774 Comments

But wait, look over here, it’s climate change!

Expand full comment

I just got in on the ground floor of a biodegradable, eco-friendly pitchforks-and-torches startup. I have a feeling that business will be a-boomin' by next spring.

Expand full comment

Fable ~ The Kings mate once said to the King "all you have to do is convince the pitchfork people that the torch people are trying to take away their pitchforks."

I truly hope the blame falls where it belongs and that the repercussions are swift and all encompassing.

Expand full comment

It’s doesn’t really seem like a fable anymore does it? Globalists know what they’re doing, pitting the virtue signalling injected against the ‘unclean’. Or the trans against straight. Or BLM against everyone. Or parents against child groomers….the list goes on and on with these made up issues of division.

Expand full comment

Parents against child groomers isn't a made up division.

Expand full comment

Might have been better said: "school boards against parents who are against child grooming."

Expand full comment

Divide et impera indeed but globalists

- Created the Trans psyop

- Created BLM

- Promote child sexual abuse

I'm not on board with you if your post meant to suggest we treat those groups as equal partners at the table -- that we've just been tricked into opposing them. That rather we should should accept their "alternative lifestyle" of child rape, genital mutilation, theft and looting.

Just to be clear...

Expand full comment

Dear God, please let the blame fall where it belongs and that the repercussions are swift and all encompassing.

I believe in the power of prayer!

Expand full comment

And look where that got you.

Expand full comment

Why do atheists always have to reply to every comment like this showing off their smug sense of superiority? Belittling others is like a compulsion with some of these people. Not only is it not persuasive, it just makes you look like a jerk.

Expand full comment

Not "look like".

Expand full comment

Agree. Not all of us do though, which makes it harder to see that we exist and are on the same side.

Expand full comment

Well you may inadvertently have a point James.

Prayer can bring nothing without obedience to God.

Our god Yaweh made it clear that we would be punished if we did not follow his law, and the nations clearly haven't. Yaweh's punishment is as obvious as natural consequences in the secular view.

And as his will be done, the agents of his punishment are the 'vessles of destruction', our enemies.

Expand full comment

Send me the link.

I'd like to pitchfork a few of the clowns....

Expand full comment

Any franchise opportunities?

Expand full comment

Cool and ah, good thinking. : )

Expand full comment

🔱🤡🤣 🔥

Expand full comment

The scary thing (as I posted on Senger's article) is that the fact that people like Birx are unafraid to incriminate themselves publicly means that they are certain that they have already won and have endless power to destroy the angriest mob imaginable. I'm also in the mood for pitchforks, torches and much more, but the bad guys are just salivating over the prospect since it will give them the excuse to declare martial law and put us in the camps.

Expand full comment

They are agents of Satan or true evil if you can’t go that far. The only truth any of this makes any rhyme or reason. Clear to me. This kind of Evil is indifferent to threats or pushback but the Bible says use The righteousness of God against the devil and he will flee. There is a spiritual battle being waged right now in every corner of the earth. Those of us awake and fighting back or resisting are in this battle. But not alone. Seeking Christ was my only option. Stay strong.

Expand full comment

Yes, there is that. Good point

Expand full comment

We have one already but it needs a good and thorough sharpening.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 23, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Same's true for rope, I suppose. But for now that's a flex-goal.

Expand full comment

I uppose it's worth pointing out that spears are reusable within a shorter timeframe than an ropes. Although both are 'safe and efficient'.

Expand full comment

Don't you mean "safe and effective" (just kidding, but Fauci's favorite phrase)

Expand full comment

Or moneypox.

Expand full comment

*moneypox

Expand full comment

The auld folks might remember this one. Apropos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBYZoc9lnvE

Expand full comment

climate change AND mon(k)eypox!!!

Expand full comment

inadvertently accurate

Expand full comment

"if we can just eliminate the people exhaling the C02 with these vaccines, we'll be doing a much better job working towards my mother and father's goals" -eugenicists

Expand full comment

Absolutely agree. Ending the Co2 emmisions from the wef, govt, cdc, fda, etc should end the crisis immediately.

I'm sure there's environmentally friendly diy guillotine instructions somewhere around here.....

Expand full comment

The longer they sweat in a bent over position while we figure it out the better. No instruction book necessary!

Expand full comment

and, as of today according to WHO - Tedros MONKEY POX is now a global health emergency (1 step short of being deemed a Pandemic).

Expand full comment

I know how to not get monkey pox. I’m not in that risk factor.....

Expand full comment

Or turn off the TV. Either way works🙂

Expand full comment

What the CDC can’t bring themselves to say to the gay community, is stop having sex for a few weeks. No, they’ll wait until it spreads in the heterosexual community. It must have to do with some sort of equity agenda.

Expand full comment

They want another pandemic. They don't want them to stop

Expand full comment

Right?

Expand full comment

Mon(k)eypox is just as much fakery as HIV/AIDS.

All instrumental for the FEARmongering ‘elitists’ and their collaborators which you will find everywhere in society but especially unfortunately in the ‘health’ sector, the indoctrinated lot that spreads information that is not valid.

Everything will come out in the open and it will happen in my lifetime.

Expand full comment

Unfortunately the double jabbed and boosted are immunosuppressed. They may be at higher risk for monkeypox even with non-sexual contact.

Expand full comment

How unfortunate that there is absolutely, positively no way to prevent its spread. amiright??

Expand full comment

Ohhhh what to do, what to do? Um, I mean what not to do, what not to do!

Expand full comment

AIDS II - The Sequel

(with CGI Rock Hudson & Liberace special guest appearances)

Expand full comment

Yeah,

They are trying it again and unfortunately people are buying into the shit.

Smell the mon(k)ey and turn away, no TV and you will be just fine. Live your life.

Expand full comment

If you haven't discovered Mark's Substack site yet, please do so today. He's the best and most original writer on Covid topics in America. Mark is one of those people who could never get a job at a real journalism or news site - because he's too good and can think for himself.

Expand full comment

I have taken the time to read a few of Mark’s writings. Going to be in the can’t miss category, along with Monica Hughes The Mariachi Years. Both are more than excellent

Expand full comment

I will add her..thanks! (I am assuming she is on substack!)

Expand full comment

Yes, she is.

Expand full comment

Thank you! Just subscribed. I don't know how I missed him all these months...

Expand full comment

I discovered him about five months ago. Every column he's written has been great. They are very well written, researched and always develop some original thought.

Expand full comment

Well written, thanks for the link. I, too once had a friend like that, didn’t live very long, so I get your point.

Expand full comment

Fortunately the people behind the plandemic are also behind the climate narrative. When that link is made and becomes public, questions will be asked and the weakness of the climate change narrative will be taken apart. At least, I would like to think that will be the case. Time will tell.

Expand full comment

MORE PLANDEMICS, CLIMATE EMERGENCY, WEATHER MODIFICATION, MASS DIE-OFF

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6FSnfB1zk3sp/

Expand full comment

We have SO many tipping points that need to happen soon before they get to the point of enforcing vaxx passes, digital ID, UBI, etc. Once that happens we are screwed.

Expand full comment

Do not EVER comply.

Expand full comment

I don't plan on it.

Expand full comment

ha! Love the pitchfork!!

Expand full comment

Why will they have to do THAT when Pfizer states that

"they only need to vaccinate 35% of the population who will

then infect the rest through the air they breathe and the touch of

their skin" with maladies that include "blood clots?" Sadly, they

seemed to "have covered all of their bases." Yeah. Possibly there is

no more need for those messy expensive death camps (FEMA?)

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 24, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

You are right, Anthony's "surface stations" project was one of the first crowd-sourced efforts that pretty conclusively showed "the science" was bunk, or at least highly skewed. I contributed a site myself to the project in Orange County, CA that had moved three times and went from being in the middle of nowhere to being surrounded by housing subdivisions.

Quality control on these sites was abysmal as they were never intended for use in trending long-term temperature trends within a few tenths of a degree. That didn't stop the climate scientists from trying though, seemingly oblivious to the well-known Urban Heat Island effect and poor station siting. As usual, their recommended "solution" is more money and power to the experts with us working stiffs doing what we are told and footing the bill.

Expand full comment

I'm going to look him up as I'm so sick of explaining the most obvious contradictions I've come up with myself. One is, why did all those Democrat (pro-GND) govs reverse the plastic bag ban over covid when the 'virus' isn't transferred by surfaces? Why do Gore et al. fly around in huge fuel-wasting planes? Why are massive SUVs and trucks still allowed when they were on the way out in the 1970-1980s? WHy was that reversed? And yeah, they are covering everything with concrete, think that doesn't make the temperature rise? There are so many things going on that cause the catastrophes we see; and then of course there is the fact that before everyone had a phone and surveillance video was everywhere, they went on but we didn't see them.

Expand full comment

(Like)

Expand full comment

It's terrible, with the price of gas, I can only afford either monkey pox or climate decorations. I do have some nice blue and yellow lights for sale.

Expand full comment

(Like).

Expand full comment

After Monkeypox comes climate change, yep.

Expand full comment

After? The climate change emergency has already been launched. Netherlands/Europe and Canada have already decided to decimate agriculture by restricting the use of fertilizer. The anti government protests have been ongoing for weeks now.

Expand full comment

I am more referring to the lockdown part of it that is surely coming.

Expand full comment

Yep, they definitely want another!

Expand full comment

💥

Expand full comment

I've seen recent articles that say that high temps (climate change) cause blood clots.

Expand full comment

And side-show Monkeypox now declared a World health ‘emergency’.

Expand full comment

While it's confirmed from the New England Journal of Medicine that it only affects gay men. How is that even possible? I call bullshit.

Expand full comment

Anal sex with hundreds of partners every year, while serially abusing amyl-nitrate (a known immune system wrecker) and other drugs makes you an orders of magnitude more at-risk superspreader of all kinds of infectious disease.

If left-handed redheads adopted this practice en-masse as a 'lifestyle choice' it'd be considered a left-handed redhead problem.

Expand full comment

That’s not what it says. It is affecting mostly gay people right now, but it can affect anybody. Cases normally are very few and confined to Africa.

It is a close contact disease and gay men have become its epicentre because of the behaviour of some of them at certain recent events because an infected person must have been at one of these events.

It is unlikely to spread into the general population therefore.

However - no crisis must go to waste - the bureaucrats who feed off crises are trying to suggest, as they did with HIV - that it’s a risk for everybody which it is, but the risk for 99.99999% is zero.

Expand full comment

Yeah, but that’s still a lot of angry customers.,,

Expand full comment

Ban beans. Beans means farts 😂👉💨😳

Expand full comment

😂 They already invented a mask for cows to control their C02 and burbs so I wouldn't be surprised by anything at this point. Probably already getting a vax ready for all us useless eaters for C02 control. I can see Gates with his Grinchy smile and rubbing his hands together like the creepy psycho he is.

Expand full comment

Thanks for picking up on the significance of Tucker's recent monologue. IMO this is big "news" as he is the first TV news anchor to touch the third rail of woke science reporting (basically, until this segment aired, no one at network TV could question the "truism" that vaccines are "safe and effective").

This is even more significant when we realize that Tucker has the No. 1 rated primetime news/commentary show in North America (he has 3 million nightly viewers). Furthermore, we know that Fox News - like all big media - probably gets 50 percent of its advertising revenue from Big Pharma. So Tucker is actually attacking the goose that lays the golden eggs for broadcasters and Internet sites. The fact he was allowed to broadcast his views is also significant. One can only infer that his bosses signed off on his monologue.

Yes, such commentary could and should have been broadcast two years ago, but better late than never, I guess. I think this IS a sign that taboo subject are not quite as taboo. Let's just hope Tucker and his colleagues at Fox News give "middle America" more information along these lines in coming weeks and months. They definitely have a network TV monopoly on this taboo subject. They will actually benefit long-term from being on the right side of history.

Expand full comment

But Fox is still considered by the Karen's as that Pro Trump channel and won't watch or listen. It is bunkum "(says my sister the tv devotee). I'm afraid that the mass fomation has been going on since 2016, and I doubt the powers that be want to reverse it...they will just point it towards climate change or something else, and all the Karen's will pivot in turn.

Gosh I am angry. Maybe only we that could see the lies are going to get angry when the shots don't work becomes common knowledge. Because I've been angry for 2.5 years at least, and for some reason, this soft going away of the Covid and the unwillingness of anyone to start accusing and naming names is making me doubly angry.

Expand full comment

I was at dinner with one of my triple injected friends last night who has had Covid twice now.

She can see part of what's not adding up, but can't quite get there. I finally just said "they're not vaccines". The shock on her face was priceless, but she couldn't dispute what I said.

I think all of "us" need to continue this.. one person at a time until they see.

Expand full comment

great idea. I'm working on family members but have to be gentle about what I say, like not saying "you may have ruined your immune system"

Expand full comment

The 'may' softens it, and if you change the 'ruined' to 'damaged', I think that's fine. Good to go.

Try to avoid saying: 'You have condemned yourself to an unavoidable and rapid decline towards death.'

Expand full comment

I just say “Your immune system has been decimated by the ‘vaccine’ - Bioweapon”. Has worked for a few. Not sugar coating it anymore.

Expand full comment

That a girl!! 💕

Expand full comment

Har! That does cross my mind, in similar words, but I'm trying to be kind.

The one that I want to say is "You have caused Dad to go into this steep decline." but I don't to my credit.

Expand full comment

You know your audience better than me, but how about: 'What could have happened to Dad since the vaccination to cause such a steep decline? I can't understand it.'

(Kidding aside, sending you good wishes across the interweb for your dad).

Expand full comment

Walk softly but carry a big stick concept. I like it

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Jul 24, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Only laughing because I know exactly those varied and loud emotions for the same reason

Expand full comment

Mattias Desmet, the Mass Formation Psychosis guy has said "give information, but do not try to persuade."

So maybe something like 'Is there any other vaccine out there that you have to take multiple times a year and you can still get the disease?'

Or "if my dog was vaxxed against rabies three times and still got rabies, I'd start asking questions."

Expand full comment

I find something a person is angry about, say taxes. Then I co-rant about taxes and go on to loss of freedoms to mandates to loss of small business to full on dictatorship and last but not least transhumanism. You know Carrot Stick like

Expand full comment

I just say “your smart you will figure this out, hopefully it won’t be too late” and just move on.

Expand full comment

hahaha

Expand full comment

Great suggestions!

Expand full comment

I have a couple of coworkers I keep reminding to listen very closely to their bodies and to never get a booster. I try to be gentle but patience has never been my strong suit.

Expand full comment

There is no time for gentle.

These people are idiots that put experimental substances into their bodies.

Expand full comment

I have just done that last week to a nurse. They're not vaccines, they're gene therapy. Her facial expression as the truth hit home actually made me sad

Expand full comment

Try this. Ask them when they got the polio vaccine was the purpose to prevent severe cases of polio in the future or was it that you would never have polio? Do you need polio booster shots every four months? Then maybe they'll get the difference between a real vaccine and what should really be marketed as a "therapy" that may or may not reduce your symptoms.

Expand full comment

Even polio was a con. DDT looks like the culprit and by the time the polio shots came out, DDT was in decline and again success was given to the vaccines. Google or Brave “Toxicology vs Virology: Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud” published in the New Eastern Outlook.

Expand full comment

Maybe I am around really dumb people but when I say that I end up having explain RNA and DNA and well everything. At least it keeps me on my toes.

Expand full comment

I don't think you're around really dumb people.

People have been made to believe that C0VID will kill you. Aka it is fatal. If the vaxxine does not work, that means, in their mind, they go back to that horrible place where they can die at any moment form COVID. I know that doesn't make sense; I know someone in Big Pharma that KNOWS I had COVID and knows I have natural immunity ,but still wanted me to get the vaxx. Because natural immunity doesn't work with COVID. It all comes down to being afraid, and their fear trumps their logic.

I feel sorry for them. And "they" include almost all of my friends and relatives.

Expand full comment

My personal opinion only: people need to have a understanding of DNA and RNA and how it’s involved in life. Maybe dumb was harsh but . . .

I do feel sorry and am overwhelmed with the needless, callus death and destruction but choices have been made.

Expand full comment

I would think RNA and DNA would be covered in grade school science, no?

Expand full comment

Not in the early 60s.

Expand full comment

Agree that people are discovering a lot on their own now. A lot of us have never known anyone who died from CoV back in the day, but we are seeing more and more of our vaccinated friends getting ill. That rings a bell that people who thought they were safe aren't. They bought the lie and are not happy about getting fooled.

Expand full comment

It's impossible to hide now.

My triple injected friend just keeps saying you must have an awfully strong immune system (as I've not had Covid or any shots). To be fair, I think everyone is at risk to contract it now.. it's just that THEIR risk is now higher than mine. That classic inversion story that the propagandists sold).

Expand full comment

Really hard to know if it's your immune system or some other factor leading to immunity. We know via the Princess cruise ship and the UK Challenge trials that some people are immune. Odd that nobody seems to want to study why that might be so. While Dr Prasad insists we all will get infected, I depend on mouth/nasal hygiene to protect me since I have had two shots and am maybe at great risk of infection.

Expand full comment

You probably had it and shook it off

of course, everyone will get it. The moment the virus left the Wuhan lab it was going to be an endemic virus

Expand full comment

and a good Vitamin D level. That (in a lot of studies) determines who get ill.

Expand full comment

It's funny you say that. I had some strange big in January 2020, then a bad cold in 2021... But took an antibody test and a T-cell test. Both came back negative.. so not sure what to make of that... except the tests are unreliable?

Expand full comment

I see them every day in the hospital setting.

Blood clots, new strange cancers in before healthy people and they are now younger. Cancers in remission suddenly jumps to stage IV. Strange infections. All types heart conditions.

Higher amount of infections after surgery, even after minor surgeries. Wounds that does not heal.

Chronic pains that has gone from bad to worse.

The common theme is the injections. Two or three of them. Still haven’t met anyone with a fourth shot.

I am currently working in Norway.

Expand full comment

(Like) but horrified for people.

All the jabbed around me who did the Pfizer are unwell

Expand full comment

How horrible! What is the state of mandating injections there? Are unvaxxed being locked out of society.

Expand full comment

No mandates even though many hospital administrators around the country ‘forced’/coerced its personell into taking it by saying that if they did not they could be out of work which was just BS. All illegal of course. They had ‘mandated’ face diapers at one time and I did not work for almost ten months because of that. I refused, and I refused testing.

The fake PCR-tests was the one thing that kept this shit going.

I am a contract worker and choose where and for how long I work. If I would have been in a steady place I still would act the same.

They tried locking out people, did not really sell well but more in Norway than in Sweden which is my birth country. There has been resistance in both countries and they have gained traction.

I am very open with my standpoint and have been since this plandemic started.

And I have met and treated/taken care of thousands of patients without getting ‘it’. The thing that does not exist.

Other workers in other fields have sort of been ‘mandated’ but many opted out. The percentage number that comes from the authorities concerning injections have to be looked upon as fakery even though many did take the experimental poison.

In Norway for instance it came out that the former Prime Minister, Erna Solberg wanted to hide the government actions for a hundred years, it did not taste well for the Norwegians.

They are kind of trying the same in Sweden.

Our so called FDAs and CDCs are heavily involved with the pharmaceutical industrial complex, same as everywhere else in the world.

Today and since months back all type ‘restrictions’ are gone. I never followed anyone, nor will I.

Expand full comment

Yes it matters that we speak up. Not always, not with everyone, it’s not always effective. But people speaking up is the reason for the Overton window shift.

Expand full comment

I work for a wealthy older gentleman. He claims to be a conservative republican. But he is on board with these vaccines 100%. About 6 months ago there was an article in the New York times talking about the vaccinated becoming angry with the unvaccinated. He tapped that article in disgust, looked at me and said, "I don't blame them. We should be angry."

The look on his face when I finally told him that I was not vaccinated, I thought he was going to toss me out the window ... If he could. Trying to explain these issues to him was like talking to a brick wall. He's a faithful reader of the New York times, the Wall Street journal, and the St Louis Post-Dispatch. And he kept repeating the refrain, "but I read blah, blah, blah.."

And here is the kicker.. about 2 months ago he said to me, with this wide-eyed mystified look on his face, "Did you know that vaccinated people are getting sick with covid?"

You could have knocked me over with a feather. He obviously didn't listen to a thing I told him.

Expand full comment

I have an older friend who is the same way. Since he had his vaccines, he's had a blood clot/stroke that could have killed him and his already increasing brain fog has become noticeably worse. He and his wife just had very bad cases of Covid that kept them home-bound for a week. His wife has also had a cancer scare. But he still is befuddled and upset that I haven't been vaccinated ... and I haven't had Covid ever (although I am 95 percent sure I had it in January 2020 - when the virus wasn't even supposed to be in America).

Expand full comment

Caught it on a plane August 24, 2019, coming home from Virginia Beach.

Expand full comment

I bet you did have it.

I had it in Feb 2020 (we were on tour and in a lot of countries)

Expand full comment

I'm not sure "conservative republican" defines who we are anymore. I know too many who call themselves that but buy into the globalist mentality on too many issues - like the jabs.

Expand full comment

No... It's like they're just realizing it now.

In my circle of friends / acquaintances, I'd say the ratio was at least 5 to 1 (vaxxed vs unvaxxed)

Expand full comment

At least in his case, he is pretty much home bound and has few friends and no family close. I work taking care of his property and some of his personal affairs. He was aware of the whole "breakthrough infections" bull crap, but he is just now coming to terms with the real magnitude of the vaccine failure.

Expand full comment

They've been buying the Pharma BS longer than we have.

Just keep mentioning, maybe he'll take the red pill.

Thank you for trying.

Expand full comment

Agree. I don't always or even often, but when the opportunity presents itself - Yes, we need to.

Expand full comment

Exactly, at one’s discretion. You’ll know the right time and place.

I’m close to opening a stubborn old fools eyes at work, picking my opportunities to present him with facts…so very close….

Expand full comment

Good luck with that! Let us know how that goes! 😉

Expand full comment

what is that?

Too lazy to research rn

Expand full comment

If my already limited friends & family hadn’t deleted me from their life, I certainly wouldn’t give up. Nowadays I talk to strangers.

Expand full comment

Shoshone, don't give up. Many (most) of us here have been ignored (at best), and shunned / uninvited at worst. Yet we are all still here. We stand together even if separated by geography.

Expand full comment

Thanks John. It’s not easy out there!

Expand full comment

No it's not. I've been mostly left alone by my friend circle, as THEY stayed holed up in their house for more than a year.

However, I've missed most holidays the past 1.5 years as my 20-something nephew threw a temper tantrum if my partner and I were going to be invited. Not sure how this all ends well

Expand full comment

I was at a bridal

Shower recently and my friend who knew I had Covid in the spring. “Well at least now you have immunity” she is in the this is just a cold having moved from there are no viruses camp. I responded “I’m not sure what kind of immunity you get against a bioweapon.” Crickets. I don’t know exactly what’s going on but my money is on incapacitating bioweapon that some r more vulnerable to or get hot lot shot.

Expand full comment

That was a great response. Sometimes the only way (left) to reach people is by shocking them.

Expand full comment

You don't think there is natural immunity?

Expand full comment

🙋🏻‍♀️I absolutely do.

Expand full comment

That was a very clever remark!!! Can I use it sometime?

Expand full comment

Absolutely!

Expand full comment

Agreed.

Expand full comment

we're all simmering

Expand full comment

What burns me up is that a non-vaccine that has already caused MILLIONS of medical injuries and deaths world-wide is not worthy of ONE Congressional hearing. And these tallies of death and misery are growing every day.

Expand full comment

consider the congress. But they continue to "work" on the Jan 6 insincere-erection.

Expand full comment

I've had the same thought over and over. One American died directly from events of January 6th - and this unarmed person was shot (arguably murdered) by a cop. So we compare and contrast one death to ... millions.

Expand full comment

Put it this way. The "insurrectionists" didn't kill one person. The one person who was killed was killed by an employee of the government.

Now who is responsible for the deaths of millions of Americans (if we count the vaccine deaths, lockdown "collateral damage" deaths and the faulty treatment deaths)? Our government is directly or indirectly responsible for all of these deaths.

We are talking about mass murder - literal "crimes against humanity." I would say in two years, the death toll will surpass that of the Holocaust. Maybe it has already.

Expand full comment

Another woman was beaten to death. They're claiming it was an overdose. One of the witnesses has been held in solitary confinement without bail since J6 to prevent him from talking.

Expand full comment

Ron Johnson sponsored a Congrssional Hearing in January 2022, I think. Very powerful five hours of testimony.

Expand full comment

I think I watched about 3 hours begore I just had to get things done. It was impressive!

Expand full comment

And what could that imply?

Worlwide joint depop agenda.

Massive corruption. And why do we keep appealing to the corrupt and abusive powers that be?

They're certainly not going to help. This is what they want

Expand full comment

Ron Johnson has held 2 orv3 hearings...rather large ones. However...if media doesn't cover said hearings...

Expand full comment

Those weren't Congressional Hearings. He just organized a panel of experts and whistleblowers and let them speak. He was the only Senator present. This had nothing to do with Congress. The hearings I'm talking about would put witnesses under oath (on threat of perjury) and require discovery - providing documents, etc.

The reason that the Democrats are spending $40 million to defeat Sen. Johnson is that if the Republicans do take control of the Senate, he will be in a position of leadership on one key Committee that could do exactly what I outlined above. They know he is serious. This possibility must scare the hell out of them.

I've become a big fan of Sen. Johnson for holding those panels and you are right that the media completely boycotted these events - which were full of eye-opening news and claims.

Expand full comment

If it's public information, a summary of Big Pharma donors to various congress critters would probably be very eye-opening.

Expand full comment

Opensecrets.org/ donor-lookup Exactly what and from whom congress and politicians get the swag. Very enlightening.

Expand full comment

Exactly!

Expand full comment

Thanks..I hope it is not just me.

Expand full comment

It’s not.

Expand full comment

I've already seen people completely dismiss the contents of Tucker's report, purely because it was presented on Fox by Tucker. That's the mentality of these people.

Expand full comment

I can see that, but there are plenty of Tucker listeners who DID take the shots and might be convinced.

Gotta convince one injected at a time.

Expand full comment

You're right, it would have been illuminating for many of Tucker's viewers. I certainly see it as a positive development.

Expand full comment

Exactly. I know lots of conservatives who drank the koolaid in 2021 and took the shots to get their lives back. Those people are the ones who are slowing coming around on this. A former colleague of mine comes to mind. He has already admitted I was right on masks and I bet vaccines will be next.

Expand full comment

A family member is immunocompromised. He and the rest of the family took the shots to protect him, even thought we knew our teen/young adult kids were at extremely low risk. Foolishly, as it turns out, we trusted the scientists at the FDA to examine the data and if the shots were safe and effective. We trusted the Israeli data, too. And when the Israeli (and European) data started showing that the shots were not so effective, our opinions were changed by the data. No more COVID shots for us. We used to be able to trust institutions. I guess we now know all the bureaucracy cannot be trusted. Amongst the terrible consequences of the betrayal by institutions is that people are doubting vaccines that still are safe and effective. We are all still going to get our tetanus and whooping cough boosters, kids have gotten meningitis vaccines. For these, the benefits outweigh the risks. And I really hope the FDA correctly approved the new shingles vaccine and that it is effective. I don't want shingles!

Expand full comment

I wouldn't take the shingles shot. ever.

Expand full comment

I really don't think the meningitis or whooping cough vaccines pass the risk/benefit test, esp the meningitis

Expand full comment

I think this episode has been eye opening for many of us. I initially just chose to wait because the technology was new.

For what it's worth, I've heard several doctors have been trying to figure out how to reverse the adverse effects from the shots. I want to say the FLCCC has been looking at that ( but I could be wrong). Might be worth checking out.

I also hold out hope that our natural immune system might clear this over time. Good luck!

Expand full comment

It's very safe to completely dismiss anything Tucker says, because he's the fakest of fake news.

Expand full comment

Tucker is by far the best commentator on TV.

Expand full comment

Tucker has been scoring high viewership amongst democrats since COVID. A percent of dems jumped ship and they’re more likely to follow tucker and bill Maher. In other words the Karen’s are an ever smaller percent of dems.

Expand full comment

I've been wondering if Tucker isn't interested in a Presidential run.

Expand full comment

He has a great deal of clout where he is. Remember in late Feb of 2000, he got in his car and drove to Mar-a-lago and famously pleaded with the president to take COVID seriously. Trump had been pretty dismissive about it up to that point. I don't know how much influence Tucker had with Trump, but we did see the president shift his rhetoric shortly thereafter. In retrospect, I'm not sure that was the right approach.

That kind of influence is based on his ratings. Also, with all due respect, Tucker's approach is a kind of disciplined outrage when it comes to any subject. That works for network TV. Serious leadership isn't disciplined outrage. That is just reactionary stuff. Deeply entertaining if you are inclined toward his world view. We need serious leaders going forward. Leaders who will act fearlessly and thoughtfully and creatively.

Expand full comment

I agree. He can probably have more influence where he is. But I'd also like to have one principled and smart president leading our country in my lifetime. Tucker wouldn't need a teleprompter and could go all day sparring with the press in press conferences. We'd not have to worry about any future lockdowns or vaccine mandates. I don't think we'd have to worry about any unnecessary foreign wars (although he has become really bellicose toward China recently) and he'd probably pick good judges. He'd veto a lot of stupid bills. That's really all I'm looking for in a president. "First do no harm" and then have some persuasion skills to move the needle when it comes to de-brainwashing the masses.

Expand full comment

I really connect with the notion of a presidential "do no harm" concept.

Expand full comment

(Like)

Expand full comment

Me too. Some have speculated about this. He did just give a big speech in Iowa. If he is considering this, I bet being the most vocal critic of all the Covid or vaccine narratives might be one of his big campaign planks. Of course, DeSantis vaulted to likely front-runner status by separating himself from all the other alleged political leaders (who are really all followers) on Covid issues.

DeSantis vs. Tucker would give Republicans two candidate who probably would change the Status Quo. Both would be a major improvement IMO. Please, no more Romneys, McCains, Doles, Bushes, etc.

Tucker also despises the Neo-cons who got American into all these wars in recent decades. I mean "interventions." When America invades and occupies another sovereign nations it's for freedom or protecting our "national security" ... against nations that don't even have a Navy.

Expand full comment

You will find no solutions with any of these “elites.” Only grassroots organizing and the development of working people’s political groups designed to redesign our future will lead to any real change. Regular people can and must do this on their own. Otherwise we are doomed to status quo at best, NWO at worst.

Expand full comment

too smart for that

Expand full comment

He just got asked about that but seems to like what he is doing now well enough.

https://youtu.be/LAdlCbMFVvs

His answer does not, as the clickbait headline says, "stun" the crowd, but is interesting nonetheless.

Expand full comment

good news. Red pilling should continue

Expand full comment

I see the red pill as a choice. After it goes down though there are lots of questions. That’s when what you’re talking about takes place. First the person has to be open to information

Expand full comment

Warning. When you start to apply critical thinking and skepticism - when you start to question the validity of one pronouncement from an "expert" or "authority" - it's not going to stop there. This is really why the Establishment can't allow one false narrative to be debunked. If this happened, the whole country would start asking, "What else have these people been lying about?"

Expand full comment

This is an excellent point. Once I started pulling on the Covid thread, you start seeing all sorts of other "distractions". Ukraine comes to mind as a great example.

Expand full comment

Just say everything- the look of shock is speechless.

Expand full comment

Got any facts to support that assertion?

Expand full comment

This whole thing has been an anger challenge for me. Helped to move away from a blue city

Expand full comment

I used to love living in New York State. I'm worried.

Hochul's speech about how we're all her disciples still makes me blood run cold

Expand full comment

Well, she is the Devil, and it is NY!

Expand full comment

NY is not the devil. Two bad (very bad) governors (one of whom was run out of DC on a rail and the other an unknown creature of doom) and we're suffering.

Expand full comment

New York State is such beautiful country. But I couldn’t live there under the current regime. Gov is an Uber-Karen

Expand full comment

I don’t see ever returning to my native state: California.

Expand full comment

Even though FOX has that reputation with a certain segment of our larger society, it's worth noting that TCT is the highest rated news and information program in the country. There is not even a close second, at least on cable news networks. That's not saying much however. There are some YouTube channels that out perform CNN and MSNBC primetime programing in viewership.

Expand full comment

Tucker Carlson Tonight

Expand full comment

Ohhhh. Sorry

I watch him when I can

My husband left and slept on the couch last night because I fell asleep when he came on at 2am

Expand full comment

I haven't looked but among journalists I know, Yahoo is a joke--changing reporters' stories to be more anti-Trump or anti-conservative.

Expand full comment

Oh it was a story that seemed identical to one from The Wrap, but that one didn’t have a date—I was just searching for the topic, as Matt Taibbi had written about it—don’t know where he got his numbers.

Expand full comment

Like the bad kitty says…first a trickle then a flood. Fox News is just playing it smart by getting (slightly) ahead of the flood, allowing the trickle, so they can sanctimoniously claim to be truth tellers after the dam collapses entirely

Expand full comment

At some point, it would seem to make common sense that the "smart money" would want to be on the right side of history. BTW, there's a reason Tucker Carlson has the No.1-rated TV talk show in America. So "telling the truth" or "challenging untruths" is actually great for ratings.

Now I say this knowing that the "My Pillow" man is the only big advertiser who will advertise on Tucker's show. This is a major "tell" about corporate America. They boycott shows that try to tell the truth.

Expand full comment

Yep. People are starving for truth. The issue is there aren’t too many billionaires supporting truth because, well, there’s not as much money in it.

Expand full comment

I think I've got one "solution" that might actually work. Some multi-millionaire or billionaire with an altruistic bent needs to start an investigative news organization that investigates all the hundreds of topics that are off limits to real investigations in the mainstream press. You wouldn't be starting a traditional newspaper or magazine that covers everything - just the topics that are taboo. You'd employ real journalists, professional as well as citizen journalists, plus researchers, editors, analysts, fact-checkers, etc. Teams of them would work for weeks and months on complex, time-consuming stories. These would be credentialed reporters that could attend all the important press conferences and ask questions that nobody else is asking these people. And then you'd market the heck out of this site. The resulting work product - all centralized (not splintered like Substack) - would probably and quickly attract millions of loyal readers. That is, if the mainstream "news" sites aren't going to do real journalism (and they are not), you do it yourself.

You'd also work closely with all these great Substackers, promoting sites like this one, giving them even larger audiences.

I know this is a great idea because I know this is the last thing the Powers that Be would want to see. But it would take a decent amount of money to start and do it right. And you might never make money. But that's not the goal. The goal is saving the country. Plus, I wouldn't be surprised if such a site did make a profit. The demand for real journalism - journalism that doesn't suck up to the Powers that Be - is that great.

I know this. I'd be first in line to apply for a position at such a site ... and this site WOULD pay good freelancers for excellent stories.

Expand full comment

That’s what the Intercept was supposed to be.

Expand full comment

FWIW, many of the people who spoke out early against the poison death jab and continue to speak out are often guests on Infowars.

Expand full comment

I’ve heard lots of breaking stories on Infowars 😎

Expand full comment

Sounds good, but not only would the writers or researchers be ostracized, but I doubt there would be much of a market. There's an old saying: people listen to what they want to hear. As regards news, similarly, people tend to cherry pick facts that support their world-view, and resist data which would contradict it. This is just human nature. The "real story," or at least dissident views (sometimes with confirmatory evidence, how nice!) can be found, but requires dogged effort sometimes. Rare is the person who doesn't harbor at least some beliefs (perhaps subconscious, or from early childhood) that if he were aware of them. he might have to admit were ludicrous.

And finally, do you really want to know "the truth"? I puzzled long over Nietzsche's cryptic introduction in "Beyond Good and Evil." Look it up if you wish. I will only comment on the Oedipus and the Sphinx example. It requires knowing at least the plots of Sophocles's three Oedipus plays. Oedipus was a man who was a tragic victim of fate, through no fault of his own and seeking his fortune, bested the Sphinx by solving its riddle (otherwise it would have killed him) and as a reward gains a kingdom and a queen, but later learns of the horrid tricks Fate has played upon him. The implicit message here is that by inquiring into some mysteries, even f you solve them, you may bring great unhappiness upon yourself.

Expand full comment

No, I think there's a huge market for contrarian and truth-seeking journalism. These rapidly-growing Substack sites prove this. Tucker Carlson's ratings prove this. So do the Page View numbers of Zero Hedge. The UK site The Daily Skeptic was founded about 18 months ago and now has millions of readers .... by simply publishing stories no mainstream sites will publish.

How would the writers and researchers be ostracized? They'd be working for a news organization and website. The Powers that Be can control Facebook or Twitter but not somebody going to Zero Hedge or the Daily Skeptic.

It would be a one-stop shop for real and original investigative journalism. It's moot because I don't think any millionaire investors will fund it. But if they were willing to put up, say, $8 million and would be willing to operate in the red for years, it could be done. How or why would this matter? Well, you'd have scores of real journalists breaking and pursuing stories and scandals that nobody is pursuing.

Expand full comment

No, the reason he's the the number 1 rated TV talk show in America is because he tells exactly the lies that a large portion of the popular want to hear. Your assertion that Tucker Carlson is "telling the truth" or "challenging untruths" is not just wrong, it's laughable. The entire purpose of Tucker's show is to tell lies and challenge the truth.

Expand full comment

I think it is perhaps more accurate to say Tucker will report the truth or challenge an untruth when it is both safe and profitable for Tucker. ... Or at least when it is not dangerous or outright unprofitable to do so.

I mean, the piece featured here is a sort of "breakthrough" in the MSN. That in no way mitigates culpability for past behavior, nor is it necessarily indicative of future reporting. It is simply an overall good that happened and lasted about 5 minutes.

Expand full comment

An even better analogy, if I tell this right. I believe this is from a Dominican Republic travel guide. In this nation, there are ancient rivers that course through deep, narrow gorges through the mountains. In some places there's enough flat land so that towns or villages sprang up alongside the river. Now, what happens when there are downpours, perhaps from a tropical storm, far upriver? It's happened that local emergency personnel begged locals to evacuate, but they refused. After all, the river wasn't rising, and it was not even raining in their town. Hours later, the water rose, rapidly, carrying away homes and people.

While I've not experienced anything like that firsthand, I HAVE driven through West-by-God Virginia (mid-1980s) and saw a geologically similar area. It was a year or two after the major flood. It's quite impressive to see rocks, logs and other debris 50-100 feet above the mean level of what in normal times is a small river or large creek running through a hollow.

Expand full comment

Great analogy! The rainstorm is just too far upstream at the moment for anyone downstream to take seriously. People don’t have the foresight or they just don’t wanna deal with what’s coming…either way….it’s coming!

Expand full comment

Yes on the “two years ago.” The horror is that this is all bolting the barn door after the horse has escaped. Many millions of people are now irrevocably mortally wounded on a time-release basis, not an if, but a when. They swallowed the shit-smeared, rusty fishing hook.

Expand full comment

I don't know how they sleep at night or look at themselves in the mirror. Most of these people view themselves as "crusading" "truth-seeking" journalists - the "good guys" if you will. They say they are fighting corruption and the "bad guys." But they are really part of the key army for an Evil Empire. They've allowed all of this carnage to go on. Furthermore, they attack the people and organizations that have tried to stop it. Admitting or belatedly recognizing the truth that they were on the wrong side all along is one of those truths most people can't handle.

Expand full comment

Most of these journalists are left leaning and elite college graduates (or wannabes). And they think all Covid 19 jab skeptics are hardened, right wing, deplorable idiots. It's a very simple good vs. evil story they've constructed. And they're on the side of good. I think that's how they sleep at night.

And if you confront these same journalists with the fact that a LOT of African Americans and Latinos are also Covid 19 jab skeptics, they manage the mental contradiction by inventing a story about "vaccine inequality" or "unequal access to vaccines" or something. These "journalists" totally side step and ignore African Americans like Dr. Christina Parks, PhD, who said quite clearly, "We don't want your fuckin' vaccines!"

Expand full comment

Whoever came up with the term "pack journalism" was a smart fellow. They are a pack and you can't go against the pack. It's also like a cult.

Expand full comment

Tuskegee who?

Expand full comment

Thank you for that. I like that she said that.

As a former NPR journalist, I cannot understand these people seeing themselves as intellectuals when they don't see other sides, when they think everything is binary, black or white, good or evil...

Expand full comment

What we need is a lot more "whistleblowers" in the press - people who will admit that some stories are definitely off limits. The greatest scandal of them all is the scandal that real scandals can't be exposed. I mean, who is going to expose them?

Expand full comment

Substack is making some great inroads on this. The problem of course is that you have seek it out and figure which ones to read, which is just too much effort for the average drone who would rather just turn on CNN and shut off their minds. The Zen of conformity.

Maybe, just maybe, some will have that come to Jesus moment and ask themselves, "Have I been lied to?".

Expand full comment

Project Veritas does that

Expand full comment

James O’Keefe is your huckleberry.

Expand full comment

no consciences. They go far but have hollow lives with no connection to their fellow human beings

Expand full comment

quite illustrative language. bravo!

Expand full comment

I understand what you're saying, but I can't comprehend the "attacking the goose that lays the golden egg" part. How can this be? I mean what network would jeopardize that level of sponsorship? I don't get it.

Now I will make a guess: there are two classes of big pharma sponsors. One is Pfizer. It's a class all by itself. The other is all of the remaining big pharma companies combined. And all the other players hate Pfizer. So they told Fox it was A-OK with them to let the air outta Pfizer's tires.

Expand full comment

I've wondered the same thing, but it seems to me that all of Pharma is in the same fraternity or club. They don't want ANY club member to be attacked because they know they could be next. Everything changed in 1998 (?) when regulations were changed to allow Pharma to advertise its products. This allowed every Pharma company to pay what amounts to "protection" money to the networks and news organizations that could sink them in the future.

But your point about the rest of the club being happy if, say, Pfizer was killed is intriguing. Moderna is a new kid on the block, but Johnson & Johnson is the Big Gorilla in this space and they also produced a vaccine.

Ed Dowd who is reporting on all-cause mortality figures - has opined that Pfizer and Moderna - literally backed by Fauci - will be either out of business or bankrupt in a few years. I hope he's right; this would be the case if real investigative journalism was allowed in the mainstream ... but it's not.

Expand full comment

If they're all in the same club, then my guess is just simply wrong.

I suppose the only way my guess might be worth considering is if the "big club" has deep internal rivalries.

For instance, J&J must be quite angry that they were forced away from the pig trough early. (I mean, where do you find the J&J jab nowadays? And their "one and done" product was so appealing!) But we might want to ask: who exactly was behind banning J&J from the trough? Did Pfizer pull some strings within the FDA and media to make that happen? What could be worse for Pfizer's Covid 19 mRNA jab "annual subscription model" than a one and done shot from a rival company?

Expand full comment

It's interesting to think about what might be going on behind the scenes ... but I am definitely in the group that thinks all of these leaders are now in the same "club" (not just Pharma companies). The last thing they want is for real investigative journalism to take down one of their fellow members. This would set a terrible precedent for them.

Regarding J & J, I've wondered if their executives might have seen the writing on the wall (and their own lab research) and voluntarily bailed out of this program. This company could perhaps survive and they could argue that their vaccine was not as bad and they didn't continue to push it forever?

If we ever reach the point where people finally take up pitch forks, all of these executives will be catching flights to their bug-out bunkers in New Zealand (or whatever countries have no extradition treaties with America). In fact, if it gets to this point, there will probably no longer be a United States of America. Or those states will now be 20 instead of 50.

Expand full comment

If, and it's a very BIG "IF", these companies did not do anything legally wrong (e.g. Fraud, etc.) then they should have nothing to worry about. The jabs, meds, etc. are all emergency use authorization which should indemnify them against any claim. Of course, their use should have been voluntary, with fully informed patient consent and so on, but none of that, strictly speaking, is the manufacturer's concern.

Expand full comment

Unless they leave the planet permanently they can be hunted down and returned. Plenty of precedent for that with criminals committing crimes against humanity.

Expand full comment

J&J supposedly wasn’t profiting, maybe more of a PR stunt, a smaller way to trial DNA vaccines, and a way to confuse people who wanted a nongenetic vax—a lot of people thought it was a traditional one.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that insight. I'm one of those people who thought the J&J Covid jab was a "traditional vaccine." It's good to learn that, at root, it was a genetic vaccine. I think I became confused because they said that it was using a longstanding adenovirus platform for delivery. IDK. Sounded conventional to me. It's hard for the average person to understand these things properly.

I guess it's still fair to ask how the J&J jab compares in safety to the mRNA ones tho. I mean, with the mRNA ones, we have this fear of long term circulation of this so-called "mRNA" (formulated with pseudouridine) and long term circulating lipid nanoparticles.

For example, I'd like to know if the adenovirus based DNA vaccine at least maybe stays local to the injection site. Or does it circulate all over the body, hitting the internal organs and so forth like Pfizer does?

Expand full comment

They have been used a little bit before. JJ has a lower death-report rate maybe because many only got one dose, but AZ is similar with two shots and has killed many. JJ lacks the additional dangers of the inflammatory LNPs.

Interesting discussion here but not many answers.

https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/rna-vaccines-and-their-lipids

Expand full comment

"They" replaced the J&J CEO halfway through this with a CEO trained in Beijing. Hmmmmm

Expand full comment

Interesting. I wasn't able to find out any more about the Beijing connection, but I did find this, on the Johnson and Johnson Wikipedia page of all places:

In 2020, "Johnson & Johnson committed over $1 billion toward the development of a not-for-profit COVID-19 vaccine...."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_%26_Johnson#Coronavirus_(COVID-19)_response

So their product was not for profit! I can hear Albert Bourla screaming at Fauci and Collins when he heard the news, "Guys, we can't just stand around and let a not-for-profit competitor eat our lunch. Somebody kill that thing."

"Oh, yessir, Mr. Bourla! Right away, sir!"

Expand full comment

Now, what you found seems to be the missing piece.

Expand full comment

I read it in the Wall Street Journal but it was just a matter-of-fact announcement about a CEO stepping down. I was like, "Whoa!" this should be a bigger story.

Expand full comment

I always thought that

Expand full comment

Dowd. Ed Dowd.

Expand full comment

Tx. He and his silent research partner have also noted that social security disability claims are up significantly in the last 18 months.

Expand full comment

Putting these companies out of business would take losses almost too big to imagine. They all operate with the model that "punishable by fine" means "legal for a price" and they can afford the price. The only thing that could work would be actual criminal liability for individuals, and that seems unlikely.

Expand full comment

I agree with your prediction. But, sometimes I wonder about little exceptions to this rule. Like when "the system" allowed Lehman Brothers to go bankrupt, or when the Arthur Andersen accounting firm was brought down by the Enron scandal.

It seems that every once in a great while, the combination of a company's bitter rivals and a fearful government join forces and slay a giant. The rivals always hated the company because they know it's been cheating. And government regulators feel the heat when the public angrily demands that they "do something." And in those very rare circumstances, a large company might just make it on to the chopping block.

But I still think your prediction is correct. They're too big. Pfizer will continue with minimal investigations or blowback. After all the FDA and CDC together with Pfizer have formed an unholy alliance from healthcare hell. And what outside force could possibly take them ALL down? IDK.

Expand full comment

Oh they definitely pick the winners and losers...

Our government is the problem...and I think we need a revolution. Again.

We have been asleep while the system was corrupted from within by our very own

representatives, and the global corporations lobbying strength. Never again should we have a Washington DC .

I hope the next revolution will see at least the US learning from our mistakes (like income taxes, property taxes, etc).

Much less of a federal government...

It is gonna get a lot worse...but I hope maybe that as the fourth turning proceeds, there might come a spanner in the works of these globalists and the CCP. I pray every day for a Black Swan that will somehow disrupt their plans for us, and wake our fellow humans up.

Expand full comment

No argument here.

Expand full comment

Tucker and Laura Ingrahm have been hosting vaccine data truth tellers for over a year. Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Bartachara (mangled spelling, sorry), Dr. Marty Makary.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 25, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Those guests are very qualified, ethical and worth watching.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 25, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

well, Tucker is on right now and he just asked when Deborah Birx is going to be charged. Yay! At least we have that

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 26, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

and yet, Cavuto keeps putting FauXi ugly face on Fox

Expand full comment

Adding to your comment: worth remembering Murdoch gave millions to the Biden campaign, not a dime to DJT campaign (per Sharyl Attkisson report); & that current FNC execs are part of the predator class.

This is not the only 3rd rail topic TC has been tackling in the last few weeks. For months he has dropped easily overlooked phrases against the narrative indicating he fully understands the extent of the 3Nov coup machinations; has been doing same with c19. He has also as much as possible been shedding light on the DC gulag & openly taunting the 6Jan narrative. With a more upfront presentation on the current horror with the injections, have been wondering if he is preparing to launch his own media enterprise like Glenn Beck did.

How long will the execs tolerate this dissent? Of course the counter question is, how on earth would the channel stay in biz w/out TCT?

BTW, is there a name for televised memes? The graphics on his show often say what he won’t say aloud. And they are ridiculously (in the literal sense) funny!

This is the best ‘stack.

Expand full comment

Spot on about Fox and the Murdoch's. Wow, if he did that would be something. I do hope that they cannot afford to let him go or be silenced. TC is the only person worth watching on any of the MSM channels.

Expand full comment

His shows are the best. Though I really enjoy watching Harris Faulkner too. She seems wickedly smart with a sharp tongue.

Expand full comment

I’ll give her another chance. She seems like a “go along to get along” rather than one who questions authority. Show is on at a bad time for me...

Expand full comment

My husband and I had that Tucker show on the other night. I was sifting through emails on my phone while he was watching. He paused the show to say "I thought you would be interested in this. It's shocking." I responded that I was only shocked this information was finally being aired on mainstream news. I've known about it for at least a year if not longer. I didn't realize just how much he (my husband) didn't know since he views me as a conspiracy theorist.

Expand full comment

That's why this segment was so important. None of what Tucker said was news to any of us. But it probably was "shocking" news to millions of his viewers.

Expand full comment

So true and that's exactly why I provided the example. It was such a defining moment.

Expand full comment

My husband (jabbed but no boosters, who also thinks it's Putin's inflation) won't stay in the room when Tucker is on.

I wish he'd watch, but he wouldn't believe any of it.

That's how they get the BS across because the truth tellers are labelled as dangerous people.

Expand full comment

Agreed. Tucker reporting on this is a bombshell. The narrative is about to be blown up.

Expand full comment

He has been saying the whole time that they’re not safe or effective but he didn’t have The Lancet to back him up. He has had Dr. Malone and Alex Berenson on. Laura Ingraham had Peter McCullough on her show as early as last summer. He has more scientific evidence now, and people clearly see the vaxxed are getting ill, so his tone was more emphatic this time. The first study he quoted was co-authored by MCullough who has been attacked.

Expand full comment

Malone, Berenson, and McCullough are quacks. And no, the vaxxed are not getting ill.

Expand full comment

Oh? Then why dies the CDC say they sre getting myocarditis and pericarditis? The CDC is lying? What about the peer-reviewed papers showing thrombocytopenia, clotting, prion disease, diabetes and more as a result of the shots? Not all the vaxxed are getting ill, just many. Even Kariko says the heart issues may be from the vaccine spike protein, which Malone was one of the first to warn about

Expand full comment

The CDC isn't actually saying that, and it's not peer-reviewed papers making those ridiculous (and in the case of prions, biologically impossible) claims.

Expand full comment

Wow do you just come on here to spread misinformation? Here ya go.

PRION disease post vaccination, peer-reviewed:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357442961_Creutzfeldt-Jakob_Disease_After_the_COVID-19_Vaccination

and here’s why it’s biologically possible:

Prion-like Domains in Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Differ across Its Variants and Enable Changes in Affinity to ACE2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35208734/

CDC meetings on myocarditis and pericarditis:

“CDC and its partners are actively monitoring reports of myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination. Active monitoring includes reviewing data and medical records and evaluating the relationship to COVID-19 vaccination.”

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html

The CDC Will Hold an Emergency Meeting About Heart Inflammation Following COVID-19 Vaccines

https://www.shape.com/lifestyle/mind-and-body/cdc-emergency-meeting-heart-inflammation-covid-vaccines

New CDC guidance: Waiting longer between COVID-19 vaccine doses could reduce risk of heart damage

https://cardiovascularbusiness.com/topics/clinical/covid-19/cdc-covid-19-vaccine-heart-damage-myocarditis

Studies showing heart inflammation post-vaccine

New study: 133x risk of myocarditis after COVID vaccination

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/321238

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2782900

Myocarditis and Pericarditis After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31401-5

https://www.statnews.com/2021/05/14/setting-the-record-straight-there-is-no-covid-heart/

Expand full comment

It's literally not possible, because there are no "Prion-like domains in the spike protein". Quacks and kooks making evidence-free assertions in fringe journals don't make it true.

Expand full comment

News/facts delayed, are news/facts denied. People have the right to make informed choices, or at the very least to make choices that are not founded on government sponsored misinformation.

Expand full comment

NewsMax only has two that go against their ties to Pfizer, also late to the show.

Expand full comment

Tucker Carlson is the epitome of fake news.

Expand full comment

Tucker Carlson is a commentator...ie.he does not report the news, does not choose what to report as news, he is there to give an OPINION on whatever he fancies.

News is supposed to be FACTS. Commentators like Tucker give opinions.

I realize the line has blurred in the past 50 years because newscasters distort the news, choose which facts to present, and also comment on them by how they talk about them..true for tv, newspapers, etc.

But originally, the news was supposed to be What Where When, and How. Not Why.

Expand full comment

Tucker Carlson gives LIES.

Expand full comment

I wrote a review of The Real Anthony Fauci that actually got published. More importantly, a few aggregator sites (Citizens Free Press and The Daily Skeptic) linked to my review and the "page views" are quite high, according to my editor at UncoverDC.com.

It's still dumfounding to me that the No.1-selling non-fiction book in the world over the last eight months has not even been reviewed by 95 percent of mainstream newspapers and Internet sites. Dr. Birx's book - which has zero footnotes - IS being reviewed at these sites. Kennedy's book has more than 40 pages (2,200+) supporting end notes.

https://uncoverdc.com/2022/07/18/robert-f-kennedy-jr-takes-on-fauci-in-most-important-book-of-our-times/

Expand full comment

It is though incredibly encouraging that so many have read it - despite there being virtually zero publicity about on TV and other MSM. There are far more of us than the bastards in charge of this would have you believe.

Once you've read it, nothing about the world, and especially Bigpharma/Bigtec/Militay industrial complex etc. will ever seem the same.

A real eye opener - and I've known what a bunch of murdering crooks Bigpharma are for over 30 years.

Please buy the book and recommend it to everyone and never forget, we have right on our side.

"The Real Anthony Fauci" by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Expand full comment

As an "independent" journalist I can provide this anecdote about the power of censorship. Once someone like me (who is interested in writing pieces that challenge "conventional wisdom") has written an article this is just the first part of the battle. Then you have to find someone who will publish such a "taboo" article. For me, this eliminates about 99 percent of sites that accept freelance submissions. Then if some brave site like UncoverDC.com publishes your work, you hope that someone else will pick it up and link to the article so your piece actually reaches a decent-sized audience. Well, in the case of UncoverDC, its publisher was banned from Twitter the same time Trump was. I think the site has been "de-platformed" from many social media sites, which kills both their audience and their ability to make money.

I haven't been banned from Twitter yet, but I have been banned from Facebook. But my work as a writer has also been effectively censored because my articles are blocked from reaching mass audiences.

I've come to believe that the real hope for our future doesn't reside in whether Elon Musk buys Twitter (and allows free speech), but in whether the censors allow Substack to keep publishing. That's where all the real and important journalism and commentary today is taking place.

Expand full comment

I have said for years that the death of this country as we know it will not necessarily be at the hands of politicians, 'experts', the Deep State or Marxist infiltration, but the root cause is our media. Without their conspiracy to promote the left's causes and stifle any dissent, we would be in a far better place than we are today.

Expand full comment

Hear! Hear!

Expand full comment

Rooting for you. Tough job in the best of times

Expand full comment

No journalist who is interested in covering off-limits topics can make enough money to provide for their family. I think some Substackers might be making decent money (if they have attracted enough paying subscribers). I hope this is the case. But the only way to make a living as a full-time journalist is to write stories that the Powers that Be have "authorized." This is a sad state of affairs - for real journalists and for society that needs to learn inconvenient truths.

Expand full comment

I’m with you! The fact that every chapter in Kennedy’s book has a QR code, enabling you to update new stats or info, any time— is reason enough for this dang good book to be at least MENTIONED. I learned far more reading it than all my college texts, combined.

Then there’s also the little thing of, for decades any Kennedy could do the smallest thing and all the powers that be would fall all over themselves talking about it for days, clamoring to

interview the latest Kennedy to reach a milestone, yet RFK, jr writes this masterpiece best seller and crickets… Maddening, unscrupulous, media act as though they “report” and investigate. They’re parrots, without plumage.

Expand full comment

And Kennedy documents this too. He admits that he once did great on the speaking circuit and was a guest on all the liberal talk shows. But once he started questioning vaccines - and then the Covid narratives - he was persona non grata. In my review, I note that he would actually qualify for a "Profile in Courage" Award named after his uncle, President John F. Kennedy. Anyone can parrot the authorized company line. Kennedy took on every powerful person and organization on the entire planet. And he did this knowing this would cause him great personal and financial harm. That's the definition of courage- Doing the right thing even though you know it won't benefit you and will probably cause you harm.

Expand full comment

And yet trash like the 1619 Project, a wholly fictional rewrite of American history brimming with race hatred, not only gets a Pulitzer but is now taught in classrooms to malleable young minds.

Some people read to learn and discover, others to reinforce their membership in the herd.

Expand full comment

Fantastic review thanks for the wonderful synopsis and critical look at the culture that shuns it. My only suggestion would be to add a link to the citations for Bobby's book that are archived at CHD by chapter with hotlinks straight to the source... fab bookmark for everyone! :~)

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/fauci_info/citations/

Expand full comment

Posted! Thank you!

Expand full comment

How could I have forgotten UncoverDC in that list of parallel media!?!? So sorry. I can’t keep up, though the podcast is a must for me. I may have downloaded the book because of your review. I can only read a few paragraphs at a time, it’s so .... sickening to consider what is actually being said.

Those footnotes! One provided a link to a documentary a young man who came of age as an outcome of AIDS/HIV took hold - avoid unprotected sexual activity- I have to watch it again as it shocked me.

Expand full comment

Yes, I noted that some months ago. The few mentions in the major press scarcely discuss the book. Comments more like "Do you think he's mentally ill? And a Kennedy too! Such a shame!"

Expand full comment

Bravo

Expand full comment

Got to call BS on your comment about Tucker coming late to the game. He provided a forum for Alex and Jay B. and Scott Atlas and Malone very early in 2021.

Expand full comment

Good point.

Expand full comment

Tucker asked Trump to take Covid seriously. I remember coz I had to tuned him off for a few weeks, while Ingraham was solidly against lockdowns from the start (her monologue on March 12th 2020 was titled "Contain the Virus, but Protect Our Freedom"), and was the first person on MSM to give an outlet to the people involved in the Great Barrington Declaration (she was ft. talks by Jay B. earlier than the GBD) back in 2020 (episode Oct 05), and was discussing HCQ and IVM openly in 2020 (earliest episode I backed up is dated April 1st 2020) and early 2021 with not only McCullough, but also Dr. Stephen Smith and Dr. Ramin Oskoui. She also did a 1hr podcast with Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi back in Dec. 2020, which was basically what turned me off completely of these vaxes. Around that time, there was a video of Bhakdi explaining what the spike protein did inside the body. Scary crap.

Expand full comment

Tucker may be late to the party but he showed up in style.

Expand full comment

Yep. And right now he is the only MSM person talking about Biden selling our strategic reserve to China, among others.

Expand full comment

Tucker did interview Robert F. Kennedy Jr. when he published his book "The Real Anthony Fauci." One of the first blurbs on the book cover is from Tucker.

Expand full comment

and Peter McCullough

Expand full comment

Birx played a pivotal role in all the COVID Theater. Read Scott Atlas's book, A Plague Upon Our House.

Expand full comment

after I read that, I was so upset. I had no idea she had lied to us and to those who could have kept us out of the dystopian nightmare she desired for us

Expand full comment

It was all political football. "Get the Orange Man out". Trump wanted her and FauXi gone, but was told not to rock the boat (or the vote).

Expand full comment

Just exactly so. Trump is forever pilloried for not firing these traitors, and that criticism is not unjustified, but the focus needs to be put on the traitors themselves and the myriad ways they betrayed our country.

Expand full comment

I think the need to get Trump out is underestimated in this whole scenario. I must admit I still don’t understand the why of the hatred of Trump, but it does exist

Expand full comment

I’ll go so far as to speculate that it may have been the driver of events. Of course, I’m mocked mercilessly whenever I say that in “mixed company.”

Expand full comment

Because they had so many plans and he was not in them.

Then the economy improved and it was becoming harder for people to hate him.

An ad campaign and Tantrums

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 23, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Now I know why so many governors asked Trump to stop her visits. They thought he was sending her. What an absolute snaggle toothed horror she is

Expand full comment

https://twitter.com/jennifernuzzo/status/1550117448598228996?s=21&t=nz9gvRXNugPk8ru-2UFXYA

This pisses me off to no end - Jennifer Nuzzo, who co-authored *the* last-stand seminal paper arguing against the insanity and idiocy of lockdown (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17238820/) with the late Donald Henderson - a lady who could have loudly protested this absurdity early on (but didn’t) now saying we should just move on, nothing to see here. “Yeah mistakes were made but no need to lay blame that won’t help anybody.”

Yeah fuck you lady, you failed

Expand full comment

I love how she is being razed to the ground on twitter.

No moving forward without accountability ....who was it who threw out the entire history of how humans best handle respitory diseases and our former policy with respect to pandemics? Who passed laws forbidding access to low cost safe drugs?

Lets start with those people.

Expand full comment

Yes,let’s!

Expand full comment

Why do I feel like they're *still* going to find a way to shift their anger toward blaming the unvaccinated...?

Expand full comment

I see it this way, too! And, think they are already making their move with Novavax. They are marketing it, in part, by saying it's not a mRNA "vaccine" so maybe that will change the minds of the unvaccinated who didn't want the mRNA. ha! Doubtful most - if not all the unvaccinated at this juncture want Novavax! I certainly do not. So, see? Easy! They can start blaming the unvaccinated again for the spread and continued mutations (I say again because with so many jabbed getting and spreading covid and creating new variants, there has been a kind of hush across MSM, hasn't there?). Really really worrisome. What, if any new restrictions will they put on the unvaccinated?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jul 23, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Good point. Yes, they are starting to acknowledge natural immunity. Yet, I continue to hear talk of the new omicron booster, jab #5 for some. And, there is still a lot of denial: I live in a blue state that STILL places restrictions on the vaccinated...can't enter certain venues, can't work without being vaxxed and boosted, for instance. Frankly, there continues to be mixed messages (often found in the very same article), so it's hard to know what to expect, really. What I don't expect is anyone copping to the botched response to the virus.

Expand full comment

Yes, but it's getting harder for them.

Expand full comment

if the Democrats were thinking clearly they'd impeach Trump a third time for rushing these vaccines through FDA. they'd probably win this time.

but Democrats drank more of the kool aid than anyone.

Expand full comment

I'm a lifelong registered democrat (probably moving registration to independent, however) as are many of my unvaccinated friends. Please don't make us all out to be the same.

Expand full comment

Fair enough. I should have been more clear. I was speaking of the high level Democratic leadership whose current strategy for electoral popularity appears to be failing. It seems to me Democrats went against one of their old traditional principles: freedom of choice for the individual. Or something like that. They just got on the wrong side of these vaccines, I think.

And it was so interesting because we have a quote from Kamala Harris before the election saying she wouldn't take a vaccine if it was developed by Trump. She was on the right track with this issue. And then, bam, all of a sudden President Biden wants to fire private sector workers who refuse to take the jab!

And I'm thinking: What happened? Where did their skepticism of all things Trump go?

Expand full comment

Yeah, a lot of people speak about people as if everyone in every demographic is the same (all dems, all republicans, all muslims, all jews, all women, all rich people, all poor people, blah blah blah). I find it really irritating! I'm sick of being labeled, reduced, and I'm certain others are as well. I'm sick of the division. I think it's a slippery slope. Divide and conquer. But who wins?

I agree: Hearing people, many of them no doubt democrats and other left leaning scream, "my body my choice" yet many of these same people insist there is no choice when it comes to injecting a rushed to market product. They don't even see the irony. It's maddening.

Your Kamala point...yeah, I hear you.

By the way, I know many Dems who did not want to support the Biden-Kamala ticket. But they definitely did not want to cast a vote for Trump.

I don't care what side of the fence people are on, IMO few high level politicians give a S--T about their constituents. I think some get into office because they care, want to make a difference, but soon become corrupted by the system (if they weren't already corrupted coming in, and had everyone duped while campaigning). This country is not in a good place. And, people here on this thread (not you!), and in other spaces, who have their heels dug in as they continue to sew division, are not helping.

Expand full comment

I'm glad you don't care what side of the fence someone is on. I can see value in arguments from both sides of the fence. I do try to stay independent as a voter. I've voted for republicans, democrats, independents, and even greens. And I will continue to do so.

If some candidate has an idea that seems right for the current time, in my opinion, I will vote for that candidate, even if it means jumping over a fence. Who gives a crap? A political party is not a religion. We should all feel free to change to a different one. And then change back again if it suits us. A political party is just a tool.

That's why I really respect -- not hate, respect -- this "strange" set of people who voted for Obama in one election and then later voted for Trump! They're willing to try something different, something really experimental if they think it might help. They're willing to break all the dishes in their house if it might solve an important problem.

Expand full comment

I care more about how people treat each other than what side of the fence they are on. Having said that, I do have my long held values, and I do vote with these in mind. And like most people, I do tend to "hang" with those whom I share values (although not entirely). Only now I am very conflicted about my vote, because of the response to the virus, which I think has been tragically mishandled.

Expand full comment

Yep! Have posted often that Biden could have early on, as soon as “ breakthroughs” started, embraced therapeutics, deplatformed Fauci and blamed the whole jab debacle on Trump. I knew Joe lacked the skills to do that but had hoped maybe someone could break through to him. I guess that Kool Aid just tasted too good.

Expand full comment

he wouldn't have. too beholden to corporate $$$$. Plus, he, along with most in the US believe their doctors know best.

Expand full comment

Gato, your articles are full to the brim of so many good quotes. In this post, my favourite is "...a missionary in every pot...". I've been saying this (not with as much wit) for a while now.

To some extent, I believe the best way out of this mess is to give some people an easy exit, or at least relatively easy while hitting a few with serious charges, trials and jail.

Expand full comment

I'm partial to "if the pivots were any faster, we could make these people hold magnets and it would generate sufficient power to replace the german nuclear industry"

Expand full comment

My first thought was, don't give Germany any ideas.

Expand full comment

And the smattering of low brow humour is also appreciated "aging like a fart i sealed in a pringles can back in high school."

Expand full comment

I guffawed at that one myself.

Expand full comment

Oh now they will be told to channel their neurosis and anger at CLIMATE CHANGE DENIERS.

Its all so freaking tedious.

Expand full comment

Jesus and one of the Woke of his day were talking. The religocrat (more important than technocrats in that society) asked Jesus, "“Of all the commandments, which is the most important?”

“The most important one,” answered Jesus, “is this: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second is this: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no commandment greater than these.”

The bigshot Wokester wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”

The response is very pertinent to us, the story of the Good Samaritan.

WE need to be the Good Samaritan. We are the despised, overlooked, who will actually come to the aid of the debilitated and be strong enough to keep society running.

So keep us laughing and heartened, El Gato Malo, we've got work to do.

Expand full comment

I've been posting on the Covid stacks for about a year, and was a little annoyed when I noticed your handle a few days ago. After reading your comments, I realized we probably agree about 95% of the time. Keep it up!

Expand full comment

It is very confusing to see Jeff C and Jeff C-C. I just changed my handle to my name, Jeff Cook-Coyle.

Expand full comment

Whoops, sorry Jeff!

Glad the Jeff C’s at least see things similarly!

Cheers, Jeff C-C

I am very happy to be a part of El Gato Mako’s troupe. I am the new cat on the block.

Expand full comment

I fell for the 2 shots to stop “transmission” - won’t be doing any more. I’m under 50 and doing more burpees....fingers crossed I don’t end up “mysteriously” dying in my sleep ☹️. Notice chise specified “against infection”

Expand full comment

Same here, but I got the two Moderna because my kids harassed me..."You're old, dad, and the virus will kill you if you don't get the vaccine." I had some doubts then, but it was more about the efficacy of the shots. I never dreamed that the damned things would turn out to be so dangerous.

Expand full comment

I understand. Speaking for myself, I had no doubt these things would end up killing large numbers of people. I knew this because every "expert" said there was zero risk of this.

Expand full comment

I didn't know what to expect. I don't rely on allopathic medicine for care (because it's sick care, not health care). Still, the words Operation Warp Speed was all I needed to hear to further confirm I would never get near the stuff. I feel for those who believed their doctors and/or the TV doctors have all the answers. Hard lessons for those who now know better. Praying for your safety

Expand full comment

Not to mention all the animal study in all the

previous attempts to create a vax—- did great at first. All the ferrets had loads of antibodies but when subsequent disease/variants emerged, they died off more & more with each illness, proving the vax demolishes immune systems. *There ARE some detox methods that supposedly work to one degree or other.

Expand full comment

If I may ask, *why* did you “never dream that the damned things would turn out to be so dangerous?”

I’m 31 and figured out when I was about 22 that the major parties and pretty much all politicians, with exceptions you can count on one hand, are full of shit.

I always thought the annual campaign pushing “flu shots” was creepy and stupid since it wasn’t even a secret that the people making them were just guessing at which strains of the flu would be prevalent in a given year, and I always knew I *couldn’t* be sure what was going into them.

It always seemed so blindingly obvious to me that if someone wanted to really fuck up the population, they could just slip them some poison under the guise of a flu shot.

I don’t mean to sound harsh, but I just don’t understand what reasons the “experts” gave-- media talking heads, politicians, “scientists” who don’t ask questions-- for anyone to trust them, but I would like to understand what it was they did that *was* convincing to so many people.

Expand full comment

Make sure you're doing low dose aspirin every day.

Expand full comment

Last shot was a year ago - probably would have been fallout by now I would think?

Expand full comment

FLCCC has an anti-spike protocol that includes fasting (kills off the bad cells and new cells grow).

https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-recover-post-vaccine-treatment/

Expand full comment

Also make sure to have a good vitamin D level per this article:

COVID-19 Mortality Risk Correlates Inversely with Vitamin D3 Status, and a Mortality Rate Close to Zero Could Theoretically Be Achieved at 50 ng/mL 25(OH)D3: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

found here:

https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/10/3596/htm

Expand full comment

I’m in the 80’s and my wife is at 100. We’ve yet to be symptomatic. Never did an antibody test.

Expand full comment

antibody test kinda useless

Expand full comment

Why are they useless? I had one done recently 2 months after I was sure I had covid but it came back 'no antibodies' so I was suspicious but don't know enough about it.

Expand full comment

I hope so, maybe so. But I and many others have taken note of the dramatic increase in hospitalizations and doctor visits for the full gamut of strange medical conditions. What's causing this if not the vaccines? My father-in-law is having major medical issues with some kind of liver infection the doctors can't diagnose. He's fully vexed and I of course think the two things might be related. Shingles cases are going through the roof. New cancers and cancers that were long dormant that have come back also makes one wonder what's going on. I think these cases and symptoms will manifest themselves for the rest of our lives. Yes, some people - maybe most vaccinated people - will be okay, but plenty will suffer some condition that probably is related to the vaccines. We just don't know the timeline of every different person, all of whom have different immune systems and pre-existing conditions, etc. What's also unknown is if the offspring of vaccinated people have future issues. I think it's clear already that birth rates among the vaccinated are down significantly.

As others have said, 250 million people are effectively the lab rats when it comes to short, medium and long-term adverse effects.

Expand full comment

Probably closer to a billion counting foreign nations.

Expand full comment

long-term blood vessel and immune system damage often takes longer to rear ugly heads

Expand full comment

As of yet - nothing to prove the shots stick around for a year + ... damage would surface

Expand full comment

I can look at my Dad and state that doesn't seem to be true at all. So many friends' cancer has come roaring back after, years, decades, of testing cancer free.

The grift continues to work because people don't want to see the connection.

Expand full comment

Oh I have a friend that had a cancer flare up and kill her quick - and almost immediately after her second shot. I suspect if there was anything on deck for me that it would have happened by now - fingers crossed

Expand full comment

If you had no adverse reactions you probably got saline. Or the mRNA had degraded before it was given to you to the point that it was no longer toxic due to improper handling (i.e. not having been kept ultra-ultra-cold.)

Expand full comment

Had the immediate head rush that lasted a few days - tinitus for a few months but that was it thankfully

Expand full comment

Don't take ANY MORE CHANCES. See below.

Expand full comment

hope so. many of those I follow seem to think you would be out of the clear. but, we just don't know, do we?

Expand full comment

low dose aspirin everyday ate the stomach of my stepsister's mother, killed her. I'd be careful giving medical advice like this.

Expand full comment

And Alex Berenson’s 7/22 Substack headline: The vaccines have failed.

Lots of nervous cats are attempting to unmark their territory.

Meanwhile. 7/22 WSJ Mansion Section big deal article about Moderna & Pfizer execs buying big bucks real estate. (WSJ should have called it the Manson section).

Expand full comment

Yes. Even if by some miracle a few executives are tried criminally or in civil court, they've already pocketed their hundreds of millions of dollars. They no doubt paid cash for their mansions, vehicles and dividend-producing stocks. And we're told from the time we are children that crime doesn't pay. Well, yes, it does - if you know the right type of crimes to commit.

Expand full comment

On the Daily Mail also, with pic of their new mansions and smiling faces. Can someone grab a screenshot?

Expand full comment

That follows. You used to see the same thing when some big trial lawyer firm got some massive judgment against a defendant. But no trial lawyer firms (or only a handful) are going to go after all the "deep pockets" they COULD sue with Covid lawsuits. Just like reporters know what investigations they can't conduct, the Plaintiff Bar Associations know what lawsuits they can't bring. Even the fearless trial lawyers fighting for the Little Guy ... know not to go against the Biggest Guys ... or the protected narrative of the U.S. government.

Expand full comment

Will try

Expand full comment

Fauci’s “I’ll be leaving in 2 yrs” = prideful preempt for inevitable firing

Expand full comment

The only way he'll be fired is if a Republican (say DeSantis) is elected in 2024. Surely, he wouldn't expect to continue to serve in three years .... when he would be 85 years old. If you parse his comment, he's simply planning to go to some other position/organization where he will continue to be pulling some of the levers behind the curtains. For now, he has to remain where he is to keep putting out fires that would expose all his past malfeasance and crimes against humanity.

Expand full comment

Oh yeah! The devil himself could not have found a better deceiver — the number 1 job description for the matter at hand. Oh, and the matter of the AIDS/AZT drug business.

Expand full comment

I doubt he CAN be fired (civil service protections.) He has turned down not one but two opportunities to be promoted, by different Presidents, to be NIH director. I assume that's because he would lose the power base and protections he had obtained for himself.

Expand full comment

Or a slick way to defuse the demands that he be fired (“there’s no need as I’m leaving soon anyway!”)

Expand full comment

Even the Germans are getting on board. This little tweet might beget a firestorm of unintended consequences. Government enforces mandates to inject citizens with known poison; government admits poison injures; citizens sue government for setting and enforcing mandates to inject citizens with poison causing harm & death. How the German government will attempt to walk back that little tweet remains to be seen.

https://www.wnd.com/2022/07/german-government-admits-severe-side-effects-following-mrna-vaccine/

Expand full comment

Haha - I wonder how much longer it's going to take before the average person realizes just how many lies they've been convinced is truth?

The vaccines are the tip of the iceberg. The US has been lied in order to justify every war they've been involved with for the last 20 years, every war. The Ukraine conflict is riddled with lies for example. Climate change alarmism has been a lie for decades.

It's interesting to see this finally come to pass. I've been waiting for this moment for a long time. It was a main reason I got into internet development. This is precisely what we were aiming for 30 years ago, and it's taken SO MUCH LONGER than I ever imagined it would. Hope this isn't another false start.

What gives me a good deal of hope is that censorship is now in the open as are the existence of bots. These haven't just come into existence recently, they've been around for at least 15 years but good luck trying to convince the average person they were around.

I hope to see the end of the empire of lies.

Expand full comment

"The US has been lied in order to justify every war they've been involved with for the last 20 years, every war."

Try 120 years. "Remember the Maine."

Check out "War Is A Racket" by Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler written in the 1930s.

Expand full comment

I know, but the last 20 years have been particularly egregious because they were caught lying in real time BEFORE the wars began. Mainstream "news" ignored it despite 1000's, if not 100's of thousands of people trying to correct the "mistakes".

Expand full comment

Sorry, my post wasn't intended to sound like a smart ass. I completely agree with you.

If you look back at the whole "Remember the Maine" situation and the build-up to the Spanish American War, the New York Times was a major driver of jingoisim and pro-war sentiment, just as it was during the early stages of Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, both Gulf Wars and the GWOT. As always, our "papers of record" are the chief propagandists for the elite, be they the MIC or Big Pharma.

Expand full comment

You didn't sound like a smart ass to me.

Well aware of what our "mainstream news" actually is. We'll destroy them in time. Say what you like about Trump, he did INCREDIBLE damage to the propaganda machine - for that alone, it was worth electing him.

Expand full comment

“Fake news is the enemy of the people.”

Imo, truer words were never spoken.

Expand full comment

There used to be more of an effort to look impartial imo. These days every page sounds like the editorial page

Expand full comment

It's just more obvious it's propaganda. It's always been propaganda.

Remember this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmfVs3WaE9Y

All of that was false. She was coached by "PR firm" (propaganda agency) Hill & Knowlton.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony

I remember seeing that on television. I was just a kid at the time, but the propaganda worked on me. I was outraged when it was discovered to have been entirely false testimony, and I was waiting for the Kuwaiti ambassador to be held accountable for having his daughter lie to congress.

5 years later, I realized it was entirely a show, Congress always knew she was lying, and the intelligence agencies knew she was lying. That's when I finally realized our government is a criminal syndicate, not just a bunch of bumbling doofuses that just keep "making mistakes".

Expand full comment

Like Grenada and Panama, it was all false. Even then, people forgot that Saddam had fought a proxy war against Iran for eight years between 1980 and 1988 and that the West - the US and UK, primarily - had funneled billions of dollars of weapons and technology, along with encouragement, to Saddam's regime. Kuwait had engaged in slant drilling and was basically stealing Iragi oil. Iraq's complaints were ignored. Iraq threatened to invade Kuwait to "teach them a lesson" to which U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie replied that the US did not take a position on Iraq's border dispute with Kuwait. The Iraqis interpreted this as a 'green light' to invade which it did. The stories of Iraqi atrocities in Kuwait were suspected to be false then. The real atrocity was the duck shoot of retreating Iraqi army units as they were trapped on the lone highway - the "Highway of Death" - leading from Kuwait back to Iraq.

I'm not defending Saddam by any stretch but the US is notorious for abandoning those who believe themselves to be US allies. Leaving South Vietnam and Cambodia out to dry in 1975, the Shah in 1978, Somoza in 1979. Noreiga was running drugs for the CIA for a decade before the US used this activity as a pretext to invade Panama in 1989. Most recently, abandoning the government in Kabul after the US had spent twenty years, two trillion dollars, 22,000 dead and wounded US servicemembers along with the collateral results of yet another failed nation building exercise.

Go back and read Neil Sheehan's A Bright Shining Lie about Vietnam. That's what made Vietnam revisionism in the 1980s particularly troubling because it was obvious within five years of the fall of Saigon and Phnom Penh that the US was choosing to ignore the lessons of Vietnam. This mentality led directly to the cluster f***s in Iraq and Afghanistan because the US had learned nothing about COIN.

Expand full comment

Or a paid advertisement.

Expand full comment

I too hope to see that end but don’t expect it. Many folks need those lies to feel “ safe”, whatever that is. I’ve been thinking about Richard Jewell a lot lately. Tell me again what happened to Louis Freeh. Did many care when that was exposed?

Expand full comment

Unfair to Tucker, though. He’s been a vocal vaccine skeptic for ages. At least toward mandates and the conformist push for vaccines.

Expand full comment

opposing a mandate be standing for the constitution is not the same as saying "these vaccines don't work and are killing people."

the former has always been allowable, the latter is only now becoming so.

Expand full comment