I think it would be a more persuasive argument here if you could cite some clinical studies which have been peer reviewed. Whilst I am very concerned about the mRNA gene therapy experiment, I have not found anything substantive to convince me that the vaccines i grew up with throughout the 70s & 80s ever did anything but good.
Caveat her…
I think it would be a more persuasive argument here if you could cite some clinical studies which have been peer reviewed. Whilst I am very concerned about the mRNA gene therapy experiment, I have not found anything substantive to convince me that the vaccines i grew up with throughout the 70s & 80s ever did anything but good.
Caveat here is that formulations MAY have been changed in more recent times, surreptitiously - but, I think that the prevalence of so many hideous chemicals in our environment, food, air and water which are known to cause a wide range of neuro-toxic, endocrine disrupting, carcinogenic - 'every-genic' - along with the low quality of food/diets is far more likely to explain the uptick in all manner of chronic illnesses, conditions or diseases than a conspiracy to cause autism via a vaccine.
Occam's razor here comrades - and don't attack the messenger just because you don't agree. This kind of aggression and myopia is an extension of the outrage-mongering our dear elite have been stoking to keep us immobilised and disunited since time, and it really weakens the rest of our power to co-operate, organise and resist.
Having caught the medical establishment in a series of huge, fat lies and utterly evil, psychopathic behavior the only rational response is to discard everything they have ever said pending further review.
I agree wholeheartedly in most of what you say, except that 'we' should discard everything 'they' have ever said. This is very post-modernist and abandoning EVERYTHING so that 'we' can review everything is an enormous undertaking alone, and beyond impractical. There is proof about the efficacy of the polio vaccines for one thing, as we never see it in our daily lives.
If someone cheats you in business, you don't do business with them again unless there is no alternative. And if someone tells you a series of lies, you no longer trust statements they make.
That's called common sense and falls within the remit of the old Italian proverb "He that deceives me once, it’s his fault; but if twice, it’s my fault." which was first documented in “The Court and Character of King James,” written by Anthony Weldon in 1651. The English version is of course "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me". There's nothing post-modernist about it at all.
And you, or I (or anyone else) don't need to review everything. I just need to review any treatments proposed to me. And that's not an enormous and impractical undertaking at all. In fact it's probably something I should have done all along.
Specifically wrt to polio, I believe that in India the vaccine works, at least in part, by simply re-defining the diagnosis. In other words any child who gets polio symptoms after receiving a vaccine is diagnosed with something called "non-polio acute flaccid paralysis". The exact same symptoms would be diagnosed as polio in any child who had not been vaccinated. Thus polio disappears, only to be replaced by a larger epidemic of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis. See how that works? And how similar it is to the type of statistical fraud we have seen during the covid era?
I am not aware whether or not a similar position prevails, or even if any studies have been done, in more developed nations.
I agree with your point about taking personal responsibility for reviewing the treatments proposed to you. That endeavor still requires access to trusted sources of information. Doing that due diligence in the pre-internet 70's and 80's would be a much different task that doing so today.
Read the materials she cited. The burden of proof is on the person proposing to stick some chemical in you. That you didn’t perceive harm is not an RCT.
Dissolving Illusions is a must read. And yes formulations have changed. I heard a doctor say, that the old, single vaccine for measles worked pretty good, but that the multijab they give now, is not good for either of the 3 ingredients. That might have been Dr Wakefield. You might also want to check the ingredients of the jabs, if it reads PEG, that is a very poor ingredient in shampoo. Do you want that in your body?
Compare the vaccines you received to the current CDC schedule. There is very little overlap. DTP is no longer even available in the US as it is too dangerous but they dumped it on third worlders to kill their babies https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868131/
I think it would be a more persuasive argument here if you could cite some clinical studies which have been peer reviewed. Whilst I am very concerned about the mRNA gene therapy experiment, I have not found anything substantive to convince me that the vaccines i grew up with throughout the 70s & 80s ever did anything but good.
Caveat here is that formulations MAY have been changed in more recent times, surreptitiously - but, I think that the prevalence of so many hideous chemicals in our environment, food, air and water which are known to cause a wide range of neuro-toxic, endocrine disrupting, carcinogenic - 'every-genic' - along with the low quality of food/diets is far more likely to explain the uptick in all manner of chronic illnesses, conditions or diseases than a conspiracy to cause autism via a vaccine.
Occam's razor here comrades - and don't attack the messenger just because you don't agree. This kind of aggression and myopia is an extension of the outrage-mongering our dear elite have been stoking to keep us immobilised and disunited since time, and it really weakens the rest of our power to co-operate, organise and resist.
NBamaste.
Occam's Razor is a very narrow mathematical statement. It has no applicability to this situation.
See https://theethicalskeptic.com/2013/06/30/the-real-ockhams-razor/
Having caught the medical establishment in a series of huge, fat lies and utterly evil, psychopathic behavior the only rational response is to discard everything they have ever said pending further review.
I agree wholeheartedly in most of what you say, except that 'we' should discard everything 'they' have ever said. This is very post-modernist and abandoning EVERYTHING so that 'we' can review everything is an enormous undertaking alone, and beyond impractical. There is proof about the efficacy of the polio vaccines for one thing, as we never see it in our daily lives.
If someone cheats you in business, you don't do business with them again unless there is no alternative. And if someone tells you a series of lies, you no longer trust statements they make.
That's called common sense and falls within the remit of the old Italian proverb "He that deceives me once, it’s his fault; but if twice, it’s my fault." which was first documented in “The Court and Character of King James,” written by Anthony Weldon in 1651. The English version is of course "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me". There's nothing post-modernist about it at all.
And you, or I (or anyone else) don't need to review everything. I just need to review any treatments proposed to me. And that's not an enormous and impractical undertaking at all. In fact it's probably something I should have done all along.
Specifically wrt to polio, I believe that in India the vaccine works, at least in part, by simply re-defining the diagnosis. In other words any child who gets polio symptoms after receiving a vaccine is diagnosed with something called "non-polio acute flaccid paralysis". The exact same symptoms would be diagnosed as polio in any child who had not been vaccinated. Thus polio disappears, only to be replaced by a larger epidemic of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis. See how that works? And how similar it is to the type of statistical fraud we have seen during the covid era?
I am not aware whether or not a similar position prevails, or even if any studies have been done, in more developed nations.
Well said. Thanks.
I agree with your point about taking personal responsibility for reviewing the treatments proposed to you. That endeavor still requires access to trusted sources of information. Doing that due diligence in the pre-internet 70's and 80's would be a much different task that doing so today.
Read the materials she cited. The burden of proof is on the person proposing to stick some chemical in you. That you didn’t perceive harm is not an RCT.
Dissolving Illusions is a must read. And yes formulations have changed. I heard a doctor say, that the old, single vaccine for measles worked pretty good, but that the multijab they give now, is not good for either of the 3 ingredients. That might have been Dr Wakefield. You might also want to check the ingredients of the jabs, if it reads PEG, that is a very poor ingredient in shampoo. Do you want that in your body?
Compare the vaccines you received to the current CDC schedule. There is very little overlap. DTP is no longer even available in the US as it is too dangerous but they dumped it on third worlders to kill their babies https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868131/
And just the number of childhood vaccines, now recommended, is cause for concern…72…and now with Covid 75/76…!?!