Yes, and in terms of the plan, it may include vaccine surveillance via Bluetooth radiation. The data is preliminary, but doctors in Mexico have found that those inoculated with most types of covid vaccines emit Bluetooth frequencies likely from graphene oxide in their bodies that can be picked up as a MAC address on laptops and cell phon…
Yes, and in terms of the plan, it may include vaccine surveillance via Bluetooth radiation. The data is preliminary, but doctors in Mexico have found that those inoculated with most types of covid vaccines emit Bluetooth frequencies likely from graphene oxide in their bodies that can be picked up as a MAC address on laptops and cell phones, even after they have died. The unvaccinated control group emitted no Bluetooth signal unless they had a PCR test, in which case they generated a different code. https://www.comusav.com/en/BlueTruth/
This is full-on bullshit. Look at the sources they cite for example. The experimental graphene antenna operate in the teraherz band. Bluetooth opertes in the gigaherz band 2.402-2.48. A teraherz antenna can't send at bluetooth wavelengths which are a thousand times longer.
These people are shooting shit with a shotgun and seeing whom they can grift some donations from.
[It's also trivial to test with a friend. Install bluetooth scanner app. Go somewhere away from bluetooth devices. Have jab victim approach. You won't see a bluetooth beacon.]
Graphene Oxide, nanobots, all of that vaccine related BS cracks me up. They are toxic because of the mRNA, the LNPs and maybe the Spike protein is also toxic (not convinced about that, though).
Yes, and in terms of the plan, it may include vaccine surveillance via Bluetooth radiation. The data is preliminary, but doctors in Mexico have found that those inoculated with most types of covid vaccines emit Bluetooth frequencies likely from graphene oxide in their bodies that can be picked up as a MAC address on laptops and cell phones, even after they have died. The unvaccinated control group emitted no Bluetooth signal unless they had a PCR test, in which case they generated a different code. https://www.comusav.com/en/BlueTruth/
This is full-on bullshit. Look at the sources they cite for example. The experimental graphene antenna operate in the teraherz band. Bluetooth opertes in the gigaherz band 2.402-2.48. A teraherz antenna can't send at bluetooth wavelengths which are a thousand times longer.
These people are shooting shit with a shotgun and seeing whom they can grift some donations from.
[It's also trivial to test with a friend. Install bluetooth scanner app. Go somewhere away from bluetooth devices. Have jab victim approach. You won't see a bluetooth beacon.]
Graphene Oxide, nanobots, all of that vaccine related BS cracks me up. They are toxic because of the mRNA, the LNPs and maybe the Spike protein is also toxic (not convinced about that, though).
Could you post the DOI or other source identifier for the paper(s) that you refer to? The list of sources is quite long at the end of the documentary.
From their bibliography nothing indicates gigaherz-band research.
https://www.comusav.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/bibliografiaA-MikAndersen.pdf
bbasi, Q.H.; El-Sallabi, H.; Chopra, N.; Yang, K.; Qaraqe, K.A.; Alomainy, A. (2016).
Terahertz channel characterization inside the human skin for nano-scale body-centric
networks. IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 6(3), pp. 427-434.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2542213
Abbasi, Q.H.; Nasir, A.A.; Yang, K.; Qaraqe, K.A.; Alomainy, A. (2017). Cooperative in-
vivo nano-network communication at terahertz frequencies. IEEE Access, 5, pp. 8642-
8647. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2677498
Aliouat, L.; Rahmani, M.; Mabed, H.; Bourgeois, J. (2021). Enhancement and
performance analysis of channel access mechanisms in terahertz band. Nano
Communication Networks, 29, 100364.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2021.100364
etc