the regulatory capture of "unexplained" deaths
turning up the gaslights so that no one can see
it’s a bizarrely intrinsic article of faith among humanity that one can trade liberty for safety and that if we just put “good, smart people” in change and let them tell us what to do, they will protect us.
of all the pabulum passing as panacea, this one is the one that gets you. over and over. because the sorts of people that float to the top of such systems are never better or smarter this time and the systems themselves are always captured, again and again, by cronyism and special interest. just like last time.
it’s just public choice theory 101. (and no one should be allowed to study econ or political science without first reading buchanan and tullock. it’s like teaching demolitions without first teaching safe handing of explosives)
it’s how you wind up in a world where the response to data like this:
and this:
becomes this:
and this:
neither the media nor the health agencies and officials are staying silent. they are actively gaslighting and flat out making up syndromes to explain away an inconvenient fact pattern: they just pushed the most dangerous and ineffective vaccines in human history upon a credulous public and the effects are starting to get really, really bad and the big truth of it is becoming to vast for the big lie to eclipse.
the tales are getting so tall that they appear starved of oxygen. (heck, they cannot even seem to keep their SADS acronyms straight because they are all making up too much misinformation too rapidly to coordinate it)
and medicine is devolving to this something akin to a cartoon.
and make no mistake, this is all about following the money and evading the responsibility.
pfizer has not yet released comirnaty, the approved version of their vaccine.
and they probably never will.
this is almost certainly because an EUA drug (emergency use authorization) carries a liability exemption. you’re free from responsibility for bad outcomes. but start selling the FDA approved version and nope, now you’re on the hook. and they do not want that.
what they do want is an evergreen product with no future requirements for trials. and they are likely to get it.
gatopal™ clown basket explains: (more HERE)
this is going to render the covid shot annual, possibly semi-annual.
it will not be tested in any meaningful way for safety or efficacy, just spun out on pre-approved biosimilar claims and targeted at some guess about what the variant will be this year, a practice that has broadly failed in flu (but that has created quite a franchise of snake oil shots).
the side effects will not drop. based on what we’re seeing thus far, they will likely rise.
they did last time.
but hey, at least we already know that variant specific boosters fail to elicit variant specific immunity. because it was tested.
and the already vaxxed are too antigenically fixated by prior doses for their immune systems to generate new adaptive response to covid variants. which is why simply having had covid and having recovered from it (natural immunity) is outperforming being vaccinated and having had covid.
and why the triple dosed are getting covid at rates far above their unvaxxed friends, even when we control for age groups.
and the risk ratio on this has been rising rapidly.
alas, this incredibly useful data series was discontinued by the UK and so we cannot update it and see how it’s going now especially in light of BA5 which is causing such ill effect upon the boosted in portugal where it pervades. i have a niggling suspicion they did not eliminate it because the trend looked good for vaccines.
the data on the collapse and outright inversion of these product’s efficacy has become widespread and compelling and it’s moving past cases and into hospitalization and deaths.
so these biosimilar variant booster guesses have little hope of efficacy or safety even at stationary targets, much less targets now evolving far more rapidly than before due to a homogeneous pool whose immune fixation is around non-sterilizing response. and every new round of boosts will likely accelerate this trend by generating period of immune suppression in a fixated herd.
and the response from FDA is: so let’s stop looking at data and start approving new versions without clinical trials or testing just as they eliminated panel review for these mRNA products as soon as the panels started objecting to putting them in kids.
these are the greased rails of graft and institutional capture. the principled people quit in disgust over it and those who remain are there to play ball and feather nests.
the focus of these institutions is neither safety nor efficacy. it’s crony corporatism.
the FDA no longer functions. no single regulator so permeated by industry can. if you want real safety and accountability, you need markets.
single point of permission = single point of capture.
and those held hostage by it will inevitably be us.
Unfortunately, the recklessness on this level this will only end with mass death -- and it started already.
The VAERS adverse events, immensely important as they are, will be dwarfed by the wave of deaths due to destroyed immune systems, endless repeat Covid infections giving further immune damage, endless flu infections lasting 10+ days, and other "vaccinated people illnesses".
I know a vaxed person with whom I am in contact. This person has mysterious illnesses that the rest of the family (unvaxed and of completely ordinary health at best) cannot even catch from this person. The illnesses are pretty bad. Last one was fever of 105.8 degrees.
Good luck
Good news on this topic:
The public is increasingly aware of evidence that the COVID vaccines are dangerous. A bit of evidence:
A week and a half ago, Bill Gates' new book, How to Prevent the Next Pandemic was #1 on Amazon's forensic medicine bestseller list, and mine was #2 on that list.
Today, my book, Neither Safe Nor Effective: The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines is #1 and Gates is at #6.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/books/227695/ref=zg_b_bs_227695_1
I cite over 300 webpages from governments in Europe and North America and peer-reviewed studies. The case is airtight that the COVID vaccines cause 1) higher COVID positivity rates, 2) cardiovascular injury and 3) deaths. (Likely they cause other injuries, but there is less evidence for each of those at this time.) I have mailed the book to every constitutional attorney I can think of, and am being interviewed by journalists last week and this week.
You, gato malo, as well as Igor Chudov, Jessica Rose and Joel Smalley of Substack alerted me to data, and I cite and credit each of you in the book, along with the original sources each of you cite. Thank you.