The discussion between Joe Rogan and Alex Berenson was interesting when they spoke about how those who got the jabs were behaving. Joe explained (paraphrasing), that this was the first time in history where well educated and wealthy people lined up first to take an experimental drug. Instead of even beginning to admit they might have made a mistake, they have turned angry and now everyone has to get the jabs.
My fear was that the regulatory agencies were likewise brainwashed and would continue to green light these shots. This story from Gato gives me hope that people are reckoning that the numbers do not add up.
The damage that has been done to our society on so many levels is catastrophic, not the least of which is our diminishing trust in government, institutions, and physicians. Iām already considering skipping the flu shot and my yearly physical. Illogical? Not trusting people who lie to me is logical.
This booster study just confirms that healthy people on average, will have a worse time with the vaccine than they will with covid (that they will probably end up getting anyway). How is this not common knowledge by now? How are they still acting like these vaccines work, and trying to force them on people? What is the end game here? Just keep boosting until it's blatantly obvious the vaccines are making everyone sicker?
I could show this to most people in my neighborhood and they would still go down to the hospital banging on the windows begging to be jabbed. I have never seen so many drones on auto-destruct in my life.
Also - very nice breakdown of the study. That 22% infection rate widened my eyes for a second. then it was like "yep". So sad.
Just more evidence that the āvaccinesā arenāt really about helping people; theyāre about helping the drug companies. If they can get the green light to pump more and more into our veins, they willāregardless of need, efficacy, or adverse effects.
The response: So what. They're what we have and they're not COVID, so you're being resistant. Shut up and get vaxxed or die.
Knee-jerk emotional reaction aside: my gut tells me that the numbers around infection rates provided in the above are ABSOLUTELY higher than a naturalistic control. No WAY does COVID spread that consistently outside of (if I recall the past year's data correctly) first-degree passes of family members in close quarters at home.
And that's ON TOP OF vaccine side effects.
My takeaway: these are literally poisons that are labeled vaccines, and we're supposed to be happy that they're merely (most of the time) low-grade poisons. To shut up and obey and inject ourselves with a net negative that we can NEVER TAKE BACK.
Dear Gato - Your analysis is spot on for most of you write here. I do note your nostalgia for the good old days of the FDA and all those very safe vaccines out there. Of note, these are (somewhat ironically) the first vaccines to ever be tested against an inert placebo. Go check out the trials for the typical childhood vaccines. The āplaceboā is either another vaccine or an adjuvant in the vaccine being tested. Also of note, in spite of begging from advocacy groups and basically being told to do so by their own over site body, the FDA and CDC have failed to do any meaningful studies on childhood vaccines and autoimmunity or other chronic illness. We do seem to have rather large numbers of those these daysā¦ maybe worth investigating. But probably not.
At our local Rite Aid you can march right in and in a loud steady voice tell the pharmacist "I want you to give me a Moderna booster". And he will. Authorized or not.
Does anyone know why the boosters havenāt been adapted specifically to Delta? I thought mRNA tech was so fast they could come up with a vax from scratch in just hours. If thatās the case why donāt they have a Delta-adapted booster? Not that I want an Alpha, Delta or Smelta version, just wonderingā¦
Could some of the soulless automatons at the FDA be getting pangs of conscience for their participation in the world's biggest medical scam? And for the oceans of blood on their hands? Are they worried about angry mobs when people find out they've been getting gulled all along?
We live in a land with thousands of Lady Macbeth's waiting for their dark night of the soul to strike.
Here's the smell of the blood still:
All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little
Hand. Oh, oh, oh!
The Doctor knows the score:
Foul whisperings are abroad: unnatural deeds
Do breed unnatural troubles: infected minds
To their deaf pillows will discharge their secrets:
At the risk of stating the obvious, yet adding little to your analysis, one should also understand this. At their worst, Moderna is only a mundane pretender to Pfizer. Pfizer is Voldemort. Moderna is a sentient tick on Voldemort's dog's ass with delusions of grandeur. And yet, here we are...
The thought occurred some time ago that there doesn't seem to be any strict standard for what counts as an acceptable set of side effects. Without really clear and tight criteria for that, an injection of live SARS-CoV-2 itself could be considered a highly effective vaccine: just classify the resulting illness as an expected side effect and furiously deny any causal link to really serious outcomes.
Normally this never comes up. I don't recall having a bad reaction to any other vaccines I've taken. I don't know if that's just because classical vaccine tech in general doesn't trigger side effects or whether it's because the only ones that get approved/mass rolled out are optimized for it.
The discussion between Joe Rogan and Alex Berenson was interesting when they spoke about how those who got the jabs were behaving. Joe explained (paraphrasing), that this was the first time in history where well educated and wealthy people lined up first to take an experimental drug. Instead of even beginning to admit they might have made a mistake, they have turned angry and now everyone has to get the jabs.
My fear was that the regulatory agencies were likewise brainwashed and would continue to green light these shots. This story from Gato gives me hope that people are reckoning that the numbers do not add up.
The damage that has been done to our society on so many levels is catastrophic, not the least of which is our diminishing trust in government, institutions, and physicians. Iām already considering skipping the flu shot and my yearly physical. Illogical? Not trusting people who lie to me is logical.
This booster study just confirms that healthy people on average, will have a worse time with the vaccine than they will with covid (that they will probably end up getting anyway). How is this not common knowledge by now? How are they still acting like these vaccines work, and trying to force them on people? What is the end game here? Just keep boosting until it's blatantly obvious the vaccines are making everyone sicker?
I could show this to most people in my neighborhood and they would still go down to the hospital banging on the windows begging to be jabbed. I have never seen so many drones on auto-destruct in my life.
Also - very nice breakdown of the study. That 22% infection rate widened my eyes for a second. then it was like "yep". So sad.
the lipstick on that pig is not working, let's add a skirt and a wig.
Death Cultists will virtue signal straight into their graves as they sing the "safe & effective" booster songs.
The upcoming ADE Season songs will not be sung at the tombstones.
Just more evidence that the āvaccinesā arenāt really about helping people; theyāre about helping the drug companies. If they can get the green light to pump more and more into our veins, they willāregardless of need, efficacy, or adverse effects.
The response: So what. They're what we have and they're not COVID, so you're being resistant. Shut up and get vaxxed or die.
Knee-jerk emotional reaction aside: my gut tells me that the numbers around infection rates provided in the above are ABSOLUTELY higher than a naturalistic control. No WAY does COVID spread that consistently outside of (if I recall the past year's data correctly) first-degree passes of family members in close quarters at home.
And that's ON TOP OF vaccine side effects.
My takeaway: these are literally poisons that are labeled vaccines, and we're supposed to be happy that they're merely (most of the time) low-grade poisons. To shut up and obey and inject ourselves with a net negative that we can NEVER TAKE BACK.
Let's go Brandon.
Dear Gato - Your analysis is spot on for most of you write here. I do note your nostalgia for the good old days of the FDA and all those very safe vaccines out there. Of note, these are (somewhat ironically) the first vaccines to ever be tested against an inert placebo. Go check out the trials for the typical childhood vaccines. The āplaceboā is either another vaccine or an adjuvant in the vaccine being tested. Also of note, in spite of begging from advocacy groups and basically being told to do so by their own over site body, the FDA and CDC have failed to do any meaningful studies on childhood vaccines and autoimmunity or other chronic illness. We do seem to have rather large numbers of those these daysā¦ maybe worth investigating. But probably not.
At our local Rite Aid you can march right in and in a loud steady voice tell the pharmacist "I want you to give me a Moderna booster". And he will. Authorized or not.
Does anyone know why the boosters havenāt been adapted specifically to Delta? I thought mRNA tech was so fast they could come up with a vax from scratch in just hours. If thatās the case why donāt they have a Delta-adapted booster? Not that I want an Alpha, Delta or Smelta version, just wonderingā¦
Could some of the soulless automatons at the FDA be getting pangs of conscience for their participation in the world's biggest medical scam? And for the oceans of blood on their hands? Are they worried about angry mobs when people find out they've been getting gulled all along?
We live in a land with thousands of Lady Macbeth's waiting for their dark night of the soul to strike.
Here's the smell of the blood still:
All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little
Hand. Oh, oh, oh!
The Doctor knows the score:
Foul whisperings are abroad: unnatural deeds
Do breed unnatural troubles: infected minds
To their deaf pillows will discharge their secrets:
More needs she the divine than the physician.
Look, hate to disappoint you all but this is window dressing meant ot look like they are doing their jobs.
Reminds me of our Pfizer board member ex FDA pal saying he doubts we will see mandates for kids anytime soon.
yeah right
At the risk of stating the obvious, yet adding little to your analysis, one should also understand this. At their worst, Moderna is only a mundane pretender to Pfizer. Pfizer is Voldemort. Moderna is a sentient tick on Voldemort's dog's ass with delusions of grandeur. And yet, here we are...
Amazing analysis, but you missed one thing.
The adverse effect was ONE pregnancy that ended in a spontaneous abortion.
That was the ONLY pregnancy in the entire trial. Is that a joke or what?
I wrote about it also:
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/38-out-of-171-moderna-booster-recipients
In the review of cumulative data following the August 16, 2021 data cutoff of Modernaās P201B
live database, a 26-year-old female in the 100 Āµg primary series group, and taking oral
contraception for a year prior to booster vaccination, reported a pregnancy about one month
after her booster vaccination based on a positive home pregnancy test. This participant had a
negative pregnancy test on the day of booster vaccination; the first day of her last menstrual
period was on the same day as booster vaccination. The subject reported continuation of her
oral contraception after her pregnancy test. The estimated date of conception was two days
after her booster vaccination. The subject experienced a spontaneous abortion 52 days after
vaccination at an estimated 8 weeks gestation (10 months and 11 days after the first prime dose
of 100 Āµg mRNA-1273 and 9 months and 12 days after the second prime dose of 100 Āµg
mRNA-1273). This event was not considered by the investigator or Moderna to be related to
study vaccination. This participant subsequently became pregnant again 115 days after the
booster vaccination, and this second pregnancy was reported as ongoing.
The thought occurred some time ago that there doesn't seem to be any strict standard for what counts as an acceptable set of side effects. Without really clear and tight criteria for that, an injection of live SARS-CoV-2 itself could be considered a highly effective vaccine: just classify the resulting illness as an expected side effect and furiously deny any causal link to really serious outcomes.
Normally this never comes up. I don't recall having a bad reaction to any other vaccines I've taken. I don't know if that's just because classical vaccine tech in general doesn't trigger side effects or whether it's because the only ones that get approved/mass rolled out are optimized for it.