I'm not certain about this, but I suspect in coming years there will be a land-office business in lawsuits against employers and other entities that mandated the jabs. Perhaps there is other law they can hide behind, but I'm quite sure the PREP Act of 2005 (that gives much of the emergency immunity) doesn't apply. Where are the lawyers? …
I'm not certain about this, but I suspect in coming years there will be a land-office business in lawsuits against employers and other entities that mandated the jabs. Perhaps there is other law they can hide behind, but I'm quite sure the PREP Act of 2005 (that gives much of the emergency immunity) doesn't apply. Where are the lawyers? Where are the suits? We know they're a bunch of unprincipled scum only interested in money...but that's just the point! 🤑
Yeah, I thought of that. That was the first gambit six months ago when the company I mentioned in the original comment demanded that we assign only the vaccinated to their account. Our initial position: 'Indemnify us and we'll do it.' They wouldn't budge, so the next gambit was to threaten to terminate the contract.
Wait until the first employee charges whoever wrote them the termination letter with assault. Yes, a criminal charge brought forth and prosecuted. I too was surprised at the scope of the charge, not being in the justice business. I would be worried if I was an employer intimidating workers.
I'm not certain about this, but I suspect in coming years there will be a land-office business in lawsuits against employers and other entities that mandated the jabs. Perhaps there is other law they can hide behind, but I'm quite sure the PREP Act of 2005 (that gives much of the emergency immunity) doesn't apply. Where are the lawyers? Where are the suits? We know they're a bunch of unprincipled scum only interested in money...but that's just the point! 🤑
Yeah, I thought of that. That was the first gambit six months ago when the company I mentioned in the original comment demanded that we assign only the vaccinated to their account. Our initial position: 'Indemnify us and we'll do it.' They wouldn't budge, so the next gambit was to threaten to terminate the contract.
Wait until the first employee charges whoever wrote them the termination letter with assault. Yes, a criminal charge brought forth and prosecuted. I too was surprised at the scope of the charge, not being in the justice business. I would be worried if I was an employer intimidating workers.