6 Comments
тна Return to thread

Malone and Kirsch are both vaxxed, so I care quite a bit. If we lose them, we lose two of our best.

On the other hand, I almost want a mass vaxxed die-off just so people will WTFU. If 1 mn die now, it might save 100 mn from getting the mRNA Flu jab or the monkeyscam crapcine.

Expand full comment

I showed my brother their stuff. His only reaction was to point out they got vaxxed therefore they must not believe what they're saying, therefore the jabs are perfectly safe. Didn't occur to him that maybe they didn't realize until afterward, or maybe some got AEs that changed their minds, or maybe they knew the dangers,made a choice for themselves based on their own circumstances, but still think the jabs are dangerous enough that everyone should get all the info and total freedom to make their own choice.

Nope. They have jabs,therefore everything they point out about the dangers can be safely ignored.

He has,however, not gotten the boosters, nor has his wife,and they aren't injecting the kids, which I am grateful for every day. If there is danger, at least the kids are safe and if they dont leap at more boosters and their cumulative damage, there might be a chance for them too.

Expand full comment

Malone is responsible for the mRNA technology. He knew as early as the late 1990's it was dangerous, definitely by the 2000's. He's smart. He changed horses when he realized very soon after the vax rolled out it would be a disaster. Malone is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Expand full comment

I disagree. His rationale is that mRNA gene therapy (never intended as vax), was for people who were probably going to die. It was more of a Hail, Mary, NEVER intended for general population level treatment.

All medicines can be dangerous, depending on dosage, underlying conditions etc. People have OD'd on aspirin.

A kitchen knife is dangerous, but is used for good. His efforts were likely to make the therapy work in spite of any dangers.

In short, it's possible you are correct, but the evidence I have seen is weak and circumstantial. Far from proof.

Expand full comment

Malone has transformed into a rights warrior, complete with attempts to put actions today into historical and revolutionary perspective. He is not a natural performer, as far as I can see.

I believe he legitimately is a good man that sees evil at his doorstep.

Expand full comment

For the past 2 years, all the evidence I've seen of the people involved in this in any way - even peripherally - is nothing but utter criminal malevolence through and through. Right now, I assume they're all guilty until proven otherwise.

Expand full comment