165 Comments

IMO, most of the players involved are psychopaths. I don't underestimate their ability to justify almost anything if it serves their purposes, especially if they get to control people and line their pockets.

And what about the follow on questions...

Why are they downplaying and suppressing vaxx adverse events?

Why did the FDA elect not to require more stringent data capture?

Why did the FDA choose not to convene an independent review board?

Why did they claim the vaxx stays in the injection site when they've used this tech in the past to deliver mRNA all over the body, including the brain?

Why did the CDC director ignore the recommendations of the advisory panel and the ACIP regarding boosters?

Why are they pushing boosters with almost no data?

Why are they pushing jabs for children who have almost no risk from the virus?

Why are they pushing jabs for pregnant women who were excluded from the trials?

(Even Pfizer doesn't recommend pregnant women get the jab.)

Why are they claiming safety, efficacy, and effectiveness that real world data undermines?

(Yesterday, Victorian Health Minister Martin Foley said 78%...78%...of those in hospital were fully vaxxed and another 17 were partially vaxxed).

https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/coronavirus/victoria-375-people-currently-in-hospital-with-covid19/video/562ac33889c5d16e6158c38b94d8ed5f?fbclid=IwAR3nGgSdBCQaoVmF60GIGAWwxA0MWkLJybnuIgEJ-DfgICkmrK2XsyV20xs

Why are they making employment and education conditional upon vaxx status with a vaccine that they've admitted doesn't stop infection or transmission?

Sometimes coincidences are coincidental. Sometimes they're not. There are too many coincidences. There is too much aberrant behavior that cannot be explained or reconciled.

I know everyone objects to Holocaust analogies, but this situation calls for one. I've often wondered why people got on the trains. They vastly outnumbered the guards. Yes, self preservation was a factor...and concern for children, wives, and elderly parents.

I believe they got on the trains because they were good people...normal people...people with hope...who could not imagine what lay in store for them. They could not imagine the evil planned for them because they themselves were not evil.

I don't profess to know what is really happening, why it is happening, or who is behind it.

But I cannot dismiss the possibility that this is more than hubris, arrogance, incompetence, stupidity, and greed.

I cannot dismiss the possibility that this was a plan...and they...whoever they are...are executing to it.

Expand full comment

“no one is that stupid, reckless, and amoral. (no, not even these guys)”

If it weren’t for the coordinated censorship and smearing of all dissent since the start, I might share your view.

But the censorship is a large red flag indicating that there are some guys who are that reckless and amoral, and greedy for power, control and resource concentration.

Expand full comment

they can develop a whole new vaccine in mere months but they haven't once updated it with a newer S protein to restore its effectiveness against Delta

Expand full comment

A careful perusal of the comment section so far seems to indicate that a large majority of the commenters believe that the people involved with the Wuhan Lab, NIH, Moderna, BMGF, et al are indeed that stupid, reckless, and amoral as to possibly release the virus deliberately so as to sell billions of dollars of vaccines with zero liability, cull the population and redesign the economy and all of society to suit their nefarious aims.

I never would have believed this two years ago, but after witnessing the sheer power grabs, the suppression of safe and inexpensive therapeutics, the housing of infected patients in nursing homes when the only thing we knew at the time was that the elderly were most susceptible to this novel virus, the mandates, the passports, the mass firings... there is no evil too evil for these people. So yes, I believe them capable of any and all depravity. Our lives are meaningless to these sociopaths.

Expand full comment

They were able to have a vaccine candidate ready in a few short months. Well over a year latter they haven't been able to advance a new spike? Seems more like shrinking the timeline than the efficiency of the technology.

Expand full comment

There are a lot of odd and altogether unprecedented in human history facts all through this pandemic: why the high-pitched shrieking at any mention of off-label therapeutics? Why the mass snowjob around the origins? Why the extreme devotion to lockdowns that have clearly at best slowed but by no means stopped the spread? All of these facts make much more sense if you look at it from the point of view of anyone holding a patent on a coronavirus vaccine.

Expand full comment

i came across that stat news article a while back when trying to learn about the mRNA vaccines, and it's alarming. not only does it document that moderna was way over valued, i believe it also implies that bancel may have been lying to investors to keep the funding coming. in other words, reading between the lines in that article, it's possible bancel ends up in cuffs but-for the COVID pandemic. hell of a coincidence for a company that partnered with NIH on its COVID vaccine. quadrupley so, considering it's looking more and more like NIH *bankrolled* the pandemic in the first place.

Expand full comment

"no one is that stupid, reckless, and amoral. (no, not even these guys)"

Sorry, but ... "yes, especially these guys". If you know anything at all about the careers of some of those mentioned here, you will know (or very strongly suspect), that they are psychopaths and/or megalomaniacs capable of unspeakable deeds. They are nefarious.

That they coalesced around a set or fortuitous circumstances is likely a question of "being there". Daszak is on record as proposing the unthinkable. Gates' history is reprehensible. Fauci is an appalling human being at every level. These are a set of people whose bent naturally causes them to exploit situations by taking control and re-purposing for their own enrichment, and it appears they have done so in plain sight, exploiting insider knowledge and access to unlimited funds

Expand full comment

I'm wondering how many of the commenters are going to say, like me, that there ARE people that "stupid, reckless, and amoral". I will not assume that the release was an accident; we have come too far down the road of being told constant lies for me to give these scientists and billionnaires the benefit of the doubt.

Expand full comment

ps Summer 2020, former Pfizer VP of Research, respiratory, Dr Michael Yeadon expressed concern that if certain individuals came to power, the systems being in place could be used for a global depopulation program. Several weeks ago he called it a global depopulation program designed to provide plausible deniability.

Yes, there are sociopaths who are so filled with hubris that they would think they'd inherit the earth so to speak..

Expand full comment

"no one is that stupid, reckless, and amoral. (no, not even these guys)"

To arrive at this conclusion only shows that you have not been studying the subject long enough. Fashion yourself a hat out of the sturdy heavy-duty tinfoil and dive in, there are folks in your audience who've been aware of Event 201 from the beginning.

FWIW, I don't believe they let loose a *deadly* virus, I believe they let loose a largely benign virus they could easily treat with a prohibited drug should one of their *own* catch it. They need cover to dismantle their faulty economic system and erect the control grid. The real bioweapon is the shot. (That they are most certainly reckless and amoral enough to kill millions with a mRNA "vaccine" should inform your statement above)

Expand full comment

“no one is that stupid, reckless, and amoral.”

That’s weird. Last I checked we are the same species that drops rocks off of overpasses to kill absolute strangers out of boredom.

Russia, off the bat, can be assumed to have been trying to plot something like this for the last 30 years. They understand the West’s weakness as well as their own, biowarfare is just rational.

For private actors who have the capability, depopulation is “rational” as well (under a delusion of immortal ego).

I don’t think Russia has any way to “play” Bill Gates, so, option 2 seems likely. You can’t look at the vaccination rate for Russia however and have any misconceptions about where they’ve placed their bet. It doesn’t match yours.

Expand full comment

When u said this "no one is that stupid, reckless, and amoral. (no, not even these guys)" you forgot GREEDY. Just like Gates thinks cause he has money his word is golden. The same reason companies like Monsanto continue to kill people wirh Round Up and can sleep at night.

Expand full comment
founding

Careful Gato, or you might find yourself prancing on a hot tin roof instead of wearing one....

Expand full comment

yep, yep, and yep ..

.. and here's the red pill

all of the above can also be neatly seen in the trail of patent applications filed by the various actors involved .. Moderna, the NIH et al .. which patent filings not only show that every aspect of SARS-COV-2 had been bioengineered by the end of 2018 .. but that Moderna had actually started work on their mRNA vaccine at the start of 2019, despite knowing they needed to licence essential elements of the technology to complete their aims .. well Fauci et al made sure those IP licences were made available to Moderna, who filed it's joint patent for their mRNA vaccine in November 2019, a whole month before the outbreak was announced

.. a further benefit from tracking the patent filings is you get to see which US government agencies and private foundations funded the underlying research into those patents .. and I'll let you guess which names show up

all of the above has been fully documented to a very high legal standard (evidence-wise), by Dr David Martin .. look for the document titled:

The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

but this link should do:

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%2520FauciCOVID-19%2520Dossier.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjvkfnz1KfzAhVa73MBHVTfCsgQFnoECAYQAg&usg=AOvVaw2eQiYSY2vAfTQpEI6wdKlH

.. it's a large document to be sure, so an easier entree is to watch Dr Martin speak to the document, when being interviewed by US/German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, seen here:

https://odysee.com/@daveswildcamping:0/4FdvU43qOdfD:3

(look Reiner up .. he's gold plate legit)

.. and note that Dr Martin with his legal have had at least one private audience with a US Supreme Court justice, and several other similar meetings with Federal Court justices .. where each of their Honours agreed verbally that Dr Martin has gathered evidential dynamite, but none are willing to allow Martin to run with it presently in an open hearing .. why? .. because big business this time has for now, really put the fix in at all levels

.. James Bond villains ain't got nothing on big pharma and those with vested interests

Good luck to us all

from Australia

*proudly waving my gold foil cap*

Expand full comment

You’re an excellent writer. I very much appreciate your prose. Right now another writer comes to mind. Bukowski. I often hear his words, “go all the way” when my skepticism begins to falter. I took a pause in your essay the moment you sailed the conclusion that the individuals involved couldn’t be so malicious as to release a virus upon the world. I wonder, why does your skepticism stop there? I’ll quote Bukowski, “if you’re going to try, go all the way.”

Expand full comment