(Why do I keep showing up here so fast? Sitting on my sofa crocheting with my email open. I ain't, like, stalking...)
This really to me, whatever other issues I have about anything in the US in this moment in time, is the proof that the "progressive left" are dead souls walking. If you're a parent YOUR ONLY MEANINGFUL JOB IS TO PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN.
In the early These Times, when I'd fled MSNBC for CNN (stop laughing), I saw an interview with one of the families that had volunteered their early elementary-grade 2 kids for the trials, and everyone was beaming and the kids were so proud...
Almost vomited on my nice carpet. It was sort of like that anecdote my mother told me lo these very many decades ago, when she was in the theater watching "On the Beach" while she was pregnant with me, and the scene came on where the young mother gave her baby the bottle laced with a lethal dose of sleeping pills, and my mom had to run from her seat and throw up. (One of the few times she showed the appropriate maternal instincts, by the way...).
And funny thing. I've only ever seen that film on TV. They censor that scene....
I thought of "On the Beach" when I was in Melbourne's city centre during the first lockdown. The empty, desolate streets reminded me of the last moments of the movie after everyone who lined up outside the old Queen Victoria Hospital (now demolished) in Lonsdale Street to get their suicide pills had gone home to die. No dance number from Fred Astaire in that movie.
I know! It’s tearing your hair out at the roots incomprehensible! I still feel Ike the last two years can’t possible be real and that the rest to come will be even worse
EXACTLY!!! I’ve been saying this forever. It makes me SICK to see children being used in this game of chicken. There is only one acceptable end to this whole thing and that is to see all of these monsters swinging by their necks.
They are wanting to do the same thing here in Australia. The only way they see getting out of this unscathed, is to get it on the childhood register, asap. Before the bodies don't fit under the regulatory carpets.
If you live in Melbourne, you probably read that propaganda piece in the woke press last week that Moderna is opening a new plant here, with production set to start in 2024. So they're showing no sign of giving up. Our Innovation minister seemed to be wetting herself with excitement at the economic prospects. So much money to be made facilitating death and disablement.
I'll have to check with the Office of Oxymorons because it's possible she could be part of 'military intelligence', now that we all seem to be still under some vague form of martial law, with despatches from the front continuing to be heavily censored.
Is your entire nation "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers" redux? There're too many Covidian horrors to list worldwide but I never thought Australians wouldn't en masse fight back against the whole shitshow from beginning to now.
Did they mention who the subjects were and where they are from? Many impoverished children have been used for drug trials in the past which didn't turn out so well.
Mar 23, 2022·edited Mar 23, 2022Liked by el gato malo
Most are missing the point. The drug companies have liability immunity because these shots are issued under a liability immunity-granting EUA. They lose some of that immunity when this goes to an "approved" drug UNLESS it is on the pediatric immunization schedule. That is why you have NEVER seen a Comirnaty vaccine dose given, even though it is illegal to continue to use a EUA drug when there is an approved drug available. In the current environment, the use of the approved drug will also open them up to liability lawsuits for the damage they have caused. So you will not see it...even though that is the law.
Pfizer/Moderna will do ANYTHING to get this approved for pediatric patients because at that time they have complete, permanent immunity from any harms these drugs cause. If they do not get them approved, and the EUA is eventually ended (unlikely with the current administration but has to happen sometime one would think) they will all owe so much money to so many injured folks they likely will go bankrupt.
That is why this is not going away. It has nothing to do with safety or efficacy...only liability shielding for the manufacturers.
Agreed El Gato, they know it's their only option to deflect when the bodies pile up. I'll go you one better though....have you noticed that Pfizer (and the Chinese vaccine producers apparently) have begun voluntarily recalling some of their medications (hypertension, etc) already on the market? Particularly the medications that have ACCEPTABLE levels of carcinogenic materials or heart related myocardial triggering substances....
Now if I was a certain company lawyer, and I was worried about a clients certain products ability to produce cancer/heart damage that was currently under EUA....I would DEFINITELY recommend voluntarily pulling any currently licenced product from market that could be liable for cancer causing substances. Especially when there is about to be an explosion of new and reactivated cancer patients.....
But thank goodness I'm just a barefoot healer, not a company lawyer.🤨😉
I see them tossing Walensky first and some minor players. . I think she has major culpability, don’t get me wrong, but if she gets thrown under and others escape justice? Not ok.
I seem to remember hearing that once they have the immunity, it basically requires the US AG to approve even getting to ball rolling to get it invalidated.
The problem is that fraud is a very high bar. Given the evil/stupid choice, they will all become instantly stupid. "If only we had known...we were just trying to do the right thing...". I would love for it to be shown, but it is hard to prove up.
The sacklers will someday be flung into a hellscape they richly deserve. There will be a Covid Criminal wing there as well. And the Klaus Schwab Memorial flaming pit. All the barbecue they can eat.
I’m not sure about the difference between the fraud standard and the “willful misconduct” standard, but I learned today that in 2004 and 2005, Congress passed laws amending the 1944 Public Health Service Act, in a way that strictly limits liability to cases of ‘willful misconduct’ that’s the proximate cause of injury and death, for any product approved under an EUA during a declared public health emergency. The laws on the books even go so far as to classify contractors (like Pfizer, Moderna, hospitals, pharmacies, nurses, doctors) as government employees of US-Health and Human Services, for purposes of Federal Tort Claims Act. Giving them (I think) government immunity.
The laws are set up so the only recourse is the ‘Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.’
And at least one court - Supreme Court of NY in 2012 — has interpreted the laws very strictly, to apply to injury and death caused by a ‘vaccinator’ without the consent of the person injected.
Please, if you do not already read it, read Utobian (Dr. Toby Rogers') substack, and heed his "call to action" to contact the FDA people who will be making the decision to approve or not approve any covid vaccines for children. He has names and email addresses, and it really doesn't take very long to cut and paste and send a number of emails. We MUST stop this madness. Maybe if we let them know a bunch of surly cats are watching, with claws unsheathed, they'll have second thoughts.
"Liability" is also the reason that vents and Remdisivir is the only treatment being used in hospitals. The CDC/ FDA (I forget which one) specifies that as the Official C0VID protocol, and if you die using the official protocol, the hospital can't be sued. But... if you use something else, you could be open to litigation.
Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is the vaccine manufacturers have indemnity immunity across the board thanks to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. And that the Countermeasures Injury Compensation does the same during the “National emergency” pandemic.
I think this is all purely profit driven and enabled by the agency capture that has deepened during the pandemic.
You are correct. When the "National Emergency" ends (which it will likely never do under this administration but it likely will someday one hopes) then the NCVIA will become applicable...BUT ONLY IF THE DRUGS ARE LISTED ON THE PEDIATRIC IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE. That is why they are so desperate to give this shot that clearly does not work to children that clearly do not need it. Everything else at this point is just smokescreen. Without liability protection they are likely toast as the effects of the shot show increasingly over the coming years.
I just cannot imagine the sums of money changing hands to make sure this gets done. Compared to the amounts for which they would be liable, any payoffs would be chicken feed.
Power corrupts and absolute ("emergency") power corrupts absolutely. Throw in some money as well and you have what we have.
Question: does going on the pediatric immunization schedule (even that term makes me cringe since I will never again vax even my pets!) protect Pharma from liability for ADULTS who are Covid vax injured or killed?
Am I misreading the control group’s adverse events? What exactly was the control group’s injected with? Or did some in the control group get covid while taking part in the trial? One final question. Who in their right mind would volunteer their child to a covid experimental biological study. At what point is this consider child abuse?
Next door neighbour age 71, and a vaxxer, said her daughter is refusing the vaxx for the grandchildren. I responded that was a very good decision because there is no safety data for children at this time and children fair well for the most part if they get covid. Risk/benefit ratio.
Probably gave them toxic lipid nano-particle 'placebo.' They never seem to disclose what is in the placebo shots, but according to RFK, Jr. no vaccines are ever tested against inert placebos.
any parent that enrolled their 6M -6 yr old in this foul experiment should be arrested for child abuse. I have no doubt we are not seeing all the data, especially the most egregious.
This is where I personally applaud Maddie de Garays mom. No I don’t appreciate she put or allowed her daughter in the trial but she’s gone out of her way now to speak up. Let’s hope and pray other parents eyes will be opened to the wrongs. Unfortunately we all know what that means for their poor kiddos. 😞
I wish I could be as kind as you but I do not understand how any parent would allow experimentation on their children. Period. Your most precious ones in the world you hand over to big pharma....are you kidding me...how could you even trust big pharma if you did any due diligence on their history and backgrounds and what unscrupulous things they have been involved in. Of course now she speaks up but it is too late now...damage done.
Agree. But it’s going to take people like this to convince many. Steve Kirsch was convinced by a service guy! Think about that! A vax injured service guy. And Steve’s this engineer who invented the optical mouse! I think it was a carpet cleaner if I remember right. Think about the implications of that.
I just don't know how people are so daft. They spend more time researching what kind of laptop they will buy but hand over their kids to Pfizer without doing any kind of research or background check on the drug companies.
They so badly want it authorized for the little ones so they can get it on the kid vax schedule and perpetuate their immunity. That much is obvious at this point.
probably both. this would be why I didn't let my teens get it. I had fertility issues and I didn't have the vax schedule this poor generation did. there is no need for this stupid shot and if life got hard for a little while without the passport, so be it. fortunately the kids completely understood and are standing strong with me.
Good. So did my kids. I have friends whose children took the shot and they are beside themselves with worry. My heart goes to them but I am so relieved that my kids listened to me.
Plenty of my family have gotten the shot. My parents, my cousins, nephews and nieces, and one of my sisters and her husband. I’m definitely worried about all of them. My other sister and I, along with our kids, have chosen to stay in the control group.
My brother and his wife. Their son and a niece and her family have stayed unjabbed. A sister has disowned me and my closest sister died last April I’m certain from the jab. My brothers wife was almost murdered by remdisivir and vent last fall. She barely escaped the hospital with her life. Her job wants to fire her now.
same here. some of my kids' friends have gotten it and I worry about them as well. it was a mix of parents made them do it and a few needed it for work. like you, i'm relieved that my kids didn't put up a fight and are content with not having it. i'm just grateful they where still in high school and that King Phil Murphy never mandated it like his buddy Newsom. Hoping that saner heads will prevail, as well as the move to SC this summer, so that they'll be able to continue without getting jabbed.
In the AP article reporting this and many other similar articles about covid injections for young children they routinely depict parents as waiting desperately, breathlessly for approval. They write as if every parent was angry at the FDA and CDC for withholding this life-granting benison. It makes me want to puke. The pharma-funded media gaslighting parents into believing that they should be eagerly awaiting these shots is the ultimate symbol of the moral abomination of modern society.
You think they're assessing clinical risk/benefit? Ha, no. They're assessing how much trouble they will be in if they keep pushing axiomatic policy goals.
I predict the FDA will enthusiastically rubber stamp this ASAP. Once these poisons are deemed by the FDA to be approved as “safe” for children, all of them can be legally mandated for every age going forward. At least that’s my understanding
While a lengthy approval process is typically necessary for gene-edited animals to enter the food market, the FDA streamlined the process for gene-edited cattle, allowing them to skirt the regular approval process
The FDA announced in March 2022 that Recombinetics’ gene-edited cattle received a low-risk determination for marketing products, including food, made from their meat
This marks the FDA’s first low-risk determination for enforcement discretion for an intentional genomic alteration in an animal for food use
The animals have genes modified to make their coats shorter and slicker, which is intended to help them better withstand heat stress, allowing them to gain more weight and increase the efficiency of meat production
In 2019, Brazil stopped its plans to allow a herd of Recombinetics’ gene-edited cattle after unexpected DNA changes were uncovered
Long-term safety studies have not been conducted, and experts are calling for long-term safety and toxicity studies
Yikes, have never heard of this! I HAVE heard they may start getting mRNA poison into foods so that people who won’t take vax will still get gene modification & immune compromise….
Or spray it in the air. Or have rub on vax. Or send out vax trolls into the public to accidentally bump into you. I love meat. I may have to buy local—which I can.
Rose, to see the whole article, look up Dr. Mercola, he posted it on his blog today. It is lengthy but goes into more detail and of course Bill Gates is behind this sordidness.
I believe they are not liable if 'recommended' for all children. Either way it is sick and perverse to simply let captured regulatory bodies yield approvals for, while funded by, the same pharma co's pushing the products.
But I'm sure they'll just change the definition of 'recommended' to mean 'mandated', just as they have re-defined 'immunity', 'vaccine', and other aspects of science long since established.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr: “They are never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine without getting liability protection. Now the emergency use authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and under the CARES Act."
"So as long as you take an emergency use vaccine, you can’t sue them. Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children. Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine. That’s why they are going after the kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection.”
That is the goal. As soon as the FDA recommends the vaccine to the Immunization Schedule, the vaccines will be fully licensed (what is being dispensed now is NOT approved/licensed) and the EUA's will be dropped. Once a vaccine is on this schedule, the manufacturer and your health providers are shielded from any harm the vaccine does...at any age.
Public buildings in my suburban Los Angeles town have gone to mask-optional, except in areas frequented by very young children -- who, the signs say, are still in danger because they're unvaccinated. The public library is mask-optional; the children's room in the library is mask-required. We've had 80 deaths in town, 79 of them were among the elderly sick in our only nursing home, and we're still squarely focused on the devastating danger to four year-olds. The desperation to get very young children vaccinated against Covid-19 is a form of madness that won't be resolved. It's socially sticky, fact-immune, and somehow increasingly panicked.
From what I've heard, if they can get this poison on the childhood vax schedule they will have complete immunity from lawsuits pretty much forever under that despicable 1986 act. We have got to stop this crap.
I don't know how to act to stop it when the FDA isn't even listening to its own boards of scientific experts, and the FDA's director and deputy director of vaccine approval have fled the agency because no one is listening to them, either. The train appears to have no brakes.
(Why do I keep showing up here so fast? Sitting on my sofa crocheting with my email open. I ain't, like, stalking...)
This really to me, whatever other issues I have about anything in the US in this moment in time, is the proof that the "progressive left" are dead souls walking. If you're a parent YOUR ONLY MEANINGFUL JOB IS TO PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN.
The fact that anyone offered BABIES AND TODDLERS to inject as a trial is stupifyingly sick.
In the early These Times, when I'd fled MSNBC for CNN (stop laughing), I saw an interview with one of the families that had volunteered their early elementary-grade 2 kids for the trials, and everyone was beaming and the kids were so proud...
Almost vomited on my nice carpet. It was sort of like that anecdote my mother told me lo these very many decades ago, when she was in the theater watching "On the Beach" while she was pregnant with me, and the scene came on where the young mother gave her baby the bottle laced with a lethal dose of sleeping pills, and my mom had to run from her seat and throw up. (One of the few times she showed the appropriate maternal instincts, by the way...).
And funny thing. I've only ever seen that film on TV. They censor that scene....
I thought of "On the Beach" when I was in Melbourne's city centre during the first lockdown. The empty, desolate streets reminded me of the last moments of the movie after everyone who lined up outside the old Queen Victoria Hospital (now demolished) in Lonsdale Street to get their suicide pills had gone home to die. No dance number from Fred Astaire in that movie.
Geez I keep lying. Mom wasn't pregnant then...
You’re funny
I always hope to express myself memorably.
Ok I had a hard time not laughing re CNN. Just admitting it.
On mom, wow. 😢
I know! It’s tearing your hair out at the roots incomprehensible! I still feel Ike the last two years can’t possible be real and that the rest to come will be even worse
Like that scene in Dallas when Bobby wakes up and it’s all been a dream. If only.
EXACTLY!!! I’ve been saying this forever. It makes me SICK to see children being used in this game of chicken. There is only one acceptable end to this whole thing and that is to see all of these monsters swinging by their necks.
Concur. ASAP.
California pending SB871 to mandate covid vax kids 0-17. Defend the kids who have no voice in this matter:
California Legislature Position Letter Portal: SB 871 (education, health and judicial committees)
https://calegislation.lc.ca.gov/Advocates/
They are wanting to do the same thing here in Australia. The only way they see getting out of this unscathed, is to get it on the childhood register, asap. Before the bodies don't fit under the regulatory carpets.
If you live in Melbourne, you probably read that propaganda piece in the woke press last week that Moderna is opening a new plant here, with production set to start in 2024. So they're showing no sign of giving up. Our Innovation minister seemed to be wetting herself with excitement at the economic prospects. So much money to be made facilitating death and disablement.
"Innovation minister" should be the first example in the dictionary for the entry "oxymoron", or perhaps second, after "intelligence agency".
I'll have to check with the Office of Oxymorons because it's possible she could be part of 'military intelligence', now that we all seem to be still under some vague form of martial law, with despatches from the front continuing to be heavily censored.
Is your entire nation "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers" redux? There're too many Covidian horrors to list worldwide but I never thought Australians wouldn't en masse fight back against the whole shitshow from beginning to now.
Who volunteers a 6-month baby to test an experimental vaccine?
Very, very, very bad people.
What do you mean "your" children?
How anachronistic.
They belong to "whole communities". You know, just like you and your property do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23fxiKWFKrg
I dare her say that to my face
Yes, let’s start “making better investments” in the units, err… I mean children.
The leftspeak translation of "investment" is "spend money we've stolen from others to empower my cadre and enrich my cronies".
Yeah, I forgot...
Did they mention who the subjects were and where they are from? Many impoverished children have been used for drug trials in the past which didn't turn out so well.
You have read where Fauci got his kids from for his experiments right? Documented in RFK jr book. Still wondering how that hasn’t been prosecuted!
Professional middle-class American family.
Most are missing the point. The drug companies have liability immunity because these shots are issued under a liability immunity-granting EUA. They lose some of that immunity when this goes to an "approved" drug UNLESS it is on the pediatric immunization schedule. That is why you have NEVER seen a Comirnaty vaccine dose given, even though it is illegal to continue to use a EUA drug when there is an approved drug available. In the current environment, the use of the approved drug will also open them up to liability lawsuits for the damage they have caused. So you will not see it...even though that is the law.
Pfizer/Moderna will do ANYTHING to get this approved for pediatric patients because at that time they have complete, permanent immunity from any harms these drugs cause. If they do not get them approved, and the EUA is eventually ended (unlikely with the current administration but has to happen sometime one would think) they will all owe so much money to so many injured folks they likely will go bankrupt.
That is why this is not going away. It has nothing to do with safety or efficacy...only liability shielding for the manufacturers.
this is very much the case and very much the grift.
the only questions is whether regulators will, once more, accede.
of course, much of this immunity would be invalidated in the event that fraud were proven.
that could be an interesting pivot if the time comes that someone needs to be thrown under the bus.
Agreed El Gato, they know it's their only option to deflect when the bodies pile up. I'll go you one better though....have you noticed that Pfizer (and the Chinese vaccine producers apparently) have begun voluntarily recalling some of their medications (hypertension, etc) already on the market? Particularly the medications that have ACCEPTABLE levels of carcinogenic materials or heart related myocardial triggering substances....
Now if I was a certain company lawyer, and I was worried about a clients certain products ability to produce cancer/heart damage that was currently under EUA....I would DEFINITELY recommend voluntarily pulling any currently licenced product from market that could be liable for cancer causing substances. Especially when there is about to be an explosion of new and reactivated cancer patients.....
But thank goodness I'm just a barefoot healer, not a company lawyer.🤨😉
I see them tossing Walensky first and some minor players. . I think she has major culpability, don’t get me wrong, but if she gets thrown under and others escape justice? Not ok.
Do you know how much fraud litigation activity is getting under way? This link to a video featuring Dr David Martin looks like a promising strategy.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/23/david-martin-files-lawsuit-against-joe-biden/
I seem to remember hearing that once they have the immunity, it basically requires the US AG to approve even getting to ball rolling to get it invalidated.
Edward Dowd suggests that if fraud is proven to have occurred in the EUA process, then all liability protections cease.
The problem is that fraud is a very high bar. Given the evil/stupid choice, they will all become instantly stupid. "If only we had known...we were just trying to do the right thing...". I would love for it to be shown, but it is hard to prove up.
This is exactly where the Sacklers have fled -- to "whoops, what a tragic accident!"
The sacklers will someday be flung into a hellscape they richly deserve. There will be a Covid Criminal wing there as well. And the Klaus Schwab Memorial flaming pit. All the barbecue they can eat.
I’m not sure about the difference between the fraud standard and the “willful misconduct” standard, but I learned today that in 2004 and 2005, Congress passed laws amending the 1944 Public Health Service Act, in a way that strictly limits liability to cases of ‘willful misconduct’ that’s the proximate cause of injury and death, for any product approved under an EUA during a declared public health emergency. The laws on the books even go so far as to classify contractors (like Pfizer, Moderna, hospitals, pharmacies, nurses, doctors) as government employees of US-Health and Human Services, for purposes of Federal Tort Claims Act. Giving them (I think) government immunity.
The laws are set up so the only recourse is the ‘Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.’
And at least one court - Supreme Court of NY in 2012 — has interpreted the laws very strictly, to apply to injury and death caused by a ‘vaccinator’ without the consent of the person injected.
Report here:
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/project-bioshield-act-of-2004-and?s=w
Please, if you do not already read it, read Utobian (Dr. Toby Rogers') substack, and heed his "call to action" to contact the FDA people who will be making the decision to approve or not approve any covid vaccines for children. He has names and email addresses, and it really doesn't take very long to cut and paste and send a number of emails. We MUST stop this madness. Maybe if we let them know a bunch of surly cats are watching, with claws unsheathed, they'll have second thoughts.
What a day to leap for joy, their demise and our revenge. Loving the word Bankruptcy-music to my ears.
A pure coincidence that once again the "for the sake of the children" premise ends up harming the children.
"Liability" is also the reason that vents and Remdisivir is the only treatment being used in hospitals. The CDC/ FDA (I forget which one) specifies that as the Official C0VID protocol, and if you die using the official protocol, the hospital can't be sued. But... if you use something else, you could be open to litigation.
More people need to understand this !!!
Correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is the vaccine manufacturers have indemnity immunity across the board thanks to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. And that the Countermeasures Injury Compensation does the same during the “National emergency” pandemic.
I think this is all purely profit driven and enabled by the agency capture that has deepened during the pandemic.
You are correct. When the "National Emergency" ends (which it will likely never do under this administration but it likely will someday one hopes) then the NCVIA will become applicable...BUT ONLY IF THE DRUGS ARE LISTED ON THE PEDIATRIC IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE. That is why they are so desperate to give this shot that clearly does not work to children that clearly do not need it. Everything else at this point is just smokescreen. Without liability protection they are likely toast as the effects of the shot show increasingly over the coming years.
I just cannot imagine the sums of money changing hands to make sure this gets done. Compared to the amounts for which they would be liable, any payoffs would be chicken feed.
Power corrupts and absolute ("emergency") power corrupts absolutely. Throw in some money as well and you have what we have.
Question: does going on the pediatric immunization schedule (even that term makes me cringe since I will never again vax even my pets!) protect Pharma from liability for ADULTS who are Covid vax injured or killed?
they are already jabbing zoo animals for covid:{
Yes it does…blanket immunity attaches when the drug is listed on the pediatric immunization schedule.
Another confirmation of my decision to never get or give a vaccine again.
That so many major medical institutions know this and have gagged their research staff is so Mengelian that really, this is beyond words.
Who needs data when you have the narrative and captured institutions?
Am I misreading the control group’s adverse events? What exactly was the control group’s injected with? Or did some in the control group get covid while taking part in the trial? One final question. Who in their right mind would volunteer their child to a covid experimental biological study. At what point is this consider child abuse?
Next door neighbour age 71, and a vaxxer, said her daughter is refusing the vaxx for the grandchildren. I responded that was a very good decision because there is no safety data for children at this time and children fair well for the most part if they get covid. Risk/benefit ratio.
Probably gave them toxic lipid nano-particle 'placebo.' They never seem to disclose what is in the placebo shots, but according to RFK, Jr. no vaccines are ever tested against inert placebos.
How did she respond?
She agrees💕💕
Clots for Tots.
I believe that busses in Canada now have signs on them that say "Kids Can Have Strokes Too."
Good comment but I just can’t “like”. 😞😢 too true
any parent that enrolled their 6M -6 yr old in this foul experiment should be arrested for child abuse. I have no doubt we are not seeing all the data, especially the most egregious.
Hell, I want parents arrested for the masking. But I agree about the trials. Sick.
My sentiments exactly
This is where I personally applaud Maddie de Garays mom. No I don’t appreciate she put or allowed her daughter in the trial but she’s gone out of her way now to speak up. Let’s hope and pray other parents eyes will be opened to the wrongs. Unfortunately we all know what that means for their poor kiddos. 😞
I wish I could be as kind as you but I do not understand how any parent would allow experimentation on their children. Period. Your most precious ones in the world you hand over to big pharma....are you kidding me...how could you even trust big pharma if you did any due diligence on their history and backgrounds and what unscrupulous things they have been involved in. Of course now she speaks up but it is too late now...damage done.
Agree. But it’s going to take people like this to convince many. Steve Kirsch was convinced by a service guy! Think about that! A vax injured service guy. And Steve’s this engineer who invented the optical mouse! I think it was a carpet cleaner if I remember right. Think about the implications of that.
I just don't know how people are so daft. They spend more time researching what kind of laptop they will buy but hand over their kids to Pfizer without doing any kind of research or background check on the drug companies.
They so badly want it authorized for the little ones so they can get it on the kid vax schedule and perpetuate their immunity. That much is obvious at this point.
Sterility &/or early death
probably both. this would be why I didn't let my teens get it. I had fertility issues and I didn't have the vax schedule this poor generation did. there is no need for this stupid shot and if life got hard for a little while without the passport, so be it. fortunately the kids completely understood and are standing strong with me.
Good. So did my kids. I have friends whose children took the shot and they are beside themselves with worry. My heart goes to them but I am so relieved that my kids listened to me.
That’s the thing even if I got them. I would be constantly worried. My family and grandkid have and, yes I’m worried. I pray everyday for this to end.
Plenty of my family have gotten the shot. My parents, my cousins, nephews and nieces, and one of my sisters and her husband. I’m definitely worried about all of them. My other sister and I, along with our kids, have chosen to stay in the control group.
My brother and his wife. Their son and a niece and her family have stayed unjabbed. A sister has disowned me and my closest sister died last April I’m certain from the jab. My brothers wife was almost murdered by remdisivir and vent last fall. She barely escaped the hospital with her life. Her job wants to fire her now.
same here. some of my kids' friends have gotten it and I worry about them as well. it was a mix of parents made them do it and a few needed it for work. like you, i'm relieved that my kids didn't put up a fight and are content with not having it. i'm just grateful they where still in high school and that King Phil Murphy never mandated it like his buddy Newsom. Hoping that saner heads will prevail, as well as the move to SC this summer, so that they'll be able to continue without getting jabbed.
In the AP article reporting this and many other similar articles about covid injections for young children they routinely depict parents as waiting desperately, breathlessly for approval. They write as if every parent was angry at the FDA and CDC for withholding this life-granting benison. It makes me want to puke. The pharma-funded media gaslighting parents into believing that they should be eagerly awaiting these shots is the ultimate symbol of the moral abomination of modern society.
👏
Luckily, for Moderna, we no longer live in a sane world, by any stretch of the imagination.
You think they're assessing clinical risk/benefit? Ha, no. They're assessing how much trouble they will be in if they keep pushing axiomatic policy goals.
My 3 children who were in this age group at the time we had it in Sept 2021, Delta:
6 yr old never really had any symptoms and wife doesn't think he was even sick
4 yr old had a low grade fever return the next night, but was normal during the day and active. 2 yr old was better after 12 hours.
This was the case for the older children as well, 12 hours of malaise and low grade fever and then active and normal later.
The vaccine is worse then the disease.
We didn't need any studies to tell us the kids in particular, who are virtually immune have ZERO reason to risk the side effects of these poisons.
I predict the FDA will enthusiastically rubber stamp this ASAP. Once these poisons are deemed by the FDA to be approved as “safe” for children, all of them can be legally mandated for every age going forward. At least that’s my understanding
And Look What The POS FDA Just Approved
While a lengthy approval process is typically necessary for gene-edited animals to enter the food market, the FDA streamlined the process for gene-edited cattle, allowing them to skirt the regular approval process
The FDA announced in March 2022 that Recombinetics’ gene-edited cattle received a low-risk determination for marketing products, including food, made from their meat
This marks the FDA’s first low-risk determination for enforcement discretion for an intentional genomic alteration in an animal for food use
The animals have genes modified to make their coats shorter and slicker, which is intended to help them better withstand heat stress, allowing them to gain more weight and increase the efficiency of meat production
In 2019, Brazil stopped its plans to allow a herd of Recombinetics’ gene-edited cattle after unexpected DNA changes were uncovered
Long-term safety studies have not been conducted, and experts are calling for long-term safety and toxicity studies
Yikes, have never heard of this! I HAVE heard they may start getting mRNA poison into foods so that people who won’t take vax will still get gene modification & immune compromise….
Or spray it in the air. Or have rub on vax. Or send out vax trolls into the public to accidentally bump into you. I love meat. I may have to buy local—which I can.
A lot of people believe chemtrails are suspect also. iDK enough about them to be sure
I hope you can open or copy and paste this into your browser and open it.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/03/23/fda-gives-green-light-to-gene-edited-cattle.aspx?ui=e625125c27aff83fb34818312d0b18ebb7d9343b124c78031e56507d4bb269b9&sd=20200512&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art2HL&cid=20220323&mid=DM1138934&rid=1441598865
I was able to open, thx. Haven’t read it yet
Somewhat predictably, the site is "currently unavailable". Damn!
https://www.mercola.com/ Andy, the article is right on his site, just found it.
already doing this in the salmon we eat. See Dr. Mercola's blog on this he posted today. Has to do with CRISPR gene editing.
Wait a minute. I was already on the edge of becoming a vegetarian. Are you telling me that now beef will be injected with mRNA.
I hope this opens or try and copy and paste into your browser.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/03/23/fda-gives-green-light-to-gene-edited-cattle.aspx?ui=e625125c27aff83fb34818312d0b18ebb7d9343b124c78031e56507d4bb269b9&sd=20200512&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art2HL&cid=20220323&mid=DM1138934&rid=1441598865
Rose, to see the whole article, look up Dr. Mercola, he posted it on his blog today. It is lengthy but goes into more detail and of course Bill Gates is behind this sordidness.
I believe they are not liable if 'recommended' for all children. Either way it is sick and perverse to simply let captured regulatory bodies yield approvals for, while funded by, the same pharma co's pushing the products.
But I'm sure they'll just change the definition of 'recommended' to mean 'mandated', just as they have re-defined 'immunity', 'vaccine', and other aspects of science long since established.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr: “They are never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine without getting liability protection. Now the emergency use authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and under the CARES Act."
"So as long as you take an emergency use vaccine, you can’t sue them. Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children. Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine. That’s why they are going after the kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection.”
https://rightedition.com/2021/12/28/robert-f-kennedy-jr-explains-why-theyre-going-after-the-kids-and-its-not-what-you-think/
That is the goal. As soon as the FDA recommends the vaccine to the Immunization Schedule, the vaccines will be fully licensed (what is being dispensed now is NOT approved/licensed) and the EUA's will be dropped. Once a vaccine is on this schedule, the manufacturer and your health providers are shielded from any harm the vaccine does...at any age.
"There was no real risk here to mitigate."
Public buildings in my suburban Los Angeles town have gone to mask-optional, except in areas frequented by very young children -- who, the signs say, are still in danger because they're unvaccinated. The public library is mask-optional; the children's room in the library is mask-required. We've had 80 deaths in town, 79 of them were among the elderly sick in our only nursing home, and we're still squarely focused on the devastating danger to four year-olds. The desperation to get very young children vaccinated against Covid-19 is a form of madness that won't be resolved. It's socially sticky, fact-immune, and somehow increasingly panicked.
From what I've heard, if they can get this poison on the childhood vax schedule they will have complete immunity from lawsuits pretty much forever under that despicable 1986 act. We have got to stop this crap.
I don't know how to act to stop it when the FDA isn't even listening to its own boards of scientific experts, and the FDA's director and deputy director of vaccine approval have fled the agency because no one is listening to them, either. The train appears to have no brakes.
Did Biden vote for that? He’s only ever been a politician and he’s been there for ever. Never an honest job.
Oh, we passed sane long ago......
Poor kids. This is child abuse.