upticks in cancer

and upticks in normalization based gaslighting

a lot of people are focusing on this article today in the WSJ:

obviously, this has been quite a hot topic of late.

and clearly this has not been lost on big pharma who has been notably acquisitive in the space. pfizer was buying last year. merck just did.

the biden administration has been all over this.

many seem to be presuming this WSJ piece indicates a sort of mainstreaming of the idea that we’re seeing a big cancer surge post covid/covid vaccine.

alas, i do not think this is so.

the WSJ piece does not even include the covid era. its analysis ends in 2019.

Cancer is hitting more young people in the U.S. and around the globe, baffling doctors. Diagnosis rates in the U.S. rose in 2019 to 107.8 cases per 100,000 people under 50, up 12.8% from 95.6 in 2000, federal data show. A study in BMJ Oncology last year reported a sharp global rise in cancers in people under 50, with the highest rates in North America, Australia and Western Europe. 

the study is “Global trends in incidence, death, burden and risk factors of early-onset cancer from 1990 to 2019” and can be accessed through the link above.

the big jump in colorectal diagnosis seems to pop. note that these are cases, not deaths, and so it’s very possible screening rates are having a big effect here. this is not a rise in other groups. my base guess here is it’s just a big uptick in screening younger people. (why does no one ever control for sample rate?)

overall cancer rates per capita actually dropped in the US over this period. (source CDC) note that this chart also truncates pre 2021.

but, given the data post 2020, it seems simply wild to me to do a study like this right now and end it in 2019. that seems more than a coincidence. it seems like an attempt to normalize a more recent trend that’s accelerating aggressively before it becomes more apparent.

in UK, excess deaths of younger people from cancer spiked in 2021 and blew out to 40% in 2022.

the US has also seen unprecedented issues that longtime gatopal™ ethical skeptic has been tracking for years now.

the BMJ article causes “alarm” over a 13% rise in cases over a 20 year period, but somehow ignores that in the 2 years following the mass rollout of untested mRNA vaccines manufactured using a process materially different than anything run through drug trials and prone to massive error, impurity, and infidelity that we’re seeing something well in excess of that showing up in actual deaths in just a 3 year period.

that’s quite a substantial omission/point to stop being curious.

“other than that, mrs lincoln, how was the play?”

given the terrible issues around SV40 promoters (an oncogenic) and the pseudo-uridines that can shut down TLR’s (which identify cancer for the immune system) and all the plasmids and CG enrichment in these synthetic spike proteins and genetic factories, this is unfortunately NOT a shocking outcome.

many of us expressed concern.

fellow feline Anandamide (kevin mckernan) went so far as to sequence the vaccine and found not only plasmids (spike protein factories) but also shockingly low purity levels and all manner of contaminants and some really dangerous issues (like frame shifting) which produce all manner of junk proteins whose effects can be difficult to guess. gatopal™ Igor Chudov has covered that too as well as some ideas like mRNA vaccine integrating into human DNA and the possibility that the vaxxes have been encouraging forms of antibodies (IgG4) that have been associated with accelerations in cancer growth.

is this all locked up and settled as causal? no. i would not say so, at least not to p<0.05 kinds of levels, but then, the kinds of tests one would need to do that have not been done, so this is not terribly surprising.

what IS surprising is the fact that despite entire fields of freshly fired musketry, those “investigating” this issue are avoiding any and all smoking guns and instead looking where the crime ain’t.

we should be doing these studies.

we aren’t.

to study this without including 2021-3 is not a mistaken mission, it’s a serious choice, one that seems, like so many other like “normalizing young male athletes dying of heart failure on the field, happens every day dontcha know!” just as they did with all manner of other outcomes.

it’s the classic move. you know what’s coming so you get in front of it with an alternate explanation, a re-written history.

“oceania has never been at war with eastasia” flips to “ocenaia has always been at war with eastasia.” and off you go.

"the past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth"

(remember when you thought orwell was overdone? yeah, me too. it wasn’t.)

past a certain point, the surest sign of what’s happening is to focus on what the regime assures you is not occurring.

they are never going to stop these sorts of lies until we stop falling for them.

plan accordingly.