I don't completely understand your post, Aria Veritas. All I can say is that I am Jewish and I don't believe there's anything about being Jewish per se that predisposes people to be involved in pandemic evils. Lots of people were involved in such evils so, statistically speaking, it's likely that their number includes some Jews, as well …
I don't completely understand your post, Aria Veritas. All I can say is that I am Jewish and I don't believe there's anything about being Jewish per se that predisposes people to be involved in pandemic evils. Lots of people were involved in such evils so, statistically speaking, it's likely that their number includes some Jews, as well as many people who are not Jewish. I'm not sure if the above posters meant to imply that there is something about being Jewish that predisposes people to evil actions, but if so that's indeed an unfortunate way of thinking.
Yes, it is an evil way of thinking, evil is live backwards, something we've all been doing for generations now, if not centuries.
What I'm saying is there might be some truth in the wacky outliers crazy takes on things, but perhaps even the wacksters haven't gone deeply enough in to the meaning of the words they use. Because if they had, they see they are also mistaken about who is behind the 'evil' or the way we 'live' these days, including themselves. Everyone wants a scapegoat, and never wants to look at their own actions.
I can't be more straightforward I'm afraid, because it is not a straightforward topic. It would take a week of very carefully thought-out, carefully worded labour to do it justice.
How much of this is simply due to circumstance? Whether we like it or not, Jews (European/Askhenazi) are among the most intelligent people in the world. This fact, in part, explains why they are disproportionately found in positions of great expertise etc. Historically they lived as distinct culture within a host society. Some of the segregation was imposed by the Gentile, to be sure. But a lot of it comes from the insular nature of Judaism and the individual culture -- mixing with the outsider is discouraged. Jews tended to offer badly needed services to their "host": money lending, skilled trades, and so forth. Problem: less successful (Gentile) will sometimes think himself taken advantage of (whether true or not). Secondly, in-group loyalty would tend to mean a Jew would favor his own over outsiders.
Please note that all, or nearly all, of the above would apply to any isolated clan, whether it was Gypsy, Traveller, or some other past or present group.
If the above is mostly correct, it means that a lot of antipathy to Jews is simply due to their success -- too much success, in the eyes of the envious. At first being a blessing, but sometimes getting too powerful and being seen as a curse is even reflected in Hebrew tradition: e.g. the story of how Jospeh rose from slavery to be second in command in Egypt, yet ultimately the tribes were "asked to leave" posthaste.
Let’s play a thought experiment. Imagine the stereotypical bigot who blames all the world’s problems on the Jews. Imagine a world where they had never existed. Wouldn't it be likely that the world would still have many, perhaps all of the ills that you ascribe to the Jews? Of course it would. You would just blame a different group.
People confuse Jewish people with Zionist Jews or Zionist Kabbalists. They are not one and the same. While I can get along with most anyone, I’m not real thrilled at the idea of getting chummy with people who support religious practices which call for my demise or servitude and enslavement.
There are Jewish people in Israel working very hard to preserve Palestinian’s human rights and sovereignty. There are Muslims pushing for reformation not unlike Christians enacted years ago. These people give me hope for a brighter future.
And just because something is one possible explanation, it does not follow that it is the only explanation, or the correct one.
You may disagree with Churchill and all the others who believe in a "high cabal" (plenty of them have written about it). One possibility is that there is no high cabal, and bankers have never funded wars(!)
Another is that there are small interdependent groups which could be loosely described as a high cabal.
Apropos Jews: if the cabal exists, it is possible that there are
- no Jews;
- a few Jews, just as there may be a proportional number of any other group;
- a disproportionat number of Jews for whatever reason;
- all Jews.
But - even if the last of these possibilities were the case, it would not reflect at all on all the other Jews, the 99.99999% of them. They are only responsible or their own behaviour. It would not prejudice me or any rational person against Jews ... any more than I would blame English people for the excesses of Rhodes and Milner e.g.
Another point to bear in mind is that Jews alive today are a different group of people from those in previous centuries and in different places, even though they try and retain some cultural continuity. Some of those cultures would have behaved differently from each other, and certainly from today's Jews. This is very obvious if you read Solzhenitsin's "200 Years Together", or compare the lot and culture of black jews in Israel, semitic Jews in the Middle East, Caucasian Jews in Western Asia or New York.
Exactly the same could be said of White people, or Black people. The cultural circles I move in today, as a white man are very different from those white men who formed the Mormons, or ancient Druids, or ran the British Empire.
I don't completely understand your post, Aria Veritas. All I can say is that I am Jewish and I don't believe there's anything about being Jewish per se that predisposes people to be involved in pandemic evils. Lots of people were involved in such evils so, statistically speaking, it's likely that their number includes some Jews, as well as many people who are not Jewish. I'm not sure if the above posters meant to imply that there is something about being Jewish that predisposes people to evil actions, but if so that's indeed an unfortunate way of thinking.
Yes, it is an evil way of thinking, evil is live backwards, something we've all been doing for generations now, if not centuries.
What I'm saying is there might be some truth in the wacky outliers crazy takes on things, but perhaps even the wacksters haven't gone deeply enough in to the meaning of the words they use. Because if they had, they see they are also mistaken about who is behind the 'evil' or the way we 'live' these days, including themselves. Everyone wants a scapegoat, and never wants to look at their own actions.
I can't be more straightforward I'm afraid, because it is not a straightforward topic. It would take a week of very carefully thought-out, carefully worded labour to do it justice.
"It would take a week of very carefully thought-out, carefully worded labour to do it justice " - Or four grams of dried psilocybin mushrooms
How much of this is simply due to circumstance? Whether we like it or not, Jews (European/Askhenazi) are among the most intelligent people in the world. This fact, in part, explains why they are disproportionately found in positions of great expertise etc. Historically they lived as distinct culture within a host society. Some of the segregation was imposed by the Gentile, to be sure. But a lot of it comes from the insular nature of Judaism and the individual culture -- mixing with the outsider is discouraged. Jews tended to offer badly needed services to their "host": money lending, skilled trades, and so forth. Problem: less successful (Gentile) will sometimes think himself taken advantage of (whether true or not). Secondly, in-group loyalty would tend to mean a Jew would favor his own over outsiders.
Please note that all, or nearly all, of the above would apply to any isolated clan, whether it was Gypsy, Traveller, or some other past or present group.
If the above is mostly correct, it means that a lot of antipathy to Jews is simply due to their success -- too much success, in the eyes of the envious. At first being a blessing, but sometimes getting too powerful and being seen as a curse is even reflected in Hebrew tradition: e.g. the story of how Jospeh rose from slavery to be second in command in Egypt, yet ultimately the tribes were "asked to leave" posthaste.
Let’s play a thought experiment. Imagine the stereotypical bigot who blames all the world’s problems on the Jews. Imagine a world where they had never existed. Wouldn't it be likely that the world would still have many, perhaps all of the ills that you ascribe to the Jews? Of course it would. You would just blame a different group.
People confuse Jewish people with Zionist Jews or Zionist Kabbalists. They are not one and the same. While I can get along with most anyone, I’m not real thrilled at the idea of getting chummy with people who support religious practices which call for my demise or servitude and enslavement.
There are Jewish people in Israel working very hard to preserve Palestinian’s human rights and sovereignty. There are Muslims pushing for reformation not unlike Christians enacted years ago. These people give me hope for a brighter future.
The traditionalists? I’ll just leave that there.
yup ... and with Zionists (who are not necessarily Jews) and with Israelis, and with followers of the religion Judaism (plenty of Jews are atheists).
People don't think very rigorously.
That’s why I included the new fad Kabbalists but really there are Catholic Zionists, look at Joe!
Hey but if you really are a thinker, would you tell me what you think of these? (Please?)
Bitchute:
Act 1: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DYlb92zMkj41/
Act 2: https://www.bitchute.com/video/TCI1C9xxfDrA/
Satan's doorknob:
All true: a clear explanation of the common view.
And just because something is one possible explanation, it does not follow that it is the only explanation, or the correct one.
You may disagree with Churchill and all the others who believe in a "high cabal" (plenty of them have written about it). One possibility is that there is no high cabal, and bankers have never funded wars(!)
Another is that there are small interdependent groups which could be loosely described as a high cabal.
Apropos Jews: if the cabal exists, it is possible that there are
- no Jews;
- a few Jews, just as there may be a proportional number of any other group;
- a disproportionat number of Jews for whatever reason;
- all Jews.
But - even if the last of these possibilities were the case, it would not reflect at all on all the other Jews, the 99.99999% of them. They are only responsible or their own behaviour. It would not prejudice me or any rational person against Jews ... any more than I would blame English people for the excesses of Rhodes and Milner e.g.
Another point to bear in mind is that Jews alive today are a different group of people from those in previous centuries and in different places, even though they try and retain some cultural continuity. Some of those cultures would have behaved differently from each other, and certainly from today's Jews. This is very obvious if you read Solzhenitsin's "200 Years Together", or compare the lot and culture of black jews in Israel, semitic Jews in the Middle East, Caucasian Jews in Western Asia or New York.
Exactly the same could be said of White people, or Black people. The cultural circles I move in today, as a white man are very different from those white men who formed the Mormons, or ancient Druids, or ran the British Empire.