Can someone explain to me how multi-ethnic society isn't doomed to fail when we have morons like this on SCOTUS because of skin color and the presence of a vajayjay? I don't pay taxes so this idiot can tell me what I can and cannot say. This is not sustainable. It does not end well.
KBJ doesn’t know what a woman is, or the first amendment. She is an intersectionality shield for the regime like Kamala and KJP. DIE uber alles, including free speech. I for one welcome our future Google Gemini Supreme Court. Lawfare is turning our judicial system into show trials and kangaroo courts: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/lawfare-65-project-democracy-docket-marc-elias
Anyone who wants to take away your right to speak always has something to hide. If they didn't, they would welcome open debate. When open debate is censored/shut down, something is very, very wrong. Freedom of speech is the most basic right and the right which causes all others to fall if taken away. All across history, the censors were never the good guys.
All she will ever be is the first black woman appointed to the court for DEI reasons. That is not something I would be proud of TBH. Where is the achievement? It's sad for everyone.
The only purpose SCOTUS serves is to decide whether or not a law or act is Constitutional.
It's one thing for a non-biologist to not be able to even colloquial define woman (especially seeing as being a woman one of her key qualifications for this sinecure https://youtu.be/0JNO0TBbpSc?si=Mfn6AZc4Y_Hgv7yF)
But it's entirely another thing for a trained legal scholar, one who's been appointed to the highest bench in the land, to not be able to properly understand "Congress shall make no law respecting... abridging the freedom of speech."
Hamstringing the Government is the entire f#@&ing point of 1A.
One has to consider the possibility that those representing "our side" don't actually believe what we believe about rights, and want to make sure the power exists when they wield the whip hand. Everyone says "oh Republicans so stupid, go speed limit, never accomplish anything," because they think the Rs are some kind of opposition. This is a mistake. They may be stupid, but they are just as venal and corrupt as the Ds. One big club, as the man said.
But now that Oregon and Washington have eliminated the bar exam, we can look forward to more "justice" from the likes of KJB.
The biggest issue is that it's not technically government induced censorship when the platforms doing the censoring are on the same team as the biden regime. They wanted to do all this, because they are the regime. They are indistinguishable from each other.
You'd almost be better off with the Supreme Court (all of whom still believe the covid hoax) by attempting to prove that facebook, Google, Amazon, and historical Twitter IS the federal government and not private companies and that any act in which they restrict free speech is government censorship.
Justice Brown’s view is a direct result of 60+ years of the Marxist assault on the nuclear family. I don’t know what her personal background is, but the welfare state that destroyed the black American family has convinced three generations that the government is responsible for providing for you and keeping you safe, not your parents. In that world, when you weigh the right of the individual to speak freely against the “responsibility” of the government to keep you safe, it seems heartless to advocate for the individual. What about all those people who will be hurt, you bunch of selfish meanies who think your speech is more important than all the grandmas who will die if they don’t take this shot? Grandma can’t make up her own mind don’t you know? And that’s where we are.
We literally had someone on the "highest court in the land" showing that this Country is doomed.
5months, 5years, 50years, not a matter of if but when.
When she spewed out that the 1st Amendment was bad because it could hamstring the Government from censoring info it deemed "harmful", I almost shit my pants. THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT!!!
I can't think of a more perfect example of our downfall than that exchange from KBJ.
BUT, that's exactly why she was put there.
1/3 to 1/2 of this Country agrees with her, because they think they'll always be on the correct side of the Freedom Fence. Idiots, all of them. Little do they know, the Freedom Fence or Circle of Freedom only gets smaller, it only contracts. At some point, you are on the wrong side. It never fails, EVER.
Now what does "doomed" mean. Civil War? Divorce? States just ignoring Fed Law/Judiciary? Well that last one is already going on, Blue States have been doing that for years and years now.
The extremes in this Country have ZERO common ground anymore, and that's where our institutions stand at this point. It's FUBAR.
All Empires end, ours is no different or special.
The reality is, things could be so amazing around the World, BUT...
We have psychopaths and sociopaths running this Country, and the World for that matter.
They are drawn to Government, for obvious reasons. That is a HUGE problem.
That's why, even though elections are rigged, it doesn't matter. We aren't just an election or two away from fixing any of this. The rot is everywhere and unfixable. A full gut rehab is needed.
I read a summary of yesterday's SCOTUS activity on this case that said SCOTUS was admonishing the plaintiffs because they hadn't shown the harm that was done to them by the government's efforts to suppress speech.
While I think this is off-track (as GM explained so well, they should be addressing the infringements of rights not worrying about proving harm), I think the plaintiffs need to attack the claim that the wrong information can harm people. Make the government prove that information is DIRECTLY harmful to people.
Information by itself can do no harm. Information is just words and images that are processed by people. People then decide what they will do with that information. Absorb it, ignore it, talk about it with friends, whatever. There can be no possible harm until the person takes action. Any harm is thus the responsibility of the person taking in the information, not on the purveyor of the information.
If we can blow up the claim that information is harmful to people, the justification for censorship falls apart.
Can someone explain to me how multi-ethnic society isn't doomed to fail when we have morons like this on SCOTUS because of skin color and the presence of a vajayjay? I don't pay taxes so this idiot can tell me what I can and cannot say. This is not sustainable. It does not end well.
KBJ doesn’t know what a woman is, or the first amendment. She is an intersectionality shield for the regime like Kamala and KJP. DIE uber alles, including free speech. I for one welcome our future Google Gemini Supreme Court. Lawfare is turning our judicial system into show trials and kangaroo courts: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/lawfare-65-project-democracy-docket-marc-elias
Spot on. I'm gonna like me any post that uses both miscegenation and defenestration.
Never forget 1A is just as important for the listener.
For every person they silence a thousand can not hear.
Draw a picture of that and it's worth a thousand words.
That's what they're after.
Anyone who wants to take away your right to speak always has something to hide. If they didn't, they would welcome open debate. When open debate is censored/shut down, something is very, very wrong. Freedom of speech is the most basic right and the right which causes all others to fall if taken away. All across history, the censors were never the good guys.
Justice DEI has no business being on SCOTUS.
Great post, gato.
Why aren’t YOU arguing in front of the Supreme Court?!? Our odds might improve…
This Ketanji chick can't even define a woman. She is the new perfect democrat: A fcking useful MORON
All she will ever be is the first black woman appointed to the court for DEI reasons. That is not something I would be proud of TBH. Where is the achievement? It's sad for everyone.
The only purpose SCOTUS serves is to decide whether or not a law or act is Constitutional.
It's one thing for a non-biologist to not be able to even colloquial define woman (especially seeing as being a woman one of her key qualifications for this sinecure https://youtu.be/0JNO0TBbpSc?si=Mfn6AZc4Y_Hgv7yF)
But it's entirely another thing for a trained legal scholar, one who's been appointed to the highest bench in the land, to not be able to properly understand "Congress shall make no law respecting... abridging the freedom of speech."
Hamstringing the Government is the entire f#@&ing point of 1A.
It would be nice if a Supreme Court Justice actually understood the First Amendment.
One has to consider the possibility that those representing "our side" don't actually believe what we believe about rights, and want to make sure the power exists when they wield the whip hand. Everyone says "oh Republicans so stupid, go speed limit, never accomplish anything," because they think the Rs are some kind of opposition. This is a mistake. They may be stupid, but they are just as venal and corrupt as the Ds. One big club, as the man said.
But now that Oregon and Washington have eliminated the bar exam, we can look forward to more "justice" from the likes of KJB.
The biggest issue is that it's not technically government induced censorship when the platforms doing the censoring are on the same team as the biden regime. They wanted to do all this, because they are the regime. They are indistinguishable from each other.
You'd almost be better off with the Supreme Court (all of whom still believe the covid hoax) by attempting to prove that facebook, Google, Amazon, and historical Twitter IS the federal government and not private companies and that any act in which they restrict free speech is government censorship.
chilling and disgrace scary heartbreaking to say the least. Katanji brown is a clueless moron. Clearly an idiotic half wit diversity hire
Justice Brown’s view is a direct result of 60+ years of the Marxist assault on the nuclear family. I don’t know what her personal background is, but the welfare state that destroyed the black American family has convinced three generations that the government is responsible for providing for you and keeping you safe, not your parents. In that world, when you weigh the right of the individual to speak freely against the “responsibility” of the government to keep you safe, it seems heartless to advocate for the individual. What about all those people who will be hurt, you bunch of selfish meanies who think your speech is more important than all the grandmas who will die if they don’t take this shot? Grandma can’t make up her own mind don’t you know? And that’s where we are.
We literally had someone on the "highest court in the land" showing that this Country is doomed.
5months, 5years, 50years, not a matter of if but when.
When she spewed out that the 1st Amendment was bad because it could hamstring the Government from censoring info it deemed "harmful", I almost shit my pants. THAT IS THE WHOLE POINT!!!
I can't think of a more perfect example of our downfall than that exchange from KBJ.
BUT, that's exactly why she was put there.
1/3 to 1/2 of this Country agrees with her, because they think they'll always be on the correct side of the Freedom Fence. Idiots, all of them. Little do they know, the Freedom Fence or Circle of Freedom only gets smaller, it only contracts. At some point, you are on the wrong side. It never fails, EVER.
Now what does "doomed" mean. Civil War? Divorce? States just ignoring Fed Law/Judiciary? Well that last one is already going on, Blue States have been doing that for years and years now.
The extremes in this Country have ZERO common ground anymore, and that's where our institutions stand at this point. It's FUBAR.
All Empires end, ours is no different or special.
The reality is, things could be so amazing around the World, BUT...
We have psychopaths and sociopaths running this Country, and the World for that matter.
They are drawn to Government, for obvious reasons. That is a HUGE problem.
That's why, even though elections are rigged, it doesn't matter. We aren't just an election or two away from fixing any of this. The rot is everywhere and unfixable. A full gut rehab is needed.
But hey, what's on Netflix???!!!
SMDH.
I read a summary of yesterday's SCOTUS activity on this case that said SCOTUS was admonishing the plaintiffs because they hadn't shown the harm that was done to them by the government's efforts to suppress speech.
While I think this is off-track (as GM explained so well, they should be addressing the infringements of rights not worrying about proving harm), I think the plaintiffs need to attack the claim that the wrong information can harm people. Make the government prove that information is DIRECTLY harmful to people.
Information by itself can do no harm. Information is just words and images that are processed by people. People then decide what they will do with that information. Absorb it, ignore it, talk about it with friends, whatever. There can be no possible harm until the person takes action. Any harm is thus the responsibility of the person taking in the information, not on the purveyor of the information.
If we can blow up the claim that information is harmful to people, the justification for censorship falls apart.