That is by design. If it REALLY ISNT about our health, but something else, why would the CDC need to spend time doing real analysis? If it is not about public health, but something else entirely, NOT DOING REAL ANALYSIS, makes perfect sense, because real analysis destroys the narrative created to support the “something else.” If the trut…
That is by design. If it REALLY ISNT about our health, but something else, why would the CDC need to spend time doing real analysis? If it is not about public health, but something else entirely, NOT DOING REAL ANALYSIS, makes perfect sense, because real analysis destroys the narrative created to support the “something else.” If the truth, derived from real non-manipulated data (like the definition of “fully jabbed”) destroys your narrative, it deserves to be destroyed.
That is by design. If it REALLY ISNT about our health, but something else, why would the CDC need to spend time doing real analysis? If it is not about public health, but something else entirely, NOT DOING REAL ANALYSIS, makes perfect sense, because real analysis destroys the narrative created to support the “something else.” If the truth, derived from real non-manipulated data (like the definition of “fully jabbed”) destroys your narrative, it deserves to be destroyed.