"We stand on the precipice of massive breakthroughs in human health and longevity."
Yes, but I strongly suspect that the people behind this project want that for themselves, not us. They're just using us to work out the kinks of this technology. It's remarkable that hundreds of millions of people lined up to be human test subjects in thi…
"We stand on the precipice of massive breakthroughs in human health and longevity."
Yes, but I strongly suspect that the people behind this project want that for themselves, not us. They're just using us to work out the kinks of this technology. It's remarkable that hundreds of millions of people lined up to be human test subjects in this experiment. I still can't believe it...
This is definitely the hill to die on. Fight like the future of mankind is at stake here, because it is.
I don’t want to pee on anyone’s firework. But trust me, it’s 100X easier to hurt, injure or kill a human than it is to induce a change that’s just right & helps the subject / patient.
Please allow me to point out something a pharmacologist with pharmacokinetic & toxicology knowledge knows before I even lift a pen to scribble some key parameters.
Almost every drug in today’s pharmacies would be no use if you alter the dose by 3-10X in either direction.
Some are more “forgiving” than others, but if you increase the dose by a mere 3X you very commonly get unacceptable side effects. If you drop the dose by just 3X, you might as well not bother, for we’ll be way south of efficacy.
With that established, I point out that there are NO control mechanisms in the mRNA products. While we might invent controls, we currently have a grand total of zero.
What do I mean?
-no way to relate mRNA dose to amount of protein made
-no way to regulate duration of protein expression
-no way to regulate where in the body the mRNA goes
By control, I don’t just mean higher / lower, but for example as above, how to land in the tiny spot that’s high enough to work, not too high thus avoiding side effects, had finally, for all this to happen where it must & not where it’s unacceptable.
I’m what they used to call an enthusiastic sceptic. I’ve been humbled & amazed by what I’ve witnessed over three decades & more.
Dr. Yeadon, do you see any evidence of shedding of spike protein from the vaccine?
I appreciate that you come on these substack boards and interact with us. In the spring of last year, LifeSiteNews posted your video warning of these "vaccines." My family took it to heart and we are all non-GMO to date. Thanks.
I’m not convinced about shedding. I do accept that we’re in uncharted territory & we really don’t know what’s in the coding in the vaccines.
For example if they replicate (which they’re not supposed to) then yes, it would be possible for an injected person to accidentally affect an unjabbed person.
If not, I don’t see how shedding could work. Only a tiny amount of spike, relative to what’s swimming around your body could get into a nearby person. So to injure a person nearby, the donor in this case would always be overwhelmed by spike themselves & would always be much more unwell that the unvaccinated but adversely affected person.
Bottom line is that drugs are poisons. When used judiciously the benefits can outweigh the risks and promote healing. Knowing when, where, and how much is an art not a science, and that usage varies from person to person (hence "the art of medicine").
To the drug company's chagrin, using drugs in this fashion doesn't result in mega blockbusters. So drugs were recast from poisons to something akin to fertilizer. They are to be used far and wide, haphazardly spread around, and are required to promote health. The noble concept of preventative medicine was redefined to mean giving people drugs when they aren't sick "to keep them healthy". Remember the insane calls a few years ago to put statins in the water supply? None of this is by accident, but is an intentional business strategy to increase sales.
Pharma is evil, it is run by sociopaths who value profits above all else. Find a good physician who truly practices the art of medicine rather than blindly following pharma's algorithms.
Thanks for continuing to speak out on this Dr. Yeadon.
"But trust me, it’s 100X easier to hurt, injure or kill a human than it is to induce a change that’s just right & helps the subject / patient."
Trust not required. Anyone who remembers being a kid and stacking up blocks to knock down knows that building takes time and gets boring compared to the instant gratification of demolition.
All the things you mention to find the "sweet spot" of safety and efficacy would take time and money, so much of each that the effort would not have born the fruit desired. The vaccines wouldn't have been "ready" in time to "save lives" in the short term and to prove the value of mRNA technology for medicine over the long haul.
When those injected can no longer ignore what’s happening as they get sick and people around them die unexpectedly there will be a reckoning. A friend of mine died unexpectedly from a pulmonary embolism within a month of receiving his booster. The doctors said he had undiagnosed pulmonary thrombosis and assured his wife it was not related to Covid in any way. They wouldn’t even consider the shots might be a factor. That defies logic and is why many of us will never again blindly trust the medical establishment. Is our side finally winning? How many people have you heard brag about getting their booster shots lately? How many doses are going bad in the freezer? Just watch, they’ll extend the expiration date AGAIN and introduce a new humanitarian effort to ship extra doses to third world countries.
The last time I heard someone happily say, "I'm getting the booster!" was about six weeks ago. Last week, she admitted she'd been "thrown for a loop after the booster" and was still feeling less than 100%. She seemed cheery enough about the ill effects (!?!?!?!?), but the fact that she was able to admit the link between the shot and her health was at least an itsy-bitsy, teeny-weeny good sign. I wonder if her social circle, however, will talk her out of seeing the connection.
And while the average fat & inactive 52yo definitely can die of a heart attack, it’s extraordinarily unlikely in once very fit people, because they develop what’s called extensive collateral circulations in the coronaries, which is protective to an extent.
If they want to live to 180 or longer that cuts out generations of their own. Hopefully they go extinct in the process. Nature is quite capable of revenge.
I think the latter is quite possible. There's a video of Yuval Noah Harari taking of transhumanism saying 'no more free will'. I sincerely believe that God would not allow that to happen and He would smite us all, well, not the innocent.
"We stand on the precipice of massive breakthroughs in human health and longevity."
Yes, but I strongly suspect that the people behind this project want that for themselves, not us. They're just using us to work out the kinks of this technology. It's remarkable that hundreds of millions of people lined up to be human test subjects in this experiment. I still can't believe it...
This is definitely the hill to die on. Fight like the future of mankind is at stake here, because it is.
I don’t want to pee on anyone’s firework. But trust me, it’s 100X easier to hurt, injure or kill a human than it is to induce a change that’s just right & helps the subject / patient.
Please allow me to point out something a pharmacologist with pharmacokinetic & toxicology knowledge knows before I even lift a pen to scribble some key parameters.
Almost every drug in today’s pharmacies would be no use if you alter the dose by 3-10X in either direction.
Some are more “forgiving” than others, but if you increase the dose by a mere 3X you very commonly get unacceptable side effects. If you drop the dose by just 3X, you might as well not bother, for we’ll be way south of efficacy.
With that established, I point out that there are NO control mechanisms in the mRNA products. While we might invent controls, we currently have a grand total of zero.
What do I mean?
-no way to relate mRNA dose to amount of protein made
-no way to regulate duration of protein expression
-no way to regulate where in the body the mRNA goes
By control, I don’t just mean higher / lower, but for example as above, how to land in the tiny spot that’s high enough to work, not too high thus avoiding side effects, had finally, for all this to happen where it must & not where it’s unacceptable.
I’m what they used to call an enthusiastic sceptic. I’ve been humbled & amazed by what I’ve witnessed over three decades & more.
Dr. Yeadon, do you see any evidence of shedding of spike protein from the vaccine?
I appreciate that you come on these substack boards and interact with us. In the spring of last year, LifeSiteNews posted your video warning of these "vaccines." My family took it to heart and we are all non-GMO to date. Thanks.
John,
I’m not convinced about shedding. I do accept that we’re in uncharted territory & we really don’t know what’s in the coding in the vaccines.
For example if they replicate (which they’re not supposed to) then yes, it would be possible for an injected person to accidentally affect an unjabbed person.
If not, I don’t see how shedding could work. Only a tiny amount of spike, relative to what’s swimming around your body could get into a nearby person. So to injure a person nearby, the donor in this case would always be overwhelmed by spike themselves & would always be much more unwell that the unvaccinated but adversely affected person.
Best wishes
Mike
Pfizer's own study showed shedding, and warned about the proximity of vaccinated people to pregnant mothers.
Thanks, Dr. Yeadon. May God keep you and your family safe through what's coming.
Good for you!
Bottom line is that drugs are poisons. When used judiciously the benefits can outweigh the risks and promote healing. Knowing when, where, and how much is an art not a science, and that usage varies from person to person (hence "the art of medicine").
To the drug company's chagrin, using drugs in this fashion doesn't result in mega blockbusters. So drugs were recast from poisons to something akin to fertilizer. They are to be used far and wide, haphazardly spread around, and are required to promote health. The noble concept of preventative medicine was redefined to mean giving people drugs when they aren't sick "to keep them healthy". Remember the insane calls a few years ago to put statins in the water supply? None of this is by accident, but is an intentional business strategy to increase sales.
Pharma is evil, it is run by sociopaths who value profits above all else. Find a good physician who truly practices the art of medicine rather than blindly following pharma's algorithms.
Thanks for continuing to speak out on this Dr. Yeadon.
"So drugs were recast from poisons to something akin to fertilizer. "
"Brawndo! It's got the electrolytes plants crave!"
I thought Idiocracy was approx 500 years from now. 😭
Thank you, Dr.
"But trust me, it’s 100X easier to hurt, injure or kill a human than it is to induce a change that’s just right & helps the subject / patient."
Trust not required. Anyone who remembers being a kid and stacking up blocks to knock down knows that building takes time and gets boring compared to the instant gratification of demolition.
All the things you mention to find the "sweet spot" of safety and efficacy would take time and money, so much of each that the effort would not have born the fruit desired. The vaccines wouldn't have been "ready" in time to "save lives" in the short term and to prove the value of mRNA technology for medicine over the long haul.
When those injected can no longer ignore what’s happening as they get sick and people around them die unexpectedly there will be a reckoning. A friend of mine died unexpectedly from a pulmonary embolism within a month of receiving his booster. The doctors said he had undiagnosed pulmonary thrombosis and assured his wife it was not related to Covid in any way. They wouldn’t even consider the shots might be a factor. That defies logic and is why many of us will never again blindly trust the medical establishment. Is our side finally winning? How many people have you heard brag about getting their booster shots lately? How many doses are going bad in the freezer? Just watch, they’ll extend the expiration date AGAIN and introduce a new humanitarian effort to ship extra doses to third world countries.
The last time I heard someone happily say, "I'm getting the booster!" was about six weeks ago. Last week, she admitted she'd been "thrown for a loop after the booster" and was still feeling less than 100%. She seemed cheery enough about the ill effects (!?!?!?!?), but the fact that she was able to admit the link between the shot and her health was at least an itsy-bitsy, teeny-weeny good sign. I wonder if her social circle, however, will talk her out of seeing the connection.
I fear it's not the case that our side is winning, but that everyone is losing.
https://jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf
We're up to page 59 now Shane Warne has died...????
Heart attack. I wonder what caused it. No question mark because it wasn't a question. 52 years old.
And while the average fat & inactive 52yo definitely can die of a heart attack, it’s extraordinarily unlikely in once very fit people, because they develop what’s called extensive collateral circulations in the coronaries, which is protective to an extent.
Amazing document. I don’t think it’s going as planned.
If they want to live to 180 or longer that cuts out generations of their own. Hopefully they go extinct in the process. Nature is quite capable of revenge.
We either die on it or God will smite us all.
I think the latter is quite possible. There's a video of Yuval Noah Harari taking of transhumanism saying 'no more free will'. I sincerely believe that God would not allow that to happen and He would smite us all, well, not the innocent.