PCR test inventor Kary Mullis is on video discussing why the test does not diagnose anything, and there is the issue of the cycle count as mentioned by Mullis. No one of prominence has ever discussed this publicly. Around various Substacks and other alternative places, everyone knows about this, of course. But most people and virtually all the MSM appear to have no idea, or were ordered not to talk about it. My daughter (nurse) had to get the damn test weekly. More than once she tested positive, then got a repeat test that was negative. Yep...pandemic of testing for sure. The testing drove the narrative.
It"evolved". Initially we had to have 3 negatives in a row to discharge a patient. As you may have guessed each day was a different answer. Money being lost on new admits meant rule changes and changing from PCR to the quick testing method. Save with sick staff. Initially stay off duty for 10 days, then no fever for 3 days then heck, if you feel ok come in.
Yes. It was always a pandemic of testing. It really is that straightforward.
PCR test inventor Kary Mullis is on video discussing why the test does not diagnose anything, and there is the issue of the cycle count as mentioned by Mullis. No one of prominence has ever discussed this publicly. Around various Substacks and other alternative places, everyone knows about this, of course. But most people and virtually all the MSM appear to have no idea, or were ordered not to talk about it. My daughter (nurse) had to get the damn test weekly. More than once she tested positive, then got a repeat test that was negative. Yep...pandemic of testing for sure. The testing drove the narrative.
It"evolved". Initially we had to have 3 negatives in a row to discharge a patient. As you may have guessed each day was a different answer. Money being lost on new admits meant rule changes and changing from PCR to the quick testing method. Save with sick staff. Initially stay off duty for 10 days, then no fever for 3 days then heck, if you feel ok come in.
To clarify, PCR just amplifies the amount of "testable" virus. Testing without amplification resulted in more"negatives".
I'm convinced!