It amazes me that stopping "vaccine hesitancy" has taken precedence over stopping death and illness. I will never trust another "vaccine", a health "official", or most allopathic doctors again for the rest of my life.
"anti-vaxer" absolutely is a psy-op. Likely directly from the CIA lexicon - as "conspiracy theory/ist" demonstrably is. Notice how many people delivering video testimony of their (often horrific) vax injury - start by affirming "I am not an anti-vaxer" - there's the operation right there!
= =
I like the Dr Zelenko protocol for assessing "each medical intervention" - is it safe? is it effective? is it necessary?
Probably. But all vaccines as well as the new gene “therapies” are poisons. All the vaxxed versus unvaxxed studies show that unvaxxed is healthier.
So my answer to the psyop is psychological jiu jitsu, “Damn straight I am anti-vaxx. I don’t see how injecting liability-free poisons can improve anyone’s health.”
I watched Vaxxed last week... most doctors are scum.. they'd prescribe dioxin pills if it would get them an all expenses paid trip to the next 'medical conference'
That's been my position for just over twenty years. Hopefully at least one good thing that will come out of the plandemic will be a significant increase in people coming to the same conclusion.
I vaxxed my older 3 kids with the usuals on schedule. My baby, though...I’m waiting. And maybe won’t do any of them at all. But they sure pressure you to! I’d prefer to take the passive risk, rather than the active risk. And RFK’s book really opened my eyes!
Excellent thing to add to the conversation here; ... but I thought the claim was that in 2020 the number of infant/child vaccinations declined steeply (due to "pandemic disruptions" in health care delivery) and then, subsequently, the decline in infant mortality was observed.
In any case, I think it likely that vaccine "hesitancy" in FL will grow, if only because of the voting-with-feet migration into the state. Such voters bringing their hesitancy with them.
Perhaps they are relaizing that they squandered the publics faith in vaccines on a bunch of snake oil that doens't work and you they will never get that faith back. It's the CDC who cried Wolf here.
I don’t believe anything these global / national agencies & “experts” have done was due to incompetence. They KNEW the survivability rate early on; they KNEW cheap, well trialed & safe meds were effective; they KNEW the long standing protocols for trialing new meds & vaccines; they KNEW this mRNA stuff was not only not a “vaccine”, but that decades of trying to make it one had never worked & killed all the animals on whom they’d experimented w/ it
This is a lab made virus and they knew that it was not very deadly. The purpose of releasing the virus was to impose mRNA quackcines for digital Id control mechanism.
The blueprint of the scamdemic was published back in 2010:
yeah, I agree. they didn't care, "let's make money! people die anyway I'm sure the net of lives saved will be greater, or maybe not, but well still get rich" or whatever immoral nonsense they thought up. I'm staying FAR away from PHARMA now!
Hard not to agree with you when even financial experts are coming to similar conclusions but from different angles: Club of Rome, Malthusians: all want 'reduced', poor and controlled.
This is the thing that made me skeptical. The suppression of early treatments which they know work and are safe . They killed hcq and ivm as treatment options intentionally . Pure evil malfeasance
Whatever happened to “right to try”?! What business is it of anybody - esp GOVERNMENT” if I’m willing to try an “experimental treatment” to potentially save my own life. And Ivermectin was, until 2020, considered one of the safest & most indispensable drugs around. I think it even won a Nobel prize in about 2015
Goal #1 was to get rid of Donald Trump. If we admit we know all this stuff about the virus, we can't pretend it's a society-ending event and we don't get to do all the 'fun' stuff we did to try to combat the virus.
The very very first antibody tests in April 2020 proved that we had already been living with the virus for months without noticing. That's when the big shift to 'zero covid' occurred, even though the cowards couldn't come out and say they were going for zero covid.
The covid restrictions were designed to upend American life and ruin Trump's chance of re-election. They were NEVER about a virus.
Certainly not (never about the “virus”). And it has long been my personal theory that we were well on the way to global herd immunity or already there way before lockdowns by March 2020 because I’ve seen news articles of a mystery illness in VA & MD in June 2019.
I think getting rid of Trump was only part of it. The globalists freaked over Brexit too, & the coordinated global response to repress each country’s own people didn’t really have much to do w/ Trump. He also shit himself in his own foot, surrounding himself w/ the likes of the malevolent lawn troll, Scatf-Queen Birx, et al. Not to mention “warp-speeding” a “vaccination” by waiving all safety protocols & granting liability immunity to big Pharma. And he’s STILL out there flogging the “vaccines” as one of his greatest achievements, saying they “saved millions of lives” when the now well documented reality is that they don’t work to purpose AND are damaging & killing thousands if not 100s of thousands….
That’s why Paul Offit (creator of Rotavirus vaccine and Shockingly FDA advisor.... no! There’s no conflict of interest! Why would you ask?) is not recommending continued boosters. Might hit his bottom line
My Dad was always avoiding drs and jabs and is a vital 87 year old, or was vital. Relatives pressured him to get the clot shots.
Now his house is filled with pulleys and handles so he doesn't fall down.
It's breaking my heart.
And, now, when something is truly wrong, he won't go to a doctor until it is emergency room level bad. And, since the clot shots, it has already been twice in a year.
I hope there is a hell for them--you know who I mean.
I hope that this will have the effect of people not treating their doctor as gods and pharma as the answer to everything. People should at least have a full understanding of every medicine prescribed and if/when they can be off it (and how to get there).
el gato malo will be happy to know that I won’t even vax my (indoor) cats in the future! I’ve already apologized to them and promised not to do it again.
Yesss! I stopped vaxing my cats. One is vax free and she used to be a street cat. She's the healthiest cat despite her rough start. On the other hand, I lost fully vax cat and I spent a lot of money and treatment to detox my other one. She's now 18 years old and enjoying her retirement life vax free!
Yes, my minimally vaxxed cat (who came to me via a farm and from a vet) is almost 20. She's deaf now and finally showing signs of aging (osteopenia and sarcopenia, if I had to guess). But rural living in the mountains means that she's more likely to be picked off by an eagle than a microbial infection.
When I told my vet no more rabies vaccine she told me no more her. And not in a nice way. So far none of my dogs have foamed at the mouth except from thirst or inhaling salt water.
I haven't been to the vet for a very long time. Both cats are healthy, eat well and poop well. I just want to make my older one comfortable in her golden years and would prefer hospice when the time is getting near.
Hospice as in a place where your cat could be given palliative care? Or are you just talking you giving palliative care to your cat? A number of years ago we had a dog who got cancer. We did not opt for cancer treatment (much to the vets eternal displeasure). She lived a pretty good life until the last month or so. But she died at home, in her bed with us where she had been most all of her life. I wouldn't be anxious to have to have another dog die that way, but I can think of worse ways. We have a dog that had a death wish. She is much safer, but infinitely less happy now that she is mostly leashed. I think she was hoping for a more exciting end. We shall see. She's an old broad with a fascination with taunting snakes so...
Hospice is where I give her palliative care at home where she feels comfortable the most. Death is something we have lost touch with. As caring pet caregiver we want to help, heal, fix, and we have pushed death to a corner. It isn't in our homes the way it was 100 years ago, we treat with medicine and fix everything. Well, everything dies and changes eventually and I think our pushing it so far out of our day to day life has left us unprepared and with a false notion that it should be easy. It isn't always quick, but what it is, is a rite of passage we all face in our own way and deserve to be supported through it.
My kitties are 12, 12, and 13. I have considered not getting the rabies vaccines anymore since they 1) hate going in the carrier and 2) never go outside - but the county could legally fine me if they found out. And I don't think my vet has the time or will to alert the county about every kitty that doesn't come in.
And for these obligate carnivore, my two cats (the used to be street cat and the retired vax free cat) only eat raw fresh human grade meat, organs and bones. When they got fleas, I don't give them toxic flea treatments. I just brush them, vacuum the house and treat my yard with diatomaceous earth. In fact, it's my cats who converted me into an antivaxx. A badge of honor that I'm wearing now. They taught me how bad the vaccines were for their health. One day when I have children, no needles would ever touch them either!
It was a very easy transition for my street cat and I needed more patience with my older cat. Once they taste fresh raw food, they don't want to go back to commercial food. They have more finer palate now 😂
I think the "no vaccines" people are too absolutist. The "vaccines" against Covid-19 are indeed about the perfect example of how NOT to produce a safe, well tested, well proven immunization. They fail on all counts. And yes, there were other vaccines that caused deaths/injuries. But to believe that all vaccines are evil and a thing to avoid? I'd say that is going too far.
We do well if we avoid being too categorical. Ideally each thing (vaccine) will be judged on its own merits.
Can’t disagree with you that we should be open minded. But I think we have gone too far on vaccines, especially the children schedule and the flu shots. I’d rather our NIH focus on natural health than bowing to Pharma $. Vitamin D, zinc, weight loss, sunshine, exercise, natural foods, low carbs, etc should be top of the list, not injections.
I rescue cats as well, and agree that certain vaccines can protect animals in stressed and crowded shelter situations. I get my foster kittens vaccinated for FVRCP if they will be with other kittens prior to adoption (having lost one to calici virus in the past.) I’m talking about my established indoor cats. The one I never vaxxed lived to 22 1/2. The others got diabetes, cancers and so on.
that's maybe fine if you never let them outside, they never escape, or you never die and they have to be rehomed with someone who may let them out! it's really best to protect them as much as you can from the worst things, like rabies, but i can see why people would want to skip vaxxes for more basic things that can be treated if they happen.
I share your concerns for average cat owners, but I am extremely careful with them and have resources that will care for them no matter what happens. They are my “children”. But I appreciate your advice!
My indoor cats are rescues but unjabbed except for a couple. No reason to jab them. If they made the shots safer I would consider. Just like if they made the shots safer for people.
Me too. Life long vaccinee (even my children) and vaccinator (i am a physician assistant), i have decided that neither nor my young children will be receiving any vaccine from here on out. This has shown me that you cannot trust public health authorities. At all. They do not have our best interest at heart. Money and power is all they crave. I’m out.
I have a nasty feeling that they are priming us all for forced vaccination of the entire population, "for the greater good." I read recently that that is in the planning stages at the FDA. Time will tell, but turning the unvaccinated into the enemy of the people is a clever and effective strategy to get the masses to accept forced vaccinations.
What else would you expect from Nazis? This is why the people who see through this bullshit have to do their best to wake other people up. If we don't succeed, I prefer WW3 and nuclear annihilation.
Before this psy-op, I thought that "antivaxxers" were some sort of Amish people, that were denying science, motivated by religious beliefs; now I know better!
Dr. Mengele was a "gatito bueno", compared to Faucizilla!
At this point we're well past interpreting any of this as incompetence. It's simply impossible to credit that such a vast number of highly trained specialists and subject-matter experts could have been completely blind to the blindingly obvious.
The only remaining possibility is malign intent: pressure coming down from the top, from people who for reasons I sincerely doubt had a scintilla of anything to do with providing immunity to COVID-19, wanted the frankenjuice jabbed into every arm and didn't give a good god-damn about any deleterious consequences. Everyone beneath them in the hierarchy was made to understand that it was in their personal best interests to NOT understand any problems with this project, no matter how staggeringly clear they were in the data or how easily predicted they could be by anyone with even a bit of common sense. Dissent and get fired; dissent too loudly, and be derided in the controlled press as a lunatic.
The most interesting question at this point isn't even, "Is the V counterproductive or just ineffective?" It's, "what was the real reason they wanted so very, very badly to jab everyone with this concoction?"
What's dispiriting to note is how many knew something was seriously off and remained silent in the face of it. Paycheck>>>Integrity, apparently.
If the goal was simply to get people enrolled in a digital ID system, why not go with a run-of-the-mill attenuated virus vaccine...or saline? Nope, mRNA it was! For everyone. I cannot think of a single innocent explanation as to why the authorities pushed to get a needle into every arm, since the virus posed almost no risk to healthy people under 70 yo.
Precisely. It doesn't make sense if the goal was public health; nor does it make sense if the goal was a giant fakeout to herd people into digital ID or whatever. It follows that they're up to something extremely dark.
depopulation...gates stated it in his ted talk...to paraphrase, if we do a good job with birth control and vaccines we will slow population growth and reduce carbon emissions
I think maybe they believed that mRNA technology was the magic bullet that would lead to a cure for a multitude of maladies from viruses to cancer and everything in between.
Like the introduction of functions in early programming languages, they thought it had the potential to revolutionize the field. mRNA technology was believed to be a similar game changer, malleable, and general enough to enable it to be recruited to do whatever particular tweek was needed to get the body to heal itself.
If thousands of deaths in the short term were necessary to save millions in the future, they rationalised that to be an ethical exchange.
Maybe, but it is unethical to sacrifice unwitting thousands to save millions down the line.
We are dealing with incredibly wealthy sociopaths who have gained control of many governments throughout the world. There are billions of us polluting their planet. They are not about the business of improving our lives. More like culling the herd, I fear. Nothing that's happened since vaccines rolled out has budged me off this apocalyptic scenario. In fact, most things that transpired since then affirm it. God help us.
The mRNA tech probably does have enormous potential. But what early testing had been done was spotty and disappointing. I fully agree that the mRNA products should never have been approved. But that's because they haven't been adequately tested for safety or efficacy. I concur that what is going on now is a monstrosity of greed and power-seeking at the least, and could have darker motives.
But none of the above precludes, in the least, the possibility that mRNA might prove a great technology if/when they overcome its obvious bugs.
Believe it or not, most Nazi doctors were enthusiastic supporters of Hitler's programs. The human detritus would be coldly dealt with in order for the Master Race to flourish. They fancied being on the front lines in bringing about a positive future as they envisioned it. The ends justify the means, and all that...
Our doctors turned a blind eye to this evil to maintain employment. Absolutely despicable.
The Nazis were devils, no doubt. But other nations were to some extent in the same boat. If you've done any reading about Eugenics, it was a popular movement in the early 20th century, to include the USA. Of course we never took things to the lengths the Nazis did, but we certainly did our share of sterilizations, in some places, the programs continued until the 1970s. Americans like to ride on their moral high horse but alas, we too have a few skeletons in the national closet.
And the really horrifying truth? At its core Eugenics is correct: It is NOT in the "herd's" (humanity's) long-term interest to allow the "less fit" to reproduce. And yes, the very ill, the old, the weak and the unfit are a drain on resources and thus should be "culled." This is "correct" in the natural sense, that Nature demands survival of the fittest.
None of this is news, it has been well known to scientists and ethicists for hundreds of years. Nietzsche wrote about it in the 19th century; his arguments were along the lines that democracy was the (many) weak organizing to protect against the (few) strong, ultimately producing a tame, domesticated citizen. In places he explicitly argues the weak should be culled.
Please observe I'm not defending Eugenics in any moral sense. Other than the most humane forms of it ("positive" eugenics) which would be, say, voluntary mating by consenting people, virtually any other types very quickly wades from the relatively firm ground of the merely morally dubious (mandatory birth control, anyone?) to the muck of forced sterilizations, ultimately into the quicksand of extermination.
We now return you to your preferred, Disney-esque fantasy world where all animals are herbivores and peace, happiness, butterflies and rainbows are the norm!
I support eugenics as an ideal. Why wouldn't we want more people to be strong, healthy, brave, intelligent, good-looking, honorable, and otherwise gifted, than the reverse?
The clinker is that Eugenicists usually wanted this program to be carried out by the government. I was disabused of this hope upon reading 1984 when I was a college freshman, and realized that if the government was running it, they would inevitably breed mediocre conformists instead, because those are the people they can rule over.
If the government is doing it, the result will be domestication. We eugenicists are hound dogs who aspire to be wolves, but the government would turn us into pugs, or toy poodles, or perhaps those little dogs the Aztecs used to eat.
I think Nietzsche had a sense of this. His concept of the "superman" was the eugenic ideal, but in contempt of government, absent Darwinian logic, and wrapped in the mantle of tragedy.
I've also heard that women are natural eugenicists in their search for a husband. They should be left to follow their instincts, and let the men each pursue his own "superman". That is the real eugenic method that we have always practiced, and the only one that actually works.
Women USED to be “natural eugenicists”...They, like other mammals, used to look for the fittest mate, the one most likely to provide shelter and safety and a good life for her and her children. Unfortunately, with the so-called “safety net” of our social welfare system, the government has become the provider for many women and their children. Many women are now WILLING to “mate” with sub-par men that are unwilling to work OR protect their progeny. Too many women don’t demand it of them.
Women are no longer gatekeepers. We’ve lost the instinct mentioned above...and society is weaker as the result.
About that...from the GAO, "HHS Agencies Need to Develop Procedures and Train Staff on Reporting and Addressing Political Interference" https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104613
If they can normalize all the corners they've cut with this shot, which obviously but unprovably and unpredictably kills some of the people who get it, and wrap this into a digital ID system that ties to medical, financial, and social credit, they've got us. You have no money without a current ID, your ID won't stay current without your regular booster, and your shot will be individualized to you given your genetic/medical profile, so it won't be the same as what any other person gets. If you make yourself troublesome you will die of a previously undiagnosed condition conveyed by your next booster, and no one else will dare to help you because they are vulnerable to the same thing themselves. Dissidents and deadwood can be plucked out. If the economy is tight, your retirement will be short. Even if you own land and can farm, you can't pay your taxes without a current ID card, and your land will be seized. Short of living as a hobo, you are stuck.
That is the power they are grasping for here: the arbitrary power of life and death over every human being in the reach of this economy. The power to kill people, individually or in groups, as anonymously and unaccountably as they have been freezing or deleting social media accounts over the past two years. For the scheme to work, they have to set up an endless schedule of required Russian roulette shots into every arm, with no exceptions.
I have no doubt that everything you wrote is exactly correct, and yet, I can't help but suspect that there's something even more nefarious at play in the specific nature of the technology they're pushing to inject into everyone.
It amazes me that stopping "vaccine hesitancy" has taken precedence over stopping death and illness. I will never trust another "vaccine", a health "official", or most allopathic doctors again for the rest of my life.
Same for me. I never gave much thought to vaccines before the plandemic but I’m an antivaxxer and proud of it now.
I think this "anti-vaxxer" label is a psy op.
These are consumer medical products, not Gods.
Just because you label something a "vaccine", and then change the definition when it fails...doesn't make it a God.
Each medical intervention should be reviewed on a risk-benefit analysis. This one failed miserably on every metric.
"anti-vaxer" absolutely is a psy-op. Likely directly from the CIA lexicon - as "conspiracy theory/ist" demonstrably is. Notice how many people delivering video testimony of their (often horrific) vax injury - start by affirming "I am not an anti-vaxer" - there's the operation right there!
= =
I like the Dr Zelenko protocol for assessing "each medical intervention" - is it safe? is it effective? is it necessary?
Agreed—-one should say they are a pro-informed consenter. This implies having the ability to critically think and use good clinical judgment.
Probably. But all vaccines as well as the new gene “therapies” are poisons. All the vaxxed versus unvaxxed studies show that unvaxxed is healthier.
So my answer to the psyop is psychological jiu jitsu, “Damn straight I am anti-vaxx. I don’t see how injecting liability-free poisons can improve anyone’s health.”
Well said, S M
Me as well
I have been for 17 years!
I watched Vaxxed last week... most doctors are scum.. they'd prescribe dioxin pills if it would get them an all expenses paid trip to the next 'medical conference'
And me.
That's been my position for just over twenty years. Hopefully at least one good thing that will come out of the plandemic will be a significant increase in people coming to the same conclusion.
I vaxxed my older 3 kids with the usuals on schedule. My baby, though...I’m waiting. And maybe won’t do any of them at all. But they sure pressure you to! I’d prefer to take the passive risk, rather than the active risk. And RFK’s book really opened my eyes!
Did you see Floridan overall infant mortality went down 12% last year? coincidentally Florida became the most overall vaccine hesitant state.
Excellent thing to add to the conversation here; ... but I thought the claim was that in 2020 the number of infant/child vaccinations declined steeply (due to "pandemic disruptions" in health care delivery) and then, subsequently, the decline in infant mortality was observed.
In any case, I think it likely that vaccine "hesitancy" in FL will grow, if only because of the voting-with-feet migration into the state. Such voters bringing their hesitancy with them.
Perhaps they are relaizing that they squandered the publics faith in vaccines on a bunch of snake oil that doens't work and you they will never get that faith back. It's the CDC who cried Wolf here.
I don’t believe anything these global / national agencies & “experts” have done was due to incompetence. They KNEW the survivability rate early on; they KNEW cheap, well trialed & safe meds were effective; they KNEW the long standing protocols for trialing new meds & vaccines; they KNEW this mRNA stuff was not only not a “vaccine”, but that decades of trying to make it one had never worked & killed all the animals on whom they’d experimented w/ it
This is a lab made virus and they knew that it was not very deadly. The purpose of releasing the virus was to impose mRNA quackcines for digital Id control mechanism.
The blueprint of the scamdemic was published back in 2010:
https://themillenniumreport.com/2020/07/rockefeller-lockstep-2010-was-blueprint-for-2020-covid-19-pandemic/
Murderna patented their Covid-19 quackcine on 2019-03-28, 9 months before SARS-Cov-2 was released in Wuhan China.
So, these quackcines were not developed as the result of a 'pandemic' but were the purpose of the scamdemic.
'Murderna'...great rebranding. I'll use it going forward.
new spokes person is Ja Rule
At Murderna we care about your health:
https://librti.com/page/view-video?id=1515
NB: Their stock symbol is mRNA as shown below - this is an evil corporation.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/MRNA
Moderna Quackcine Patented 9 Months Before Pandemic. Thanks to the Fauci-Baric’ Manmade SARS Viruses
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2022/04/11/moderna-vaccine-patented-9-months-before-pandemic-thanks-to-the-fauci-baric-manmade-sars-viruses/
If this is even half true, then my sense of reality is so warped and broken that absolutely nothing can surprise me anymore.
Welcome to the Covid Zone where green becomes red and vice versa!!!
Kagan Fauci, Ralph Baric, Bull Gates and Clown Schwab are enjoying people's suffering around the globe...
I know how you feel, but you're wrong. You can get gut punched again by more proofs. I just wish they'd stop.
yeah, I agree. they didn't care, "let's make money! people die anyway I'm sure the net of lives saved will be greater, or maybe not, but well still get rich" or whatever immoral nonsense they thought up. I'm staying FAR away from PHARMA now!
Hard not to agree with you when even financial experts are coming to similar conclusions but from different angles: Club of Rome, Malthusians: all want 'reduced', poor and controlled.
This is the thing that made me skeptical. The suppression of early treatments which they know work and are safe . They killed hcq and ivm as treatment options intentionally . Pure evil malfeasance
Whatever happened to “right to try”?! What business is it of anybody - esp GOVERNMENT” if I’m willing to try an “experimental treatment” to potentially save my own life. And Ivermectin was, until 2020, considered one of the safest & most indispensable drugs around. I think it even won a Nobel prize in about 2015
Bc of it worked, they wouldn’t need the magic juice under eua
Of course
They started building the legal architecture in 1983.
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/american-domestic-bioterrorism-program?s=r
None of that stuff gets rid of Donald Trump.
I don’t understand?
Goal #1 was to get rid of Donald Trump. If we admit we know all this stuff about the virus, we can't pretend it's a society-ending event and we don't get to do all the 'fun' stuff we did to try to combat the virus.
The very very first antibody tests in April 2020 proved that we had already been living with the virus for months without noticing. That's when the big shift to 'zero covid' occurred, even though the cowards couldn't come out and say they were going for zero covid.
The covid restrictions were designed to upend American life and ruin Trump's chance of re-election. They were NEVER about a virus.
Certainly not (never about the “virus”). And it has long been my personal theory that we were well on the way to global herd immunity or already there way before lockdowns by March 2020 because I’ve seen news articles of a mystery illness in VA & MD in June 2019.
I think getting rid of Trump was only part of it. The globalists freaked over Brexit too, & the coordinated global response to repress each country’s own people didn’t really have much to do w/ Trump. He also shit himself in his own foot, surrounding himself w/ the likes of the malevolent lawn troll, Scatf-Queen Birx, et al. Not to mention “warp-speeding” a “vaccination” by waiving all safety protocols & granting liability immunity to big Pharma. And he’s STILL out there flogging the “vaccines” as one of his greatest achievements, saying they “saved millions of lives” when the now well documented reality is that they don’t work to purpose AND are damaging & killing thousands if not 100s of thousands….
And when Aussie and NZ and China and Austria etc. did them, that was about Trump, too?
Not sure I agree with your police work here.
And just think....they still wouldn't have gotten elected without "2000 Mules" carrying fake ballots.
That’s why Paul Offit (creator of Rotavirus vaccine and Shockingly FDA advisor.... no! There’s no conflict of interest! Why would you ask?) is not recommending continued boosters. Might hit his bottom line
Yeah but the flu shots didn't work and they did well with them. they just wanted faster bigger money
I have a feeling there are lots of us that will never willingly be injected, see doctors or be hospitalized going forward, if we can avoid it
Yes.
My Dad was always avoiding drs and jabs and is a vital 87 year old, or was vital. Relatives pressured him to get the clot shots.
Now his house is filled with pulleys and handles so he doesn't fall down.
It's breaking my heart.
And, now, when something is truly wrong, he won't go to a doctor until it is emergency room level bad. And, since the clot shots, it has already been twice in a year.
I hope there is a hell for them--you know who I mean.
I hope that this will have the effect of people not treating their doctor as gods and pharma as the answer to everything. People should at least have a full understanding of every medicine prescribed and if/when they can be off it (and how to get there).
I think there are a lot of people out there who think vaccines are shots of magical chemicals full of antibody potion and nothing else.
If that were the case, that would explain why they think the more vaccines the better. Avoid disease, right?
But between the antibiotics, adjuvants, and other toxins in each injection, it should always have been a risk benefit decision.
And now the mRNA are not even vaccines.
I, for one, will take a bullet before I take another injection for anything but especially covid.
ME TOO!!!!
Me too!
el gato malo will be happy to know that I won’t even vax my (indoor) cats in the future! I’ve already apologized to them and promised not to do it again.
Yesss! I stopped vaxing my cats. One is vax free and she used to be a street cat. She's the healthiest cat despite her rough start. On the other hand, I lost fully vax cat and I spent a lot of money and treatment to detox my other one. She's now 18 years old and enjoying her retirement life vax free!
Yes, my minimally vaxxed cat (who came to me via a farm and from a vet) is almost 20. She's deaf now and finally showing signs of aging (osteopenia and sarcopenia, if I had to guess). But rural living in the mountains means that she's more likely to be picked off by an eagle than a microbial infection.
When I told my vet no more rabies vaccine she told me no more her. And not in a nice way. So far none of my dogs have foamed at the mouth except from thirst or inhaling salt water.
I haven't been to the vet for a very long time. Both cats are healthy, eat well and poop well. I just want to make my older one comfortable in her golden years and would prefer hospice when the time is getting near.
Hospice as in a place where your cat could be given palliative care? Or are you just talking you giving palliative care to your cat? A number of years ago we had a dog who got cancer. We did not opt for cancer treatment (much to the vets eternal displeasure). She lived a pretty good life until the last month or so. But she died at home, in her bed with us where she had been most all of her life. I wouldn't be anxious to have to have another dog die that way, but I can think of worse ways. We have a dog that had a death wish. She is much safer, but infinitely less happy now that she is mostly leashed. I think she was hoping for a more exciting end. We shall see. She's an old broad with a fascination with taunting snakes so...
Hospice is where I give her palliative care at home where she feels comfortable the most. Death is something we have lost touch with. As caring pet caregiver we want to help, heal, fix, and we have pushed death to a corner. It isn't in our homes the way it was 100 years ago, we treat with medicine and fix everything. Well, everything dies and changes eventually and I think our pushing it so far out of our day to day life has left us unprepared and with a false notion that it should be easy. It isn't always quick, but what it is, is a rite of passage we all face in our own way and deserve to be supported through it.
My kitties are 12, 12, and 13. I have considered not getting the rabies vaccines anymore since they 1) hate going in the carrier and 2) never go outside - but the county could legally fine me if they found out. And I don't think my vet has the time or will to alert the county about every kitty that doesn't come in.
(Like) ❤️🐈⬛
And for these obligate carnivore, my two cats (the used to be street cat and the retired vax free cat) only eat raw fresh human grade meat, organs and bones. When they got fleas, I don't give them toxic flea treatments. I just brush them, vacuum the house and treat my yard with diatomaceous earth. In fact, it's my cats who converted me into an antivaxx. A badge of honor that I'm wearing now. They taught me how bad the vaccines were for their health. One day when I have children, no needles would ever touch them either!
For a moment I missed the word "grade" in that line about your cats eating "raw fresh human grade meat". That was quite a shock!
I wish my cats would eat raw. I’ve tried several times.
It was a very easy transition for my street cat and I needed more patience with my older cat. Once they taste fresh raw food, they don't want to go back to commercial food. They have more finer palate now 😂
As an animal rescuer, I advise against that :/ Vaccines do help quite a bit. Guess people will have to learn the hard way.
I think the "no vaccines" people are too absolutist. The "vaccines" against Covid-19 are indeed about the perfect example of how NOT to produce a safe, well tested, well proven immunization. They fail on all counts. And yes, there were other vaccines that caused deaths/injuries. But to believe that all vaccines are evil and a thing to avoid? I'd say that is going too far.
We do well if we avoid being too categorical. Ideally each thing (vaccine) will be judged on its own merits.
Can’t disagree with you that we should be open minded. But I think we have gone too far on vaccines, especially the children schedule and the flu shots. I’d rather our NIH focus on natural health than bowing to Pharma $. Vitamin D, zinc, weight loss, sunshine, exercise, natural foods, low carbs, etc should be top of the list, not injections.
I know you're not ill willing them or their cats.
I rescue cats as well, and agree that certain vaccines can protect animals in stressed and crowded shelter situations. I get my foster kittens vaccinated for FVRCP if they will be with other kittens prior to adoption (having lost one to calici virus in the past.) I’m talking about my established indoor cats. The one I never vaxxed lived to 22 1/2. The others got diabetes, cancers and so on.
that's maybe fine if you never let them outside, they never escape, or you never die and they have to be rehomed with someone who may let them out! it's really best to protect them as much as you can from the worst things, like rabies, but i can see why people would want to skip vaxxes for more basic things that can be treated if they happen.
I share your concerns for average cat owners, but I am extremely careful with them and have resources that will care for them no matter what happens. They are my “children”. But I appreciate your advice!
My indoor cats are rescues but unjabbed except for a couple. No reason to jab them. If they made the shots safer I would consider. Just like if they made the shots safer for people.
I stopped after mine got one of those cancers that come from the jabs that only some vets will talk about.
Damn it feels good to be an antivaxxer
My completely unvaccinated perfectly healthy children are my pride and joy
Mine too!
Same!
mine was unjabbed since 4 years old but he was forced to get one last year. so angry
When mass death is the goal, "stopping vaccine hesitancy" is replaced with "a jab on every arm."
I won't rest easy until they are all on trial at the hague. Really not until they're dead.
"I won't rest easy until they are all on trial at the hague."
Forget the Hague. This needs extralegal Mossad style retribution.
Starting with those doing gain of function research and torturing lab animals.
Me too. Life long vaccinee (even my children) and vaccinator (i am a physician assistant), i have decided that neither nor my young children will be receiving any vaccine from here on out. This has shown me that you cannot trust public health authorities. At all. They do not have our best interest at heart. Money and power is all they crave. I’m out.
Funny how their desperate push for this “vaccine” has turned off so many to all vaccines!
if only there were a vaccine we could give that could protect people from vaccine hesitancy - and let’s get it on the children’s vaccine schedule asap
I have a nasty feeling that they are priming us all for forced vaccination of the entire population, "for the greater good." I read recently that that is in the planning stages at the FDA. Time will tell, but turning the unvaccinated into the enemy of the people is a clever and effective strategy to get the masses to accept forced vaccinations.
What else would you expect from Nazis? This is why the people who see through this bullshit have to do their best to wake other people up. If we don't succeed, I prefer WW3 and nuclear annihilation.
Before this psy-op, I thought that "antivaxxers" were some sort of Amish people, that were denying science, motivated by religious beliefs; now I know better!
Dr. Mengele was a "gatito bueno", compared to Faucizilla!
Dear Bad Cat:
why do your statistical analyses never control for EM exposure... data not available? you’re not interested? too hard?
was ‘covid’ & ‘injectables’ biologic damage a cloak for EM biologic damage as 5G ratcheted up & rolled out, expanding into the meta verse?
EM biologic damages stunningly similar (heart, immune, neurologic)
did some formulations of the injectables exacerbate EM biologic damage?
telecom industry liability protection stunningly similar to vax industry liability protection.
https://anycalculator.com/mercola_and_5g.pdf
would explain the ‘necessity’ of endemic ‘covid’ as well as the ‘necessity’ of increasingly virulent variants.
Love, 🐱💧 kitten tears rolling down
Which means we need to keep reminding people that there is still lot's to see here and lots of jail space to fill here
If they don’t get us under the digital ID & “currency” passports first….
Absolutely! Otherwise they'll pull this shit again
At this point we're well past interpreting any of this as incompetence. It's simply impossible to credit that such a vast number of highly trained specialists and subject-matter experts could have been completely blind to the blindingly obvious.
The only remaining possibility is malign intent: pressure coming down from the top, from people who for reasons I sincerely doubt had a scintilla of anything to do with providing immunity to COVID-19, wanted the frankenjuice jabbed into every arm and didn't give a good god-damn about any deleterious consequences. Everyone beneath them in the hierarchy was made to understand that it was in their personal best interests to NOT understand any problems with this project, no matter how staggeringly clear they were in the data or how easily predicted they could be by anyone with even a bit of common sense. Dissent and get fired; dissent too loudly, and be derided in the controlled press as a lunatic.
The most interesting question at this point isn't even, "Is the V counterproductive or just ineffective?" It's, "what was the real reason they wanted so very, very badly to jab everyone with this concoction?"
What's dispiriting to note is how many knew something was seriously off and remained silent in the face of it. Paycheck>>>Integrity, apparently.
If the goal was simply to get people enrolled in a digital ID system, why not go with a run-of-the-mill attenuated virus vaccine...or saline? Nope, mRNA it was! For everyone. I cannot think of a single innocent explanation as to why the authorities pushed to get a needle into every arm, since the virus posed almost no risk to healthy people under 70 yo.
Something very evil is going on.
Precisely. It doesn't make sense if the goal was public health; nor does it make sense if the goal was a giant fakeout to herd people into digital ID or whatever. It follows that they're up to something extremely dark.
depopulation...gates stated it in his ted talk...to paraphrase, if we do a good job with birth control and vaccines we will slow population growth and reduce carbon emissions
I think maybe they believed that mRNA technology was the magic bullet that would lead to a cure for a multitude of maladies from viruses to cancer and everything in between.
Like the introduction of functions in early programming languages, they thought it had the potential to revolutionize the field. mRNA technology was believed to be a similar game changer, malleable, and general enough to enable it to be recruited to do whatever particular tweek was needed to get the body to heal itself.
If thousands of deaths in the short term were necessary to save millions in the future, they rationalised that to be an ethical exchange.
Maybe, but it is unethical to sacrifice unwitting thousands to save millions down the line.
We are dealing with incredibly wealthy sociopaths who have gained control of many governments throughout the world. There are billions of us polluting their planet. They are not about the business of improving our lives. More like culling the herd, I fear. Nothing that's happened since vaccines rolled out has budged me off this apocalyptic scenario. In fact, most things that transpired since then affirm it. God help us.
The mRNA tech probably does have enormous potential. But what early testing had been done was spotty and disappointing. I fully agree that the mRNA products should never have been approved. But that's because they haven't been adequately tested for safety or efficacy. I concur that what is going on now is a monstrosity of greed and power-seeking at the least, and could have darker motives.
But none of the above precludes, in the least, the possibility that mRNA might prove a great technology if/when they overcome its obvious bugs.
Yes. This might offer insight: https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/covid-vaccines-as-the-aschen-agenda?s=w
Excellent essay and compilation of videos.
Neuralink & meta verse.
Most doctors in Nazi Germany went along with the program too.
I bet it was just like this.
We used to wonder how it happened. Now we know.
A bunch of people just...going along.
Believe it or not, most Nazi doctors were enthusiastic supporters of Hitler's programs. The human detritus would be coldly dealt with in order for the Master Race to flourish. They fancied being on the front lines in bringing about a positive future as they envisioned it. The ends justify the means, and all that...
Our doctors turned a blind eye to this evil to maintain employment. Absolutely despicable.
The Nazis were devils, no doubt. But other nations were to some extent in the same boat. If you've done any reading about Eugenics, it was a popular movement in the early 20th century, to include the USA. Of course we never took things to the lengths the Nazis did, but we certainly did our share of sterilizations, in some places, the programs continued until the 1970s. Americans like to ride on their moral high horse but alas, we too have a few skeletons in the national closet.
And the really horrifying truth? At its core Eugenics is correct: It is NOT in the "herd's" (humanity's) long-term interest to allow the "less fit" to reproduce. And yes, the very ill, the old, the weak and the unfit are a drain on resources and thus should be "culled." This is "correct" in the natural sense, that Nature demands survival of the fittest.
None of this is news, it has been well known to scientists and ethicists for hundreds of years. Nietzsche wrote about it in the 19th century; his arguments were along the lines that democracy was the (many) weak organizing to protect against the (few) strong, ultimately producing a tame, domesticated citizen. In places he explicitly argues the weak should be culled.
Please observe I'm not defending Eugenics in any moral sense. Other than the most humane forms of it ("positive" eugenics) which would be, say, voluntary mating by consenting people, virtually any other types very quickly wades from the relatively firm ground of the merely morally dubious (mandatory birth control, anyone?) to the muck of forced sterilizations, ultimately into the quicksand of extermination.
We now return you to your preferred, Disney-esque fantasy world where all animals are herbivores and peace, happiness, butterflies and rainbows are the norm!
I support eugenics as an ideal. Why wouldn't we want more people to be strong, healthy, brave, intelligent, good-looking, honorable, and otherwise gifted, than the reverse?
The clinker is that Eugenicists usually wanted this program to be carried out by the government. I was disabused of this hope upon reading 1984 when I was a college freshman, and realized that if the government was running it, they would inevitably breed mediocre conformists instead, because those are the people they can rule over.
If the government is doing it, the result will be domestication. We eugenicists are hound dogs who aspire to be wolves, but the government would turn us into pugs, or toy poodles, or perhaps those little dogs the Aztecs used to eat.
I think Nietzsche had a sense of this. His concept of the "superman" was the eugenic ideal, but in contempt of government, absent Darwinian logic, and wrapped in the mantle of tragedy.
I've also heard that women are natural eugenicists in their search for a husband. They should be left to follow their instincts, and let the men each pursue his own "superman". That is the real eugenic method that we have always practiced, and the only one that actually works.
Women USED to be “natural eugenicists”...They, like other mammals, used to look for the fittest mate, the one most likely to provide shelter and safety and a good life for her and her children. Unfortunately, with the so-called “safety net” of our social welfare system, the government has become the provider for many women and their children. Many women are now WILLING to “mate” with sub-par men that are unwilling to work OR protect their progeny. Too many women don’t demand it of them.
Women are no longer gatekeepers. We’ve lost the instinct mentioned above...and society is weaker as the result.
The Nazi doctors. Not everyone by any means was part of that party, though they suffered for their not joining.
it is becoming a very bleak science fiction movie...
I expected my cyberpunk dystopia to come with street samurai, bionic limbs, heat vision, and a hacker cyborg gf. This movie sucks.
It reminds me of Soylent Green. Maybe this IS the remake.
we may still get the zombies, if they keep rolling out the boosters
Well said
ha!
"pressure coming down from the top"
About that...from the GAO, "HHS Agencies Need to Develop Procedures and Train Staff on Reporting and Addressing Political Interference" https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104613
😳
It would be the power to poison people at will.
If they can normalize all the corners they've cut with this shot, which obviously but unprovably and unpredictably kills some of the people who get it, and wrap this into a digital ID system that ties to medical, financial, and social credit, they've got us. You have no money without a current ID, your ID won't stay current without your regular booster, and your shot will be individualized to you given your genetic/medical profile, so it won't be the same as what any other person gets. If you make yourself troublesome you will die of a previously undiagnosed condition conveyed by your next booster, and no one else will dare to help you because they are vulnerable to the same thing themselves. Dissidents and deadwood can be plucked out. If the economy is tight, your retirement will be short. Even if you own land and can farm, you can't pay your taxes without a current ID card, and your land will be seized. Short of living as a hobo, you are stuck.
That is the power they are grasping for here: the arbitrary power of life and death over every human being in the reach of this economy. The power to kill people, individually or in groups, as anonymously and unaccountably as they have been freezing or deleting social media accounts over the past two years. For the scheme to work, they have to set up an endless schedule of required Russian roulette shots into every arm, with no exceptions.
I have no doubt that everything you wrote is exactly correct, and yet, I can't help but suspect that there's something even more nefarious at play in the specific nature of the technology they're pushing to inject into everyone.