A lot of PhDs probably consider themselves an authority in whatever field they're in. They expect to be listened to when they offer advice, and if you aren't a fellow expert in the same field, expect unquestioning agreement with them. It would be natural for them to extend that obeisance to other PhDs from a field they're not expert in.
A lot of PhDs probably consider themselves an authority in whatever field they're in. They expect to be listened to when they offer advice, and if you aren't a fellow expert in the same field, expect unquestioning agreement with them. It would be natural for them to extend that obeisance to other PhDs from a field they're not expert in.
I bought into the CMU results under the reasoning that awareness of their own field's intellectual corruption would make them perceive that the biological sciences are just as hollow...
A lot of PhDs probably consider themselves an authority in whatever field they're in. They expect to be listened to when they offer advice, and if you aren't a fellow expert in the same field, expect unquestioning agreement with them. It would be natural for them to extend that obeisance to other PhDs from a field they're not expert in.
I bought into the CMU results under the reasoning that awareness of their own field's intellectual corruption would make them perceive that the biological sciences are just as hollow...