229 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 19, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Satan's Doorknob's avatar

It'll be interesting to see what, if any, challenges to the law occur. Of course I don't support such a law as it can only further state capture of medicine. I've little legal knowledge, but I suspect that "misinformation" is a bit vague. The law usually wants more specific definitions. States have much greater power to limit "speech" of a business than of a private citizen. But it's not clear that muzzling doctors is a good use of such power.

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

Legal challenges take years to play out. Unless an injunction against the law is given for the duration of the trial, by the time of the judgement the law will have become engrained in practice regardless the outcome.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Pliers and blowtorch's?

Expand full comment
Will's avatar

That was my thought when I first heard about it. How in God's name can they dictate how your doctor treats you. I know, I know...it's California, but trying to cancel doctors because they had a different opinion on how to treat their patients is totalitarian madness. I bought some Ivermectin just to have on hand. Haven't had to use it, but I am not sure of the proper dose for a 175 pound male. Anybody here know?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 19, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Will's avatar

Thanks!

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

Drummers! Beat the Long Roll!

Expand full comment