I wondered what your answer would be. I'm pleased to find that my conclusions were not so far off. They'd rather sacrifice millions of people than their own careers and bottom-lines. I'd like to say I'm surprised, but, no, not really.
they are literally unable to admit to themselves that they did this. their own cognitive and emotional processes prevent it. to admit they did this, to know that they were responsible is flat out beyond consideration because they cannot countenance it emotionally.
they need not be psychopaths. just fragile humans trying to protect their self image. and those doing to will lash out viciously to prevent having to face a truth they do not want to.
Thank you. I get your point and agree they will not likely admit an error. But they could have said we've protected the high risk groups and there's no need to go further, without any admission of error. If they're worried about the Mareks scenario, this might explain why they've pushing for 100% coverage in low risk groups. Do you agree?
I see plenty of evidence for bad ethics and bad judgment but no evidence for a planned cull. Claims like yours without evidence cause the mainstream to view all vaccine critics as crazy people. You should stop. It damages the work of good people like el gato malo.
I think it’s to be a depopulation event as well & I thought so long before we had any clinical data on vaccines.
40 years training & practise in life sciences has taught me that every single statement about hazards & mitigation has been utter lies from before lockdown #1 to today,
The coordinated abandonment of pandemic preparedness plans and adoption of stupid lies proves supranational organisation.
The entire vaccine design to mandates is all completely broken in every way & at every level.
The midazolam / remdesivir / ventilator murders are large in number.
70,000 more died at home due to fear of an overwhelmed NHS, which never happened.
Autopsies banner worldwide.
Ignoring dozens of peer reviewed journal articles on lockdown & masks so pretending they’re both still needed is obviously fraud.
Extreme use of PsyOps internationally.
VaxPass itself adds nothing to public safety.
No. This isn’t an occasion where incompetence replaces conspiracy.
The conspiracy is clear if you’re receptive, nothing theoretical about it.
Right, our leaders are definitely NOT playing politics with people’s lives. They just want what’s best for everyone.
I’m not saying it was a planned cull (isn’t that hyper hypothetical at this point anyway?) but if there were one, it would be their dripping wet fantasy come true.
because admitting that you not only did this but forced it is a political career ender and a company destroyer.
imagine what happens to moderna and pfizer and AZ if this is the case. sure, they have liability waivers, but what about reputationally?
what happens to health officials, presidents, and prime ministers?
would ANYONE who pushed this get to keep a job if it turns out they turned delta into mareks?
I wondered what your answer would be. I'm pleased to find that my conclusions were not so far off. They'd rather sacrifice millions of people than their own careers and bottom-lines. I'd like to say I'm surprised, but, no, not really.
i worry it's worse that that.
they are literally unable to admit to themselves that they did this. their own cognitive and emotional processes prevent it. to admit they did this, to know that they were responsible is flat out beyond consideration because they cannot countenance it emotionally.
they need not be psychopaths. just fragile humans trying to protect their self image. and those doing to will lash out viciously to prevent having to face a truth they do not want to.
relevant to your comment about them not needing to be psychopaths. it's long but very interesting
https://johnwaters.substack.com/p/covid-totalitarianism-the-deification
I think it was Upton Sinclair who called it:
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
I'll have to remember that one. How true.
Thank you. I get your point and agree they will not likely admit an error. But they could have said we've protected the high risk groups and there's no need to go further, without any admission of error. If they're worried about the Mareks scenario, this might explain why they've pushing for 100% coverage in low risk groups. Do you agree?
No, they would love to cull the unvaccinated. Synergistic effect with open borders.
I see plenty of evidence for bad ethics and bad judgment but no evidence for a planned cull. Claims like yours without evidence cause the mainstream to view all vaccine critics as crazy people. You should stop. It damages the work of good people like el gato malo.
I think it’s to be a depopulation event as well & I thought so long before we had any clinical data on vaccines.
40 years training & practise in life sciences has taught me that every single statement about hazards & mitigation has been utter lies from before lockdown #1 to today,
The coordinated abandonment of pandemic preparedness plans and adoption of stupid lies proves supranational organisation.
The entire vaccine design to mandates is all completely broken in every way & at every level.
The midazolam / remdesivir / ventilator murders are large in number.
70,000 more died at home due to fear of an overwhelmed NHS, which never happened.
Autopsies banner worldwide.
Ignoring dozens of peer reviewed journal articles on lockdown & masks so pretending they’re both still needed is obviously fraud.
Extreme use of PsyOps internationally.
VaxPass itself adds nothing to public safety.
No. This isn’t an occasion where incompetence replaces conspiracy.
The conspiracy is clear if you’re receptive, nothing theoretical about it.
Right, our leaders are definitely NOT playing politics with people’s lives. They just want what’s best for everyone.
I’m not saying it was a planned cull (isn’t that hyper hypothetical at this point anyway?) but if there were one, it would be their dripping wet fantasy come true.
Well, anything is possible, given Fauci and Milly are still emplyed
Well said.
1)Would you not agree at his stage it's more of a civilization/culture destroyer?
2)How would someone throw a few bucks your way?