6 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Laura Garcia's avatar

Did you see my comment on Meryl Nass’ substack regarding the clip of Tom Bancel’s reference to 100,000 doses and upping production to a billion doses because a pandemic is coming?

Everyone is busy debating the context....while missing the obvious.

Some say, he isn’t referring to COVID vaccines. Some say that even though a pandemic had not been declared, by January (when Davos happens) it was clear elsewhere in the world that a virus was on the loose.

But here is the thing.....

Even if those two things are true...

Explain to me how it is that Bancel upon. Ok’ing back from Davos seems so self assured that there will not be any drugs, repurposed or otherwise, already available to battle the virus?

How come he clearly has a mindset at that time that the production (billion doses) will be needed or desireable? He is in the pharma business....he clearly knows that clinical trials are long and involved. After all, Moderna was incorporated in 2010 and had failed precipitously for the better part of a decade in failing to bring to market any product. Despite their hype on the mRNA technology they had failure in clinical trials.

His comment would suggest that he knows an EUA will be in the mix, but again....how could that be? After all, docs in the US and elsewhere had yet to really try to counter the virus and it’s symptoms/harm with what was already available.

So...I’m my mind, his statement is an admission that he knew full well that the shock and fear campaign was about to be unleashed and that those who would narrate the crisis had already decided that this would be a perfect opportunity to do a global clinical trial and make huge $$$$ for future research of a technology that had this far failed to live up to its promise of making them able to “engineer man’s own evolution.”

When you look at all the supposed mitigation efforts....social distancing, masking, lockdowns, constant counting on the news of those who died and later....how many unvaccinated died....you can see that the measures were clearly designed to get the shot into as many as possible.

And if one wonders why it had to be everyone....I still think that was largely about muddying the waters for the general public and masking the obvious problems with the vaccine that have now become apparent.

If they had only vaccinated one group...like the elderly, it would have been much easier to zero in on safety signals.

Good for thought.

Expand full comment
JC's avatar

mRNA is here to stay. Australia is building new Moderna mRNA plants. Australia plans to inject all it's beef in 2023 with mRNA for foot in mouth. Flu shots will start coming up through this channel. The bi & tri-valent shots are coming up through this channel. It almost makes me wonder if the whole plandemic was for the purpose of putting mRNA in every living thing to control the biome.

Expand full comment
Laura Garcia's avatar

That is definitely worth consideration. What is it about the mRNA platform that has these guys hell bent on introducing it to living entities....humans, plants, animals? While they tout it as a novel approach that will mitigate against disease.....they are wholly ignoring the harm done or adverse reactions. So, begs the question.....are the shots, technology, and or infusion of mRNA about something else or even just a step towards some bigger idea/innovation?

I have done a little bit of research on this company called iBio that has been working on using mRNA technology in plants as a means of vaccination through food.....what the hell? And if they develop this kind of technology and decide it is for our benefit to receive said “vaccination” will they bother to tell us? Or will they simply push it out in the supply lines under the guise of “common good”? It is frightening really. Have you read anything about them exploring using plants as a means of implementing this technology on a larger scale?

Expand full comment
JC's avatar

Currently my belief is running that they are using the mRNA to insert self-assembling nanotech. When they are ready, they will "turn it on."

If nothing else, it is a bioidentifier for compliant vs. non-compliant.

But why? Because they can....because it is there....when you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Expand full comment
Laura Garcia's avatar

I agree and am concerned about their real motives. Did you read my substack on Charles Lieber? Some things don’t add up.....or do, when you consider the new normal requires us to accept 2+2=5 and asking questions---NOT ALLOWED and if you persist you are labeled a conspiracy theorist or are viewed as a leper by the compliant. It is all very disturbing.....made worse by the fact that so many seem to not recognize the non-sequitors or propaganda being drilled into the masses. Ugh.

Expand full comment
JC's avatar

There are THREE lights!!!!!

The agenda - I used to listen to Lee Camp, and he talked about how normal people just go through their lives, living, caring, raising children, working...it's the evil people who have long range plans. And they can't be good.

When I look at these plans, and the mofo's who are putting them in place - it's got to be about more than profit. How much gold can you have when you're dead? (as in, these plans have been going on for decades, maybe centuries - and the people who started this ball in motion - are now dead). With digital control, it makes American and French Revolution nigh impossible. We are so fucked.

I will check your substack - I like your writing style in comments, and I suspect we are sisters from another mother.

Expand full comment