this is a look only at vaccine effects on covid, not the net risk/benefit equation. (because that's what's relevant to driving vaccine mediated evolution)
full risk/ben looks very different.
these vaccines were never a good overall bet for the young or healthy.
this is a look only at vaccine effects on covid, not the net risk/benefit equation. (because that's what's relevant to driving vaccine mediated evolution)
full risk/ben looks very different.
these vaccines were never a good overall bet for the young or healthy.
Then author, don't say the unvacc'd don't do as well...the data is shaky! as Malone and Bossche point out (Meeting of the Covid-19 Giants recent interview with Dr. Phillip McMillan). Govt's stopped doing proper data needed for such statements, which makes sense, God forbid we'd actually be allowed to KNOW if the jabs work or not. Bottom line - Your statement is very misleading. Whatever data you are using doesn't beat what B and M say in my op. Readers can go to Bossche's website and read all his science. He wrote the WHO to plead for them to stop many months ago. He still stands by his science. It has not changed.
Respectfully, if you don't want to know Gato's take on what the data seems to be saying, you shouldn't be reading here. Yes, the data quality is problematic, but it is for everyone. I also read Bossche, Malone, and others. All have the same data, different conclusions. This is as it should be... because #realscience. Pulling one's punches by not stating an unwanted or unsettling conclusion... that would be totally wrong. I think Gato does a great job of letting us know the limitations of the data and his conclusions. Indeed, he does this much more transparently than most. These evaluations are a work in progress, but I think we benefit by getting a feel for where we seem to be at the moment, even if it's not what we'd wish for.
this is NOT an urging to run and get vaxxed.
this is a look only at vaccine effects on covid, not the net risk/benefit equation. (because that's what's relevant to driving vaccine mediated evolution)
full risk/ben looks very different.
these vaccines were never a good overall bet for the young or healthy.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/all-cause-deaths-and-vaccination
Very probably not good for anyone.
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/what-risk-benefit-analysis
Then author, don't say the unvacc'd don't do as well...the data is shaky! as Malone and Bossche point out (Meeting of the Covid-19 Giants recent interview with Dr. Phillip McMillan). Govt's stopped doing proper data needed for such statements, which makes sense, God forbid we'd actually be allowed to KNOW if the jabs work or not. Bottom line - Your statement is very misleading. Whatever data you are using doesn't beat what B and M say in my op. Readers can go to Bossche's website and read all his science. He wrote the WHO to plead for them to stop many months ago. He still stands by his science. It has not changed.
Respectfully, if you don't want to know Gato's take on what the data seems to be saying, you shouldn't be reading here. Yes, the data quality is problematic, but it is for everyone. I also read Bossche, Malone, and others. All have the same data, different conclusions. This is as it should be... because #realscience. Pulling one's punches by not stating an unwanted or unsettling conclusion... that would be totally wrong. I think Gato does a great job of letting us know the limitations of the data and his conclusions. Indeed, he does this much more transparently than most. These evaluations are a work in progress, but I think we benefit by getting a feel for where we seem to be at the moment, even if it's not what we'd wish for.