The representative also told Heavy that the manufacturing process is the same. The products with the EUA authorized label will still be used until their expiration date, if storage conditions are followed.When Comirnaty received full FDA approval, the FDA noted in a press release: “The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty… for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.”
The existing EUA Pfizer vaccines have a liability shield which means that everyone involved with the product is protected from being sued. People who take a EUA vaccine and end up suffering injuries can only obtain compensation after applying to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). The program has only awarded compensation to three percent of the claims made. On the other hand, people have the right to not take the vaccine. For instance, no business can force employees to take EUA vaccine injections. This right is protected under federal laws. Comirnaty is not yet available in the U.S.
There is a lawsuit stating that EUA should be withdrawn since Comirnaty has FDA approval.The law cited in the suit is 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 which concerns “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies.” The code states that a EUA designation must only be used when there is no “approved” alternative for preventing or treating the specific disease. Granting approval to Comirnaty should naturally make the EUA licenses of existing Pfizer vaccines void. In addition, the EUA status for other COVID-19 vaccines should also not be preserved.
Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.
Comirnaty has FDA approval, so vaccine mandates for Comirnaty can be imposed. The current mRNA vaccine does not have FDA approval, so it cannot be mandated.
Comirnaty is NOT on the mandated childhood vaccination schedule, so it isn't fully shielded from liability.
i dont think anyone does. some are asking but no answers so far
I tried to find out by using a search engine. I got these "answers."
https://heavy.com/news/comirnaty-vs-pfizer-vaccine-legally-distinct/
The representative also told Heavy that the manufacturing process is the same. The products with the EUA authorized label will still be used until their expiration date, if storage conditions are followed.When Comirnaty received full FDA approval, the FDA noted in a press release: “The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty… for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.”
https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/09/09/why-the-fdas-pfizer-vaccine-approval-is-controversial-disingenuous-and-facing-a-lawsuit.html
The existing EUA Pfizer vaccines have a liability shield which means that everyone involved with the product is protected from being sued. People who take a EUA vaccine and end up suffering injuries can only obtain compensation after applying to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). The program has only awarded compensation to three percent of the claims made. On the other hand, people have the right to not take the vaccine. For instance, no business can force employees to take EUA vaccine injections. This right is protected under federal laws. Comirnaty is not yet available in the U.S.
There is a lawsuit stating that EUA should be withdrawn since Comirnaty has FDA approval.The law cited in the suit is 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 which concerns “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies.” The code states that a EUA designation must only be used when there is no “approved” alternative for preventing or treating the specific disease. Granting approval to Comirnaty should naturally make the EUA licenses of existing Pfizer vaccines void. In addition, the EUA status for other COVID-19 vaccines should also not be preserved.
https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com/2021/08/24/two-things-mainstream-media-didnt-tell-you-about-fdas-approval-of-pfizer-vaccine/
Buried in the fine print of Monday’s approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the Pfizer Comirnaty COVID vaccine are two critical facts that affect whether the vaccine can be mandated, and whether Pfizer can be held liable for injuries.
Comirnaty has FDA approval, so vaccine mandates for Comirnaty can be imposed. The current mRNA vaccine does not have FDA approval, so it cannot be mandated.
Comirnaty is NOT on the mandated childhood vaccination schedule, so it isn't fully shielded from liability.