A few things are indisputable:
1. There has been a concerted effort by the purveyors of the COVID vaxx to cover up the data that would be useful in assessing efficacy. This, in spite of the fact that the "vaccines" were labeled "experimental" from the get-go, and promises were made about assessing safety and efficacy on the fly. This…
1. There has been a concerted effort by the purveyors of the COVID vaxx to cover up the data that would be useful in assessing efficacy. This, in spite of the fact that the "vaccines" were labeled "experimental" from the get-go, and promises were made about assessing safety and efficacy on the fly. This kind of hanky-panky can not be described as accidental. It surely is deliberate and speaks to the existence of some truth which it is hoped will remain concealed.
2. All-cause mortality rate differences between blacks and whites are not adjusted for socio-economic factors that might differentiate these groups, so conclusions are hard to have confidence in. Were there changes in the socio-economics of the British black population in 2022? Seems unlikely, but we really have no data on whether this could be related to the dip in Black all cause mortality. Or was it that White all cause mortality actually increased relative to Blacks because more Whites had received the booster, which evidence suggests increases mortality significantly compared to getting just one or two jabs?
3. The life insurance data, which has skyrocketed since the introduction of the vaccines combined with the relative lack of increase in all-cause mortality prior to the vaccines (i.e., in 2020) is the strongest naturalistic evidence that COVID-19 was not a significant health crisis, and that the vaccines were the actual and true health health crisis, and the probable cause of the spike in the death rate which began in January 2021.
A few things are indisputable:
1. There has been a concerted effort by the purveyors of the COVID vaxx to cover up the data that would be useful in assessing efficacy. This, in spite of the fact that the "vaccines" were labeled "experimental" from the get-go, and promises were made about assessing safety and efficacy on the fly. This kind of hanky-panky can not be described as accidental. It surely is deliberate and speaks to the existence of some truth which it is hoped will remain concealed.
2. All-cause mortality rate differences between blacks and whites are not adjusted for socio-economic factors that might differentiate these groups, so conclusions are hard to have confidence in. Were there changes in the socio-economics of the British black population in 2022? Seems unlikely, but we really have no data on whether this could be related to the dip in Black all cause mortality. Or was it that White all cause mortality actually increased relative to Blacks because more Whites had received the booster, which evidence suggests increases mortality significantly compared to getting just one or two jabs?
3. The life insurance data, which has skyrocketed since the introduction of the vaccines combined with the relative lack of increase in all-cause mortality prior to the vaccines (i.e., in 2020) is the strongest naturalistic evidence that COVID-19 was not a significant health crisis, and that the vaccines were the actual and true health health crisis, and the probable cause of the spike in the death rate which began in January 2021.
Much quackery afoot with the “safe and effective” quackcines. (Oh, they were effective all right!)