322 Comments

When you refer to "the Jabs," what are we discussing? Jabs are not just one, monolithic thing.

Examination of vials is discouraged or outright illegal. The results from those who forged ahead and tested include: 1.) very bad ingredients, 2.) Wild card variations in formulas from single manufacturers, and 3) no rhyme or reason about who got what and where different batches were shipped.

All of this is obscured further by blatant data tampering and lying.. Scrubbing deaths from VAERS and military databases helps hide the invalidation and gaslighting happening now when people drop over dead or get their horrendous cancer diagnosis. "Oh no, it couldn't be THAT."

This was all designed to hide signals, from the very first flawed study that didn't report deaths and miscarriages to the latest tweets from compliant henchmen.

The fact that we are still seeing the death signal after global coverup efforts is a signal all its own.

Expand full comment

I think the sun came out in week 20 so probably just climate change

Expand full comment

Check out my analysis of the German data:

https://vigilance.pervaers.com/p/excess-deaths-and-boosters-by-state

Your articles were an inspiration for me to get into this.

Expand full comment

Correlation may not equal causation, but it sure provides evidence of it. I'm perfectly willing to assume causation until proven otherwise. The burden of proof is on them, not on us. We've shown the correlation, but we don't have the means to prove causation. Politicians and public health bureaucrats have sworn the jabs are safe, so that should give them the incentive to prove that all these deaths are just coincidental. Their silence speaks loudly.

Expand full comment

Although the data all around the world is pretty shoddy really, in spite of the seemingly unlimited availability of taxpayer money available to fund other COVID initiatives, the work that independents have done is immense relative to the public health authorities who remain baffled by pretty much everything since it doesn;t fit the narrative they've been provided. There is an easy way to disassociate from the crap public health data altogether though - https://metatron.substack.com/p/safe-and-effective-25000-surveys.

Expand full comment

Pfizer's own 7 month "safety" trial from 2020 showed all cause mortality in a 46,000 participant study at 16 dead in the placebo group and 21 dead in the "vaccine" group.

If Pfizer openly admitted it was this bad, this early....you know it's much worse.

Expand full comment

“Punishing” Sweden for their high-profile bucking of the lockdown mania by sending them “bad” (i.e. inert) vaxxes?

Expand full comment
founding
Dec 29, 2022·edited Dec 29, 2022

*just release ACM by age, vaxx status (for real, not the bad data the CDC uses), and vaxx type and we could have this sorted out in an afternoon.

Eventually actuary tables/schedules and life/health insurance data will help with this analysis.

That's a back door way of following the money

Expand full comment

This is just a theory- could it have something to do with aspiration/injection technique? I believe Sweden was one of the first countries to raise this issue.

Expand full comment

I'm suspicious of all data curated by all governments. The same corrupt politicians that drive policy decisions also drive the data collection. What they churn out may be manipulated to hide the evidence so smarty pants, like yourself, el gato malo, don't have the smoking gun. I pray some day, soon, the truth all comes out. Thanks to brave and curious cats like yourself, maybe it will happen.

Expand full comment

I think showing prevalence of vaccine harm will be the more persuasive element of these investigations as

1) there seems to be a wall of unassailable tautologies around attacking pure efficacy (the "they were never intended to stop transmission, they reduce serious illness and death, they're perfect")

2) damning evidence of prevalent harm makes any argument of their inefficacy more relevant (if it can be argued they are basically harmless even if useless, there is less consequence).

I wish you luck. We're in the stage where there's plenty of questioning but it is proving hard to translate what many of us already know into any kind of consequential change.

Expand full comment

Very interesting indeed! Might be an idea to get figures from Africa as well. This group was probably the most exposed to the WuFlu virus and also the least vaxxed.

Expand full comment

Could natural exposure to Covid reduce the side effects of later vaccination?

Expand full comment

If the public health authorities have one job, it is to reduce excess deaths. If there is one way to chip away at the narrative wall created by the media to protect the PHA’s about masking, vaccines, and lockdowns, it is to constantly ask about the elevation in excess deaths. Just force them to explain how they failed at their jobs. At some point, they will crack.

Expand full comment

Copying my comment from Die Fackle2.0 the other day when this was the topic there:

"We had the Covid-bump in mortality during 2020, about 8 000-10 000 more than expected. However, as Covid generally kills the very old, infirm and those with specific comorbidities, this bump cannot be blamed solely on the virus as such, since Sweden had a bumper crop of babies during the 1940s, especially the latter half of that decade, and these people are now in their 80s.

As in, that entire generation is reaching their life-expectancy at the same time as Covid hits. So the largest generation in swedish history (relative population numbers at the time of their birth) is now passing, leading to a general increase in all-cause mortality.

After 2020, mortality is dropping which is also unsurprising as - to put it callously - those especially vulnerable to Covid have now largely died off. There is as of yet no excess mortality reported that matches the roll-out of the RNA-injetions, as there seems to be in Britain (The Naked Emperor has been looking at this, among others), the US (as Igor Chudov is reporting on) or other places.

While any discussion about why we see these differences between nations will be purely speculative at this point, my money is on underlying society-wide differences in access to and quality of general health care, public health as such and the nutritional quality of food and access to same, and also dietary habits.

You simply do not see "american fat" poor people here. It is extremely rare, and what few there are, aren't enough to show up in national statistics - whereas in the US and to a lesser degree Britain, they number in the millions (or tens of millions in the US).

8 hours sleep per night, as unprocessed natural food as possible, a good mix of everything - no bloody diets!, avoid hyperprocessed goods like most candies, snacks, pastries and sodas and get at least 10-20 kilometes walking in per day, and avoid sitting down for extended periods; no longer than 20 minutes at a time, then be up and do something else.

The above is not based on science but on the simple fact that that is how we evolved, so that's how we function. The modern day capitalist-industrialist (or Taylorist even) society, the dream of the old modernists and futurists, is purely unnatural. (And no, that doesn't mean Luddites or communists are worth considering as more than speed bumps - folly on one side of the river does not mean wisdom lives on the other.)"

Edited for spelling.

Expand full comment

In December/January of 2019/2020 before international consensus had been established whether Covid was anything special or just another "Cry Wolf"-moment, several major swedish daily papers, pundits and other prominent figures loudly and roundly ridiculed any and all fears, and cals for re-established border checks and so on.

This was due to a domestic debate whether open borders is a good thing or not, and these liberals, libertarians and modern leftist progressives were looking to score cheap points by connecting border control with panicked fear-mongering. Sweden's major liberal daily paper, Dagens Nyheter (Daily News; think wannabe-NYT at its wokest) even organised a trip to the worst affected places in Italy just to show how harmless Covid was and how unfounded any calls for border checks were.

Those articles, tweets and so on disappeared a couple of weeks later.

But if these several dozen people brought Covid back to Stockholm in January 2020, that would harmonise nicely with your thinking that we got it earlier than others and that it spread more here.

Oh, and I know on paper Sweden had some anti-Covid measures, but in reality we had none whatsoever outside of hospitals. We had stuff like "you can't use the two rows of seats closest to the busdriver" on public transport - yeah, that'll stop an airborne virus... We had so, so much idiotic stuff like that most people just said "Fudge it!", had their colds, took their jabs and got on with life.

Substack called Die Fackel 2.0 (don't worry, it's in english) has been looking into this for some time, since the Stacker lives and works in Norway, so I recommend anyone interested to head on over there and compare notes.

Expand full comment