And just because something is one possible explanation, it does not follow that it is the only explanation, or the correct one.
You may disagree with Churchill and all the others who believe in a "high cabal" (plenty of them have written about it). One possibility is that there is no high cabal, and bankers have never funded wars(!)
Another is that there are small interdependent groups which could be loosely described as a high cabal.
Apropos Jews: if the cabal exists, it is possible that there are
- no Jews;
- a few Jews, just as there may be a proportional number of any other group;
- a disproportionat number of Jews for whatever reason;
- all Jews.
But - even if the last of these possibilities were the case, it would not reflect at all on all the other Jews, the 99.99999% of them. They are only responsible or their own behaviour. It would not prejudice me or any rational person against Jews ... any more than I would blame English people for the excesses of Rhodes and Milner e.g.
Another point to bear in mind is that Jews alive today are a different group of people from those in previous centuries and in different places, even though they try and retain some cultural continuity. Some of those cultures would have behaved differently from each other, and certainly from today's Jews. This is very obvious if you read Solzhenitsin's "200 Years Together", or compare the lot and culture of black jews in Israel, semitic Jews in the Middle East, Caucasian Jews in Western Asia or New York.
Exactly the same could be said of White people, or Black people. The cultural circles I move in today, as a white man are very different from those white men who formed the Mormons, or ancient Druids, or ran the British Empire.
Satan's doorknob:
All true: a clear explanation of the common view.
And just because something is one possible explanation, it does not follow that it is the only explanation, or the correct one.
You may disagree with Churchill and all the others who believe in a "high cabal" (plenty of them have written about it). One possibility is that there is no high cabal, and bankers have never funded wars(!)
Another is that there are small interdependent groups which could be loosely described as a high cabal.
Apropos Jews: if the cabal exists, it is possible that there are
- no Jews;
- a few Jews, just as there may be a proportional number of any other group;
- a disproportionat number of Jews for whatever reason;
- all Jews.
But - even if the last of these possibilities were the case, it would not reflect at all on all the other Jews, the 99.99999% of them. They are only responsible or their own behaviour. It would not prejudice me or any rational person against Jews ... any more than I would blame English people for the excesses of Rhodes and Milner e.g.
Another point to bear in mind is that Jews alive today are a different group of people from those in previous centuries and in different places, even though they try and retain some cultural continuity. Some of those cultures would have behaved differently from each other, and certainly from today's Jews. This is very obvious if you read Solzhenitsin's "200 Years Together", or compare the lot and culture of black jews in Israel, semitic Jews in the Middle East, Caucasian Jews in Western Asia or New York.
Exactly the same could be said of White people, or Black people. The cultural circles I move in today, as a white man are very different from those white men who formed the Mormons, or ancient Druids, or ran the British Empire.