4 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
VeryVer's avatar

It’s a common pharma problem—win the battle but lose the war. Lots of drugs use the surrogate end point as proof it works but don’t look at all cause mortality. Cancer drugs especially.

Expand full comment
James Bogash's avatar

Surrogate end markers. The scourge of missing valid end points. There is already a push to use antibody response as the surrogate end marker for vaccine efficacy. Like that'll turn out fantastic.

Expand full comment
Ed's avatar

it is a common for profit, wag the fda pharma problem.

my experience in weapon testing: fda is worse than dod, and fda has a revolving door just as the pentagon alums....

Expand full comment
Duchess's avatar

I am so pleased that these brilliant people on substack are now speaking up for Mortality and Morbidity as being the correct endpoints for ANY trial...not infection.

Bravo! Please keep repeating this..because our excess mortality and mobidity stats are FRIGHTENING.

Expand full comment