Yes. Thanks for that. I will sign up with Malone. Yes the more I think about it the more I think it was a terrible blunder in the first place to let the narrative be about the vaccines.
They are there to 'start the machine'. 'The machine' is clearly what the story should all be about.
There is a subtext about the most effective 'star…
Yes. Thanks for that. I will sign up with Malone. Yes the more I think about it the more I think it was a terrible blunder in the first place to let the narrative be about the vaccines.
They are there to 'start the machine'. 'The machine' is clearly what the story should all be about.
There is a subtext about the most effective 'starter'.
There is one about 'starters' that damage the machine at the same time (like perhaps putting ethanol in a family saloon car).
There is one about 'starters' that don't really start the machine (like maybe starting with ethanol and full choke and never pushing the choke in again).
But they are subtexts.
The story should be about the machine. If we want to get rational. Question is: Do we?
I can't answer the rational question because that has probably been my biggest struggle through this: I have zero tolerance for irrationality.
McCullough encourages people to not get hung up on the masks as he thinks that's a distraction, but I think it's also been the first step in medical tyranny and getting people to comply. So I appreciate his point, but I'm still not complying.
Yes. Thanks for that. I will sign up with Malone. Yes the more I think about it the more I think it was a terrible blunder in the first place to let the narrative be about the vaccines.
They are there to 'start the machine'. 'The machine' is clearly what the story should all be about.
There is a subtext about the most effective 'starter'.
There is one about 'starters' that damage the machine at the same time (like perhaps putting ethanol in a family saloon car).
There is one about 'starters' that don't really start the machine (like maybe starting with ethanol and full choke and never pushing the choke in again).
But they are subtexts.
The story should be about the machine. If we want to get rational. Question is: Do we?
I can't answer the rational question because that has probably been my biggest struggle through this: I have zero tolerance for irrationality.
McCullough encourages people to not get hung up on the masks as he thinks that's a distraction, but I think it's also been the first step in medical tyranny and getting people to comply. So I appreciate his point, but I'm still not complying.
The masks fit quite nicely into the concept of "nudging" people into increasingly more compliance with tyrannical dictates.