Interesting, isn't it, that "shame" and "compliance" and assertions which fly in the face of evidence - which are enforced through deliberate mass formation, are being used in conjunction with a drug in a clinical trial, where generally - except for this one - people not only must *voluntarily* consent, but also the makers have liability…
Interesting, isn't it, that "shame" and "compliance" and assertions which fly in the face of evidence - which are enforced through deliberate mass formation, are being used in conjunction with a drug in a clinical trial, where generally - except for this one - people not only must *voluntarily* consent, but also the makers have liability for the injurious effects of their products. In this case, free will is being overcome by psychological coercion on a massive scale. Perhaps this isn't a "drug trial" at all, perhaps the governments pushing this know the long-term effects - premature death, sterilization of children before childbearing age - and are doing it to reduce the human population and stop its growth.
Klaus Schwab and a lot of his buddies are pretty closely tied in to the Club of Rome. and one of the main concerns of this club is population which has grown beyond "carrying capacity". If you look at "Limits to Growth", published in 1972, it predicts depletion of important non-renewable resources - mainly fossil fuels. Mechanized agriculture is entirely dependent on fossil fuels - as is pretty much everything else.
Capitalism is dependent on growth of capital, and this growth is exponential. The WEF people are really interested in economic growth - they really want to keep it going. Unfortunately, resources which fuel growth - fossil fuels, primarily - are finite and being depleted. Once used, they're gone. So exponential growth has a limit point. And population growth is directly correlated to growth in energy use, too.
So, to keep things going in the way the WEF people want, population growth would have had to be controlled - capped - by, say, 1980. That didn't happen, population has at least doubled since then. So, by this argument, and with this set of facts, population has to be reduced. And growth has to be capped, or degrowth has to occur - see http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/Garcia2012.pdf
And the question is, how?
Global nuclear war would do the trick, but the people who run the WEF really don't want that - nor does any sane person - which at this point, includes very few people from the US/EU ruling class, or so it would seem - Ukraine, anyone?
So there has to be another way to get this done. A drug which kills people, not outright for the most part, but over a period of about five years, and which sterilizes children before they reach reproductive age, that would do the trick. If you could get 80% of the world's population to voluntarily take this drug, within about 5 years, the problem would be a long way down the road to a solution. And you'd want to selectively kill off non-productive, non-creative populations - the "woke", the people with "bullshit jobs" - trimming deadweight, so to speak. Unfortunately, you can't really get people to voluntarily take such a drug or give it to their children, at least under normal circumstances.
So, you have to create abnormal circumstances - like a worldwide pandemic - and the drug is the "vaccine"... And that would work. And maybe it has.
Interesting, isn't it, that "shame" and "compliance" and assertions which fly in the face of evidence - which are enforced through deliberate mass formation, are being used in conjunction with a drug in a clinical trial, where generally - except for this one - people not only must *voluntarily* consent, but also the makers have liability for the injurious effects of their products. In this case, free will is being overcome by psychological coercion on a massive scale. Perhaps this isn't a "drug trial" at all, perhaps the governments pushing this know the long-term effects - premature death, sterilization of children before childbearing age - and are doing it to reduce the human population and stop its growth.
Klaus Schwab and a lot of his buddies are pretty closely tied in to the Club of Rome. and one of the main concerns of this club is population which has grown beyond "carrying capacity". If you look at "Limits to Growth", published in 1972, it predicts depletion of important non-renewable resources - mainly fossil fuels. Mechanized agriculture is entirely dependent on fossil fuels - as is pretty much everything else.
Capitalism is dependent on growth of capital, and this growth is exponential. The WEF people are really interested in economic growth - they really want to keep it going. Unfortunately, resources which fuel growth - fossil fuels, primarily - are finite and being depleted. Once used, they're gone. So exponential growth has a limit point. And population growth is directly correlated to growth in energy use, too.
So, to keep things going in the way the WEF people want, population growth would have had to be controlled - capped - by, say, 1980. That didn't happen, population has at least doubled since then. So, by this argument, and with this set of facts, population has to be reduced. And growth has to be capped, or degrowth has to occur - see http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/Garcia2012.pdf
And the question is, how?
Global nuclear war would do the trick, but the people who run the WEF really don't want that - nor does any sane person - which at this point, includes very few people from the US/EU ruling class, or so it would seem - Ukraine, anyone?
So there has to be another way to get this done. A drug which kills people, not outright for the most part, but over a period of about five years, and which sterilizes children before they reach reproductive age, that would do the trick. If you could get 80% of the world's population to voluntarily take this drug, within about 5 years, the problem would be a long way down the road to a solution. And you'd want to selectively kill off non-productive, non-creative populations - the "woke", the people with "bullshit jobs" - trimming deadweight, so to speak. Unfortunately, you can't really get people to voluntarily take such a drug or give it to their children, at least under normal circumstances.
So, you have to create abnormal circumstances - like a worldwide pandemic - and the drug is the "vaccine"... And that would work. And maybe it has.