Share this comment
The CIA has been captured since JFK. They took him out physically and DJT digitally. Every other president just carries out orders for corporations and their intelligence goons. Highly recommend reading The Devils Chessboard.
We are all living in a Mockingbird hoax world: yuribezmenov.substack.c…
The CIA has been captured since JFK. They took him out physically and DJT digitally. Every other president just carries out orders for corporations and their intelligence goons. Highly recommend reading The Devils Chessboard.
We are all living in a Mockingbird hoax world: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/leftist-manufactured-hoaxes-covid-climate-race
has been long time rigging elections ...
I am reading a book Mickey Z wrote years ago, about the US paying for hitlers reich. Very interesting. Also some Jews involved. We know at least one!
I like Bad Catitude a lot but this there-are-Jews-involved talk makes me feel like I've stumbled into the wrong forum.
It's not the forum. It's a small handful of commenters.
If you appreciate the 1st Amendment, try the Read-Roll Eyes-Scroll Past method and engage with others.
Yes, I do appreciate the 1st Amendment and am certainly not looking to censor anybody -- we've had enough of that. It's just surprising though, reading these prejudiced-sounding comments. But you're probably right that it's not the forum, just a few wacky outliers. Good advice, thanks.
I am gay and have noticed a surprising number of comments about gays being child-molesters, etc. Those comments confirm my belief that left wing radicalism (ie all left wing thought) is a serious threat to you, me and any other group of people who is popularly believed to support the current Regime. Just as Obama set back race relations a century, Biden has undone decades of progress overcoming homophobia and antisemitism. I don't think this was unintentional The more outrageous their policies, the more polarized we become, and the more authoritarian they say they must be.
You might be on to something. I think the whole trans movement -- not trans people themselves but the insistence on "trans inclusive language" -- is dragging the LBG movement down. People like me are all for gay rights but balk at locutions like "pregnant people" etc. Insistence on these kind of gender neutral phrases and odd pronouns etc has led people to have a negative feeling about the rainbow flag. It's too bad.
Ivy educated, when it meant that net worth, pedigree and legacy status mattered far more than any other qualifications.
You cannot actually be surprised by the pedo obsession, given your education. It's part of your chosen package. It's unfortunate that 80+% of your comrades think that you're a deviant groomer.
It's the downside of the free speech. But the upside is completely worth it.
Agreed
Prejudiced is an interesting word, means pre judicial, pre-judged.
Revelation reveals veils of truth and doesn't care too much about prejudice. At first the wacky outliers seem mad. After a while, with more knowledge maybe they're not so mad. In the end they might be mad, that's true, but also perhaps there is truth in their madness, or maybe the truth lies somewhere inside the meaning of the words used that even the wacky outliers aren't aware of. Perhaps they haven't gone far enough in to the meanings of the slurs they use, but if they did, they'd find even more information.
Revelation is brutal on the psyche.
I don't completely understand your post, Aria Veritas. All I can say is that I am Jewish and I don't believe there's anything about being Jewish per se that predisposes people to be involved in pandemic evils. Lots of people were involved in such evils so, statistically speaking, it's likely that their number includes some Jews, as well as many people who are not Jewish. I'm not sure if the above posters meant to imply that there is something about being Jewish that predisposes people to evil actions, but if so that's indeed an unfortunate way of thinking.
Yes, it is an evil way of thinking, evil is live backwards, something we've all been doing for generations now, if not centuries.
What I'm saying is there might be some truth in the wacky outliers crazy takes on things, but perhaps even the wacksters haven't gone deeply enough in to the meaning of the words they use. Because if they had, they see they are also mistaken about who is behind the 'evil' or the way we 'live' these days, including themselves. Everyone wants a scapegoat, and never wants to look at their own actions.
I can't be more straightforward I'm afraid, because it is not a straightforward topic. It would take a week of very carefully thought-out, carefully worded labour to do it justice.
"It would take a week of very carefully thought-out, carefully worded labour to do it justice " - Or four grams of dried psilocybin mushrooms
How much of this is simply due to circumstance? Whether we like it or not, Jews (European/Askhenazi) are among the most intelligent people in the world. This fact, in part, explains why they are disproportionately found in positions of great expertise etc. Historically they lived as distinct culture within a host society. Some of the segregation was imposed by the Gentile, to be sure. But a lot of it comes from the insular nature of Judaism and the individual culture -- mixing with the outsider is discouraged. Jews tended to offer badly needed services to their "host": money lending, skilled trades, and so forth. Problem: less successful (Gentile) will sometimes think himself taken advantage of (whether true or not). Secondly, in-group loyalty would tend to mean a Jew would favor his own over outsiders.
Please note that all, or nearly all, of the above would apply to any isolated clan, whether it was Gypsy, Traveller, or some other past or present group.
If the above is mostly correct, it means that a lot of antipathy to Jews is simply due to their success -- too much success, in the eyes of the envious. At first being a blessing, but sometimes getting too powerful and being seen as a curse is even reflected in Hebrew tradition: e.g. the story of how Jospeh rose from slavery to be second in command in Egypt, yet ultimately the tribes were "asked to leave" posthaste.
Let’s play a thought experiment. Imagine the stereotypical bigot who blames all the world’s problems on the Jews. Imagine a world where they had never existed. Wouldn't it be likely that the world would still have many, perhaps all of the ills that you ascribe to the Jews? Of course it would. You would just blame a different group.
People confuse Jewish people with Zionist Jews or Zionist Kabbalists. They are not one and the same. While I can get along with most anyone, I’m not real thrilled at the idea of getting chummy with people who support religious practices which call for my demise or servitude and enslavement.
There are Jewish people in Israel working very hard to preserve Palestinian’s human rights and sovereignty. There are Muslims pushing for reformation not unlike Christians enacted years ago. These people give me hope for a brighter future.
The traditionalists? I’ll just leave that there.
yup ... and with Zionists (who are not necessarily Jews) and with Israelis, and with followers of the religion Judaism (plenty of Jews are atheists).
People don't think very rigorously.
Satan's doorknob:
All true: a clear explanation of the common view.
And just because something is one possible explanation, it does not follow that it is the only explanation, or the correct one.
You may disagree with Churchill and all the others who believe in a "high cabal" (plenty of them have written about it). One possibility is that there is no high cabal, and bankers have never funded wars(!)
Another is that there are small interdependent groups which could be loosely described as a high cabal.
Apropos Jews: if the cabal exists, it is possible that there are
- no Jews;
- a few Jews, just as there may be a proportional number of any other group;
- a disproportionat number of Jews for whatever reason;
- all Jews.
But - even if the last of these possibilities were the case, it would not reflect at all on all the other Jews, the 99.99999% of them. They are only responsible or their own behaviour. It would not prejudice me or any rational person against Jews ... any more than I would blame English people for the excesses of Rhodes and Milner e.g.
Another point to bear in mind is that Jews alive today are a different group of people from those in previous centuries and in different places, even though they try and retain some cultural continuity. Some of those cultures would have behaved differently from each other, and certainly from today's Jews. This is very obvious if you read Solzhenitsin's "200 Years Together", or compare the lot and culture of black jews in Israel, semitic Jews in the Middle East, Caucasian Jews in Western Asia or New York.
Exactly the same could be said of White people, or Black people. The cultural circles I move in today, as a white man are very different from those white men who formed the Mormons, or ancient Druids, or ran the British Empire.
A small number may share their sentiments here, but tip of the iceberg ..
Imagine my surprise, reading Substacks written by rational guys with a powerful inclination towards rigor of data analysis and a real aversion to nonsense, and finding their comments sections full of hysterical apocalypsers talking endlessly about Jesus.
Think of this place as a big back yard with room for anyone to pull up a chair, and eventually you find the people you enjoy kibbitzing with, and the ones best laughed at in passing.
I cannot get around it, when the book mentions a few traitors who sold out their own people. Got nothing against all the regular people, but I don't like traitors and I don't like the few, who are in the government (elected or not) and rule everything to benefit ones at the cost of others. That goes for all religions, colors, and whatever you want. People in govt should not do this, not for anyone.
There's no need to jump from "some Jews involved" to "they must be rabid anti-Semites". Jews are a large group. Just like other large groups (Americans, Muslims, golfers or the left-handed) you will find good and bad, rich and poor, empathetic and psychopathic. They don't get a pass.
The comment about Jews being involved is probably made because the reader was surprised to find hard evidence of Jews funding Hitler. (E.g. Wall St. and the Rise of Hitler by Anthony Sutton). Either you knew that, or you would find it ironic or surprising or significant in some way.
Oy vey!
Jews are ALWAYS involved!
Everystein, Singleberg and Timeowitz would agree but would squeal on the Vatican as their partner in crime. Both groups point to Phoenicians, and to priest class generally.
Christi A. Grimm?
Saint George, of the CROSS?
The burning BUSH?
The "virus" came from the needle like so many of our modern diseases. It is the 'venom' of the 'snake'; the caduceus, medicinal men are the priest class, always have been.
They're trying to tell us.
Link, please.
Link? To a book? Perhaps you are requesting the title?
https://www.amazon.com/Saving-Private-Power-Hidden-History/dp/188712845X
indeed, I can only give a link to a page where you can see or eventually, buy, the book. I took the first link I found which was amazon for which I am sorry, it is probably available elsewhere, even though it has some age to it
Absolutely! https://liborsoural.substack.com/p/rome-never-fell-the-empire-never
The CIA rigs elections around the world. The last U.S. one was no exception.
Ha! Would you please explain that to my son in law!
Think he'd listen?
Hell no! He still thinks Paul Rino..uh I mean Paul Ryan was a great republican. 🤪
Beat me to it. The cia is basically the enemy of most people living here. Citizens, anyhow. They're a great friend to the invaders. Time to eliminate them.
Schumer predicted the Trump challenges from the intel community. the fact that he did so gleefully says a lot about our Senate Majority Leader
Also Behold a Pale Horse, published in 1991
I think it would be more accurate to say that the CIA was bifurcated from the beginning, into those doing the intended service for the president and the corrupt powers-that-be.
See "stovepiping", Ray McGovern, and Fletcher Prouty.