Are you aware that Kirsch has been involved in the digital currency space? This is upsetting to me that it seems like his involvement on that front has continued even after he supposedly understands that a coup of epic proportions is underway. Any thoughts on that? Because seriously, it is beginning to feel an awful lot like some in the …
Are you aware that Kirsch has been involved in the digital currency space? This is upsetting to me that it seems like his involvement on that front has continued even after he supposedly understands that a coup of epic proportions is underway. Any thoughts on that? Because seriously, it is beginning to feel an awful lot like some in the MFM are keeping us engaged on the science of the vaccines while intentionally refusing to get into the nitty gritty of the underlying business of the coming social impact markets that will be used to govern us through the public/private partnerships with the overhaul of the financial system. I have personal reasons for asking your opinion on this. And I keep hearing Alison's caution in the back of my head relative to staying focused on the bigger agenda and not getting lost in the weeds. At this point, am wondering if we are intentionally being pulled through the weeds as a means of passing time while the digital gulag is being built.
I think it’s a much more complicated topic than digital currency bad. CBDC is a dire threat because it’s a centralized system that would give them the power of an off switch over our finances, but many people (e.g., Mathew Crawford; John Bush of Freedom Cell Network and the Greater Reset; and maybe even el gato) view bitcoin and other digital currencies as a powerful tool in a decentralized parallel economy—as long as it’s not regulated/controlled/monitored, which the government is angling to do. Bitcoin saved the Canadian truckers when their bank accounts were frozen during the protest last year as the government couldn’t access those assets.
I personally don’t know enough about it to weigh in one way or the other. I just know we need to avoid CBDC at all costs.
I understand what you are saying...relative to those who promote cryptocurrency as a means of decentralization.
The thing is....CBDC is a bad thing. And we know, that the ability of the WEF ilk to essentially own and manage everything will come with the CBDC because it will afford them the ability to measure, assess, program for outcomes, etc. as they make bets with social impact markets and best means of managing the masses.
Blockchain, as the WEF (and in the context of the articles I quickly reviewed relative to Kirsch) imagines its use in healthcare, education, finance, etc. IS A BAD THING. It is very much about tracking us from cradle to grave and then monetizing the data that is collected through programs run by a technocracy.
Do you remember how on FB Bantam Joe and Alison talked about the myth of decentralization in cryptocurrency. Like you, I am not well versed in this area. But the gist of their argument, and it made sense to me, is that even the anonymity with cryptocurrency does not cut it because you still have to have "gatekeepers" whose language you employ transactionally, so it will not remain as anonymous as we might think.
I am open to somebody/anybody correcting me. And explaining why cryptocurrency can still work as the powers that be set up a finance system run on a digital currency. And the other point not to be overlooked, the feds and others will regulate the cryptocurrency space. And I suspect the recent scandal with Bankman Fried will have supplied everything they need to argue for regulation.
My point remains, if Malone, Kirsch, Nass, and others who want to be the face of the MFM and raise the alarm regarding what the COVID crisis was all about....it really ought to include the social impact markets, CBDC and how that is going to work if the WHO/UN and WEF pathological predators get their way. And if those in the MFM are not willing to go there, then anything they are saying in the healthcare space is of limited value in the long haul. These are smart people, they have to understand not only what is at stake, but also why and how the CBDC/digital ID is a virtual prison. And the fact that they just are silent on the matter....even when you ask them in the comment section.....well, that speaks volumes.
You seem to have a repoire with Malone....have you ever asked him to directly address these matters? What, if any, response did he give? He'll talk about the WEF players in a generalized context, but again...they all seem to steer clear of the threat posed by the CBDC and social impact markets.
The reason I am beating this drum.....if we truly want to wake people up....and we still face the fact that many are just tired and done with COVID (and do not even have a reason to examine their actions, beliefs, etc. over the last two years) we need to find ways to help people understand that it is not just about a vaccine, it will very much be about what medicines you will be allowed to take, what schools your kid will be able to attend, how far you will be able to travel, whether you have exceeded your carbon allotment, etc.
I still think a powerful way to address this and raise the alarm would be for a series of writings or interviews of individuals who are newly minted conspiracy theorists and the many and various ways they came to see the light. For example, in my case....it has been a multi-faceted approach----first the nonsense in education, then my own health struggles and battles against the establishment before the pandemic, then my own harm as a breast cancer survivor caused by defective cancer-causing implants as a result of FDA shoddy work, and then the COVID nightmare whereby I knew that the vaccines were likely not good, especially for those with immune system dsyfunction....warned my mother, but she deferred to the "experts" and as a result died. The experts did not diagnose her, I did, but it was too late due to the poor medical care and the buying of the narrative by the medical profession wholesale. And yes, my diagnosis is on the death certificate.
The point is, people need to see how the malfeasance and intention in terms of what they have planned and have already done....well, it will come for everyone in time. Some of us have been awake because we discerned along the way that something was off because of an impact in our lives. For me, it was a presentation in a middle school cafetaria about proficiency-based learning and the educators were spouting crap that made no common sense to me as a parent of kids. So I began researching.....and here I am today....all the more wiser on several fronts.
We can tell people all day long, but honestly....until it touches them or until they have cause to ask questions people just defer to what they are told.
And these days, I see members of the MFM telling those who are pushing back things that will just lead to another round and we do not have time to endure another round. Because it will be the last round.
Wow, Laura, that is quite an insightful comment, and I share your concerns. I am so sorry about your mother. How heartbreaking and infuriating 😭
Just because someone hasn’t yet covered a topic doesn’t mean they don’t think it’s important, though, as I can attest given my umptillion unfinished articles. I have long been wanting to cover CBDC and the engineered financial collapse but would need to spend a significant amount of time researching given that finances are outside my area of expertise. I also feel other people (e.g., Catherine Austin Fitts) are doing a fine job covering it and raising the alarm, so I think the message is definitely getting out there.
I’m way past my bedtime and turning in now so apologies for not giving your comment the in-depth response it deserves.
I appreciate that….that everyone may be trying the best they can with what expertise they have.
But with even that point acknowledged….
How then can Malone insist that there is no evidence of purposeful intent? How can he write a book about the lies government told him and ask people to trust him as an “expert” when on the next breath he says that he took the shot and participated in the system because he trusted it.
So did his government lie to him or is he as stupid as the bureaucrats he is fond of calling dumb? He can’t have it both ways. And yet he tries….which begs questions at this late stage in the game.
I also have had enough of members of the MFM using the “I stand for truth” and am above criticism. If you question….the label gets slapped on you and one gets schooled with a “how dare you….don’t you see how much I’m sacrificing for you.” Strikes me that that is exactly the same attitude and inclination of Fauci that got us into the current predicament. And if people have differences of opinion….argue your side, don’t resort to lawsuits and as hominems.
Also, as a lawyer, I see that some of our medical experts think they are gifted in the area of semantics as a means of answering questions. But they are not as gifted as they think. I can see the flaws in their excuses or how they explain away certain inconvenient facts. A little cross examination would reveal a few artfully places non sequitors that most would not spot.
Please know, my comments are not directed at you personally. Just frustrated. But I guess…. Can start my own substack. I just worry we are in our silo and echo chambers not really moving the needle. I have neither the notoriety or reputation to raise the alarm at this late stage, but pleas to others who have platforms seem to fall on deaf ears. But that is their right. We all do what we can when we can. Be well and get some rest!
Many, MANY, people were either naive about the injections, or were too willing to justify to themselves a "Small" (they thought) risk, in order to travel freely or keep their jobs. I don't think it is fair to criticize anybody too harshly for that -- including Dr. Malone and Steve Kirsch.
Where did Dr. Malone say there is no evidence of purposeful intent? I've never gotten the impression he thinks this was all some big mistake. Have you read his recent post pointing out DARPA's complicity?
While it is true that nobody should be above criticism, I think you're casting unfounded aspersions. Yes, there are people who are weakening the medical freedom movement, but they seem most often to be "No virus and no Covid" zealots, not the prominent people in this effort.
Point of clarification regarding your earlier comments: Blockchain is only an auditable ledger system that does not automatically identify anyone, personally. However, the applications using it may provide personal information, depending on how they are written. Though I'm not a fan of cryptos, I do support the purposes for which some of them were created, and I share your concerns about CBDC's and digital ID. There are many shortcomings in BTC and other cryptocurrencies that their supporters find inconvenient to address; it seems the lure of quick riches and a false sense of invincibility make it easier to rationalize participation in a mania. For now, I'll stick with real money (metals) and avoid some of the manipulative turbulence from Chinese whales and Wall Street banks.
Dr Malone's vicious $25 million lawsuit against the Breggins, is all that I need to know about Malone. He seems to be running cover for the Bio research establishment
Breggin has a very sketchy history, selling his soul peddling nonsense before juries as an “expert.” I have read testimony of his (many years ago) that was unfounded & grossly overstated. He was obviously deeply in bed with the Scientology folks back then. Malone was quite naive going into this, like many of these guys who political leftists. I remember when he tweeted that he was shocked the NYT had spouted some nonsense. Within an hour he had 100s of responses basically pointing out that they hadn’t been trustworthy in many years. He was genuinely shocked!
Understand that Kirsch, Malone, Kory, & others were strong Democrat party supporters BEFORE they were redpilled by Covid.
Sorry, An Old Doc, but I've been following Breggin for decades. His testimonies against ECT and psych drugs have been invaluable for helping people escape these harmful treatments. YES, he does blow off at the mouth from time to time, and sometimes I can't believe he's saying what he's saying - but is this worth $25 million?
The Breggin's attacks came out of the blue and were completely unwarranted, as far as I could tell, but I'll leave it to the court to say who was wronged. As a frequent reader of Dr. Malone's substack material, I've not seen any substantive evidence of your own accusation; perhaps you can share some excerpts that bother you.
If Malone's suit has no merit, I doubt a court will find in his favor, because I don' t believe he's any kind of privileged insider in the legal system. That would mean his only result would be some large legal fees he'd have to pay.
WRT to threats, I was told by a talented business acquaintance that you either sue or you don't, but you never *threaten* to sue.
I understand the lawsuit has been filed but still not served. No idea what that means. I assume somebody must pay a process server to present to Breggins; no tickee/nowashee?
I think it's important that we unify, not dissolve into fighting amongst ourselves. I can't agree totally with anyone, but if someone is speaking truths that need to be heard, I don't need to critique their personal lives, choices, or be judgemental in any way. These truths need to be heard! This is why I was so disgusted at Malone's suit against Breggin and others.
With all that has happened since I wrote my comment to you MAA…just wondering if you have the same view now as you did earlier relative to individuals like Malone and Kirsch? I tend to subscribe at this point to Sage Hana’s view that some are just having us go in circles in certain cul de sacs….while the real issues relative to the DOD, etc. are not a subject they want to actually tackle and push out to the masses.
At this point, I am wondering about whether their role has always been to re-direct and frame “the issues” so that they can sell us on ‘reform’ which ultimately looks the same down the line as what we have dealt with. And sorry the Hawaii crew seems to be a little too scripted and coordinated….Kennedy may even be part of this redirection for the NWO/globalist agenda. He seems to have certain talking points but stops short of actually naming the criminals.
His vitriolic attacks on Mike Yeadon and extensive efforts to undermine and silence Mike for providing credible testimony regarding intentionality are highly suspicious.
Whether Malone is controlled opposition or not I cannot definitively say without evidence (as per my “Maybe” philosophy: https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/rites-of-the-tear-downers), but he is serving as a gatekeeper nevertheless and is what I describe as a mainstream straddler:
Much of his behavior could be accounted for by his colossal ego and narcissism, and he makes reckless, pride-driven decisions that cause him and his reputation considerable damage, which only he is capable of repairing by demonstrating a modicum of humility, but I don’t expect him to ever do that as he failed to do so at a time when he had a golden opportunity to drop the lawsuits. I privately outlined a potential path toward redemption, but he only doubled down on his destructive (self- and otherwise) behavior.
After I published my letter to him, he canceled his paid subscription to my Stack and canceled mine to his so I can no longer comment on his posts, indicating he did not take my call for civility in the spirit in which it was offered ;-)
He cancelled me and my paid subscription to his SS and his reason for doing so was a huge red flag. I also am troubled by those who ardently defend him. Things do not add up. Thank you for your response. I knew you had appealed to him to reconsider his treatment of Dr. Mike Yeadon. Did not know the outcome. Thank you for your efforts and for sharing the outcome. Soldier on.
Regarding the anonymity of cryptocurrency, it's true that for BTC, specifically, the blockchain is a public ledger, so anonymity doesn't technically exist for that particular currency, although this is fairly easy to get around if you use a wallet like I do that generates a new BTC "address" each time you receive Bitcoin.
First, though, I should probably explain the terms "wallet" and "address," since there is confusion around how this technology works.
A wallet is a sort of virtual safe you can manage via several different user interfaces (my current preferred one is Exodus) that makes it easier to keep track of your various transactions in various cryptocurrencies all in one place, much like an online bank account.
Except in this case, *you* are your own bank since none of this information is stored in a central server like it is at a big bank like Chase or Charles Schwab; it's all "out there" in the public ledger created by the vast network of computers all processing the transactions.
And by extension, if you lose your login credentials to your wallet, there is no customer support line that can assist you in restoring them; *you* have ultimate responsibility to store your "keys" in a safe place, the keys being a list of random words generated when you create your wallet that will allow you to restore your access to your funds by proving to the *decentralized* network of the blockchain that you are, in fact, the controller of the funds.
Hence the phrase, "not your keys, not your wallet" and why people go to extraordinary lengths to preserve this list of secret words offline since anyone who puts together the full list could take over control of your wallet. Without the list, though, it's impossible to restore access to the funds, which is also why you'll hear stories of early adopters of BTC who stored them on a flash drive but lost their keys and so can *never* recover those funds.
Now, different cryptocurrencies function differently, but with BTC, whenever you want to receive funds from someone, you have to give them your BTC "address."
The use of the term "address" was a mistake on the part of its creators, in my opinion, since it's really more of an invoice number rather than a constant identifier like an email address is.
If you're discreet, it should be difficult for an outsider to ever link your real world identity with your BTC address(es), but if they *did* put 2 and 2 together, then, due to the public nature of the BTC blockchain, anyone *could* see a history of how much BTC was transferred into and out of a given address.
HOWEVER, most wallet management software these days make it easy to generate a new "address" (invoice number) every time you want to receive BTC from someone, so that out on the public ledger, the transactions are broken into hundreds or even thousands of separate records, and anyone trying to snoop on your personal finances would have to have every single address (invoice number) you've ever used and add all of them up to figure out how much you really hold.
Lastly, it's true that the easiest way for people to start acquiring BTC (or any cryptocurrency, really) is to buy it on an exchange like Robin Hood or Coinbase, and all of the major players are now "KYC" (know your customer) compliant, so to create an account and fund it with USD or some other fiat currency, you have to send the exchange proof of your ID, and they report any sales to the IRS and can see how much crypto you buy and sell through their platform.
However, this is really only a problem for those who plan to buy crypto and flip it for more USD or fiat currency by playing the market like they would with stocks.
These people aren't into crypto for the philosophical, longterm implications but rather for the short-term gain.
If one decides to be a "h0dler" (a "holder") and simply amass BTC and other crypto over time, hoping to use it as an actual currency for exchange in the future rather than ever turning it back into fiat trash (I think of this as going "off grid" with regards to money), then there's not much the IRS or regulators can really do since you can turn BTC into other types of crypto and back or transact with other freedom fighters off of the centralized exchanges (i.e. out in the ether of the decentralized blockchain), and there is no way they can track it all or tax you since you're now out of their failing system. It's only if you want to go back "on grid" by selling your crypto for fiat currency on an exchange hooked up to the Establishment that you'd then get hit with all of their regulations and taxes.
That was long, but I hope it helped you better understand the revolutionary nature of cryptocurrencies, especially BTC and why they really are different from the CBDCs planned for us by the mfers currently running the show.
also Richard Werner is excellently clear and, somehow, calm. (Kim's selling gold here so be aware of that, nevertheless...): https://youtu.be/dM6pipDLLgw
Digital currencies are simply computer programs. Written by people. Who are undoubtedly ALL altruistic souls, thinking only of the greater good. None of whom are in any way subject to the weaknesses of the flesh. Incorruptible.
I am not willing to try to convince you different that what you believe.
All I am willing to say is that there is a lot of information out there both pro and con for anyone to read. I encourage people to find out for themselves, since if you outsource your understanding of a subject to a third party you have no way to determine if they are right or wrong, or if they are lying to you for their own purposes.
That is how you spend two years wearing masks isolated in your house and obeying directional arrows on the floor of grocery stores.
Thank you- I will pass on. I had an interesting experience today. Our Visa # was stolen, so yesterday we cancelled it and are awaiting a new card. Overnight, firms like Netflix put our accounts on hold. We are completely cut off from using these services until a new card comes today. I felt I was living in a microcosm of the social credit/CBDC system!
I think about CBDC every time I go to an ATM, and wonder - is this the time that I will be denied access? That day will come, unless I can somehow hide in the crowd (which the jab & resulting "passports" made nigh on impossible).
Absolutely! Blockchain is noted for it's capacity to eliminate all human foibles, like honor, or a conscience. It is also a noted mechanism for the elimination of critical thought, and perhaps it's most impressive attribute, blockchain totally removes ANY hint accountability.
The purveyors of CBDCs are hoping to prey on the public's general ignorance of how blockchain technology, and cryptocurrencies in general, work.
They've already begun their demonization campaign against BTC as "fake money," but they can't go too hard on that since they recognize the potential value and are stockpiling it themselves, just in case.
CBDCs are impostor cryptocurrencies since they are completely centralized, whereas true cryptocurrencies are decentralized and can be easily exchanged for multiple other competing currencies without the "need" for a central bank to do it.
Bitcoin is the real deal and most of the other cryptos are just scams. Bitcoin's primary use case is money whose value can not be inflated away and is very resistant to confiscation even by criminals including armies governments and banks.
Game theory suggests governments and banks will suffer severely as Bitcoin keeps chipping away the source of their power, which is to lend ever more money, out of thin air, primarily to the rich and powerful but at high interest rates to the serfs of the world while inflating away the value of the money, but the incentives for individuals within governments and banks is to get as much Bitcoin as fast as they can get their hands on it, so how would governments be able to achieve enough consensus to totally eradicate bitcoin from the whole earth.
So overall I expect the adoption of Bitcoin will empower the individual and gut the power of the administrators of the collective. This will likely cause a lot of disruption in the short term and we can not predict how it will all unfold but I'm ready to take the chances. This is a technological breakthrough, the cat is out of the bag and there really is no going back.
Bitcoin is an immutable distributed ledger that keeps track of all the transactions that ever occurred in the history of bitcoin. This is why cash is a much preferred medium of exchange for criminal activity because the possibility is always there that the owners of the anonymous bitcoin addresses will eventually be tracked down and the crime confirmed which makes bitcoin a dual edged sword. On the one hand good actions that are illegal can be traced down but the big cats are also forced to have a light shinning on their transaction history.
My guess is Steve Kirsch is in Cryptos hoping to profit off of Ponzi schemes, Otherwise, he would promote only Bitcoin. I still can't figure out how deeply he is connected to the deep state. Probably not as well connected as Bob Malone. Thankfully I don't have much money, otherwise I would be worried of a suit from bob.
PSA: Beware of anyone who touts BTC, especially if they talk trash about principal movers in the medical freedom movement. Research carefully before participating in the crypto markets. Bitcoin's source is still a mystery (could even be CIA), it uses more electricity than many entire nations, it is completely reliant (at least for transactions) on a functional and accessible Internet, its value is determined by the whims of large stakeholders, and it is subject to all the practical limitations described here:
The philosophy behind bitcoin is admirable, but bitcoin itself is not some kind of monetary savior. Pyramid schemes are nothing new, and it's always the last ones in who find out the hard way. Buyer beware, unless you are in it as a volatility play or small hedge...
This is a great comment that hits the nail on the head with regards to BTC's utility and why it's so far the only crypto with a fighting chance of toppling the central banks' monopolies over the various national currencies.
Related to CBDC level controls, a family member is in a hospital and I was informed today that there is a national registry of any and all drugs each of us have on our records.
Of course I was aware that doctors and pharmacies keep records, but I did not know about a national database or registry. Anybody else out there know about that and where can one learn more?
That is one of the disadvantages of socialised medicine: the government pays, the government knows all, and it's all shared. There is a digital sharing scheme called My Health Record, and you had to opt out by a certain date (I did), and now I have to check all my labs & other documents to say, "DO NOT SHARE to MyHealth Record." I don't know how much this actually does - because the government pays for all medical, so the government knows it all. This definitely includes jabbing. It is one of the advantages of a cobbled-together system like in the USA.
Funny that. I was in the SF Bay Area and was at two different hospital systems / doctors for completely unrelated situations. I positively watched the docs look at the computer and then they talked to me about medical issues I did NOT share with them. Nor did I give any system permission to share with the others. Three systems in all, and they can very clearly “see” across supposed boundaries. Opting out is BS. It doesn’t happen.
I'm thinking this likely is linked through your insurance network?
I've wondered with all the different insurance systems in the US - whether Insurance A talks to Insurance B, or if the networks are mutually exclusive. If you left the state, and went somewhere "out of network" would it be the same?
It is not an insurance network. It is this hospital system linking to that one and this medical foundation (a large group of doctors) system linking to another hospital. I watched the doctor / nurse navigate their systems.
If I left the state, doctors elsewhere probably would not have access like this. But I do not know for sure. Depends on if there is an umbrella corporation above the hospital or medical group. Like everything, when there is $$$, it gets bigger and bigger.
Yes, I think it was Sasha or Katherine Watt who said - watch them take down Pfizer, naughty Pfizer, it's all Pfizer's fault - while the PTB continue to force the agenda in other ways. Pfizer will reorganize and rise again as another hydra, and the DOD & WEF will continue marching on as usual. YES the vaccines are evil, but they are only part of the plan.
Are you aware that Kirsch has been involved in the digital currency space? This is upsetting to me that it seems like his involvement on that front has continued even after he supposedly understands that a coup of epic proportions is underway. Any thoughts on that? Because seriously, it is beginning to feel an awful lot like some in the MFM are keeping us engaged on the science of the vaccines while intentionally refusing to get into the nitty gritty of the underlying business of the coming social impact markets that will be used to govern us through the public/private partnerships with the overhaul of the financial system. I have personal reasons for asking your opinion on this. And I keep hearing Alison's caution in the back of my head relative to staying focused on the bigger agenda and not getting lost in the weeds. At this point, am wondering if we are intentionally being pulled through the weeds as a means of passing time while the digital gulag is being built.
I think it’s a much more complicated topic than digital currency bad. CBDC is a dire threat because it’s a centralized system that would give them the power of an off switch over our finances, but many people (e.g., Mathew Crawford; John Bush of Freedom Cell Network and the Greater Reset; and maybe even el gato) view bitcoin and other digital currencies as a powerful tool in a decentralized parallel economy—as long as it’s not regulated/controlled/monitored, which the government is angling to do. Bitcoin saved the Canadian truckers when their bank accounts were frozen during the protest last year as the government couldn’t access those assets.
I personally don’t know enough about it to weigh in one way or the other. I just know we need to avoid CBDC at all costs.
I understand what you are saying...relative to those who promote cryptocurrency as a means of decentralization.
The thing is....CBDC is a bad thing. And we know, that the ability of the WEF ilk to essentially own and manage everything will come with the CBDC because it will afford them the ability to measure, assess, program for outcomes, etc. as they make bets with social impact markets and best means of managing the masses.
Blockchain, as the WEF (and in the context of the articles I quickly reviewed relative to Kirsch) imagines its use in healthcare, education, finance, etc. IS A BAD THING. It is very much about tracking us from cradle to grave and then monetizing the data that is collected through programs run by a technocracy.
Do you remember how on FB Bantam Joe and Alison talked about the myth of decentralization in cryptocurrency. Like you, I am not well versed in this area. But the gist of their argument, and it made sense to me, is that even the anonymity with cryptocurrency does not cut it because you still have to have "gatekeepers" whose language you employ transactionally, so it will not remain as anonymous as we might think.
I am open to somebody/anybody correcting me. And explaining why cryptocurrency can still work as the powers that be set up a finance system run on a digital currency. And the other point not to be overlooked, the feds and others will regulate the cryptocurrency space. And I suspect the recent scandal with Bankman Fried will have supplied everything they need to argue for regulation.
My point remains, if Malone, Kirsch, Nass, and others who want to be the face of the MFM and raise the alarm regarding what the COVID crisis was all about....it really ought to include the social impact markets, CBDC and how that is going to work if the WHO/UN and WEF pathological predators get their way. And if those in the MFM are not willing to go there, then anything they are saying in the healthcare space is of limited value in the long haul. These are smart people, they have to understand not only what is at stake, but also why and how the CBDC/digital ID is a virtual prison. And the fact that they just are silent on the matter....even when you ask them in the comment section.....well, that speaks volumes.
You seem to have a repoire with Malone....have you ever asked him to directly address these matters? What, if any, response did he give? He'll talk about the WEF players in a generalized context, but again...they all seem to steer clear of the threat posed by the CBDC and social impact markets.
The reason I am beating this drum.....if we truly want to wake people up....and we still face the fact that many are just tired and done with COVID (and do not even have a reason to examine their actions, beliefs, etc. over the last two years) we need to find ways to help people understand that it is not just about a vaccine, it will very much be about what medicines you will be allowed to take, what schools your kid will be able to attend, how far you will be able to travel, whether you have exceeded your carbon allotment, etc.
I still think a powerful way to address this and raise the alarm would be for a series of writings or interviews of individuals who are newly minted conspiracy theorists and the many and various ways they came to see the light. For example, in my case....it has been a multi-faceted approach----first the nonsense in education, then my own health struggles and battles against the establishment before the pandemic, then my own harm as a breast cancer survivor caused by defective cancer-causing implants as a result of FDA shoddy work, and then the COVID nightmare whereby I knew that the vaccines were likely not good, especially for those with immune system dsyfunction....warned my mother, but she deferred to the "experts" and as a result died. The experts did not diagnose her, I did, but it was too late due to the poor medical care and the buying of the narrative by the medical profession wholesale. And yes, my diagnosis is on the death certificate.
The point is, people need to see how the malfeasance and intention in terms of what they have planned and have already done....well, it will come for everyone in time. Some of us have been awake because we discerned along the way that something was off because of an impact in our lives. For me, it was a presentation in a middle school cafetaria about proficiency-based learning and the educators were spouting crap that made no common sense to me as a parent of kids. So I began researching.....and here I am today....all the more wiser on several fronts.
We can tell people all day long, but honestly....until it touches them or until they have cause to ask questions people just defer to what they are told.
And these days, I see members of the MFM telling those who are pushing back things that will just lead to another round and we do not have time to endure another round. Because it will be the last round.
Wow, Laura, that is quite an insightful comment, and I share your concerns. I am so sorry about your mother. How heartbreaking and infuriating 😭
Just because someone hasn’t yet covered a topic doesn’t mean they don’t think it’s important, though, as I can attest given my umptillion unfinished articles. I have long been wanting to cover CBDC and the engineered financial collapse but would need to spend a significant amount of time researching given that finances are outside my area of expertise. I also feel other people (e.g., Catherine Austin Fitts) are doing a fine job covering it and raising the alarm, so I think the message is definitely getting out there.
I’m way past my bedtime and turning in now so apologies for not giving your comment the in-depth response it deserves.
I appreciate that….that everyone may be trying the best they can with what expertise they have.
But with even that point acknowledged….
How then can Malone insist that there is no evidence of purposeful intent? How can he write a book about the lies government told him and ask people to trust him as an “expert” when on the next breath he says that he took the shot and participated in the system because he trusted it.
So did his government lie to him or is he as stupid as the bureaucrats he is fond of calling dumb? He can’t have it both ways. And yet he tries….which begs questions at this late stage in the game.
I also have had enough of members of the MFM using the “I stand for truth” and am above criticism. If you question….the label gets slapped on you and one gets schooled with a “how dare you….don’t you see how much I’m sacrificing for you.” Strikes me that that is exactly the same attitude and inclination of Fauci that got us into the current predicament. And if people have differences of opinion….argue your side, don’t resort to lawsuits and as hominems.
Also, as a lawyer, I see that some of our medical experts think they are gifted in the area of semantics as a means of answering questions. But they are not as gifted as they think. I can see the flaws in their excuses or how they explain away certain inconvenient facts. A little cross examination would reveal a few artfully places non sequitors that most would not spot.
Please know, my comments are not directed at you personally. Just frustrated. But I guess…. Can start my own substack. I just worry we are in our silo and echo chambers not really moving the needle. I have neither the notoriety or reputation to raise the alarm at this late stage, but pleas to others who have platforms seem to fall on deaf ears. But that is their right. We all do what we can when we can. Be well and get some rest!
Many, MANY, people were either naive about the injections, or were too willing to justify to themselves a "Small" (they thought) risk, in order to travel freely or keep their jobs. I don't think it is fair to criticize anybody too harshly for that -- including Dr. Malone and Steve Kirsch.
Where did Dr. Malone say there is no evidence of purposeful intent? I've never gotten the impression he thinks this was all some big mistake. Have you read his recent post pointing out DARPA's complicity?
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=583200&post_id=106229677
While it is true that nobody should be above criticism, I think you're casting unfounded aspersions. Yes, there are people who are weakening the medical freedom movement, but they seem most often to be "No virus and no Covid" zealots, not the prominent people in this effort.
Point of clarification regarding your earlier comments: Blockchain is only an auditable ledger system that does not automatically identify anyone, personally. However, the applications using it may provide personal information, depending on how they are written. Though I'm not a fan of cryptos, I do support the purposes for which some of them were created, and I share your concerns about CBDC's and digital ID. There are many shortcomings in BTC and other cryptocurrencies that their supporters find inconvenient to address; it seems the lure of quick riches and a false sense of invincibility make it easier to rationalize participation in a mania. For now, I'll stick with real money (metals) and avoid some of the manipulative turbulence from Chinese whales and Wall Street banks.
Dr Malone's vicious $25 million lawsuit against the Breggins, is all that I need to know about Malone. He seems to be running cover for the Bio research establishment
Breggin has a very sketchy history, selling his soul peddling nonsense before juries as an “expert.” I have read testimony of his (many years ago) that was unfounded & grossly overstated. He was obviously deeply in bed with the Scientology folks back then. Malone was quite naive going into this, like many of these guys who political leftists. I remember when he tweeted that he was shocked the NYT had spouted some nonsense. Within an hour he had 100s of responses basically pointing out that they hadn’t been trustworthy in many years. He was genuinely shocked!
Understand that Kirsch, Malone, Kory, & others were strong Democrat party supporters BEFORE they were redpilled by Covid.
Sorry, An Old Doc, but I've been following Breggin for decades. His testimonies against ECT and psych drugs have been invaluable for helping people escape these harmful treatments. YES, he does blow off at the mouth from time to time, and sometimes I can't believe he's saying what he's saying - but is this worth $25 million?
The Breggin's attacks came out of the blue and were completely unwarranted, as far as I could tell, but I'll leave it to the court to say who was wronged. As a frequent reader of Dr. Malone's substack material, I've not seen any substantive evidence of your own accusation; perhaps you can share some excerpts that bother you.
If Malone's suit has no merit, I doubt a court will find in his favor, because I don' t believe he's any kind of privileged insider in the legal system. That would mean his only result would be some large legal fees he'd have to pay.
WRT to threats, I was told by a talented business acquaintance that you either sue or you don't, but you never *threaten* to sue.
I understand the lawsuit has been filed but still not served. No idea what that means. I assume somebody must pay a process server to present to Breggins; no tickee/nowashee?
Breggins has not yet been served. So that lawsuit may be more of a threat, as I understand it.
I think it's important that we unify, not dissolve into fighting amongst ourselves. I can't agree totally with anyone, but if someone is speaking truths that need to be heard, I don't need to critique their personal lives, choices, or be judgemental in any way. These truths need to be heard! This is why I was so disgusted at Malone's suit against Breggin and others.
With all that has happened since I wrote my comment to you MAA…just wondering if you have the same view now as you did earlier relative to individuals like Malone and Kirsch? I tend to subscribe at this point to Sage Hana’s view that some are just having us go in circles in certain cul de sacs….while the real issues relative to the DOD, etc. are not a subject they want to actually tackle and push out to the masses.
At this point, I am wondering about whether their role has always been to re-direct and frame “the issues” so that they can sell us on ‘reform’ which ultimately looks the same down the line as what we have dealt with. And sorry the Hawaii crew seems to be a little too scripted and coordinated….Kennedy may even be part of this redirection for the NWO/globalist agenda. He seems to have certain talking points but stops short of actually naming the criminals.
My recent “Letter to Robert Malone” may answer your question in part:
• https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-robert-malone
His vitriolic attacks on Mike Yeadon and extensive efforts to undermine and silence Mike for providing credible testimony regarding intentionality are highly suspicious.
Whether Malone is controlled opposition or not I cannot definitively say without evidence (as per my “Maybe” philosophy: https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/rites-of-the-tear-downers), but he is serving as a gatekeeper nevertheless and is what I describe as a mainstream straddler:
• https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-mainstream-straddler
Much of his behavior could be accounted for by his colossal ego and narcissism, and he makes reckless, pride-driven decisions that cause him and his reputation considerable damage, which only he is capable of repairing by demonstrating a modicum of humility, but I don’t expect him to ever do that as he failed to do so at a time when he had a golden opportunity to drop the lawsuits. I privately outlined a potential path toward redemption, but he only doubled down on his destructive (self- and otherwise) behavior.
After I published my letter to him, he canceled his paid subscription to my Stack and canceled mine to his so I can no longer comment on his posts, indicating he did not take my call for civility in the spirit in which it was offered ;-)
He cancelled me and my paid subscription to his SS and his reason for doing so was a huge red flag. I also am troubled by those who ardently defend him. Things do not add up. Thank you for your response. I knew you had appealed to him to reconsider his treatment of Dr. Mike Yeadon. Did not know the outcome. Thank you for your efforts and for sharing the outcome. Soldier on.
Regarding the anonymity of cryptocurrency, it's true that for BTC, specifically, the blockchain is a public ledger, so anonymity doesn't technically exist for that particular currency, although this is fairly easy to get around if you use a wallet like I do that generates a new BTC "address" each time you receive Bitcoin.
First, though, I should probably explain the terms "wallet" and "address," since there is confusion around how this technology works.
A wallet is a sort of virtual safe you can manage via several different user interfaces (my current preferred one is Exodus) that makes it easier to keep track of your various transactions in various cryptocurrencies all in one place, much like an online bank account.
Except in this case, *you* are your own bank since none of this information is stored in a central server like it is at a big bank like Chase or Charles Schwab; it's all "out there" in the public ledger created by the vast network of computers all processing the transactions.
And by extension, if you lose your login credentials to your wallet, there is no customer support line that can assist you in restoring them; *you* have ultimate responsibility to store your "keys" in a safe place, the keys being a list of random words generated when you create your wallet that will allow you to restore your access to your funds by proving to the *decentralized* network of the blockchain that you are, in fact, the controller of the funds.
Hence the phrase, "not your keys, not your wallet" and why people go to extraordinary lengths to preserve this list of secret words offline since anyone who puts together the full list could take over control of your wallet. Without the list, though, it's impossible to restore access to the funds, which is also why you'll hear stories of early adopters of BTC who stored them on a flash drive but lost their keys and so can *never* recover those funds.
Now, different cryptocurrencies function differently, but with BTC, whenever you want to receive funds from someone, you have to give them your BTC "address."
The use of the term "address" was a mistake on the part of its creators, in my opinion, since it's really more of an invoice number rather than a constant identifier like an email address is.
If you're discreet, it should be difficult for an outsider to ever link your real world identity with your BTC address(es), but if they *did* put 2 and 2 together, then, due to the public nature of the BTC blockchain, anyone *could* see a history of how much BTC was transferred into and out of a given address.
HOWEVER, most wallet management software these days make it easy to generate a new "address" (invoice number) every time you want to receive BTC from someone, so that out on the public ledger, the transactions are broken into hundreds or even thousands of separate records, and anyone trying to snoop on your personal finances would have to have every single address (invoice number) you've ever used and add all of them up to figure out how much you really hold.
Lastly, it's true that the easiest way for people to start acquiring BTC (or any cryptocurrency, really) is to buy it on an exchange like Robin Hood or Coinbase, and all of the major players are now "KYC" (know your customer) compliant, so to create an account and fund it with USD or some other fiat currency, you have to send the exchange proof of your ID, and they report any sales to the IRS and can see how much crypto you buy and sell through their platform.
However, this is really only a problem for those who plan to buy crypto and flip it for more USD or fiat currency by playing the market like they would with stocks.
These people aren't into crypto for the philosophical, longterm implications but rather for the short-term gain.
If one decides to be a "h0dler" (a "holder") and simply amass BTC and other crypto over time, hoping to use it as an actual currency for exchange in the future rather than ever turning it back into fiat trash (I think of this as going "off grid" with regards to money), then there's not much the IRS or regulators can really do since you can turn BTC into other types of crypto and back or transact with other freedom fighters off of the centralized exchanges (i.e. out in the ether of the decentralized blockchain), and there is no way they can track it all or tax you since you're now out of their failing system. It's only if you want to go back "on grid" by selling your crypto for fiat currency on an exchange hooked up to the Establishment that you'd then get hit with all of their regulations and taxes.
That was long, but I hope it helped you better understand the revolutionary nature of cryptocurrencies, especially BTC and why they really are different from the CBDCs planned for us by the mfers currently running the show.
Catherine Austin Fitts, Whitney Webb. Whitney talks about CBDC and Bitcoin some here in a recent interview: https://youtu.be/mSBs8A0Zt5g
This a a very informative interview, but Catherine Austin Fitts is not in it. Is there another one with her? Thank you for this one.
Catherine’s 2020 Planet Lockdown interview (https://rumble.com/vd15i1-planet-lockdown-catherine-austin-fitts-full-interview.html) is what gave me the stratospheric view of the global financial crisis, and her followup interview in 2021 (https://rumble.com/vpt2uq-catherine-austin-fitts-2nd-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html) added further clarity.
All of the Planet Lockdown interviews are well worth binging:
• https://planetlockdownfilm.com/full-interviews/
Wow just watched the last of the two videos. Going Direct Reset is very real.
Agreed. Those are great.
Here's CAF on Financial Rebellion this morning: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/financial-rebellion-with-catherine-austin-fitts/sovereign-state-banks/
She has very many on her Solari Report. Here’s a good one with her TN state senator. https://home.solari.com/special-solari-report-a-sovereign-state-bank-and-bullion-depository-for-tennessee-with-senator-frank-niceley/
Here’s another excellent one with CJ Hopkins
https://www.oval.media/en/mrglobal-2-2/
Thank you.
Thank you! Will have a listen.
also Richard Werner is excellently clear and, somehow, calm. (Kim's selling gold here so be aware of that, nevertheless...): https://youtu.be/dM6pipDLLgw
Full show: https://rumble.com/v2athxq-conversation-with-economist-richard-werner-the-plandemic-was-used-to-usher-.html
@LauraGarcia you are using a term I'm unfamiliar with: MFM
I get MSM = but have been scraping my brain to figure out what the "F" in MFM is? Or even the first "M"?
Medical Freedom Movement
Thank you!!!!!! (duh, right?)
Digital currencies are simply computer programs. Written by people. Who are undoubtedly ALL altruistic souls, thinking only of the greater good. None of whom are in any way subject to the weaknesses of the flesh. Incorruptible.
Or maybe not.
I am not willing to try to convince you different that what you believe.
All I am willing to say is that there is a lot of information out there both pro and con for anyone to read. I encourage people to find out for themselves, since if you outsource your understanding of a subject to a third party you have no way to determine if they are right or wrong, or if they are lying to you for their own purposes.
That is how you spend two years wearing masks isolated in your house and obeying directional arrows on the floor of grocery stores.
This is the best video I have seen thus far in terms of really explaining to people about the risks of where we are headed....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUHnC4DQS1M&t=15s
Thank you- I will pass on. I had an interesting experience today. Our Visa # was stolen, so yesterday we cancelled it and are awaiting a new card. Overnight, firms like Netflix put our accounts on hold. We are completely cut off from using these services until a new card comes today. I felt I was living in a microcosm of the social credit/CBDC system!
I think about CBDC every time I go to an ATM, and wonder - is this the time that I will be denied access? That day will come, unless I can somehow hide in the crowd (which the jab & resulting "passports" made nigh on impossible).
😆 But doesn’t blockchain technology help counteract the fallibility factor?
Absolutely! Blockchain is noted for it's capacity to eliminate all human foibles, like honor, or a conscience. It is also a noted mechanism for the elimination of critical thought, and perhaps it's most impressive attribute, blockchain totally removes ANY hint accountability.
😹 Touché.
Not at all correct.
The purveyors of CBDCs are hoping to prey on the public's general ignorance of how blockchain technology, and cryptocurrencies in general, work.
They've already begun their demonization campaign against BTC as "fake money," but they can't go too hard on that since they recognize the potential value and are stockpiling it themselves, just in case.
CBDCs are impostor cryptocurrencies since they are completely centralized, whereas true cryptocurrencies are decentralized and can be easily exchanged for multiple other competing currencies without the "need" for a central bank to do it.
Bitcoin is the real deal and most of the other cryptos are just scams. Bitcoin's primary use case is money whose value can not be inflated away and is very resistant to confiscation even by criminals including armies governments and banks.
Game theory suggests governments and banks will suffer severely as Bitcoin keeps chipping away the source of their power, which is to lend ever more money, out of thin air, primarily to the rich and powerful but at high interest rates to the serfs of the world while inflating away the value of the money, but the incentives for individuals within governments and banks is to get as much Bitcoin as fast as they can get their hands on it, so how would governments be able to achieve enough consensus to totally eradicate bitcoin from the whole earth.
So overall I expect the adoption of Bitcoin will empower the individual and gut the power of the administrators of the collective. This will likely cause a lot of disruption in the short term and we can not predict how it will all unfold but I'm ready to take the chances. This is a technological breakthrough, the cat is out of the bag and there really is no going back.
Bitcoin is an immutable distributed ledger that keeps track of all the transactions that ever occurred in the history of bitcoin. This is why cash is a much preferred medium of exchange for criminal activity because the possibility is always there that the owners of the anonymous bitcoin addresses will eventually be tracked down and the crime confirmed which makes bitcoin a dual edged sword. On the one hand good actions that are illegal can be traced down but the big cats are also forced to have a light shinning on their transaction history.
My guess is Steve Kirsch is in Cryptos hoping to profit off of Ponzi schemes, Otherwise, he would promote only Bitcoin. I still can't figure out how deeply he is connected to the deep state. Probably not as well connected as Bob Malone. Thankfully I don't have much money, otherwise I would be worried of a suit from bob.
PSA: Beware of anyone who touts BTC, especially if they talk trash about principal movers in the medical freedom movement. Research carefully before participating in the crypto markets. Bitcoin's source is still a mystery (could even be CIA), it uses more electricity than many entire nations, it is completely reliant (at least for transactions) on a functional and accessible Internet, its value is determined by the whims of large stakeholders, and it is subject to all the practical limitations described here:
https://blog.dshr.org/2022/02/ee380-talk.html
You should also understand what trusted systems are, and why blockchain isn't the end-all in the real world:
https://www.wired.com/story/theres-no-good-reason-to-trust-blockchain-technology/
Bitcoin is slow and wasteful; why not make something better?
https://desogames.substack.com/p/bitcoin-v20-the-research-coin-whitepaper
The philosophy behind bitcoin is admirable, but bitcoin itself is not some kind of monetary savior. Pyramid schemes are nothing new, and it's always the last ones in who find out the hard way. Buyer beware, unless you are in it as a volatility play or small hedge...
This is a great comment that hits the nail on the head with regards to BTC's utility and why it's so far the only crypto with a fighting chance of toppling the central banks' monopolies over the various national currencies.
If you start your own substack, I’m in.
Related to CBDC level controls, a family member is in a hospital and I was informed today that there is a national registry of any and all drugs each of us have on our records.
Of course I was aware that doctors and pharmacies keep records, but I did not know about a national database or registry. Anybody else out there know about that and where can one learn more?
That is one of the disadvantages of socialised medicine: the government pays, the government knows all, and it's all shared. There is a digital sharing scheme called My Health Record, and you had to opt out by a certain date (I did), and now I have to check all my labs & other documents to say, "DO NOT SHARE to MyHealth Record." I don't know how much this actually does - because the government pays for all medical, so the government knows it all. This definitely includes jabbing. It is one of the advantages of a cobbled-together system like in the USA.
Funny that. I was in the SF Bay Area and was at two different hospital systems / doctors for completely unrelated situations. I positively watched the docs look at the computer and then they talked to me about medical issues I did NOT share with them. Nor did I give any system permission to share with the others. Three systems in all, and they can very clearly “see” across supposed boundaries. Opting out is BS. It doesn’t happen.
I'm thinking this likely is linked through your insurance network?
I've wondered with all the different insurance systems in the US - whether Insurance A talks to Insurance B, or if the networks are mutually exclusive. If you left the state, and went somewhere "out of network" would it be the same?
It is not an insurance network. It is this hospital system linking to that one and this medical foundation (a large group of doctors) system linking to another hospital. I watched the doctor / nurse navigate their systems.
If I left the state, doctors elsewhere probably would not have access like this. But I do not know for sure. Depends on if there is an umbrella corporation above the hospital or medical group. Like everything, when there is $$$, it gets bigger and bigger.
Here is one example: https://www.dignityhealth.org/ourlocations now crosses state lines.
Yes, these networks have become behemoths since I left the US 20 years ago.
It’s bad. It’s a very, very bad situation for everyone. Do you already know what it’s called?
Yes, I think it was Sasha or Katherine Watt who said - watch them take down Pfizer, naughty Pfizer, it's all Pfizer's fault - while the PTB continue to force the agenda in other ways. Pfizer will reorganize and rise again as another hydra, and the DOD & WEF will continue marching on as usual. YES the vaccines are evil, but they are only part of the plan.