Discover more from bad cattitude
teflon tony goes to langley?
just when you thought you'd seen the bottom of the rabbithole
i am old enough to remember when “covid-19 escaped from a lab” was a “conspiracy theory.” to my own embarrassment, i initially suspected this was correct because using coronaviruses as a base for a bioweapon seemed like a poor choice and it was my presumption that this was the claim.
then i came across the whole peter daszak story and the wild and reckless GoF projects to work on various forms of vaccines and some truly crazy ideas about spreading hotwired covid to wild bat colonies. and everyone from ecohealth to peter hotez has their snouts in the trough.
this changed my mind and made “lab leak” look to me like by far the odds on (and frankly, near certain) choice. it also made an awful lot of people look like overt and deliberate liars not least of which was teflon tony himself. last i checked, perjury to congress is still a crime but hell, who knows these days?
the whole affair became one vast fox commission investigating the henhouse murders as the very people who funded and made this mess were empaneled to suss out who done it. it’s been a truly top to bottom whitewash from start to what seemed like the finish.
but might the third act be warming up?
it sure seems possible.
as many of you likely saw, a whistleblower came forward to discuss the fact that a number of CIA analysts appear to have been paid to change their takes on covid origins.
and now guess who looks to have been right in the middle of this imbroglio? oh yeah, the fauch-meister, faucharama, the fauch a ding ding: talking-point tony himself.
because this is totally normal, right? (bold mine)
According to information gathered by the Select Subcommittee, Dr. Anthony Fauci, then-director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, played a role in the Central Intelligence Agency’s review of the origins of COVID-19. The information provided suggests that Dr. Fauci was escorted into Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Headquarters—without a record of entry—and participated in the analysis to “influence” the Agency’s review.
the above text comes from this letter:
and while, sure, they are just asking some questions here (for now) goodness, they certainly do seem to be some VERY specific questions. one might even go so far as to call them “the sort of questions one only asks if one already knows the answer” but you know me, “mr suspicious paws.”
this certainly has some interesting dovetails into “the great pivot” where fauci and numerous others all suddenly went from “it’s fine, go on a cruise, masks are silly, go live your life” to the crazed and evidence free covidian stances of lock down, mask up, and jab, jab, jab that they instantly adopted upon the arrival of debbie birx to the white house (after being sent not by health agencies, but by the national security advisor.)
and there certainly was an awful lot of poorly explained and deeply unusual military involvement in and around covid.
just how deeply were the intelligence and security agencies in here? it’s quite an interesting question and one to which it would seem some real answers are more than a little appropriate. there sure was an awful lot of IC/milspec grade informational management policy running around all of a sudden.
maybe this is somehow innocent (ahem), but to find that the CIA had been captured for partisan purposes would be a national crisis. to find we were deliberately mislead by the intelligence folks for their own agendas would be far worse.
whatever the case, it seems we really need some answers here.
these are not questions that can be allowed to “just go away.”