I think they key to understanding the situation is to realize it isn’t a vaccine. The mRNA platform is a novel biomedical technology. The hope in the industry was that its use as vaccine was just the tip of the iceberg. mRNA was the cure to cancer. We don’t need conspiracy theories about depopulation to understand why the pharmaceutical…
I think they key to understanding the situation is to realize it isn’t a vaccine. The mRNA platform is a novel biomedical technology. The hope in the industry was that its use as vaccine was just the tip of the iceberg. mRNA was the cure to cancer. We don’t need conspiracy theories about depopulation to understand why the pharmaceutical companies and medical establishment would throw all caution to the wind yo get these “vaccines” approved. If the general public could be made to understand the situation regarding the mRNA platform, it would be far easier to get them to question whether they are safe.
Agree 100%., Covid was used as a pretense to roll out this technology as the next big thing. It was a solution in search of a problem. The plan was to gain maximum uptake by calling it a vaccine (trusted tech), then they could later point back to the tech's success for future roll outs. They weren't counting on all the adverse effects and it's blatant failure to actually work. Plus they underestimated the army of citizen researchers and reach of the FOIA laws. They also weren't counting on one-quarter of the population rejecting it outright thus ensuring a sizable control group.
No conspiracy theories needed to explain it (though they are always fun).
The general public are getting it I think based on the dwindling number of people taking boosters and increasing numbers of mRNA doses being tossed in the trash.
Using the vaccine label also allowed any skeptics to be labeled as antivaxxers, which brings to mind quacks who believe vaccines cause autism and other issues. It made arguments against the technology easy to dismiss. The irony is that people who never really had a reason to question traditional vaccines are now taking a more scrutinizing look at them. The aforementioned quacks may have not been quacks at all, and I foresee more push back from parents over childhood vaccines.
There is a video of Fauci and some of his pals discussing at the end of 2019 how they could get people to accept mRNA "vaccines" to replace the standard ones; they suggested the need for a massive "disruption" which would change peoples' attitudes.
The CEO of Bayer also made a speech recently in which he said that a few years ago, no one would have accepted a genetic therapy, and now that has changed (to his benefit.)
I think they key to understanding the situation is to realize it isn’t a vaccine. The mRNA platform is a novel biomedical technology. The hope in the industry was that its use as vaccine was just the tip of the iceberg. mRNA was the cure to cancer. We don’t need conspiracy theories about depopulation to understand why the pharmaceutical companies and medical establishment would throw all caution to the wind yo get these “vaccines” approved. If the general public could be made to understand the situation regarding the mRNA platform, it would be far easier to get them to question whether they are safe.
Agree 100%., Covid was used as a pretense to roll out this technology as the next big thing. It was a solution in search of a problem. The plan was to gain maximum uptake by calling it a vaccine (trusted tech), then they could later point back to the tech's success for future roll outs. They weren't counting on all the adverse effects and it's blatant failure to actually work. Plus they underestimated the army of citizen researchers and reach of the FOIA laws. They also weren't counting on one-quarter of the population rejecting it outright thus ensuring a sizable control group.
No conspiracy theories needed to explain it (though they are always fun).
The general public are getting it I think based on the dwindling number of people taking boosters and increasing numbers of mRNA doses being tossed in the trash.
Using the vaccine label also allowed any skeptics to be labeled as antivaxxers, which brings to mind quacks who believe vaccines cause autism and other issues. It made arguments against the technology easy to dismiss. The irony is that people who never really had a reason to question traditional vaccines are now taking a more scrutinizing look at them. The aforementioned quacks may have not been quacks at all, and I foresee more push back from parents over childhood vaccines.
There is a video of Fauci and some of his pals discussing at the end of 2019 how they could get people to accept mRNA "vaccines" to replace the standard ones; they suggested the need for a massive "disruption" which would change peoples' attitudes.
The CEO of Bayer also made a speech recently in which he said that a few years ago, no one would have accepted a genetic therapy, and now that has changed (to his benefit.)
Vaccines as we’ve come to understand them are nothing more than toxic cocktail witches brews. Everyone of them.