Are people becoming so demoralized that they just don't have any sense of awareness or care enough enough to know? Sadly, I can see hearts growing cold and people becoming less compassionate and empathetic toward others. Clearly, this is a spiritual battle. So many people "have eyes but cannot see." When will the world awaken to these crimes against humanity?
Seeing it and being willing to admit that you see it are two very different things. A lot of people really tied their sense of self worth and intelligence to being pro-vax/lockdowns, etc. Admitting they were not only wrong, but disastrously so, would be too much for their ego to endure. Even less chance they’d ever admit the skeptics they held in such disdain could ever have been right about anything.
Well said. I am in Canada and have had only one friend question the jab narrative, despite all of the evidence that has come out showing that they are neither safe nor effective. Sadly, all of the rest are still true believers, which I find both shocking and depressing. I am also gravely concerned about the next psy op as it seems that nobody has learnt anything from past mistakes.
Same for me here in Canada. All the vaccinated people I know have no interest or desire to question the jab narrative. They appear to want to stay willfully blind.
In some ways I get that because the alternative for them to recognize the truth would be mentally devastating for many of them. Perhaps its a form of self protection.
As an unvaccinated person, I find it ironical that I'm the one worrying about my vaccinated family and friends!
@Helen …dated a Normie (left) back in the 20-21 years. Admittedly I am the one that became the most easily frustrated. She was very smart no doubt. But On this sort of thing along with current political events she was childlike in behavior.
Having been able to analyze it thru the lens of patience, I can safely say it is indeed a survival mechanism. These people prefer to stay in their bubble because the alternative is unthinkable. This ensures they will not be ostracized from the herd where it is much easier to make a living and raise a family.
Articles like this are great but it will most likely have no effect on the masses. There’s only one thing that will knock them out and that’s severe pain. The longer and harder this carries on, the more pain will be forthcoming. It’s only a matter of when; not if.
Helen, it must be a lonely feeling being one of the few purebloods remaining in Canada. It’s incredible how blind the majority of Canadians are. Why do they vote Trudeau??? Same can be said for us… Why did we vote Biden??? (Hint: We didn’t !!!)
During the extreme measures taken to " encourage" the unvaccinated to succumb, it was lonely. Wasn't allowed to board a plane, go to restaurants, attend any sports events, swim in public swimming pools etc.
But now, having survived this onslaught on my freedom, I realize I am much stronger than I thought I was.
In Canada with a population of 40 million, approximately only 6 million of us didn't give in. I totally agree that it's incredible how blind the majority of Canadians are. I made the mistake of voting for the Liberal party in 2015 but never again. If I was American I would never vote for Biden.
Humans are doomed to repeat history. The work of Rene Girard (mimetic theory) has convinced me of it. It’s in our nature to tribally group, and the Iron Law of Hierarchy makes it clear that there will always be a outlier group thats good at pulling the strings
Actually, some of them tried to get a fourth or fifth shot but they keep getting covid and the doctor told them they have to wait 8 weeks post-covid before they can jab again. They will do it, though, and are counting down the weeks.
But believe they do...... I’ve grown so tired of the virtue signalers, I recently responded with “ well, give yourself another Pat on the back!”.... they did not understand
Absolutely. These people are quite willfully burying their heads in the sand since admitting their blind stupidity would be far too painful. Better to literally die a miserable death. My step sisters parents just got their latest booster and dad had another stroke. Doctors are baffled.
On another level, admitting there is a serious problem, especially one that affects our health, well being and freedom, pretty much obligates one to act - OH DEAR! THE "A" WORD!!! - something people have tended to studiously avoid throughout history. Taking action in this case, means giving up trusting the "authorities", healthcare and government, and that we are on our own in maintaining our health, well being and freedom, a daunting prospect for people who have lived the Good Life in America for the past 75 years. Frankly, I always thought Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm, and Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 were right on the money, to be taken as true visions of the future.
One I need to get around (back) to. I tried reading it as a high schooler who was digging into all things SF. It proved to be too 'thick'. I suspect it makes more sense now...
Yes, I read BNW in my early 20's. 50 years ago. Made an impression. But Sohl seems to have been aware in advance of just what we've experienced since 2019.
Early on in the pandemic the reason for these mandates and restrictions were predicated upon saving the vulnerable and of course asymptomatic spread. But what is more selfish...not doing something for the vulnerable, or demanding that all of society accommodate the vulnerable which is a very low percentage of the population.
I am willing to engage these people wherever they lead. If it's science, we will talk science, if it's morality, I will talk morality. This conflict we are in is on many fronts.
To me morality seems to sit on a layer above the existential nature of tyranny. Morals allow one to feel okay about imposing on others for some "good". I'm under no illusion that I can live without exerting power over others but that awareness at least makes me think about it without feeling 'moral' or superior about it.
For one, I don't get to make choices about what other people put in their bodies, EVEN if it puts me at risk.
That's a line I won't cross. No matter what.
But it's not a moral thing per se but more of an understanding of existential tyranny and my attempts to limit the degree to which I exert it on others.
Part of the reason I am against all this stuff is precisely it will only bring my worst impulses to the surface. If we do all things under the auspices of it "if it saves one life" then I have a list. By the time we get to the end of this list, it will be my version of a utopia, but I guarantee everyone will be miserable...no doubt including myself.
I agree, I don't have the right to tell people what to put into their bodies.
Well, isn't it moral not to exert yourself on others?
Was it Mencken who said that people who felt they were in that position got to indulge in the delicious moral treat of being cruel to others while feeling superior to them and justified in doing so?
Ryan, your comment reminds me of this quote by C.S. Lewis:
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals."
Another media opportunity missed.... remember when Biden and Harris (cackling) repeatedly stated that they would never take a COVID vaccine that Trump had anything to do with? And then Biden wins and does a dizzying 180 and tells us that we could cause someone’s death if we don’t get vaccinated! It was pure moral shaming, same with masks... the Bobblehead journalists never asked why the change of mind. And Biden continues campaigning solely on the immoral, dark, flawed soul of Trump..... the irony being.....
It makes me smile a bit seeing these Covidians who are jab addicted, knowing they are injecting themselves with the juice of The Donald, who is to them the offspring of Satan and Hitler. It’s just too much.
"The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' — this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats."
“Man is not, by nature, deserving of all that he wants. When we think that we are automatically entitled to something, that is when we start walking all over others to get it.”
― Criss Jami, Diotima, Battery, Electric Personality
Those are some deep insights, Ryan. People who fell for it, and condemned the resistors, can't easily back out, because that would mean complete loss of face for them since they sense that they have burned their bridges.
For us, it might be wise to repair those bridges to friends and family in this situation, and never mention the original argument unless they do. Instead, find points of alliance with them that lead in the right direction, and let them re-establish their own standing with us on the new foundations. Then, years later, they will be able to let go of their commitment to the psyop, because doing so will no longer be a catastrophic humiliation for them.
That's part of the beauty of the narrative, a lot of it is a Jenga tower of contradictions. And if you talk to people, all most of them know to do is speak in moral platitudes and barring that, insult.
Not only that but now they have made it easy to gaslight us. You know, blame the victim. There is a school of thought I've encountered recently that says we are responsible for everything that happens to us, that we attract what we secretly want, and that if something bad happens it's because we made the wrong decisions and were not smart enough to make the right ones. You watch, this will be turned around against the vaccine-injured. They should have known better (even though at the time they had no choice). They should have made a stand a la Socrates.
Which is a horrible distortion of spiritualistic philosophy. I don't know how to untangle that shit here in less than 100 words, but it is not real or spiritually valid.
I know people had to get that shot. One of my nearest relatives had to to be able to get back to the US from some shithole country he was posted in. I hope he is not injured from it. We cannot forget that people were coerced with their jobs...or worse, being cut loose in a foreign land with no way home...
I’ll admit, I fell for the covid narrative for a while. I didn’t think I was superior, at least not consciously. I was annoyed with people who weren’t going along. In the first few weeks of lockdown, I was dumb enough to think that a lockdown would matter - while at the same time I knew people flew out of wuhan before it was locked down. It was fear that got me - just short circuited my thinking.
I won’t let myself forget that I was fooled. I pick at it like an old scab that just won’t let go. I don’t want to be fooled again. I’m so glad I woke up, before any damage was done to me.
Your last question is THE question. Logic seems to say if people haven't awaken yet, they probably won't in the future. This is largely because the "watchdog" press is now completely captured. Which means we'll never get any iron-clad, definitive stories "proving" these crimes against humanity ... which means people won't get the "truth bombs" that might make them belatedly wake up.
What would have to happen is a few of the captured news organizations breaking ranks and becoming uncaptured. But, again, if this was going to happen, it would have already happened.
Fox News has had its chances but has decided the limited hangout is as far as they will go. They seem to be fading pretty quickly into establishment Newspeak - and they are the best of the lot!
If Tucker was "controlled opposition," they still decided to fire the guy that was giving Fox its effective "limited hangout." So he was being too good at his assigned role?
For my part, I think he just challenged one too many of the "authorized" narratives.
They've allowed more skeptical commentary than any other TV network, but I agree, most of their on-air reporters were "all in" on the authorized narrative on vaccines, lockdowns, etc.
At some point, Tucker went a bridge too far with his monologues. As we can tell with his recent X shows, he's not backing down on his Covid views.
When I was much younger studying WWII, I wondered even at that young age how an entire nation could be fooled by an objectively stupid guy like Mr mustache. Now that I’ve seen it happen in regards to Covid, and so much else, I still don’t understand it. BTW I read you article on Howard Stern. Great article, but what a turd that guy is.
What do you mean by 'awaken'? Do you mean know what is going on. You know. I know. Millions of people know. What good has that done? What are you doing other than decrying that more people aren't in a state that doesn't cause you to do anything?
I see this all the time, on many issues. People complain about an issue, then assume that if only more people knew, somehow change would spontaneously occur. How? Voting? Protesting? Awareness bracelets?
The issue is we don't have a powerbase from which to act. Until we have influence/ control of localities, states, regions, we are nothing but opinions and feelings. Neither of which those in charge care about. Power is the only thing they care about or respond to. Until we have that power by organizing locally and at the state and regional level we are nothing but cattle.
This has been going on in our culture for quite awhile now. Who is to say when it began as each time you point at markers...they only lead to other markers. Some will point to Covid and say this is when compassion began to break down, but anytime you outsource compassion to government entities, even with the best of intentions, in the end does it not in some way give license to defer compassion hoping that some system will pick up the pieces?
Couldn't agree more. Ppl in "helping" careers seem to be the least empathetic. I'm still distraught encountering this. Vets, dentists, ... you name it... could give two shits about pain and suffering of those they are "treating".
My heart is stone cold dead towards the lives of all democrats and I include the voters. I am not demoralized, just the opposite. I am remaining energized towards survival in a world where 50% of the jabbed will die or become permanently disabled. The highly lethal Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic is about to appear in highly vaccinated populations.
I've been blocked by the Woke crowd from warning them about global warming nonsense, the fake covid pandemic, and the jabs. Now I want the Woke crowd to die from the jabs they tried to force on me. I don't want to do anything to them, unlike the jabs they tried to force upon me. Nope, I just want to watch the inevitable result of what they did to themselves while they blocked me from presenting any warnings. I've got a good supply of popcorn for the double feature entertainment. I wonder if the electricity will go away. That will be hard.
I don't know if this posted or not, so I'll say it again.
Though many here may think this is off topic, it is the same people who "have eyes but cannot see." The poison in the skies is becoming more and more evident and causing more and more illness and destruction.
And though many of you will say or think this is off topic, but the poison from the skies is another case in point. People who "have eyes but cannot see."
That WSJ story is unbelievable. A long story on the huge spike in cancer and no mention of the V-word.
As many have said and written, real science is now dead ... but so is real journalism ... at least at the prestigious and most-influential "news" organizations.
a child born today will, by the time they come to maturity, be utterly incredulous that there was ever a thing called "mainstream media" or that anyone trusted it.
Forget "draining the swamp" of politicians and captured bureacurats. We've got to purge all the newsrooms. Or we need Substack to become the "mainstream" news source ... and "they" are starting to come after Substack.
They've already started. "Oh, it's just those five little morons with no paid subscribers and who cares about them?"
That's exactly the crack that eventually takes the wall down. Substack's owners have not been nimble in dealing with the relentless assaults on free speech by the talentless and the envious. I remember when Charlie Warzel was crying that he couldn't make any money here and he's gone back to writing for established publications and I can well imagine how deep is his bitterness:
It's almost like we're all now in the same insane asylum as Jack Nicholson's character in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest." And Nurse Ratched is taking care of all of us.
I once saw the long running play of this in SF, and couldn't help wondering what happened to the mind of the guy playing the lobotomized guy banging his head against the wall after he played that role for years. Hopefully we are not accidentally turning into him.
There's a good antidote to this in Cloud Cuckoo Land by Anthony Doerr, an homage to libraries and librarians and to that which seems lost continuing in an underground way.
Nonetheless, you are right. We can take her though. Get the key to the med cabinet, inject her with lipid nanoparticles and thorazine.
Careful with this one - the study shows that the increase happened *before* the vax rollout. It almost seems like they're trying to get ahead of an upcoming story that shows a correlation between the vax and cancer - if that happens, this article is perfect for debunking it. Too perfect.
And the lack of mentions of the vax actually adds to its credibility for said debunking. Seems fishy to me, because as you noted, how could you write an article like this and not even mention the vax? Doesn't pass the smell test. Devious. Or maybe I'm just getting too paranoid. :- )
The uptick correlates well with the surge the amount of all vaccines given starting in the 1990s. It just takes an even more precipitous turn with the jab rollout. We really should be looking at the effects of constant bombardment to immune systems and metabolism, especially those of developing children.
Well, notice the uptick is in cancer rates and not cancer deaths. The post vaxx uptick is in cancer deaths.
Increasing rates of anything can be down to increases screening or testing. Just like with COVID, they tested everyone they could. Even the ones who died in car accidents.
And it worked on me when I first read the WSJ article yesterday! My initial thought was “maybe cancer has been rising all this time....?” (The psychology behind this is fascinating). And then my skeptical side kicked in and thought it was odd they didn’t continue the data through the pandemic. Is odd the right word? 🤔 So that was a red flag. But I could see how this would work on lots of sheep who trust the government. Good insight.
Michelle, I can remember wondering - when I ostensibly started seeing so many more obits of younger people - if I just hadn’t PAID ATTENTION before 2021. But Gato is right that they are trying to normalize all of this & the sheeple will majority buy it. “Devious” might be better than “odd”?
It's not because you haven't been paying attention. I've read the obits daily for 30 years...and the change since 2021 is stark. The entire format of obituaries has changed. Cause of death used to be in the first sentence...now rarely mentioned. Huge numbers of all ages, "dying peacefully in his/her sleep." Now that this has become code for vax death... it's being replaced by merely: "died peacefully". I've noticed a new trend of the family thanking first responders. Folks dropping dead on hikes, on week-ends at the beach, on vacations further afield. One mentioned the deceased "died peacefully near his home". What? Getting the mail? Walking the dog? Chatting in a neighbor's yard? I must say, reading the obits becomes more entertaining with each passing day.
Agree Kris. I always read the obits too, but more just a scan to see if there was anyone I knew. So at the beginning, I just thought well maybe I just hadn’t really had it in my radar as I did starting w/ the poison rollout. Another one I see is “died unexpectedly”. Why aren’t families outraged & speaking out (esp families of so-called “celebrities”)? Because they’ve taken them too or ostracized or browbeat family & friends to take it?
AISLING O'LOUGHLIN: How are we doing? I hope everybody's really well and minding yourselves. I want to pull up a story that I looked at earlier and it did a number on me, I have to say. It's from the Express newspaper.
[Express article appears on screen.]
[Reading from text on screen] "Under-50s cancer cases surge 79% in 30 years— Booze, obesity, tobacco and red meat blamed. A surge in global cancer cases among the under-50s over three decades is being blamed on obesity, red meat, booze and tobacco."
That was the first paragraph that threw me right off the scent, quite frankly. It did its job and it did it very well.
[Reading from clip of text on screen]: "There were 3.26 million new diagnoses in 2019, a 79% rise compared with 1990, a study has found."
So you see what they've just done there. 2019. So this is between 1990 and 2019, and I thought, well that before the covid, before the roll out of the experimental jabs, so then, I was like, maybe it's been happening a long time.
And it just works! It worked a treat on me, and it wasn't until later on in the day— let me pull out this tweet. What are they calling it? What are they calling them now, xes? Anyway, from Ed Dowd, he used to work on Wall Street, a brilliant statistician, fantastic at reading trends. And Ed has done wonders, he wrote the book, Cause Unknown. Anyway, here's his tweet, or x, or whatever it's called.
[Screenshot of Ed Dowd's tweet appears on screen.]
[Reading from text of Dowd's tweet] "Clever propaganda: A study using the dates from 1990 to 2019... 30 years to get [to] 79% which annualized is 2.63% a year."
Ah ha, you see what they do!
[Reading again from text of Dowd's tweet] "Does the study explain a 35% increase in excess cancer claims in the UK disability system for 2022? Which is a 15 standard deviation event in case you are interested."
Now 15 standard deviation event is just off of the charts! And we know since the rollout of this experimental so-called vaccine that turbo cancers have gone through the roof. Now they have to cover their tracks of course, the mainstream media are complicit in all this because they encouraged everybody to get the jab, as they put it. And of course, we know what happened. They got paid to do that. And that continues. And now they have to cover their tracks. And this is how they do it.
And I see that story's been picked up now in provincials in Ireland, it's probably going to make it into the national newspapers, and this is how it gets into our heads, and into our consciousness.
And people start saying, well, it's been happening, it's always happening, it's been happening for the past 30 years. They see 79 percent surge pre-covid, you know. So that's how it works.
So it just goes to show you, you need to be one step ahead of the posse around here. And even for people like me, who are not necessarily numerical, I know something's up post the jab roll out, I'm looking at excess deaths, but we need to look of course art cancer cases too. And this is one way mainstream media and the medical industry, that's what they are, this is how cover their tracks. A study. The experts say. Not going to work on us this time. OK, it worked on me this morning, but not going to work on me this afternoon! Because we're going to help each other out to try and figure out what's going on.
Always look for the "investigations" that could and should happen, but don't happen. Also, as you note, look at the timelines of the data they do study.
A couple of my woketard buddies just had to bury a dear friend who was diagnosed with a turbo cancer and given weeks to live. What do they talk about 24/7? Trump and racism. Ryan Cole was calling this out in March 2021. They are just now getting around to stripping him of his license for prescribing the I word. My “$cience” teacher sister is also baffled as to why “EVERYONE has cancer now!” I sent her the Atlantic article about the French “doctor” (guy was highly credentialed and respected) who just had to have his booster before his cancer surgery, so he could be safe you see- and how his “very rare” case showed his cancer exploding all over his body after said booster. The ONLY way to get a woketard to even entertain the notion of reading something is when it comes from a woketard approved source. But sis just said it’s time to move on. She will vote the same way and keep following the experts until she kills herself and/or family members. Which is a much better option that confronting the truth of course. Our mom is in steep decline as well, and the only options are “approved” approaches. Anything outside the box is off limits. Me and my looney suggestions about diet and supplements and an FLCCC consultation are not an option. “She eats very well. Diet is not the problem”. Ok, but if the current approach isn’t working, shouldn’t a change of course be considered? Crickets. I tried.
I red-pilled two people with Naomi Wolf reading from the Pfizer documents at Hillsdale. I think it has a kind of Zen koan effect on the blue pilled, since, if they trust pharma for whatever reasons, these documents are from pharma, so legitimized by virtue of that fact. It didn't work on everyone, however. People who depend on the medical system to stay alive seem most hell bent on not hearing anything else. My old friend in FL, who underwent a stem cell transplant, calls DeSantis "Death Santis" and sends me articles about mrna winning the Nobel. I am convinced they are subjecting the blue pilled to a very specific psyop, even if they aren't woke, which plays to their sense of themselves as intellectually superior, but also engenders a sense of pity for those of us who have gone down the rabbit hole. It is so fucking sophisticated and it is only amping up. People who used to critically think have stopped and now rely on their "sources" to think for them. Sad about your sister. I've been trying to stop my brother from getting myocarditis from boosters, or worse, but haven't had much success.
Yeah. Sis said Pharma sucks, but sometimes you need them to stay alive. I’m assuming she was talking about the jabs. I’m done with them. The chips will fall where they may.
Well, it's a slow thinning of the narrow-minded herd that itself was turbo-charged beginning in 2016. There's no doubt TDS is what enabled people to become religious devotees of Fraudci & Co, and it is gradually making many of them increasingly disconnected from reality and intolerable. I truly think it (this whole period beginning with the Russia psyop) has changed my brother so profoundly on a psychological level that there is likely no way back for him and, excepting for his wife & kids' sakes, I could hardly care if he suddenly dropped-- that's how bad he's become. I hope I'm wrong on the redemption issue, but. . .
Sadly, I’m right there with you. I care not at all for anyone still in on the narrative. Mom,sis, good buddies. WTFU. Doesn’t help that they have all insulted me at some point for simply asking questions.
What's worse than the normalization is the near glamorization. Nearly every single human interest story during college sports pre-game, half-time, and post-game show is about a player's family member fighting cancer, or their charity that gives to the children's hospital. "Team ____" or "_____ Strong" is everywhere. (Just insert the cancer victim's name.) And everyone feels special for wearing the dumb t-shirts because they're "helping fight cancer," and the medical system is full of "heroes" treating (poisoning) the patients.
Tonya. You are so right about the near glamorization of illness, particularly cancer. I've noticed the exact same thing. And it's not just during college sports. It's in the professional league of most major sports.
As for the " hereos; since covid, the entire medical establishment has attained the status of heroes for merely doing their job.
I recently saw a promo ad on TV for our nurses in our province of B.C. Most likely put out by their union. The ad depicts a nurse working on new Year's Eve and there's a cutaway to her loving husband and 2 children at home who send her a video text wishing her Happy New Year.
During her coffee break she reads it and smiles. The implication is she is a selfless hero working that night!
My partner was a firefighter and worked many times on special occasions and no one thought he was a hero for doing so. It was his job and those shifts were a part of it.
My 29 year old grandson has worked for a large ferry corporation since 2018. This past Christmas is the first one he has had off and that was only after an 8 hour early morning shift on that day. Is he a hero. No. He may be in my eyes lol, but in reality he's just doing his job.
Cancer is a gold mine for the medical industry and always has been. The so called fight never ends. Why would it?
I have never donated to Cancer, or taken part in any rallies, fundraisers, or bought their t- shirts. I remember the " pinkwashing" scandals associated the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
Cancer has always been with us as a human species but was kept in check by a functioning immune system for most people.
It appears we are heading down the road for a cancer epidemic. Fasten your seatbelt. Its going to be a bumpy ride.
This reminds me of the Bugblatter Beast from hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy. It is a deadly beast, which is why you bring a towel and place it over your head. Because when you do this, the Barbalang believes the inverse of what you said above...because you can't see it, it assumes it can't see you either.
You might not take any more vaccines or boosters if you knew they were killing you. That would be tragic...to pharmaceutical profits and the hospitals, doctors, politicians, and media they pay off to protect the profits.
As an imager and procedure doctor of 40 years, your suggestion that screening may be responsible is true. Screening has shown many things which were not apparent before but were present. No one leaves these alone and watches for fear of malpractice. How man things with pre-cancerous (?,? ? ) changes resolve on their own or just stop progressing. It has been shown that a simple lumpectomy has the same result as mastectomy, chemo and radiation. There is no money or glory in watchful waiting which is what we used to do with calcifications which are predominantly benign.
I've been also seeing things on YouTube about how annual mammograms aren't really needed and may in fact be harmful. I had a calcification show up on my last screening which was biopsied and turned out to be benign. I'm due for another mammogram but I am not sure whether I should go.
Skipper. Interesting comment regarding breast cancer and screening. I am assuming that your reference to calcification is Fibrosystic disease.
I had that when I was young and at age 36 I had a mammogram which verified it was that and not cancer at the time. By the time I hit menopause it was gone. I only had the one mammogram and I'm now 73.
It is one thing to seek to obscure the possible role of the vaccine in the rise in cancer among other harms. It is another thing to continue to promote the vaccine and to add it the the recommended childhood vaccine schedule. At what point do the public health bureaucrats become liable for the harm that they know occurs or that they make every effort not to know occurs?
Jesus H Tap Dancing Christ, its gone past simple absurdity to self parody, as vaccines are promoted as if they were the lastest fashion trend. What is the "it" injection everybody is begging for this year? Oh, you got a covid booster? That's so last season, this year its all about RSV and the gritty reboot of the flu shot remastered in mRNA! But get this, I hear they're preparing personalized cancer shots for next year, wont that be wild?! I'm definitely going to be first in line for that, even if I have to camp out in front of the CVS!!!
I wish I had taken a photo of the ad I saw on a NYC transit bus in late 2021. It stated that kids get heart attacks too and it was an ad for a hospital's children's heart center. They knew all along that these shots were dangerous and they started the gaslighting early.
And add to that the constant ads for depends for women in their forties. It appears that a leaky bladder is quite normal at that age. I can't ever remember my mothers generation suffering from that at such an early age.
Absolutely right about the gaslighting of kids getting heart attacks. There have been videos put out in Canada by various health agencies claiming its perfectly normal and has always been an issue. I seem to remember a similar ad on a bus in London, England that made the headlines.
And now the gaslighting about cancer is going into overdrive.
The entire Covid Feardemic, from 30,000 feet, was perpetrated by an assortment of people, mostly in Govts. and “science”, who used the “opportunity” to implement every kind of mass population control imaginable on their respective citizenry.
Some knew they could deliberately use the occasion to amass power; some went along, so as not to be ostracized by the powers that be. And there were those who knew full well the fallacies about that which they themselves had created, and disseminated lies upon lies to instill fear and compliance, in order to obfuscate the truth. Not a one of them stopped to consider, or even gave a damn about the costs to human life and all the collateral damage their devious plans would incur on a worldwide scale, and moreso set about to crush any who would dare speak out against it.
This nightmare, breathtaking in its global scope, was perpetrated upon the people of the entire world. It is the most horrific and an unprecedented crime against humanity in history, and its effects will be felt for generations to come.
There’s no way any of them will ever own up to it. Their very lives and livelihoods depend upon keeping the lie alive, and they know it. Worse still, they will only strive harder to implement even more and harsher totalitarian measures, by whatever means necessary, to assure that never happens.
1. Allopathic medicine is great in cases of trauma and severe acute illness. Outside of that, possibly harmful. Allopathy does not make one healthier. Just die more slowly with less pain. And lots of profit.
2. Lots of profit. They cannot honestly evaluate this treatment or any other. To acknowledge this would require evaluation of other treatments. We can’t have that. You didn’t see what you saw. Your memory is lying to you. We have billions and billions of data points now in EMRs. There is a reason no one has accumulated that and performed thorough analysis of everything we do in “healthcare.” It can’t be allowed.
I agree that allopathic medicine is great in areas of trauma. When I was 71 I fell down a cliff in 2021 and broke my humerus bone in 3 places. I had a wonderful surgeon who helped me recover WITHOUT surgery. We discussed the pros and cons given my age and based on the previous research I had done he and I concluded it was my choice with his blessings.
I recovered beautifully and have full use of my arm.
The irony is he was the second surgeon I saw. The first one told me I had no choice and had to have surgery. Fortunately for me, he was unable to do the surgery since he was going on holiday. He transferred me to the second surgeon in another hospital and the rest is history.
Are people becoming so demoralized that they just don't have any sense of awareness or care enough enough to know? Sadly, I can see hearts growing cold and people becoming less compassionate and empathetic toward others. Clearly, this is a spiritual battle. So many people "have eyes but cannot see." When will the world awaken to these crimes against humanity?
Seeing it and being willing to admit that you see it are two very different things. A lot of people really tied their sense of self worth and intelligence to being pro-vax/lockdowns, etc. Admitting they were not only wrong, but disastrously so, would be too much for their ego to endure. Even less chance they’d ever admit the skeptics they held in such disdain could ever have been right about anything.
Well said. I am in Canada and have had only one friend question the jab narrative, despite all of the evidence that has come out showing that they are neither safe nor effective. Sadly, all of the rest are still true believers, which I find both shocking and depressing. I am also gravely concerned about the next psy op as it seems that nobody has learnt anything from past mistakes.
Same for me here in Canada. All the vaccinated people I know have no interest or desire to question the jab narrative. They appear to want to stay willfully blind.
In some ways I get that because the alternative for them to recognize the truth would be mentally devastating for many of them. Perhaps its a form of self protection.
As an unvaccinated person, I find it ironical that I'm the one worrying about my vaccinated family and friends!
@Helen …dated a Normie (left) back in the 20-21 years. Admittedly I am the one that became the most easily frustrated. She was very smart no doubt. But On this sort of thing along with current political events she was childlike in behavior.
Having been able to analyze it thru the lens of patience, I can safely say it is indeed a survival mechanism. These people prefer to stay in their bubble because the alternative is unthinkable. This ensures they will not be ostracized from the herd where it is much easier to make a living and raise a family.
Articles like this are great but it will most likely have no effect on the masses. There’s only one thing that will knock them out and that’s severe pain. The longer and harder this carries on, the more pain will be forthcoming. It’s only a matter of when; not if.
Helen, it must be a lonely feeling being one of the few purebloods remaining in Canada. It’s incredible how blind the majority of Canadians are. Why do they vote Trudeau??? Same can be said for us… Why did we vote Biden??? (Hint: We didn’t !!!)
During the extreme measures taken to " encourage" the unvaccinated to succumb, it was lonely. Wasn't allowed to board a plane, go to restaurants, attend any sports events, swim in public swimming pools etc.
But now, having survived this onslaught on my freedom, I realize I am much stronger than I thought I was.
In Canada with a population of 40 million, approximately only 6 million of us didn't give in. I totally agree that it's incredible how blind the majority of Canadians are. I made the mistake of voting for the Liberal party in 2015 but never again. If I was American I would never vote for Biden.
Humans are doomed to repeat history. The work of Rene Girard (mimetic theory) has convinced me of it. It’s in our nature to tribally group, and the Iron Law of Hierarchy makes it clear that there will always be a outlier group thats good at pulling the strings
Saw a young man last week with a tee shirt that said, “Don’t make me repeat myself. —History”
That’s quite amusing, actually
I thought so, too, and told the young man I really liked it!
That’s good lol
are these true believers still getting boosters though?
Unfortunately, yes.
Actually, some of them tried to get a fourth or fifth shot but they keep getting covid and the doctor told them they have to wait 8 weeks post-covid before they can jab again. They will do it, though, and are counting down the weeks.
My God. How stupid can they get. They’re beyond saving. It’s truly depressing.
I absolutely do not understand Cannucks. That vast majority blind to the truth.
Those who know only virtue signaling will never know virtue.
But believe they do...... I’ve grown so tired of the virtue signalers, I recently responded with “ well, give yourself another Pat on the back!”.... they did not understand
*furiously scribbles Bumper Sticker graphics concepts on napkin*
I'd be willing to split the profits. Ping me.
Go for it! No need to involve me. Good luck!
Nice!
Absolutely. These people are quite willfully burying their heads in the sand since admitting their blind stupidity would be far too painful. Better to literally die a miserable death. My step sisters parents just got their latest booster and dad had another stroke. Doctors are baffled.
Shame on his doctor. Cardiologists told my husband to NOT get the booster as it would probably kill him.
I should have mentioned they live in CT. That’s a serious handicap
On another level, admitting there is a serious problem, especially one that affects our health, well being and freedom, pretty much obligates one to act - OH DEAR! THE "A" WORD!!! - something people have tended to studiously avoid throughout history. Taking action in this case, means giving up trusting the "authorities", healthcare and government, and that we are on our own in maintaining our health, well being and freedom, a daunting prospect for people who have lived the Good Life in America for the past 75 years. Frankly, I always thought Orwell's 1984 and Animal Farm, and Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 were right on the money, to be taken as true visions of the future.
Jerry Sohl's Point Ultimate, if you are not familiar with it. So prescient.
Also Brave New World, A Canticle for Liebowitz, and Camp of the Saints.
Canticle for Liebowitz is a masterpiece
One I need to get around (back) to. I tried reading it as a high schooler who was digging into all things SF. It proved to be too 'thick'. I suspect it makes more sense now...
One of my favorite novels. I should read it again to try to remember it better.
I loved that book the first time I read it and still do. Brilliant in every way.
Yes, I read BNW in my early 20's. 50 years ago. Made an impression. But Sohl seems to have been aware in advance of just what we've experienced since 2019.
"A Canticle for Liebowitz"
An obscure favorite of mine. Nice!
They were "morally" right. Hard to see through that.
And even if they did, would they want to face making the wrong moral choice?
Once you think you're morally superior to another person it's gotta be hard to give up that manufactured "high-ground".
Self righteousness is a powerful drug. More so when society is rewarding you for indulging in it.
Exactly. And they glamorized cowardice as a way to inoculate against empathy.
There is the indicator that it isn't righteous. Far too often the righteous thing to do is not that which society demands.
Beautifully said.
Were they morally right though?
Early on in the pandemic the reason for these mandates and restrictions were predicated upon saving the vulnerable and of course asymptomatic spread. But what is more selfish...not doing something for the vulnerable, or demanding that all of society accommodate the vulnerable which is a very low percentage of the population.
"Were they morally right though?"
NO
I am willing to engage these people wherever they lead. If it's science, we will talk science, if it's morality, I will talk morality. This conflict we are in is on many fronts.
To me morality seems to sit on a layer above the existential nature of tyranny. Morals allow one to feel okay about imposing on others for some "good". I'm under no illusion that I can live without exerting power over others but that awareness at least makes me think about it without feeling 'moral' or superior about it.
For one, I don't get to make choices about what other people put in their bodies, EVEN if it puts me at risk.
That's a line I won't cross. No matter what.
But it's not a moral thing per se but more of an understanding of existential tyranny and my attempts to limit the degree to which I exert it on others.
Yes!
Part of the reason I am against all this stuff is precisely it will only bring my worst impulses to the surface. If we do all things under the auspices of it "if it saves one life" then I have a list. By the time we get to the end of this list, it will be my version of a utopia, but I guarantee everyone will be miserable...no doubt including myself.
I agree, I don't have the right to tell people what to put into their bodies.
Well, isn't it moral not to exert yourself on others?
Inoculating against empathy is the perfect way to describe it.
Was it Mencken who said that people who felt they were in that position got to indulge in the delicious moral treat of being cruel to others while feeling superior to them and justified in doing so?
Yep, and this is why they don't want to talk about it.
You nailed this btw
"Admitting they were not only wrong, but disastrously so, would be too much for their ego to endure."
So expect the "Let's let bygones be bygones!" to flood the zone.
Good point. Ego really gets in the way, doesn't it? A stumbling block before the blind.
This is exactly why the authorities made it a moral choice. By doing so they bypassed cognition.
By default, this made for an easy jump to portraying those who took the "wrong" moral choice as those who were unable to understand through thought.
Simple but brilliant.
How would you feel if you made the wrong moral choice because you offshored your thinking based on a psyop?
I wonder how you'd feel if you found that out after you thought you were morally superior?
You might not want to know....let alone admit it.
Ryan, your comment reminds me of this quote by C.S. Lewis:
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals."
That is such a good quote
Bingo
Another media opportunity missed.... remember when Biden and Harris (cackling) repeatedly stated that they would never take a COVID vaccine that Trump had anything to do with? And then Biden wins and does a dizzying 180 and tells us that we could cause someone’s death if we don’t get vaccinated! It was pure moral shaming, same with masks... the Bobblehead journalists never asked why the change of mind. And Biden continues campaigning solely on the immoral, dark, flawed soul of Trump..... the irony being.....
It makes me smile a bit seeing these Covidians who are jab addicted, knowing they are injecting themselves with the juice of The Donald, who is to them the offspring of Satan and Hitler. It’s just too much.
LOL! Had not thought of that!! Next Congressional hearing, Fauci will blame Trump!!!
Hanging their hat on the moral choice was HUMONGOUS red flag to me--they lost their credibility for me at that point.
"The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' — this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats."
- Aldus Huxley
Tyranny quotes!
“Man is not, by nature, deserving of all that he wants. When we think that we are automatically entitled to something, that is when we start walking all over others to get it.”
― Criss Jami, Diotima, Battery, Electric Personality
Those are some deep insights, Ryan. People who fell for it, and condemned the resistors, can't easily back out, because that would mean complete loss of face for them since they sense that they have burned their bridges.
For us, it might be wise to repair those bridges to friends and family in this situation, and never mention the original argument unless they do. Instead, find points of alliance with them that lead in the right direction, and let them re-establish their own standing with us on the new foundations. Then, years later, they will be able to let go of their commitment to the psyop, because doing so will no longer be a catastrophic humiliation for them.
Yes. I agree with exactly what you're saying.
I think it behooves us to leave "morality" out of it.
It's counterproductive.
That's part of the beauty of the narrative, a lot of it is a Jenga tower of contradictions. And if you talk to people, all most of them know to do is speak in moral platitudes and barring that, insult.
But the point is to disrupt the narrative.
Not only that but now they have made it easy to gaslight us. You know, blame the victim. There is a school of thought I've encountered recently that says we are responsible for everything that happens to us, that we attract what we secretly want, and that if something bad happens it's because we made the wrong decisions and were not smart enough to make the right ones. You watch, this will be turned around against the vaccine-injured. They should have known better (even though at the time they had no choice). They should have made a stand a la Socrates.
Which is a horrible distortion of spiritualistic philosophy. I don't know how to untangle that shit here in less than 100 words, but it is not real or spiritually valid.
I know people had to get that shot. One of my nearest relatives had to to be able to get back to the US from some shithole country he was posted in. I hope he is not injured from it. We cannot forget that people were coerced with their jobs...or worse, being cut loose in a foreign land with no way home...
Spot on
Excellent comment! You're right on point. I'm saving it for future reference.
Thanks Blair. I was just piggybacking on your comment!
No problem, Ryan! Thanks! When I have the time later, I would like to think more about your comment and respond in a more meaningful manner.
Sounds great!
I’ll admit, I fell for the covid narrative for a while. I didn’t think I was superior, at least not consciously. I was annoyed with people who weren’t going along. In the first few weeks of lockdown, I was dumb enough to think that a lockdown would matter - while at the same time I knew people flew out of wuhan before it was locked down. It was fear that got me - just short circuited my thinking.
I won’t let myself forget that I was fooled. I pick at it like an old scab that just won’t let go. I don’t want to be fooled again. I’m so glad I woke up, before any damage was done to me.
And what easier way to tell who is morally superior by wearing the mask, and adding a badge to your facebook cover picture?
Your last question is THE question. Logic seems to say if people haven't awaken yet, they probably won't in the future. This is largely because the "watchdog" press is now completely captured. Which means we'll never get any iron-clad, definitive stories "proving" these crimes against humanity ... which means people won't get the "truth bombs" that might make them belatedly wake up.
What would have to happen is a few of the captured news organizations breaking ranks and becoming uncaptured. But, again, if this was going to happen, it would have already happened.
Fox News has had its chances but has decided the limited hangout is as far as they will go. They seem to be fading pretty quickly into establishment Newspeak - and they are the best of the lot!
If Tucker was "controlled opposition," they still decided to fire the guy that was giving Fox its effective "limited hangout." So he was being too good at his assigned role?
For my part, I think he just challenged one too many of the "authorized" narratives.
Last I heard awhile back, Fox News mandated the vaccine for all employees. If that’s still the case, they’re certainly not going to backtrack.
They've allowed more skeptical commentary than any other TV network, but I agree, most of their on-air reporters were "all in" on the authorized narrative on vaccines, lockdowns, etc.
At some point, Tucker went a bridge too far with his monologues. As we can tell with his recent X shows, he's not backing down on his Covid views.
When I was much younger studying WWII, I wondered even at that young age how an entire nation could be fooled by an objectively stupid guy like Mr mustache. Now that I’ve seen it happen in regards to Covid, and so much else, I still don’t understand it. BTW I read you article on Howard Stern. Great article, but what a turd that guy is.
They are Zionist owned and controlled. Look what Bibi did sacrificing Israelis to Pfizer, why would you expect anything different?
Unfortunately I think most would rather go down with the ship than admit they chose unwisely.
Mark Twains quote, something along the lines of “it’s easier to fool a man than to convince him he’s been fooled” comes to mind.
What do you mean by 'awaken'? Do you mean know what is going on. You know. I know. Millions of people know. What good has that done? What are you doing other than decrying that more people aren't in a state that doesn't cause you to do anything?
I see this all the time, on many issues. People complain about an issue, then assume that if only more people knew, somehow change would spontaneously occur. How? Voting? Protesting? Awareness bracelets?
The issue is we don't have a powerbase from which to act. Until we have influence/ control of localities, states, regions, we are nothing but opinions and feelings. Neither of which those in charge care about. Power is the only thing they care about or respond to. Until we have that power by organizing locally and at the state and regional level we are nothing but cattle.
This has been going on in our culture for quite awhile now. Who is to say when it began as each time you point at markers...they only lead to other markers. Some will point to Covid and say this is when compassion began to break down, but anytime you outsource compassion to government entities, even with the best of intentions, in the end does it not in some way give license to defer compassion hoping that some system will pick up the pieces?
Couldn't agree more. Ppl in "helping" careers seem to be the least empathetic. I'm still distraught encountering this. Vets, dentists, ... you name it... could give two shits about pain and suffering of those they are "treating".
My heart is stone cold dead towards the lives of all democrats and I include the voters. I am not demoralized, just the opposite. I am remaining energized towards survival in a world where 50% of the jabbed will die or become permanently disabled. The highly lethal Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic is about to appear in highly vaccinated populations.
I've been blocked by the Woke crowd from warning them about global warming nonsense, the fake covid pandemic, and the jabs. Now I want the Woke crowd to die from the jabs they tried to force on me. I don't want to do anything to them, unlike the jabs they tried to force upon me. Nope, I just want to watch the inevitable result of what they did to themselves while they blocked me from presenting any warnings. I've got a good supply of popcorn for the double feature entertainment. I wonder if the electricity will go away. That will be hard.
I don't know if this posted or not, so I'll say it again.
Though many here may think this is off topic, it is the same people who "have eyes but cannot see." The poison in the skies is becoming more and more evident and causing more and more illness and destruction.
https://legiscan.com/NH/text/HB1700/id/2865234#:~:text=HOUSE%20BILL%201700-FN%20AN%20ACT%20prohibiting%20the%20intentional,and%20making%20penalties%20for%20violation%20of%20such%20prohibition
And though many of you will say or think this is off topic, but the poison from the skies is another case in point. People who "have eyes but cannot see."
https://legiscan.com/NH/text/HB1700/id/2865234#:~:text=HOUSE%20BILL%201700-FN%20AN%20ACT%20prohibiting%20the%20intentional,and%20making%20penalties%20for%20violation%20of%20such%20prohibition
We need a place to go to solve problems.
What do you know about DIRECT DEMOCRACY?
For one, it has the potential to fix our biggest problem in the world: The Corruption in our systems.
What else do you really know about it? https://open.substack.com/pub/joshketry/p/direct-democracy-is-the-answer-lets?r=7oa9d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Cancer is also caused by radiation poisoning. They (corporations) are routing Internet data through human DNA.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349881372_Effect_of_Coronavirus_Worldwide_through_Misusing_of_Wireless_Sensor_Networks
https://rumble.com/v462nj2-january-9-2024.html
https://www.ftwproject.com/orgonite-blog/wireless-body-area-network-the-new-manhattan-project/ref/6/
https://rumble.com/v3trz3s-biophotonics-covid-load-balancing-for-the-bankers-human-husbandry.html
That WSJ story is unbelievable. A long story on the huge spike in cancer and no mention of the V-word.
As many have said and written, real science is now dead ... but so is real journalism ... at least at the prestigious and most-influential "news" organizations.
i have said it once and will say it again:
a child born today will, by the time they come to maturity, be utterly incredulous that there was ever a thing called "mainstream media" or that anyone trusted it.
Forget "draining the swamp" of politicians and captured bureacurats. We've got to purge all the newsrooms. Or we need Substack to become the "mainstream" news source ... and "they" are starting to come after Substack.
We have to go back even further to the educational institutions where this has been festering for years. It all needs an overhaul.
Substack has started censoring, so distributed independent platforms are the future of free speech. We have to control the servers.
Do you have a link to what they are censoring?
I was just wondering whether 'followers' might indicate people undesirably interested in what one says.
And Substack is starting to cave to them.
If Substack starts to "go wobbly" on free speech, we might be sunk.
if substack goes wobbly, we all have our distribution lists. (be sure to download them periodically so you control it).
we'll just set up shop elsewhere with our whole networks intact.
Heard of Urbit yet
Yep. We'd have to deploy another damn "free speech" work-around. Sigh.
They've already started. "Oh, it's just those five little morons with no paid subscribers and who cares about them?"
That's exactly the crack that eventually takes the wall down. Substack's owners have not been nimble in dealing with the relentless assaults on free speech by the talentless and the envious. I remember when Charlie Warzel was crying that he couldn't make any money here and he's gone back to writing for established publications and I can well imagine how deep is his bitterness:
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2024/01/claudine-gay-plagiarism-ai-culture-war/677092/
There is always Gab.
https://substack.com/@fascio/note/c-46953746
Sad news ...
I hope so
From your lips to God’s ears!
1,000%
How far the once mighty have fallen.... shills in the loony bin.
It's almost like we're all now in the same insane asylum as Jack Nicholson's character in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest." And Nurse Ratched is taking care of all of us.
Haha, Nurse Ratched isn't taking care of me. She isn't getting anywhere near me.
As I noted in my "Star Wars" column, the "bad guys" in the real world all wear ... white ... like Nurse Ratched ... and Dr. Fauci in his lab coat.
I once saw the long running play of this in SF, and couldn't help wondering what happened to the mind of the guy playing the lobotomized guy banging his head against the wall after he played that role for years. Hopefully we are not accidentally turning into him.
There's a good antidote to this in Cloud Cuckoo Land by Anthony Doerr, an homage to libraries and librarians and to that which seems lost continuing in an underground way.
Nonetheless, you are right. We can take her though. Get the key to the med cabinet, inject her with lipid nanoparticles and thorazine.
Careful with this one - the study shows that the increase happened *before* the vax rollout. It almost seems like they're trying to get ahead of an upcoming story that shows a correlation between the vax and cancer - if that happens, this article is perfect for debunking it. Too perfect.
And the lack of mentions of the vax actually adds to its credibility for said debunking. Seems fishy to me, because as you noted, how could you write an article like this and not even mention the vax? Doesn't pass the smell test. Devious. Or maybe I'm just getting too paranoid. :- )
Not paranoid at all. This passed over to malice a long time ago.
You're quite sane...;)
The uptick correlates well with the surge the amount of all vaccines given starting in the 1990s. It just takes an even more precipitous turn with the jab rollout. We really should be looking at the effects of constant bombardment to immune systems and metabolism, especially those of developing children.
Well, notice the uptick is in cancer rates and not cancer deaths. The post vaxx uptick is in cancer deaths.
Increasing rates of anything can be down to increases screening or testing. Just like with COVID, they tested everyone they could. Even the ones who died in car accidents.
And it worked on me when I first read the WSJ article yesterday! My initial thought was “maybe cancer has been rising all this time....?” (The psychology behind this is fascinating). And then my skeptical side kicked in and thought it was odd they didn’t continue the data through the pandemic. Is odd the right word? 🤔 So that was a red flag. But I could see how this would work on lots of sheep who trust the government. Good insight.
Michelle, I can remember wondering - when I ostensibly started seeing so many more obits of younger people - if I just hadn’t PAID ATTENTION before 2021. But Gato is right that they are trying to normalize all of this & the sheeple will majority buy it. “Devious” might be better than “odd”?
It's not because you haven't been paying attention. I've read the obits daily for 30 years...and the change since 2021 is stark. The entire format of obituaries has changed. Cause of death used to be in the first sentence...now rarely mentioned. Huge numbers of all ages, "dying peacefully in his/her sleep." Now that this has become code for vax death... it's being replaced by merely: "died peacefully". I've noticed a new trend of the family thanking first responders. Folks dropping dead on hikes, on week-ends at the beach, on vacations further afield. One mentioned the deceased "died peacefully near his home". What? Getting the mail? Walking the dog? Chatting in a neighbor's yard? I must say, reading the obits becomes more entertaining with each passing day.
Agree Kris. I always read the obits too, but more just a scan to see if there was anyone I knew. So at the beginning, I just thought well maybe I just hadn’t really had it in my radar as I did starting w/ the poison rollout. Another one I see is “died unexpectedly”. Why aren’t families outraged & speaking out (esp families of so-called “celebrities”)? Because they’ve taken them too or ostracized or browbeat family & friends to take it?
They just can't go there... ostrich with head in the sand. Can't believe how many folks from my past are turning up in the obits these days.
I wonder -- might it be possible for a concerted group to do a meta-analysis of obituaries from pre and post vaxx eras?
Perhaps someone more tech-savvy than I am could convince one of these new-fangled AI chatbots to do such a thing for us ..?
Haven't you heard, they all died of Covid or Long Covid. There is one group that thinks this is all due to Covid.
Ha, “evil” is the other word that came to mind.
There are so many appropriate words....
Irish independent journalist Aisling O'Loughlin did a brief video on this psyop confusion-distraction trick back in September.
*
Propaganda Tricks
by Aisling O'Loughlin News, posted September 7, 2023
https://rumble.com/v3fn6uo-propaganda-tricks.html
TRANSCRIPT
AISLING O'LOUGHLIN: How are we doing? I hope everybody's really well and minding yourselves. I want to pull up a story that I looked at earlier and it did a number on me, I have to say. It's from the Express newspaper.
[Express article appears on screen.]
[Reading from text on screen] "Under-50s cancer cases surge 79% in 30 years— Booze, obesity, tobacco and red meat blamed. A surge in global cancer cases among the under-50s over three decades is being blamed on obesity, red meat, booze and tobacco."
That was the first paragraph that threw me right off the scent, quite frankly. It did its job and it did it very well.
[Reading from clip of text on screen]: "There were 3.26 million new diagnoses in 2019, a 79% rise compared with 1990, a study has found."
So you see what they've just done there. 2019. So this is between 1990 and 2019, and I thought, well that before the covid, before the roll out of the experimental jabs, so then, I was like, maybe it's been happening a long time.
And it just works! It worked a treat on me, and it wasn't until later on in the day— let me pull out this tweet. What are they calling it? What are they calling them now, xes? Anyway, from Ed Dowd, he used to work on Wall Street, a brilliant statistician, fantastic at reading trends. And Ed has done wonders, he wrote the book, Cause Unknown. Anyway, here's his tweet, or x, or whatever it's called.
[Screenshot of Ed Dowd's tweet appears on screen.]
[Reading from text of Dowd's tweet] "Clever propaganda: A study using the dates from 1990 to 2019... 30 years to get [to] 79% which annualized is 2.63% a year."
Ah ha, you see what they do!
[Reading again from text of Dowd's tweet] "Does the study explain a 35% increase in excess cancer claims in the UK disability system for 2022? Which is a 15 standard deviation event in case you are interested."
Now 15 standard deviation event is just off of the charts! And we know since the rollout of this experimental so-called vaccine that turbo cancers have gone through the roof. Now they have to cover their tracks of course, the mainstream media are complicit in all this because they encouraged everybody to get the jab, as they put it. And of course, we know what happened. They got paid to do that. And that continues. And now they have to cover their tracks. And this is how they do it.
And I see that story's been picked up now in provincials in Ireland, it's probably going to make it into the national newspapers, and this is how it gets into our heads, and into our consciousness.
And people start saying, well, it's been happening, it's always happening, it's been happening for the past 30 years. They see 79 percent surge pre-covid, you know. So that's how it works.
So it just goes to show you, you need to be one step ahead of the posse around here. And even for people like me, who are not necessarily numerical, I know something's up post the jab roll out, I'm looking at excess deaths, but we need to look of course art cancer cases too. And this is one way mainstream media and the medical industry, that's what they are, this is how cover their tracks. A study. The experts say. Not going to work on us this time. OK, it worked on me this morning, but not going to work on me this afternoon! Because we're going to help each other out to try and figure out what's going on.
Alright, have a great day, take care.
3:28
[END]
Cancer was increasing prior to the scamdemic. Glyphosate producing genetically engineered plants and deficiency in sunlight exposure will do that.
Always look for the "investigations" that could and should happen, but don't happen. Also, as you note, look at the timelines of the data they do study.
A couple of my woketard buddies just had to bury a dear friend who was diagnosed with a turbo cancer and given weeks to live. What do they talk about 24/7? Trump and racism. Ryan Cole was calling this out in March 2021. They are just now getting around to stripping him of his license for prescribing the I word. My “$cience” teacher sister is also baffled as to why “EVERYONE has cancer now!” I sent her the Atlantic article about the French “doctor” (guy was highly credentialed and respected) who just had to have his booster before his cancer surgery, so he could be safe you see- and how his “very rare” case showed his cancer exploding all over his body after said booster. The ONLY way to get a woketard to even entertain the notion of reading something is when it comes from a woketard approved source. But sis just said it’s time to move on. She will vote the same way and keep following the experts until she kills herself and/or family members. Which is a much better option that confronting the truth of course. Our mom is in steep decline as well, and the only options are “approved” approaches. Anything outside the box is off limits. Me and my looney suggestions about diet and supplements and an FLCCC consultation are not an option. “She eats very well. Diet is not the problem”. Ok, but if the current approach isn’t working, shouldn’t a change of course be considered? Crickets. I tried.
Hello Chiadrum, I can relate. To me it feels like watching a train slide off the cliff in slow, very, very, very slow motion. Best wishes.
I red-pilled two people with Naomi Wolf reading from the Pfizer documents at Hillsdale. I think it has a kind of Zen koan effect on the blue pilled, since, if they trust pharma for whatever reasons, these documents are from pharma, so legitimized by virtue of that fact. It didn't work on everyone, however. People who depend on the medical system to stay alive seem most hell bent on not hearing anything else. My old friend in FL, who underwent a stem cell transplant, calls DeSantis "Death Santis" and sends me articles about mrna winning the Nobel. I am convinced they are subjecting the blue pilled to a very specific psyop, even if they aren't woke, which plays to their sense of themselves as intellectually superior, but also engenders a sense of pity for those of us who have gone down the rabbit hole. It is so fucking sophisticated and it is only amping up. People who used to critically think have stopped and now rely on their "sources" to think for them. Sad about your sister. I've been trying to stop my brother from getting myocarditis from boosters, or worse, but haven't had much success.
Yeah. Sis said Pharma sucks, but sometimes you need them to stay alive. I’m assuming she was talking about the jabs. I’m done with them. The chips will fall where they may.
Well, it's a slow thinning of the narrow-minded herd that itself was turbo-charged beginning in 2016. There's no doubt TDS is what enabled people to become religious devotees of Fraudci & Co, and it is gradually making many of them increasingly disconnected from reality and intolerable. I truly think it (this whole period beginning with the Russia psyop) has changed my brother so profoundly on a psychological level that there is likely no way back for him and, excepting for his wife & kids' sakes, I could hardly care if he suddenly dropped-- that's how bad he's become. I hope I'm wrong on the redemption issue, but. . .
Sadly, I’m right there with you. I care not at all for anyone still in on the narrative. Mom,sis, good buddies. WTFU. Doesn’t help that they have all insulted me at some point for simply asking questions.
What's worse than the normalization is the near glamorization. Nearly every single human interest story during college sports pre-game, half-time, and post-game show is about a player's family member fighting cancer, or their charity that gives to the children's hospital. "Team ____" or "_____ Strong" is everywhere. (Just insert the cancer victim's name.) And everyone feels special for wearing the dumb t-shirts because they're "helping fight cancer," and the medical system is full of "heroes" treating (poisoning) the patients.
Tonya. You are so right about the near glamorization of illness, particularly cancer. I've noticed the exact same thing. And it's not just during college sports. It's in the professional league of most major sports.
As for the " hereos; since covid, the entire medical establishment has attained the status of heroes for merely doing their job.
I recently saw a promo ad on TV for our nurses in our province of B.C. Most likely put out by their union. The ad depicts a nurse working on new Year's Eve and there's a cutaway to her loving husband and 2 children at home who send her a video text wishing her Happy New Year.
During her coffee break she reads it and smiles. The implication is she is a selfless hero working that night!
My partner was a firefighter and worked many times on special occasions and no one thought he was a hero for doing so. It was his job and those shifts were a part of it.
My 29 year old grandson has worked for a large ferry corporation since 2018. This past Christmas is the first one he has had off and that was only after an 8 hour early morning shift on that day. Is he a hero. No. He may be in my eyes lol, but in reality he's just doing his job.
Cancer is a gold mine for the medical industry and always has been. The so called fight never ends. Why would it?
I have never donated to Cancer, or taken part in any rallies, fundraisers, or bought their t- shirts. I remember the " pinkwashing" scandals associated the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
Cancer has always been with us as a human species but was kept in check by a functioning immune system for most people.
It appears we are heading down the road for a cancer epidemic. Fasten your seatbelt. Its going to be a bumpy ride.
In some respects, all this mendacity is akin to a little child covering his eyes and then thinking that you can't see him because he can't see you.
We see the monsters and we know what they are doing.
This reminds me of the Bugblatter Beast from hitchikers Guide to the Galaxy. It is a deadly beast, which is why you bring a towel and place it over your head. Because when you do this, the Barbalang believes the inverse of what you said above...because you can't see it, it assumes it can't see you either.
What a perfect example! It is all Opposite Day.
You might not take any more vaccines or boosters if you knew they were killing you. That would be tragic...to pharmaceutical profits and the hospitals, doctors, politicians, and media they pay off to protect the profits.
As an imager and procedure doctor of 40 years, your suggestion that screening may be responsible is true. Screening has shown many things which were not apparent before but were present. No one leaves these alone and watches for fear of malpractice. How man things with pre-cancerous (?,? ? ) changes resolve on their own or just stop progressing. It has been shown that a simple lumpectomy has the same result as mastectomy, chemo and radiation. There is no money or glory in watchful waiting which is what we used to do with calcifications which are predominantly benign.
I've been also seeing things on YouTube about how annual mammograms aren't really needed and may in fact be harmful. I had a calcification show up on my last screening which was biopsied and turned out to be benign. I'm due for another mammogram but I am not sure whether I should go.
See https://www.cochrane.org/CD001877/BREASTCA_screening-for-breast-cancer-with-mammography
You may want to read this book:
https://www.amazon.com/Should-Be-Tested-Cancer-Maybe/dp/0520248368
Skipper. Interesting comment regarding breast cancer and screening. I am assuming that your reference to calcification is Fibrosystic disease.
I had that when I was young and at age 36 I had a mammogram which verified it was that and not cancer at the time. By the time I hit menopause it was gone. I only had the one mammogram and I'm now 73.
No money in it either, oncologists get ~65% of their income from chemo.
It is one thing to seek to obscure the possible role of the vaccine in the rise in cancer among other harms. It is another thing to continue to promote the vaccine and to add it the the recommended childhood vaccine schedule. At what point do the public health bureaucrats become liable for the harm that they know occurs or that they make every effort not to know occurs?
I’ll take never Pfucking ever for the daily double Alex
I think we will begin to see some of this happening this year-- slowly, and then all of a sudden a whole lot.
No one is liable since 1987. The year legislation was passed making big Pharm exempt from liability!!!
And the incessant pharma ads have to stop!! It wasn’t always allowed - it can be done.
I noticed this article in WSJ as I was reading this AM. The *chef’s kiss* was the headline of the article directly adjacent on the webpage.
“These Are The New Vaccines You Should Get-And It It’s Not Just Covid-19”
I wish I were kidding.
Jesus H Tap Dancing Christ, its gone past simple absurdity to self parody, as vaccines are promoted as if they were the lastest fashion trend. What is the "it" injection everybody is begging for this year? Oh, you got a covid booster? That's so last season, this year its all about RSV and the gritty reboot of the flu shot remastered in mRNA! But get this, I hear they're preparing personalized cancer shots for next year, wont that be wild?! I'm definitely going to be first in line for that, even if I have to camp out in front of the CVS!!!
I wish I had taken a photo of the ad I saw on a NYC transit bus in late 2021. It stated that kids get heart attacks too and it was an ad for a hospital's children's heart center. They knew all along that these shots were dangerous and they started the gaslighting early.
I’m also seeing a lot of ads now promoting the normalization of dementia in middle age.
And add to that the constant ads for depends for women in their forties. It appears that a leaky bladder is quite normal at that age. I can't ever remember my mothers generation suffering from that at such an early age.
Absolutely right about the gaslighting of kids getting heart attacks. There have been videos put out in Canada by various health agencies claiming its perfectly normal and has always been an issue. I seem to remember a similar ad on a bus in London, England that made the headlines.
And now the gaslighting about cancer is going into overdrive.
What is cancer - the mutation of a healthy cell. What is an mRNA shot designed to do - the mutation of a healthy cell. Go figure.
Ans that is why they could not leave a significantly big control group, my friendline.
The entire Covid Feardemic, from 30,000 feet, was perpetrated by an assortment of people, mostly in Govts. and “science”, who used the “opportunity” to implement every kind of mass population control imaginable on their respective citizenry.
Some knew they could deliberately use the occasion to amass power; some went along, so as not to be ostracized by the powers that be. And there were those who knew full well the fallacies about that which they themselves had created, and disseminated lies upon lies to instill fear and compliance, in order to obfuscate the truth. Not a one of them stopped to consider, or even gave a damn about the costs to human life and all the collateral damage their devious plans would incur on a worldwide scale, and moreso set about to crush any who would dare speak out against it.
This nightmare, breathtaking in its global scope, was perpetrated upon the people of the entire world. It is the most horrific and an unprecedented crime against humanity in history, and its effects will be felt for generations to come.
There’s no way any of them will ever own up to it. Their very lives and livelihoods depend upon keeping the lie alive, and they know it. Worse still, they will only strive harder to implement even more and harsher totalitarian measures, by whatever means necessary, to assure that never happens.
👆🏻🎯💯🎯👆🏻
Yeah we got the GCC dry-run on the "dry".
1. Allopathic medicine is great in cases of trauma and severe acute illness. Outside of that, possibly harmful. Allopathy does not make one healthier. Just die more slowly with less pain. And lots of profit.
2. Lots of profit. They cannot honestly evaluate this treatment or any other. To acknowledge this would require evaluation of other treatments. We can’t have that. You didn’t see what you saw. Your memory is lying to you. We have billions and billions of data points now in EMRs. There is a reason no one has accumulated that and performed thorough analysis of everything we do in “healthcare.” It can’t be allowed.
I agree that allopathic medicine is great in areas of trauma. When I was 71 I fell down a cliff in 2021 and broke my humerus bone in 3 places. I had a wonderful surgeon who helped me recover WITHOUT surgery. We discussed the pros and cons given my age and based on the previous research I had done he and I concluded it was my choice with his blessings.
I recovered beautifully and have full use of my arm.
The irony is he was the second surgeon I saw. The first one told me I had no choice and had to have surgery. Fortunately for me, he was unable to do the surgery since he was going on holiday. He transferred me to the second surgeon in another hospital and the rest is history.
Quick suggestion/typo catch:
"is this all locked up and settled as causal? no. i would not say so, at least not to p>0.05 kinds of levels..."
I think you mean p < .05.
doh.
thanks for that.