it" most employers can't afford to lose that many peopl5, what with the fat unemployment checks keeping so many home. You have leverage.